Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yükseköğretimde Hakkaniyet Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1, 144 - 170, 28.04.2025

Seda Nur Kurt , Gökhan Arastaman

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin eğitimde hakkaniyet algılarını incelemek ve eğitimde hakkaniyet algıları ile çeşitli değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi tespit etmektir. Çalışma nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden tarama modelinde yürütülmüştür ve çalışmaya 906 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Bu kapsamda, veriler geçerliği ve güvenirliği sağlanmış 22 maddeden oluşan “Hakkaniyet Ölçeği” ile toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar, öğrencilerin eğitimde hakkaniyet algılarının “akademisyen-öğrenci iletişimi” alt boyutunda yeterli düzeyde olduğunu; ancak ölçeğin tamamı ve diğer boyutlar için orta düzeyde olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin eğitimde hakkaniyet algısı ile tüm değişkenler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar ortaya çıkmıştır. Kadın öğrencilerin hakkaniyete dayalı eğitim algısı erkek öğrencilere göre daha yüksek çıkmıştır. Ayrıca, özel liseden mezun, daha prestijli ve köklü bir kurum olan 1. üniversiteye kayıtlı, ailesi şehir merkezinde ve büyükşehirde ikamet eden öğrencilerin hakkaniyet algısının daha yüksek olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. Buna karşın, yarı zamanlı işte çalışan öğrencilerin eğitimde hakkaniyet algılarının ise daha düşük düzeyde olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ek olarak, aile geliri ve anne-baba eğitim düzeyi arttıkça öğrencilerin hakkaniyete ilişkin algılarının arttığı ortaya çıkmış fakat kardeş sayısı arttıkça öğrencilerin hakkaniyet algısının azaldığı görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak, cinsiyet, sosyoekonomik durum ve üniversitenin öğrencilerin eğitimde hakkaniyet algısını etkileyen kritik faktörler olduğu anlaşılmıştır. İleriki çalışmalarda, farklı üniversitelerde öğrenim gören öğrencilerin eğitimde hakkaniyete ilişkin algıları incelenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hakkaniyet eğitimde hakkaniyet yükseköğretim sosyoekonomik durum cinsiyet

Kaynakça

  • Al-Qudsi, S. S. (2003). Family background, school enrollments and wastage: Evidence from Arab countries. Economics of Education Review, 22(6), 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00028-1
  • Atherton, G., Dumangane, C., & Whitty, G. (2016). Charting equity in higher education: Drawing the Global Access Map. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot/com/global/Files/about-pearson/innovation/Charting-Equity_WEB.pdf
  • Aygül, H. H. (2018). Eğitime erişim, yoksulluk ve formel/enformel iş-gücü olarak üniversite gençliği: “istihdam için mi eğitim? Eğitim için mi istihdam?”. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 58-87. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.354859
  • Baum, S., Ma, J., & Payea, K. (2010). Education pays 2010: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. College Board Advocay & Policy Center. P. 1- 56.
  • Berlanga, V., Figuera, P., &Pėrez-Escoda, N. (2016). Academic performance and persistence of study bursary holders. Revista de Cercetare si InterventieSociala, 54, 23-35. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=520436
  • Boatman, A., & Long, B. T. (2016). Does financial aid impact student engagement? Research in Higher Education, 57(6), 653-681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015- 9402-y
  • Bragg, D., & Durham, B. (2012). Perspectives on access and equity in the era of (community) college completion. Community College Review, 40(2), 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552112444724
  • Brunello, G., & Checchi, D. (2005). School quality and family background in Italy. Economics of education review, 24(5), 563-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.09.001
  • Bui, T. T. N., Ngo, N. T. H., Nguyen, H. T. M., Nguyen, H. T. L. (2019). Access and equity in higher education in light of Bourdieu’s theories: A case of minority students in Northwest Vietnam. N.T. Nguyen, L.T. Tran (Eds.), Reforming Vietnamese Higher Education, Education in the Asia-Pacific Region (Volume 50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8918-4
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., E., Karadeniz, Ş. &Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimselaraştırmayöntemleri (29. Basım). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789944919289
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Şekercioğlu, G., & Çokluk, Ö. (2021). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik Spss ve Lisrel uygulamaları (6. Basım). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi (1. Basım). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık
  • Chin-Shan, L., & Hui-Juan, C. (2012). education equity in the process of the massification of Taiwan's higher education. Chinese Education & Society, 45(5-6), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932450508
  • Council of Higher Education. (2020). Üniversite izleme ve değerlendirme raporları. https://www.yok.gov.tr/universiteler/izleme-ve-degerlendirme-raporlari
  • Council of Higher Education. (2021a). Önlisans ve lisans düzeyindeki öğrenci sayıları. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
  • Council of Higher Education. (2021b). 2021 yılı merkezi yönetim bütçesi. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/DuyuruDetay.aspx?did=1039
  • Dadon-Golan, Z., BenDavid-Hadar, I., Klein J. (2018). Measuring (in) equality in education. In G.W. Noblit, W. Pink (Eds). Education, equity, economy (Volume 5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90388-0
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme kuram ve uygulamalar. (Çev. Ed. T. Totan). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 2014).
  • Doğan, D. (2013). Yeni kurulan üniversitelerin sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, (2), 108-116. 10.5961/jhes.2013.065
  • Dowd, A. (2007). Community colleges as gateways and gatekeepers: Moving beyond the access "saga" toward outcome equity. Harvard Educational Review, 77(4), 407– 419. https://cue.usc.edu/files/2016/01/Dowd_HER_CCs-as-Gateways-andGatekeepers.pdf
  • Ekinci, C. E. (2011). Bazı sosyoekonomik etmenlerin Türkiye’de yükseköğretime katılım üzerindeki etkileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(160). http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/792
  • Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2002). Intergenerational inequality: A sociological perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002760278695
  • Erişken, E. (2019). Eğitim ve eşitsizlik: Yükseköğretimde eşitsizliğin yeniden üretimi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi]. Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Arşivi. http://acikerisim.ybu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1252
  • Goldrick-Rab,S.(2014). Conditional Pell dollars miss students who need them most. Education Next, 14(2), 59-63. https://www.educationnext.org/conditional-pell-dollars-miss-students-who-need-them-most/
  • Gölpek, F. (2011). Türkiye’de adalet ilkesi bakımından yükseköğretimde finansman politikası: kim faydalanıyor? Kim ödüyor? Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 149-176. https://library.dogus.edu.tr/mvt/pdf.php?pdf=0011194&lng=1
  • Gürbüz, S. (2021). Amos ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (2. Basım). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Felsefe yöntem analiz (2. Basım). Seçkin Yayınları.
  • Harper, S. R., & Griffin, K. A. (2011). Opportunity beyond affirmative action: How low income and working-class black male achievers access highly selective, high-cost colleges and universities. Harvard Journal of African American Public Policy, 17, (43-60).
  • Hashmi, A., & Akhter, M. (2013). Assessing the parental involvement in schooling of children in public/private schools, and its impact on their achievement at elementary level. Journal of Educational Research, 16(1), 27.https://www.proquest.com/openview/fd85e54cf37676b0ec7ff18fb713748c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1616349
  • Havari, E., &Savegnago, M. (2013). The Causal Effect of Parents' Schooling on Children's Schooling in Europe. A New IV Approach. University Ca'Foscari of Venice, Dept. of Economics Working Paper Series No, 30. https://ceistorvergata.it/RePEc/rpaper/RP315.pdf
  • Hewlett-Thomas, E. (2009). Access and equity in higher education in Antigua and Barbuda (Publication No. 3436902) [Doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Higher Education Information Management System (t.y.). Öğrenci sayıları özet tablosu, 2020-2021.https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
  • Himmetoğlu, B., Balıktay, S. O., Demirci, S., Yılmaz, G., Cengizoğlu, S. (2021). Bir bakışta eğitim 2021: Türkiye üzerine değerlendirme ve öneriler. TEDMEM. https://tedmem.org/download/bir-bakista-egitim2021?wpdmdl=3866&refresh=629406353623b1653868085
  • Horn, L., & Bobbitt, L. (2000). Mapping the road to college: First generation students’ math track, planning strategies, and context of support (NCES Publication No. 2000-153). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000153.pdf
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jöreskog, K. G., &Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International
  • Karen, D. (2002). Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980- 1992. Sociology of Education, 191-210. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3090265.pdf
  • Kil, G., Özkan, M. A., & Aykaç, N. (2021). Yükseköğretimde yaşanan uzaktan eğitim sorunlarının değerlendirilmesi: bir meta-sentez çalışması. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 11(3), 638-648. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yuksekogretim/issue/68085/1057163
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4. Basım). The Guilford Press.
  • Lalas, J. W., Charest, B., Strikwerda, H., & Ordaz, M. (2019). Nurturing hope, sense of belonging and engagement through equity. In Promoting Social Inclusion, Emerald Publishing Limited,13, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620190000013004
  • Ma, J., Pender, M., & Welch, M. (2016). Education pays 2016: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society. Trends in Higher Education Series. College Board.https://research.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/education-pays-2019-full-report.pdf
  • Ma, J., Pender, M., & Welch, M. (2019). Education pays 2019: The Benefits of Higher Education For Individuals and Society. Trends in Higher Education Series. College Board.https://research.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/education-pays-2019-full-report.pdf
  • Mizoguchi, L. A. (2020). District leadership practices that foster equity: the role of district leadership in teacher-led equity work (Publication No. 27959159) [Doctoral dissertation, Boston College]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  • OECD (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en
  • OECD (2021). Poverty rate (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/7f420b4b-en
  • Okhidoi, O. (2016). Equity in higher education: socioeconomic status and its effect on access to higher education in post-socialist Mongolia (Publication No. 10183739) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh]. ProQuest Dissertations &Theses Global
  • Rammohan, A., & Dancer, D. (2008). Gender differences in intra household schooling outcomes: the role of sibling characteristics and birth‐order effects. Education Economics, 16(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290701273574
  • Roksa, J. (2011). Differentiation and work: Inequality in degree attainment in U.S. higher education. Higher Education, 61, 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010- 9378-7
  • Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., Bell, A. D., &Perna, L. W. (2008). Contextual influences on parental involvement in college going: Variations by socioeconomic class. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 564-486. http://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/172
  • Saenz, V., Hatch, D., Bukoski, B., Kim, S., Lee, K., & Valdez, P. (2011). Community college student engagement patterns: A typology revealed through exploratory cluster analysis. Community College Review, 39(3), 235–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552111416643
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve Spss ile veri analizi (5. Basım). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Tilak, J. (2015). How inclusive is higher education in India? Social Change, 45(2), 185–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049085715574178
  • Topçu, Y., & Uzundumlu, A. S. (2012). Yükseköğretimde öğrencilerin başarısızlığına etki eden faktörlerin analizi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 2(2 Sp: A), 51-58.
  • UNESCO. (n.d.). National monitoring. UIS.Stat. http://data.uis.unesco.org/
  • UNICEF. (2015). The investment case for education and equity. United Nations Children’s Fund. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560003.pdf
  • Williams, G., &Fillippakou, O. (2010). Higher education and UK elite formation in the twentieth century. Higher Education, 59, 1-20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25622161
  • Wilson-Strydom, M. (2015). University access and theories of social justice: Contributions of the capabilities approach. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 69(1), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9766-5

An Investigation of Educational Equity in Higher Education

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1, 144 - 170, 28.04.2025

Seda Nur Kurt , Gökhan Arastaman

Öz

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate university students' educational equity perception and identify the relationship between their perceptions of educational equity and various variables. The study was conducted in a survey model, one of the quantitative research methods, and 906 university students participated in the study. A valid and reliable “Equity Scale” was structured comprising 22 items. The results revealed that students' perceptions of educational equity were adequate for the "professor-student communication"; however, it was on a moderate level for the total scale and other dimensions. Furthermore, statistically significant differences were uncovered between the perception of students regarding educational equity and all variables. Women perceived equity at a higher level. The students graduating from private high schools, enrolled at 1st university, and whose families dwell in the city center and metropolis demonstrated a higher level of perception. The perceptions of the students working part-time were discovered at lower level. Similarly, as the gross monthly household income and parental educational level increased, the perception of the students increased. Notwithstanding, as the number of siblings increased the perception of the students decreased. It was inferred that gender, socioeconomic status, and the university are critical factors influencing the educational equity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Equity educational equity higher education socioeconomic status gender

Kaynakça

  • Al-Qudsi, S. S. (2003). Family background, school enrollments and wastage: Evidence from Arab countries. Economics of Education Review, 22(6), 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00028-1
  • Atherton, G., Dumangane, C., & Whitty, G. (2016). Charting equity in higher education: Drawing the Global Access Map. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot/com/global/Files/about-pearson/innovation/Charting-Equity_WEB.pdf
  • Aygül, H. H. (2018). Eğitime erişim, yoksulluk ve formel/enformel iş-gücü olarak üniversite gençliği: “istihdam için mi eğitim? Eğitim için mi istihdam?”. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 58-87. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.354859
  • Baum, S., Ma, J., & Payea, K. (2010). Education pays 2010: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. College Board Advocay & Policy Center. P. 1- 56.
  • Berlanga, V., Figuera, P., &Pėrez-Escoda, N. (2016). Academic performance and persistence of study bursary holders. Revista de Cercetare si InterventieSociala, 54, 23-35. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=520436
  • Boatman, A., & Long, B. T. (2016). Does financial aid impact student engagement? Research in Higher Education, 57(6), 653-681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015- 9402-y
  • Bragg, D., & Durham, B. (2012). Perspectives on access and equity in the era of (community) college completion. Community College Review, 40(2), 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552112444724
  • Brunello, G., & Checchi, D. (2005). School quality and family background in Italy. Economics of education review, 24(5), 563-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.09.001
  • Bui, T. T. N., Ngo, N. T. H., Nguyen, H. T. M., Nguyen, H. T. L. (2019). Access and equity in higher education in light of Bourdieu’s theories: A case of minority students in Northwest Vietnam. N.T. Nguyen, L.T. Tran (Eds.), Reforming Vietnamese Higher Education, Education in the Asia-Pacific Region (Volume 50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8918-4
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., E., Karadeniz, Ş. &Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimselaraştırmayöntemleri (29. Basım). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789944919289
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Şekercioğlu, G., & Çokluk, Ö. (2021). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik Spss ve Lisrel uygulamaları (6. Basım). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi (1. Basım). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık
  • Chin-Shan, L., & Hui-Juan, C. (2012). education equity in the process of the massification of Taiwan's higher education. Chinese Education & Society, 45(5-6), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932450508
  • Council of Higher Education. (2020). Üniversite izleme ve değerlendirme raporları. https://www.yok.gov.tr/universiteler/izleme-ve-degerlendirme-raporlari
  • Council of Higher Education. (2021a). Önlisans ve lisans düzeyindeki öğrenci sayıları. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
  • Council of Higher Education. (2021b). 2021 yılı merkezi yönetim bütçesi. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/DuyuruDetay.aspx?did=1039
  • Dadon-Golan, Z., BenDavid-Hadar, I., Klein J. (2018). Measuring (in) equality in education. In G.W. Noblit, W. Pink (Eds). Education, equity, economy (Volume 5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90388-0
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme kuram ve uygulamalar. (Çev. Ed. T. Totan). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 2014).
  • Doğan, D. (2013). Yeni kurulan üniversitelerin sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, (2), 108-116. 10.5961/jhes.2013.065
  • Dowd, A. (2007). Community colleges as gateways and gatekeepers: Moving beyond the access "saga" toward outcome equity. Harvard Educational Review, 77(4), 407– 419. https://cue.usc.edu/files/2016/01/Dowd_HER_CCs-as-Gateways-andGatekeepers.pdf
  • Ekinci, C. E. (2011). Bazı sosyoekonomik etmenlerin Türkiye’de yükseköğretime katılım üzerindeki etkileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(160). http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/792
  • Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2002). Intergenerational inequality: A sociological perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002760278695
  • Erişken, E. (2019). Eğitim ve eşitsizlik: Yükseköğretimde eşitsizliğin yeniden üretimi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi]. Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Arşivi. http://acikerisim.ybu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1252
  • Goldrick-Rab,S.(2014). Conditional Pell dollars miss students who need them most. Education Next, 14(2), 59-63. https://www.educationnext.org/conditional-pell-dollars-miss-students-who-need-them-most/
  • Gölpek, F. (2011). Türkiye’de adalet ilkesi bakımından yükseköğretimde finansman politikası: kim faydalanıyor? Kim ödüyor? Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 149-176. https://library.dogus.edu.tr/mvt/pdf.php?pdf=0011194&lng=1
  • Gürbüz, S. (2021). Amos ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (2. Basım). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Felsefe yöntem analiz (2. Basım). Seçkin Yayınları.
  • Harper, S. R., & Griffin, K. A. (2011). Opportunity beyond affirmative action: How low income and working-class black male achievers access highly selective, high-cost colleges and universities. Harvard Journal of African American Public Policy, 17, (43-60).
  • Hashmi, A., & Akhter, M. (2013). Assessing the parental involvement in schooling of children in public/private schools, and its impact on their achievement at elementary level. Journal of Educational Research, 16(1), 27.https://www.proquest.com/openview/fd85e54cf37676b0ec7ff18fb713748c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1616349
  • Havari, E., &Savegnago, M. (2013). The Causal Effect of Parents' Schooling on Children's Schooling in Europe. A New IV Approach. University Ca'Foscari of Venice, Dept. of Economics Working Paper Series No, 30. https://ceistorvergata.it/RePEc/rpaper/RP315.pdf
  • Hewlett-Thomas, E. (2009). Access and equity in higher education in Antigua and Barbuda (Publication No. 3436902) [Doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Higher Education Information Management System (t.y.). Öğrenci sayıları özet tablosu, 2020-2021.https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
  • Himmetoğlu, B., Balıktay, S. O., Demirci, S., Yılmaz, G., Cengizoğlu, S. (2021). Bir bakışta eğitim 2021: Türkiye üzerine değerlendirme ve öneriler. TEDMEM. https://tedmem.org/download/bir-bakista-egitim2021?wpdmdl=3866&refresh=629406353623b1653868085
  • Horn, L., & Bobbitt, L. (2000). Mapping the road to college: First generation students’ math track, planning strategies, and context of support (NCES Publication No. 2000-153). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000153.pdf
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jöreskog, K. G., &Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International
  • Karen, D. (2002). Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980- 1992. Sociology of Education, 191-210. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3090265.pdf
  • Kil, G., Özkan, M. A., & Aykaç, N. (2021). Yükseköğretimde yaşanan uzaktan eğitim sorunlarının değerlendirilmesi: bir meta-sentez çalışması. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 11(3), 638-648. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yuksekogretim/issue/68085/1057163
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4. Basım). The Guilford Press.
  • Lalas, J. W., Charest, B., Strikwerda, H., & Ordaz, M. (2019). Nurturing hope, sense of belonging and engagement through equity. In Promoting Social Inclusion, Emerald Publishing Limited,13, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620190000013004
  • Ma, J., Pender, M., & Welch, M. (2016). Education pays 2016: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society. Trends in Higher Education Series. College Board.https://research.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/education-pays-2019-full-report.pdf
  • Ma, J., Pender, M., & Welch, M. (2019). Education pays 2019: The Benefits of Higher Education For Individuals and Society. Trends in Higher Education Series. College Board.https://research.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/education-pays-2019-full-report.pdf
  • Mizoguchi, L. A. (2020). District leadership practices that foster equity: the role of district leadership in teacher-led equity work (Publication No. 27959159) [Doctoral dissertation, Boston College]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  • OECD (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en
  • OECD (2021). Poverty rate (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/7f420b4b-en
  • Okhidoi, O. (2016). Equity in higher education: socioeconomic status and its effect on access to higher education in post-socialist Mongolia (Publication No. 10183739) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh]. ProQuest Dissertations &Theses Global
  • Rammohan, A., & Dancer, D. (2008). Gender differences in intra household schooling outcomes: the role of sibling characteristics and birth‐order effects. Education Economics, 16(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290701273574
  • Roksa, J. (2011). Differentiation and work: Inequality in degree attainment in U.S. higher education. Higher Education, 61, 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010- 9378-7
  • Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., Bell, A. D., &Perna, L. W. (2008). Contextual influences on parental involvement in college going: Variations by socioeconomic class. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 564-486. http://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/172
  • Saenz, V., Hatch, D., Bukoski, B., Kim, S., Lee, K., & Valdez, P. (2011). Community college student engagement patterns: A typology revealed through exploratory cluster analysis. Community College Review, 39(3), 235–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552111416643
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve Spss ile veri analizi (5. Basım). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Tilak, J. (2015). How inclusive is higher education in India? Social Change, 45(2), 185–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049085715574178
  • Topçu, Y., & Uzundumlu, A. S. (2012). Yükseköğretimde öğrencilerin başarısızlığına etki eden faktörlerin analizi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 2(2 Sp: A), 51-58.
  • UNESCO. (n.d.). National monitoring. UIS.Stat. http://data.uis.unesco.org/
  • UNICEF. (2015). The investment case for education and equity. United Nations Children’s Fund. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560003.pdf
  • Williams, G., &Fillippakou, O. (2010). Higher education and UK elite formation in the twentieth century. Higher Education, 59, 1-20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25622161
  • Wilson-Strydom, M. (2015). University access and theories of social justice: Contributions of the capabilities approach. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 69(1), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9766-5
Toplam 55 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Yönetimi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Seda Nur Kurt 0000-0001-7538-6073

Gökhan Arastaman 0000-0002-4713-8643

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 28 Nisan 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Nisan 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Eylül 2024
Kabul Tarihi 21 Mart 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Kurt, S. N., & Arastaman, G. (2025). An Investigation of Educational Equity in Higher Education. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 144-170. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.1551885
 Kapak Resmi İndir