Abstract
Examining the involvement of the Pechenegs in the ethnopolitical processes of the Southern Russian steppes is crucial for understanding the formation of the ethnic and political map of Eastern Europe during the 10th and 11th centuries. The impact of the Pechenegs on the political situation in this region remains significant for historians and ethnologists. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of the Pechenegs in the ethnopolitical processes of the Southern Russian steppes from the mid-10th century to the mid-11th century. The research focuses on the Pechenegs' contributions to ethnopolitical changes and their interactions with other peoples and states in the region. The study utilizes the works of prominent historians such as N. M. Karamzin, P. A. Golubovsky, S. M. Solov'ev and G. Manuku-Adameshteanu, as well as research by Turkish and Hungarian scholars. The analysis is based on primary sources, including chronicles and archaeological data, as well as secondary historical materials. The study addresses the origin of the name "Pecheneg" and their early homeland. Historians like Tatishchev, Karamzin, and Solovyov present different views on the origins and initial territories of the Pechenegs. Tatishchev associates the Pechenegs with the Sarmatians, while Karamzin and Solovyov identify them as Turkic peoples. The research examines the Pechenegs' influence on ethnopolitical processes in the Southern Russian steppes, including their conflicts with the Bulgars, Hungarians, Khazars, and the Rus state. Golubovsky and Manuku-Adameshteanu highlight the Pechenegs' significant impact on the Hungarians and other regional peoples. The article also explores the Pechenegs' settlement in modern Hungary and their roles as both vassals of the Kievan state and independent political actors in the region's political life. The article concludes that the Pechenegs played a significant role in the ethnopolitical processes of the Southern Russian steppes during the 10th and 11th centuries. Despite losing their political power by the mid-11th century, they had a considerable impact. Further research is needed to fully understand their role in the history of Eastern Europe.
Keywords:
References
- Artamonov, M. I. (1962). Istoriia khazar. Izd-vo Gos. Ermitazha. (In Russian).
- Garustovich, G. N. (2013). Rasprostranenie islama u pechenegov v stepakh Vostochnoi Evropy. Vestnik Akademii Nauk RB, 18 (3). (In Russian).
- Garustovich, G. N., Ivanov, V.A. (2001). Ogusy i pechenegi v Evraziiskikh stepakh. Izd-vo Gilem. Ufa. (In Russian).
- Golubovskii, P. A. (2011). Pechenegi, torki i polovtsy. Rus i step do nasheestviia tatar. Veche. (In Russian).
- Karamzin, N. M. (1878). Istoriia Gosudarstva Rossiiskogo. T.1, izdanie 2-e. Sankt-Peterburg (In Russian).
- Kiseleva, M.V. (2008). Russkiye i pechenegi: ot konflikta k konfederatsii. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnyye nauki, (7), 321-326.
- Kurat, A. N. (1937). Peçenekler Tarihi. Devlet Basımevi.
- Marquart, J. (2009). O proiskhozhdenii naroda kumanov. Perevod s angliiskogo N.I. Khrapunova. Moskva. (In Russian).
- Menuku-Adameshtyanu, G. (2000). Nasheestviia pechenegov na nizhnem Dunai (1027-1048 gg.). Stratum plus, №6. (In Russian).
- Orkun, H. N. (1933). Peçenekler. Remzi. Pilipchuk, Ya. V. (2018). Tiurkologicheskie issledovaniia, 1 (4), 5-41. UDK 94(470+571). (In Russian).
- Pletniova, S. A. (2017). Kochevniki iuzhnorusskikh steppei v epokhu srednevekovia (IV-XIII veka). Moskva (Lomonosov). (In Russian).
- Rasovskii, D. A. (2012). Polovtsy. Chernye klobuki. Pechenegi, torki i berendei na Rusi i v Vengrii. Moskva. (In Russian).
- Solov'ev, S.M. (1959). Istoriia Rossii s drevneishikh vremen. T.1, Moskva, p.149. (In Russian).
Abstract
Examining the involvement of the Pechenegs in the ethnopolitical processes of the Southern Russian steppes is crucial for understanding the formation of the ethnic and political map of Eastern Europe during the 10th and 11th centuries. The impact of the Pechenegs on the political situation in this region remains significant for historians and ethnologists. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of the Pechenegs in the ethnopolitical processes of the Southern Russian steppes from the mid-10th century to the mid-11th century. The research focuses on the Pechenegs' contributions to ethnopolitical changes and their interactions with other peoples and states in the region. The study utilizes the works of prominent historians such as N. M. Karamzin, P. A. Golubovsky, S. M. Solov'ev and G. Manuku-Adameshteanu, as well as research by Turkish and Hungarian scholars. The analysis is based on primary sources, including chronicles and archaeological data, as well as secondary historical materials. The study addresses the origin of the name "Pecheneg" and their early homeland. Historians like Tatishchev, Karamzin, and Solovyov present different views on the origins and initial territories of the Pechenegs. Tatishchev associates the Pechenegs with the Sarmatians, while Karamzin and Solovyov identify them as Turkic peoples. The research examines the Pechenegs' influence on ethnopolitical processes in the Southern Russian steppes, including their conflicts with the Bulgars, Hungarians, Khazars, and the Rus state. Golubovsky and Manuku-Adameshteanu highlight the Pechenegs' significant impact on the Hungarians and other regional peoples. The article also explores the Pechenegs' settlement in modern Hungary and their roles as both vassals of the Kievan state and independent political actors in the region's political life. The article concludes that the Pechenegs played a significant role in the ethnopolitical processes of the Southern Russian steppes during the 10th and 11th centuries. Despite losing their political power by the mid-11th century, they had a considerable impact. Further research is needed to fully understand their role in the history of Eastern Europe.
References
- Artamonov, M. I. (1962). Istoriia khazar. Izd-vo Gos. Ermitazha. (In Russian).
- Garustovich, G. N. (2013). Rasprostranenie islama u pechenegov v stepakh Vostochnoi Evropy. Vestnik Akademii Nauk RB, 18 (3). (In Russian).
- Garustovich, G. N., Ivanov, V.A. (2001). Ogusy i pechenegi v Evraziiskikh stepakh. Izd-vo Gilem. Ufa. (In Russian).
- Golubovskii, P. A. (2011). Pechenegi, torki i polovtsy. Rus i step do nasheestviia tatar. Veche. (In Russian).
- Karamzin, N. M. (1878). Istoriia Gosudarstva Rossiiskogo. T.1, izdanie 2-e. Sankt-Peterburg (In Russian).
- Kiseleva, M.V. (2008). Russkiye i pechenegi: ot konflikta k konfederatsii. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnyye nauki, (7), 321-326.
- Kurat, A. N. (1937). Peçenekler Tarihi. Devlet Basımevi.
- Marquart, J. (2009). O proiskhozhdenii naroda kumanov. Perevod s angliiskogo N.I. Khrapunova. Moskva. (In Russian).
- Menuku-Adameshtyanu, G. (2000). Nasheestviia pechenegov na nizhnem Dunai (1027-1048 gg.). Stratum plus, №6. (In Russian).
- Orkun, H. N. (1933). Peçenekler. Remzi. Pilipchuk, Ya. V. (2018). Tiurkologicheskie issledovaniia, 1 (4), 5-41. UDK 94(470+571). (In Russian).
- Pletniova, S. A. (2017). Kochevniki iuzhnorusskikh steppei v epokhu srednevekovia (IV-XIII veka). Moskva (Lomonosov). (In Russian).
- Rasovskii, D. A. (2012). Polovtsy. Chernye klobuki. Pechenegi, torki i berendei na Rusi i v Vengrii. Moskva. (In Russian).
- Solov'ev, S.M. (1959). Istoriia Rossii s drevneishikh vremen. T.1, Moskva, p.149. (In Russian).
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Turkish Society and Community |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Early Pub Date | September 14, 2024 |
| Publication Date | September 22, 2024 |
| Submission Date | July 10, 2024 |
| Acceptance Date | August 15, 2024 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2024 Volume: 11 Issue: 4 |
По всем вопросам приема статей и выпуска очередных номеров обращаться в редакцию соответствующего журнала