Aims: The aim of the study was to determine how health literacy affects Turkish neurosurgery patients' spine surgery preferences and to identify barriers to obtaining informed consent and thus create better patient education methods.
Methods: The research included 118 patients who visited the neurosurgery outpatient clinic for spinal complaints. The Turkish Health Literacy Scale (TSOY-32) was used to evaluate patients who received four different health literacy assessments: inadequate (23.7%), problematic (36.4%), sufficient (28.8%), and excellent (11.0%).
Results: Patients who demonstrated better health literacy showed decreased acceptance of surgical procedures (82.1% inadequate vs. 46.2% excellent, p=0.023) and increased second opinion seeking (25.0% vs. 69.2%, p<0.001). The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients with sufficient and excellent health literacy showed 72% and 81% decreased odds of accepting surgery when compared to patients with inadequate literacy. The factors that influenced patient choices depended on their literacy level because physician recommendations proved more significant for patients with low literacy (92.9% vs. 53.8%, p=0.008) and personal research became more important for patients with high literacy (25.0% vs. 92.3%, p<0.001). The study found that education level strongly correlated with health literacy (r=0.72, p<0.001) and health literacy strongly correlated with decision satisfaction (r=0.59, p<0.001).
Conclusion: The research demonstrates that health literacy assessment during surgical consultations combined with specific communication approaches helps patients make informed decisions in neurosurgical practice.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Brain and Nerve Surgery (Neurosurgery) |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | May 30, 2025 |
Submission Date | April 26, 2025 |
Acceptance Date | May 5, 2025 |
Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 7 Issue: 3 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"
All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)