Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Diyarbakır Ekolojik Koşullarında Bazı Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Kalite Bakımından Belirlenmesi

Year 2025, , 1 - 7, 30.06.2025

Şerif Kahraman

https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1514564

Abstract

Aspir yağı, hem yemeklik yağ hem de endüstriyel yağ olarak kullanılır. Ayrıca, aspir bitkisi, soğuğa, kuraklığa ve tuzluluk koşullarına dayanıklıdır. Bu çalışma, 2014-2015, 2015-2016 ve 2016-2017 yetiştirme sezonlarında, Diyarbakır ekolojik koşullarına uygun Aspir çeşitlerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Denemeler GAP Uluslararası Tarımsal Araştırma ve Eğitim Merkezi deneme tarlasında yürütülmüştür. Bu deneme, tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre üç tekerrürlü olarak tasarlanmıştır. Denemede Balcı, Dinçer, Linas, Olas ve Remzibey-05 çeşitleri kullanılmıştır. Tohumlar 30 cm sıra arasına ekilmiştir. Üç yıllık ortalama değerler açısından; bitki boyu, bitkide başak sayısı, bin tohum ağırlığı, ham yağ oranı ve tohum veriminde aspir çeşitleri arasında % 1'e göre önemli farklılıklar bulunmuştur. Deneme sonuçlarına göre en yüksek tohum verimi Remzibey-05 çeşidinden (188,2 kg/da), en düşük verim ise Balcı çeşidinden (151,4 kg/da) elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca, bitki boyu (110,2-116,7 cm), bitki başına tabla sayısı (13,9-17,5), tabla çapı (2,18-2,21 cm), bin tane ağırlığı (33,4-36,2 g) ve ham yağ oranı (%26,67 – 35,75) belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, üç yıllık bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına dayanarak, Remzibey-05 çeşidi Diyarbakır ekolojik koşulları için önerilebilir.

Keywords

Tabla çapı aspir Carthamus tinctorius L. tane verimi yağ oranı

References

  • Anonymous. 2021. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QC. Access Date: 30.12.2021.
  • Anonymous. 2023. Turkish Statistical Institute. Agriculture/Crop Production Statistics. Available at: https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr. Access Date: 10.10.2024.
  • Arslan, B. and E. Culpan. 2020. Determination of Agricultural and Technological Traits of Some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Genotypes Developed by Cross Breeding. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 30(4): 742-750. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.703793
  • Arslan, B., H. Çakır, and E. Culpan. 2019. Yeni geliştirilen aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) çeşitlerinin bazı özellikleri bakımından karşılaştırılması. 2. Uluslararası 19 Mayıs Yenilikçi Bilimsel Yaklaşimlar Kongresi. Uygulamalı Bilimler. 113-121.
  • Aslan, D., and A. Sirat. 2022. Gümüşhane (Kelkit) Koşullarında Bazı Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi 11 (2): 263-276. https://doi.org/10.29278/ azd.1072602
  • Aslantas, S. and F. Akinerdem. 2020. Effects of Different Sowing Dates on Yield, Yield Component and Quality of Some Winter Safflower Cultivars. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research 9 (1): 21-28.
  • Atan, M., C.B. Şahin, and N. İşler. 2019. Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Content of Different Safflower Varieties Grown under Hatay Conditions. KSU J. Agric Nat 22(5): 678-684.
  • Babaoglu, M. and M. Guzel. 2015. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) breeding activities at Trakya Agricultural Research Institute. Ekin J Crop Breed and Gen 1-1:20-25.
  • Baydar, H. and S. Erbaş, 2014. Yağ Bitkileri Bilimi ve Teknolojisi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No: 97. Isparta.
  • Çamaş, N. and E. Esendal. 2006. Estimates of broad-sense heritability for seed yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Hereditas 143: 55-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0018-0661.01914.x
  • Coskun, Y. 2014. Winter and Summer Sowing Facilities of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 1(4): 462-468.
  • Duru, S. 2024. The Current Status of Turkiye Vegetable Oil Foreign Trade and Analysis of the Competitiveness. Gümrük Ticaret Dergisi 11(35): 25-39.
  • Eryılmaz, T., C. Cesur, M.M. Yesilyurt, and E. Aydın. 2014. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Remzibey-05 Seed Oil Methyl Ester: Fuel Properties for Potential Diesel Engine Application. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 1(1): 85-90.
  • Ghorbanzadeh, N.M., G.H. Rassam, and A.R. Dadkhah. 2014. Evaluation of Yield and Seed Fatty Acid Compositions of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars in Shirvan Region. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 39 (3): 382-390.
  • Gürsoy, M., D. Başalma, and F. Nofouzi, 2018. Effects of Safflower Cultivars (Carthamus tinctorius L.) on Yield and Yield Components of Different Row and Row Spaces. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 32 1 20–28.
  • Hatipoglu, H., H. Arslan, M. Karakus, and A. Köse. 2012. Determination Suitable Sowing Time of Different Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorius L.) Cultivars on Sanliurfa Conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University. 26 (1):1-16.
  • Huth, P.J., V.L. Fulgoni, B.T. Larson. 2015. A systematic review of high-oleic vegetable oil substitutions for other fats and oils on cardiovascular disease risk factors: implications for novel high-oleic soybean oils. Adv Nutr. Nov. 13:6(6):674-93.
  • Kahraman, Ş., D. Karaaslan, and A. Hatipoğlu. 2014. Determinatıon of Suitable Sowing Date of Safflower in Diyarbakır Conditions. International Mesopotamia Agriculture Congress / 22-25 September 2014 Diyarbakır – Turkey.
  • Katar, D., Y. Arslan, R. Kodas, I. Subası, and H. Mutlu. 2014. Determination of Effect of Different Doses of Boron on the Yield and Yield Components of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty. 11(2). pp. 71-79.
  • Kayaçetin, F., D. Katar, and Y. Arslan. 2012. Flower Structure and Biology of Fertilization of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Field Crops. 21 (2): 75-80.
  • Knowles, P. F. 1980. Safflower. Hybridization of Crop Plants pp. 535-548. https://doi.org/10.2135/1980.
  • Knowles, P.F. 1989. Safflower. pp. 363–374. In: G. Röbbelen, R K. Downey and A. Ashri (Eds). Oilcrops of the world: their breeding and utilization. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Kobuk, M., K. Ekinci, S. Erbas. 2019. Determination of Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Genotypes. KSU J. Agric Nat 22(1):89-96.
  • Koç, H. 2019. Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Çeşitlerinin Farklı Yağış Koşullarında Verim ve Yağ Oranı Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 6(3): 518-526. https://doi.org/10.30910 /turkjans.595371
  • Köse, A. 2016. A Research on Determining of Seed Setting Rate in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research 3(2):152-158. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.87267
  • Köse, A., F. Çelikoğlu Koşar, and Ö. Bilir. 2021. Mutasyon Islahı ile Geliştirilmiş Bazı Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Hatlarının Tarımsal Performansları. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 8(2): 262-273. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.685982
  • Köse, A., F. Koşar, and Ö. Bilir. 2018. Agricultural Performances of Some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Lines Developed by Single Plant Selection Method. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 24 (2018): 1-11.
  • Kütük Dinçel, N. G. 2024. Yağ Bitkileri İçinde Kıymetli Bir Alternatif; Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 11(1): 195-203. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.1165220
  • Omidi, A.H., H. Khazaei, P. Monneveux, and F. Stoddard. 2012. Effect of Cultivar and Water Regime on Yield and Yield Components in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17 (1): 10-15.
  • Oz, M. 2016. Sowing Time. Variety and Yield Relationship in Safflower. Suleyman Demirel Uni. J. of the Fac. of Agri., 11 (1):71-81.
  • Ozek, K. 2016. Feed Value of Safflower and the Possibilities of Using in Farm Animal Nutrition: I. The Using and Effects in Poultry Nutrition. Iğdır Univ. J. Inst. Sci. & Tech. 6(4): 171-180.
  • Paseban Eslam, B. 2015. Effects of Planting Date on Grain Yield, Yield Components and Oil Content of Safflower Spring Cultivars in Tabriz. Journal of Agricultural Science Sustainable Production 25 (2.1):155-164.
  • Sayılır, C., V.M. Çınar, and A. Ünay. 2019. Determination of Yield and Yield Components in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars under Menemen-Izmir Ecological Conditions. Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 29(1): 71-75. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu. 568851
  • Shivani, D., Ch. Sreelakshmi, and C.V.S. Kumar. 2010. Genetic Divergence Studies in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 1(5): 1354-1357.
  • Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A biometrical approach. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, pp. 20-90.
  • Subaşı, İ., Y. Arslan, M. Yaşar. 2023. Aspir (Carthamus tinctorus L.) and its Nutraceutic Potential. In: M. Yaşar, A. Akkaya (Eds) Stratejik Sektör: TARIM-2. ISBN: 978-625-6404-81-6. Iksad Publications. Ankara/Turkey
  • Tahernezhad, Z., J. Saba, M. Zeinalabedini, S.S. Pourdad, and M.R. Ghaffari. 2018. Estimation of broad-sense heritability and variance components for seed yield and agronomic traits in native and exotic safflower (Carthamus tinctorius l.) genotypes. Bangladesh J. Bot. 47(3): 501-508.
  • Yaşar, M. and M. Sezgin. 2023. Evaluation of Yield Performance of Some Safflower Varieties in Different Environments. 5 th International Cukurova Agriculture and Veterinary Congress. 21-23 July 2023. Adana/Türkiye. p:976-983.
  • Yazdani, A. A., M. Saffari, and G. Ranjbar. 2019. Effect of Application of Treated Wastewater on Seed Yield and Heavy Metals Content of Safflower Cultivars. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. Vol. 21(5): 1277-1286
  • Zarei, G., H. Shamsi, and F. Fazeli. 2011. Effect of planting density on yield and yield components of safflower cultivars in spring. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(12): 118-120

Determination of Yield and Quality in Some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars Under Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions

Year 2025, , 1 - 7, 30.06.2025

Şerif Kahraman

https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1514564

Abstract

Safflower oil is used as both cooking oil and industrial oil. Safflower is tolerant to cold, drought, and salinity conditions. This study was conducted to determine the safflower cultivars suitable for Diyarbakır ecological in conditions, and was performed during the 2014-2015, 2015-2016, and 2016-2017 growing seasons. The experiments were conducted in the trial field of “GAP International Agricultural Research and Educational Center. This experiment was designed according to the Randomized Block with three replications. Balcı, Dinçer, Linas, Olas and Remzibey-05 varieties were used in the experiment. Seeds were sown with 30 cm row spacing. In terms of three year average values, significant differences were observed at the 1 % level among the safflower varieties for plant height, head number per plant, thousand seed weight, crude oil ratio, and seed yield. According to the results, the highest seed yield was obtained in the Remzibey-05 cultivar (1882 kg ha−1), and the lowest yield was obtained from Balcı variety (1514 kg ha−1). In addition, plant height (110.2-116.7 cm), head number per plant (13.9-17.5), head diameter (2.18-2.21 cm), thousand seed weight (33.4-36.2 g), and crude oil ratio (26.67 - 35.75 %) were determined. To conclude, based on three years of study, it was observed that the Remzibey-05 cultivar could be recommended for Diyarbakır ecological conditions.

Keywords

Head diameter safflower Carthamus tinctorius L. seed yield oil ratio

References

  • Anonymous. 2021. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QC. Access Date: 30.12.2021.
  • Anonymous. 2023. Turkish Statistical Institute. Agriculture/Crop Production Statistics. Available at: https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr. Access Date: 10.10.2024.
  • Arslan, B. and E. Culpan. 2020. Determination of Agricultural and Technological Traits of Some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Genotypes Developed by Cross Breeding. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 30(4): 742-750. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.703793
  • Arslan, B., H. Çakır, and E. Culpan. 2019. Yeni geliştirilen aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) çeşitlerinin bazı özellikleri bakımından karşılaştırılması. 2. Uluslararası 19 Mayıs Yenilikçi Bilimsel Yaklaşimlar Kongresi. Uygulamalı Bilimler. 113-121.
  • Aslan, D., and A. Sirat. 2022. Gümüşhane (Kelkit) Koşullarında Bazı Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi 11 (2): 263-276. https://doi.org/10.29278/ azd.1072602
  • Aslantas, S. and F. Akinerdem. 2020. Effects of Different Sowing Dates on Yield, Yield Component and Quality of Some Winter Safflower Cultivars. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research 9 (1): 21-28.
  • Atan, M., C.B. Şahin, and N. İşler. 2019. Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Content of Different Safflower Varieties Grown under Hatay Conditions. KSU J. Agric Nat 22(5): 678-684.
  • Babaoglu, M. and M. Guzel. 2015. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) breeding activities at Trakya Agricultural Research Institute. Ekin J Crop Breed and Gen 1-1:20-25.
  • Baydar, H. and S. Erbaş, 2014. Yağ Bitkileri Bilimi ve Teknolojisi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No: 97. Isparta.
  • Çamaş, N. and E. Esendal. 2006. Estimates of broad-sense heritability for seed yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Hereditas 143: 55-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0018-0661.01914.x
  • Coskun, Y. 2014. Winter and Summer Sowing Facilities of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 1(4): 462-468.
  • Duru, S. 2024. The Current Status of Turkiye Vegetable Oil Foreign Trade and Analysis of the Competitiveness. Gümrük Ticaret Dergisi 11(35): 25-39.
  • Eryılmaz, T., C. Cesur, M.M. Yesilyurt, and E. Aydın. 2014. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Remzibey-05 Seed Oil Methyl Ester: Fuel Properties for Potential Diesel Engine Application. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 1(1): 85-90.
  • Ghorbanzadeh, N.M., G.H. Rassam, and A.R. Dadkhah. 2014. Evaluation of Yield and Seed Fatty Acid Compositions of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars in Shirvan Region. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 39 (3): 382-390.
  • Gürsoy, M., D. Başalma, and F. Nofouzi, 2018. Effects of Safflower Cultivars (Carthamus tinctorius L.) on Yield and Yield Components of Different Row and Row Spaces. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 32 1 20–28.
  • Hatipoglu, H., H. Arslan, M. Karakus, and A. Köse. 2012. Determination Suitable Sowing Time of Different Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorius L.) Cultivars on Sanliurfa Conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University. 26 (1):1-16.
  • Huth, P.J., V.L. Fulgoni, B.T. Larson. 2015. A systematic review of high-oleic vegetable oil substitutions for other fats and oils on cardiovascular disease risk factors: implications for novel high-oleic soybean oils. Adv Nutr. Nov. 13:6(6):674-93.
  • Kahraman, Ş., D. Karaaslan, and A. Hatipoğlu. 2014. Determinatıon of Suitable Sowing Date of Safflower in Diyarbakır Conditions. International Mesopotamia Agriculture Congress / 22-25 September 2014 Diyarbakır – Turkey.
  • Katar, D., Y. Arslan, R. Kodas, I. Subası, and H. Mutlu. 2014. Determination of Effect of Different Doses of Boron on the Yield and Yield Components of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty. 11(2). pp. 71-79.
  • Kayaçetin, F., D. Katar, and Y. Arslan. 2012. Flower Structure and Biology of Fertilization of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Field Crops. 21 (2): 75-80.
  • Knowles, P. F. 1980. Safflower. Hybridization of Crop Plants pp. 535-548. https://doi.org/10.2135/1980.
  • Knowles, P.F. 1989. Safflower. pp. 363–374. In: G. Röbbelen, R K. Downey and A. Ashri (Eds). Oilcrops of the world: their breeding and utilization. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Kobuk, M., K. Ekinci, S. Erbas. 2019. Determination of Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Genotypes. KSU J. Agric Nat 22(1):89-96.
  • Koç, H. 2019. Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Çeşitlerinin Farklı Yağış Koşullarında Verim ve Yağ Oranı Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 6(3): 518-526. https://doi.org/10.30910 /turkjans.595371
  • Köse, A. 2016. A Research on Determining of Seed Setting Rate in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research 3(2):152-158. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.87267
  • Köse, A., F. Çelikoğlu Koşar, and Ö. Bilir. 2021. Mutasyon Islahı ile Geliştirilmiş Bazı Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Hatlarının Tarımsal Performansları. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 8(2): 262-273. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.685982
  • Köse, A., F. Koşar, and Ö. Bilir. 2018. Agricultural Performances of Some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Lines Developed by Single Plant Selection Method. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 24 (2018): 1-11.
  • Kütük Dinçel, N. G. 2024. Yağ Bitkileri İçinde Kıymetli Bir Alternatif; Aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 11(1): 195-203. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.1165220
  • Omidi, A.H., H. Khazaei, P. Monneveux, and F. Stoddard. 2012. Effect of Cultivar and Water Regime on Yield and Yield Components in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17 (1): 10-15.
  • Oz, M. 2016. Sowing Time. Variety and Yield Relationship in Safflower. Suleyman Demirel Uni. J. of the Fac. of Agri., 11 (1):71-81.
  • Ozek, K. 2016. Feed Value of Safflower and the Possibilities of Using in Farm Animal Nutrition: I. The Using and Effects in Poultry Nutrition. Iğdır Univ. J. Inst. Sci. & Tech. 6(4): 171-180.
  • Paseban Eslam, B. 2015. Effects of Planting Date on Grain Yield, Yield Components and Oil Content of Safflower Spring Cultivars in Tabriz. Journal of Agricultural Science Sustainable Production 25 (2.1):155-164.
  • Sayılır, C., V.M. Çınar, and A. Ünay. 2019. Determination of Yield and Yield Components in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars under Menemen-Izmir Ecological Conditions. Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 29(1): 71-75. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu. 568851
  • Shivani, D., Ch. Sreelakshmi, and C.V.S. Kumar. 2010. Genetic Divergence Studies in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 1(5): 1354-1357.
  • Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A biometrical approach. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, pp. 20-90.
  • Subaşı, İ., Y. Arslan, M. Yaşar. 2023. Aspir (Carthamus tinctorus L.) and its Nutraceutic Potential. In: M. Yaşar, A. Akkaya (Eds) Stratejik Sektör: TARIM-2. ISBN: 978-625-6404-81-6. Iksad Publications. Ankara/Turkey
  • Tahernezhad, Z., J. Saba, M. Zeinalabedini, S.S. Pourdad, and M.R. Ghaffari. 2018. Estimation of broad-sense heritability and variance components for seed yield and agronomic traits in native and exotic safflower (Carthamus tinctorius l.) genotypes. Bangladesh J. Bot. 47(3): 501-508.
  • Yaşar, M. and M. Sezgin. 2023. Evaluation of Yield Performance of Some Safflower Varieties in Different Environments. 5 th International Cukurova Agriculture and Veterinary Congress. 21-23 July 2023. Adana/Türkiye. p:976-983.
  • Yazdani, A. A., M. Saffari, and G. Ranjbar. 2019. Effect of Application of Treated Wastewater on Seed Yield and Heavy Metals Content of Safflower Cultivars. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. Vol. 21(5): 1277-1286
  • Zarei, G., H. Shamsi, and F. Fazeli. 2011. Effect of planting density on yield and yield components of safflower cultivars in spring. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(12): 118-120
There are 40 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Industrial Crops
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Şerif Kahraman 0000-0003-1160-0792

Publication Date June 30, 2025
Submission Date July 11, 2024
Acceptance Date January 19, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025

Cite

APA Kahraman, Ş. (2025). Determination of Yield and Quality in Some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars Under Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 35(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1514564
AMA Kahraman Ş. Determination of Yield and Quality in Some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars Under Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions. ANADOLU. June 2025;35(1):1-7. doi:10.18615/anadolu.1514564
Chicago Kahraman, Şerif. “Determination of Yield and Quality in Some Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorius L.) Cultivars Under Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions”. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 35, no. 1 (June 2025): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1514564.
EndNote Kahraman Ş (June 1, 2025) Determination of Yield and Quality in Some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars Under Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 35 1 1–7.
IEEE Ş. Kahraman, “Determination of Yield and Quality in Some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars Under Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions”, ANADOLU, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2025, doi: 10.18615/anadolu.1514564.
ISNAD Kahraman, Şerif. “Determination of Yield and Quality in Some Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorius L.) Cultivars Under Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions”. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 35/1 (June 2025), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1514564.
JAMA Kahraman Ş. Determination of Yield and Quality in Some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars Under Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions. ANADOLU. 2025;35:1–7.
MLA Kahraman, Şerif. “Determination of Yield and Quality in Some Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorius L.) Cultivars Under Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions”. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 35, no. 1, 2025, pp. 1-7, doi:10.18615/anadolu.1514564.
Vancouver Kahraman Ş. Determination of Yield and Quality in Some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Cultivars Under Diyarbakır Ecological Conditions. ANADOLU. 2025;35(1):1-7.
29899ANADOLU Journal by Aegean Agricultural Research Institute is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0  

30009     30010       30011     30012   30013      30014        30015  30016