Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing on the Effect of Team Cohesion on Innovative Work Behavior: A Study on Technopark Company Employees

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 404 - 419, 30.05.2025

Merve Aybek , Ahmet Mumcu

https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1528907

Abstract

This study aims to determine the mediating role of knowledge sharing in the effect of team cohesion on innovative work behavior. Team cohesion can encourage innovative thinking and risk-taking through harmony and cooperation among team members. Knowledge sharing is a critical factor that strengthens communication and cooperation among team members. The study investigated whether knowledge sharing significantly mediates the relationship between team cohesion and innovative work behaviors. The study was conducted on 141 Technopark employees. Technoparks are areas where businesses, research institutions, and entrepreneurs unite to develop innovative solutions and support technological advances resolutely. In this context, techno parks provide an environment that can strengthen the effect of team cohesion and knowledge sharing on innovative work behavior. Structural equation modeling was used to test the research hypotheses. The study results showed that knowledge sharing has a full mediating role in the effect of task interdependence, a sub-dimension of team cohesion, on innovative work behavior. As a result of the study, various suggestions were presented for field practitioners and researchers.

Keywords

Team Cohesion Innovative Work Behavior Knowledge Sharing Technopark

References

  • Ada, N., Alver, İ., & Atlı, F. (2008). Örgütsel iletişimin örgütsel bağlılık üzerine etkisi: manisa organize sanayi bölgesinde yer alan ve imalat sektörü çalışanları üzerinde yapılan bir araştırma. Ege Akademik Bakış/Ege Academic Review, 8(2), 487-518.
  • Akhavan, P., Hosseini, S. M., Abbasi, M., & Manteghi, M. (2015). Knowledge-sharing determinants, behaviors, and innovative work behaviors: An integrated theoretical view and empirical examination. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(5), 562-591. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2015-0018
  • Al-Ahmad Chaar, S., & Easa, N. F. (2021). Does transformational leadership matter for innovation in banks? The mediating role of knowledge sharing. International Journal of Disruptive Innovation in Government, 1(1), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDIG-04-2020-0002
  • Allameh, S. M. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital: The role of social capital, knowledge sharing and innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 858-874. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2017-0068
  • Alrawi, K. (2008). Cohesiveness within teamwork: the relationship to performance effectiveness – case study. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 1, 92-106.
  • Ayazlar, G. (2012). Otel işletmelerinde örgütsel öğrenme ve bilgi paylaşımının hizmet inovasyon performansına etkisi: Kuşadası 5 yıldızlı otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. [Doktora tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology 4, 359.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Beal, D., Cohen, R., Burke, M., & McLendon, C. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989-1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
  • Birasnav, M., Albufalasa, M., & Bader, Y. (2013). The role of transformational leadership and knowledge management processes on predicting product and process innovation: An empirical study developed in Kingdom of Bahrain. Tékhne, 11(2), 64-75.
  • Carless, S. A., & De Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion on work teams. small group research, 31(1), 71-88.
  • Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley L. R. (1985). The development of instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266
  • Cheng, J. H., & Fu, Y. C. (2013). Inter-organizational relationships and knowledge sharing through the relationship and institutional orientations in supply chains. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3), 473-484.
  • Chen, H., Liu, F., Wen, Y., Ling, L., & Gu, X. (2021). Compilation and application of the scale of sustainable knowledge sharing willingness in virtual academic community during the times of the coronavirus pandemic (covid-19). Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627833
  • Daspit, J., Justice Tillman, C., Boyd, N. G., & Mckee, V. (2013). Cross‐functional team effectiveness: An examination of internal team environment, shared leadership, and cohesion influences. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 19(1/2), 34-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591311312088
  • De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
  • Demir, M. (2015). Konaklama işletmelerinde birey-örgüt uyumunun iş performansı ve işte kalma niyeti üzerine etkisi. Turizm Teorisi ve Araştırma Dergisi, 1(2), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.24288/jttr.202823
  • Drucker, P. F. (1994) Kapitalist Ötesi Toplum (Çev. B. Çorakçı). İstanbul: İnkılap Kitabevi.
  • Ergün, E., & Eyisoy, M. E. (2019). Takım çalışması faktörlerinin takım performansı üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. İşletme ve Yönetim Çalışmaları: Uluslararası Bir Dergi, 6(4), 1455–1475. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v6i4.406
  • Fung, H. P. (2014). Relationships among team trust, team cohesion, team satisfaction, team effectiveness and project performance as perceived by project managers in Malaysia. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2540016
  • Goswami, S., & Mathew, M. (2005). Definition of innovation revisited: An empirical study on Indian information technology industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 9(03), 371-383.
  • Guo, H. (2018). The formation of highly-cooperative organizational climate considering impacts of organizational commitment and team cohesion.. https://doi.org/10.2991/isbcd-18.2018.86
  • Gupta, B., Iyer, L. S., & Aronson, J. E. (2000). Knowledge management: practices and challenges. Industrial management & data systems, 100(1), 17-21.
  • Gümüşsoy, Y. (2020). Ruhsal liderliğin hizmet inovasyon davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde takım uyumu ve bilgi paylaşımının aracılık rolü üzerine bir araştırma. değerlendirilmesi [Doktora tezi, Aksaray Üniversitesi]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  • Helvacı, M. A. (2008). Örgüt geliştirme üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.12780/UUSBD29
  • Herschel, R. T., & Jones, N. E. (2005). Knowledge management and business intelligence: the importance of integration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 45-55.
  • Hu, L., & Randel, A. (2014). Knowledge sharing in teams. Group & Organization Management, 39(2), 213-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114520969
  • Huang, C. C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(11), 786-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.003
  • Hülsheger, U., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
  • Im, S., Montoya, M., & Workman, J. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of creativity in product innovation teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00887.x
  • Jamshed, S., Nazri, M., & Bakar, R. (2018). The effect of knowledge sharing on team performance through lens of team culture. Oman Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 7(3), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.12816/0049504
  • Jang, E., & Kim, B. (2016). The effects of team characteristics on the innovation performance in r&d organizations : the mediating effect of creative climate. Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 41(4), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.7737/jkorms.2016.41.4.075
  • Judeh, M. (2023). Job delight and organizational citizenship behavior: role of teamwork cohesion as a mediator. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(1), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(1).2023.12
  • Kamaşak, R., & Bulutlar, F. (2010), “The influence of knowledge sharing on innovation”, European Business Review, 22(3), 306-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341011040994
  • Kauppila, O. P., Rajala, R., & Jyrämä, A. (2011). Knowledge sharing through virtual teams across borders and boundaries. Management Learning, 42(4), 395-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507610389685
  • Keller, R. T. (2017). A longitudinal study of the individual characteristics of effective R&D project team leaders. R&D Management, 47(5), 741-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12272
  • Kheng, Y. K., June, S., & Mahmood, R. (2013). The determinants of innovative work behavior in the knowledge intensive business services sector in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 9(15), 47.
  • Killingsworth, B., Xue, Y., & Liu, Y. (2016). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among global virtual teams. Team Performance Management, 22(5/6), 284-300.
  • Kim, W., & Park, J. (2017). Examining structural relationships between work engagement, organizational procedural justice, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior for sustainable organizations. Sustainability, 9(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020205
  • Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65(23), 2276–2284.
  • Kmieciak, R. (2021). Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: empirical evidence from Poland. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(5), 1832-1859. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0134
  • Laily, N., & Ernawati, D. P. (2020). The effect of knowledge sharing and innovation behavior on the performance of batik entrepreneurs. Jurnal Manajemen, 24(2), 194-209.
  • Layaman, L., Harahap, P., Djastuti, I., Jaelani, A., & Djuwita, D. (2021). The mediating effect of proactive knowledge sharing among transformational leadership, cohesion, and learning goal orientation on employee performance. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 470-481.
  • Lee, L. (2008). The effects of team reflexivity and innovativeness on new product development performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(4), 548-569. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810868380
  • Li, M., & Amponstira, F. (2020). The moderator effect of researchers & amp; #39; team tenure heterogeneity on the relationship between improvisation behavior and innovative performance in henan province, china. Asian Culture and History, 12(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v12n2p1
  • Liang, H. Y., Shih, H. A., & Chiang, Y. H. (2015). Team diversity and team helping behavior: The mediating roles of team cooperation and team cohesion. European Management Journal, 33(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.07.002
  • Lin, H. F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 135-149.
  • Liu, C., & Liu, X. (2019). Research on knowledge transfer behaviour in cooperative innovation and simulation. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 32(1), 1219-1236
  • Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.86
  • Mumcu, A. (2021). The mediating role of person-organization fit on the effect of organizational alignment on job satisfaction: The case of university. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 461-477. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1041275
  • Musneh, S. N. H., & Roslin, R. M. (2021). The effect of innovative work behaviour on the performance of service sector smes in sabah. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 20-30.
  • Nguyen, T. P. L., Tran, N. M., Doan, X. H., & Nguyen, V. H. (2020). The impact of knowledge sharing on innovative work behavior of Vietnam telecommunications enterprises employees. Management Science Letters, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.8.016
  • Nissen, H.A., Evald, M.R., & Clarke, A.H. (2014). Knowledge sharing in heterogeneous teams through collaboration and cooperation: Exemplified through Public–Private-Innovation partnerships. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 473-482.
  • Nugroho, R. (2023). Knowledge sharing as key driver for the rise of innovative work behavior. Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 38(2), 266-284.
  • Öcel H., & Aydın O. (2006). Grup sargınlığı ölçeği: geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları Dergisi, 9, 919-932.
  • Park, J., Lee, H., & Lee, J. (2013). Exploring antecedents of knowledge sharing in team-based innovation activities. Journal of The Korea Society Of IT Services, 12, 253-271.
  • Rodríguez-Sánchez, A., Devloo, T., Rico, R., Salanova, M., & Anseel, F. (2016). What makes creative teams tick? Cohesion, engagement, and performance across creativity tasks: a three-wave study. Group &Amp; Organization Management, 42(4), 521-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116636476
  • Romero, I., & Martínez-Román, J. A. (2012). Self-employment and innovation. Exploring the determinants of innovative behavior in small businesses. Research Policy, 41(1), 178-189.
  • Ryan, S. (2012). The relationship between shared vision, cohesion, role clarity, mutual trust and transformational leadership within a team setting (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).
  • Salas, E., Grossman, R., Hughes, A., & Coultas, C. (2015). Measuring team cohesion. Human Factors. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57(3), 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815578267
  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). Innovation and the “Gales of Creative Destruction”. The Library of Economics and Liberty: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. http://www. econlib. org/library/Enc/bios/Schumpeter. html, Fuente consultada el, 27.
  • Shaner, M., Beeler, L., & Noble, C. (2016). Do we have to get along to innovate? The influence of multilevel social cohesion on new product and new service development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 148-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12327
  • Song, L., Ma, Z., & Sun, J. (2022). The influence of technostress, learning goal orientation, and perceived team learning climate on intra-team knowledge sharing and innovative practices among ict-enabled team members. Scientometrics, 128(1), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04568-3
  • Spasiano, A., Grimaldi, S., Braccini, A. M., & Nardi, F. (2021). Towards a transdisciplinary theoretical framework of citizen science: results from a meta-review analysis. Sustainability, 13(14), 7904.
  • Sudibjo, N., & Prameswari, R. K. (2021). The effects of knowledge sharing and person–organization fit on the relationship between transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Heliyon, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07334
  • Turgut, E., & Beğenirbaş, M. (2013). Çalışanların yenilikçi davranışları üzerinde sosyal sermaye ve yenilikçi iklimin rolü: Sağlık sektöründe bir araştırma. Kara Harp Okulu Bilim Dergisi, 23(2), 101-124.
  • Van den Hooff, B., & De Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130.
  • Van den Hooff, B, & Van Weneen, F. D. L. (2004). Committed to share: The relationship between organizational commitment, knowledge sharing and the use of CMC. Knowl. Process. Manag, 11, 13-24.
  • Van Dong Phung, I. H., & Binsawad, M. (2018). Exploring how environmental and personal factors influence knowledge sharing behavior leads to innovative work behavior. Advances in Information Systems Development: Methods, Tools and Management, 26, 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74817-7
  • Van Vianen, A. E., & De Dreu, C. K. (2001). Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000573
  • Wang, H. K., Tseng, J. F., & Yen, Y. F. (2014). How do institutional norms and trust influence knowledge sharing? An institutional theory. Innovation, 16(3), 374-391.
  • Wang, C., & Hu, Q. (2020). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, 94, 102010.
  • Wendt, H., Euwema, M., & Emmerik, I. (2009). Leadership and team cohesiveness across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.005
  • Widmann, A., Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. (2016). The impact of team learning behaviors on team innovative work behavior. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 429-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316673713
  • Woerkom, M., & Sanders, K. (2009). The romance of learning from disagreement. the effect of cohesiveness and disagreement on knowledge sharing behavior and individual performance within teams. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9136-y
  • Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of management Review 14, 361–384.
  • Wu, J., & Lu, Q. (2012). On the relationship of leadership behavior, team cohesion and team innovation performance. https://doi.org/10.1109/ismot.2012.6679423
  • Xue, Y., Bradley, J., & Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 299-312. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111119709
  • Yang, H., & Lin, Y. (2019). Exploration of the relationship among cohesion, knowledge sharing, and team performance of design students during graduation project. [Conference Paper]. In 2nd Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation, Singapore https://doi.org/10.35745/ecei2019v2.007
  • Yoon, S. W., Matsui, M., Yamada, T., & Nof, S. Y. (2011). Analysis of effectiveness and benefits of collaboration modes with information-and knowledge-sharing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22, 101-112.
  • Zijl, A., Vermeeren, B., Koster, F., & Steijn, B. (2023). Functional diversity and team innovation. Health Care Management Review, 48(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000369

Takım Uyumunun İnovatif İş Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Bilgi Paylaşımının Aracılık Rolü: Teknopark Firma Çalışanları Üzerinde Bir Araştırma

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 404 - 419, 30.05.2025

Merve Aybek , Ahmet Mumcu

https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1528907

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı takım uyumunun inovatif iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde bilgi paylaşımının aracılık rolü belirlemektir. Takım uyumu, takım üyeleri arasındaki uyum ve iş birliği yoluyla inovatif düşünme ve risk alma gibi davranışları teşvik edebilmektedir. Bilgi paylaşımı, takımlardaki üyeler arasındaki iletişimi ve iş birliğini güçlendiren kritik bir faktördür. Araştırma 141 Teknopark çalışanı üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Teknoparklar işletmelerin, araştırma kurumlarının ve girişimcilerin inovatif çözümler geliştirmek üzere bir araya geldiği ve teknolojik ilerlemelerin kararlı bir şekilde desteklendiği alanlardır. Bu bağlamda teknoparklar, takım uyumunun ve bilgi paylaşımının inovatif iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisini güçlendirebilecek bir ortam sağlamaktadır. Araştırma hipotezlerini test etmek amacıyla yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucundan takım uyumunun alt boyutu olan görev dayanışmasının inovatif iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde bilgi paylaşımının tam aracı role sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda alan uygulayıcılarına ve araştırmacılara yönelik çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.

Keywords

Takım Uyumu İnovatif İş Davranışı Bilgi Paylaşımı Teknopark

Ethical Statement

Çalışmanın bilimsel etik değerlere ve kurallara uygun, özgün bir çalışma olduğunu, aksinin tespit edilmesi halinde her türlü yasal yaptırımı kabul edeceğimi beyan ederim.

References

  • Ada, N., Alver, İ., & Atlı, F. (2008). Örgütsel iletişimin örgütsel bağlılık üzerine etkisi: manisa organize sanayi bölgesinde yer alan ve imalat sektörü çalışanları üzerinde yapılan bir araştırma. Ege Akademik Bakış/Ege Academic Review, 8(2), 487-518.
  • Akhavan, P., Hosseini, S. M., Abbasi, M., & Manteghi, M. (2015). Knowledge-sharing determinants, behaviors, and innovative work behaviors: An integrated theoretical view and empirical examination. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(5), 562-591. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2015-0018
  • Al-Ahmad Chaar, S., & Easa, N. F. (2021). Does transformational leadership matter for innovation in banks? The mediating role of knowledge sharing. International Journal of Disruptive Innovation in Government, 1(1), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDIG-04-2020-0002
  • Allameh, S. M. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital: The role of social capital, knowledge sharing and innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 858-874. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2017-0068
  • Alrawi, K. (2008). Cohesiveness within teamwork: the relationship to performance effectiveness – case study. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 1, 92-106.
  • Ayazlar, G. (2012). Otel işletmelerinde örgütsel öğrenme ve bilgi paylaşımının hizmet inovasyon performansına etkisi: Kuşadası 5 yıldızlı otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. [Doktora tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology 4, 359.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Beal, D., Cohen, R., Burke, M., & McLendon, C. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989-1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
  • Birasnav, M., Albufalasa, M., & Bader, Y. (2013). The role of transformational leadership and knowledge management processes on predicting product and process innovation: An empirical study developed in Kingdom of Bahrain. Tékhne, 11(2), 64-75.
  • Carless, S. A., & De Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion on work teams. small group research, 31(1), 71-88.
  • Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley L. R. (1985). The development of instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266
  • Cheng, J. H., & Fu, Y. C. (2013). Inter-organizational relationships and knowledge sharing through the relationship and institutional orientations in supply chains. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3), 473-484.
  • Chen, H., Liu, F., Wen, Y., Ling, L., & Gu, X. (2021). Compilation and application of the scale of sustainable knowledge sharing willingness in virtual academic community during the times of the coronavirus pandemic (covid-19). Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627833
  • Daspit, J., Justice Tillman, C., Boyd, N. G., & Mckee, V. (2013). Cross‐functional team effectiveness: An examination of internal team environment, shared leadership, and cohesion influences. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 19(1/2), 34-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591311312088
  • De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
  • Demir, M. (2015). Konaklama işletmelerinde birey-örgüt uyumunun iş performansı ve işte kalma niyeti üzerine etkisi. Turizm Teorisi ve Araştırma Dergisi, 1(2), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.24288/jttr.202823
  • Drucker, P. F. (1994) Kapitalist Ötesi Toplum (Çev. B. Çorakçı). İstanbul: İnkılap Kitabevi.
  • Ergün, E., & Eyisoy, M. E. (2019). Takım çalışması faktörlerinin takım performansı üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. İşletme ve Yönetim Çalışmaları: Uluslararası Bir Dergi, 6(4), 1455–1475. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v6i4.406
  • Fung, H. P. (2014). Relationships among team trust, team cohesion, team satisfaction, team effectiveness and project performance as perceived by project managers in Malaysia. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2540016
  • Goswami, S., & Mathew, M. (2005). Definition of innovation revisited: An empirical study on Indian information technology industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 9(03), 371-383.
  • Guo, H. (2018). The formation of highly-cooperative organizational climate considering impacts of organizational commitment and team cohesion.. https://doi.org/10.2991/isbcd-18.2018.86
  • Gupta, B., Iyer, L. S., & Aronson, J. E. (2000). Knowledge management: practices and challenges. Industrial management & data systems, 100(1), 17-21.
  • Gümüşsoy, Y. (2020). Ruhsal liderliğin hizmet inovasyon davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde takım uyumu ve bilgi paylaşımının aracılık rolü üzerine bir araştırma. değerlendirilmesi [Doktora tezi, Aksaray Üniversitesi]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  • Helvacı, M. A. (2008). Örgüt geliştirme üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.12780/UUSBD29
  • Herschel, R. T., & Jones, N. E. (2005). Knowledge management and business intelligence: the importance of integration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 45-55.
  • Hu, L., & Randel, A. (2014). Knowledge sharing in teams. Group & Organization Management, 39(2), 213-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114520969
  • Huang, C. C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(11), 786-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.003
  • Hülsheger, U., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
  • Im, S., Montoya, M., & Workman, J. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of creativity in product innovation teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00887.x
  • Jamshed, S., Nazri, M., & Bakar, R. (2018). The effect of knowledge sharing on team performance through lens of team culture. Oman Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 7(3), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.12816/0049504
  • Jang, E., & Kim, B. (2016). The effects of team characteristics on the innovation performance in r&d organizations : the mediating effect of creative climate. Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 41(4), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.7737/jkorms.2016.41.4.075
  • Judeh, M. (2023). Job delight and organizational citizenship behavior: role of teamwork cohesion as a mediator. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(1), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(1).2023.12
  • Kamaşak, R., & Bulutlar, F. (2010), “The influence of knowledge sharing on innovation”, European Business Review, 22(3), 306-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341011040994
  • Kauppila, O. P., Rajala, R., & Jyrämä, A. (2011). Knowledge sharing through virtual teams across borders and boundaries. Management Learning, 42(4), 395-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507610389685
  • Keller, R. T. (2017). A longitudinal study of the individual characteristics of effective R&D project team leaders. R&D Management, 47(5), 741-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12272
  • Kheng, Y. K., June, S., & Mahmood, R. (2013). The determinants of innovative work behavior in the knowledge intensive business services sector in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 9(15), 47.
  • Killingsworth, B., Xue, Y., & Liu, Y. (2016). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among global virtual teams. Team Performance Management, 22(5/6), 284-300.
  • Kim, W., & Park, J. (2017). Examining structural relationships between work engagement, organizational procedural justice, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior for sustainable organizations. Sustainability, 9(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020205
  • Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65(23), 2276–2284.
  • Kmieciak, R. (2021). Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: empirical evidence from Poland. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(5), 1832-1859. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0134
  • Laily, N., & Ernawati, D. P. (2020). The effect of knowledge sharing and innovation behavior on the performance of batik entrepreneurs. Jurnal Manajemen, 24(2), 194-209.
  • Layaman, L., Harahap, P., Djastuti, I., Jaelani, A., & Djuwita, D. (2021). The mediating effect of proactive knowledge sharing among transformational leadership, cohesion, and learning goal orientation on employee performance. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 470-481.
  • Lee, L. (2008). The effects of team reflexivity and innovativeness on new product development performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(4), 548-569. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810868380
  • Li, M., & Amponstira, F. (2020). The moderator effect of researchers & amp; #39; team tenure heterogeneity on the relationship between improvisation behavior and innovative performance in henan province, china. Asian Culture and History, 12(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v12n2p1
  • Liang, H. Y., Shih, H. A., & Chiang, Y. H. (2015). Team diversity and team helping behavior: The mediating roles of team cooperation and team cohesion. European Management Journal, 33(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.07.002
  • Lin, H. F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 135-149.
  • Liu, C., & Liu, X. (2019). Research on knowledge transfer behaviour in cooperative innovation and simulation. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 32(1), 1219-1236
  • Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.86
  • Mumcu, A. (2021). The mediating role of person-organization fit on the effect of organizational alignment on job satisfaction: The case of university. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 461-477. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1041275
  • Musneh, S. N. H., & Roslin, R. M. (2021). The effect of innovative work behaviour on the performance of service sector smes in sabah. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 20-30.
  • Nguyen, T. P. L., Tran, N. M., Doan, X. H., & Nguyen, V. H. (2020). The impact of knowledge sharing on innovative work behavior of Vietnam telecommunications enterprises employees. Management Science Letters, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.8.016
  • Nissen, H.A., Evald, M.R., & Clarke, A.H. (2014). Knowledge sharing in heterogeneous teams through collaboration and cooperation: Exemplified through Public–Private-Innovation partnerships. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 473-482.
  • Nugroho, R. (2023). Knowledge sharing as key driver for the rise of innovative work behavior. Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 38(2), 266-284.
  • Öcel H., & Aydın O. (2006). Grup sargınlığı ölçeği: geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları Dergisi, 9, 919-932.
  • Park, J., Lee, H., & Lee, J. (2013). Exploring antecedents of knowledge sharing in team-based innovation activities. Journal of The Korea Society Of IT Services, 12, 253-271.
  • Rodríguez-Sánchez, A., Devloo, T., Rico, R., Salanova, M., & Anseel, F. (2016). What makes creative teams tick? Cohesion, engagement, and performance across creativity tasks: a three-wave study. Group &Amp; Organization Management, 42(4), 521-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116636476
  • Romero, I., & Martínez-Román, J. A. (2012). Self-employment and innovation. Exploring the determinants of innovative behavior in small businesses. Research Policy, 41(1), 178-189.
  • Ryan, S. (2012). The relationship between shared vision, cohesion, role clarity, mutual trust and transformational leadership within a team setting (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).
  • Salas, E., Grossman, R., Hughes, A., & Coultas, C. (2015). Measuring team cohesion. Human Factors. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57(3), 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815578267
  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). Innovation and the “Gales of Creative Destruction”. The Library of Economics and Liberty: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. http://www. econlib. org/library/Enc/bios/Schumpeter. html, Fuente consultada el, 27.
  • Shaner, M., Beeler, L., & Noble, C. (2016). Do we have to get along to innovate? The influence of multilevel social cohesion on new product and new service development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 148-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12327
  • Song, L., Ma, Z., & Sun, J. (2022). The influence of technostress, learning goal orientation, and perceived team learning climate on intra-team knowledge sharing and innovative practices among ict-enabled team members. Scientometrics, 128(1), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04568-3
  • Spasiano, A., Grimaldi, S., Braccini, A. M., & Nardi, F. (2021). Towards a transdisciplinary theoretical framework of citizen science: results from a meta-review analysis. Sustainability, 13(14), 7904.
  • Sudibjo, N., & Prameswari, R. K. (2021). The effects of knowledge sharing and person–organization fit on the relationship between transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Heliyon, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07334
  • Turgut, E., & Beğenirbaş, M. (2013). Çalışanların yenilikçi davranışları üzerinde sosyal sermaye ve yenilikçi iklimin rolü: Sağlık sektöründe bir araştırma. Kara Harp Okulu Bilim Dergisi, 23(2), 101-124.
  • Van den Hooff, B., & De Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130.
  • Van den Hooff, B, & Van Weneen, F. D. L. (2004). Committed to share: The relationship between organizational commitment, knowledge sharing and the use of CMC. Knowl. Process. Manag, 11, 13-24.
  • Van Dong Phung, I. H., & Binsawad, M. (2018). Exploring how environmental and personal factors influence knowledge sharing behavior leads to innovative work behavior. Advances in Information Systems Development: Methods, Tools and Management, 26, 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74817-7
  • Van Vianen, A. E., & De Dreu, C. K. (2001). Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000573
  • Wang, H. K., Tseng, J. F., & Yen, Y. F. (2014). How do institutional norms and trust influence knowledge sharing? An institutional theory. Innovation, 16(3), 374-391.
  • Wang, C., & Hu, Q. (2020). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, 94, 102010.
  • Wendt, H., Euwema, M., & Emmerik, I. (2009). Leadership and team cohesiveness across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.005
  • Widmann, A., Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. (2016). The impact of team learning behaviors on team innovative work behavior. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 429-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316673713
  • Woerkom, M., & Sanders, K. (2009). The romance of learning from disagreement. the effect of cohesiveness and disagreement on knowledge sharing behavior and individual performance within teams. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9136-y
  • Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of management Review 14, 361–384.
  • Wu, J., & Lu, Q. (2012). On the relationship of leadership behavior, team cohesion and team innovation performance. https://doi.org/10.1109/ismot.2012.6679423
  • Xue, Y., Bradley, J., & Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 299-312. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111119709
  • Yang, H., & Lin, Y. (2019). Exploration of the relationship among cohesion, knowledge sharing, and team performance of design students during graduation project. [Conference Paper]. In 2nd Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation, Singapore https://doi.org/10.35745/ecei2019v2.007
  • Yoon, S. W., Matsui, M., Yamada, T., & Nof, S. Y. (2011). Analysis of effectiveness and benefits of collaboration modes with information-and knowledge-sharing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22, 101-112.
  • Zijl, A., Vermeeren, B., Koster, F., & Steijn, B. (2023). Functional diversity and team innovation. Health Care Management Review, 48(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000369
There are 81 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Innovation Management
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Merve Aybek 0000-0003-4492-2886

Ahmet Mumcu 0000-0001-6610-5073

Publication Date May 30, 2025
Submission Date August 6, 2024
Acceptance Date January 22, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Aybek, M., & Mumcu, A. (2025). Takım Uyumunun İnovatif İş Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Bilgi Paylaşımının Aracılık Rolü: Teknopark Firma Çalışanları Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 9(2), 404-419. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1528907