Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Diş Hekimliği Öğrencilerinin Fakülte Tercih Nedenleri ve Uzmanlık Eğitimine Bakış Açılarının Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2025, Volume: 35 Issue: 3, 227 - 231, 24.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.17567/currresdentsci.1512912

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğrencilerin diş hekimliği fakültesini tercih etme nedenlerini, lisansüstü uzmanlık eğitiminde hangi bölümlerin daha fazla tercih edildiğini ve alan seçimi üzerinde etkili olan faktörleri belirlemektir.
Yöntem: Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi 1. ve 2. sınıfta öğrenim gören 288 öğrenciye üç temel bölümde toplam 18 soru soruldu. Form, Google Forms web sitesi aracılığıyla çevrimiçi olarak oluşturuldu ve katılımcılara dağıtıldı. Çoktan seçmeli kategorik değişkenlerin analizinde Çoklu Ki-Kare testi kullanıldı.
Bulgular: İstatistiksel analiz sonucunda babanın eğitim düzeyi ile fakülteyi seçme nedenleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Babası okuryazar olan öğrencilerin, diş hekimliği fakültesini daha çok gelir potansiyelinin yüksek olması nedeniyle tercih ettikleri, babası üniversite eğitimi almış olanların ise diş hekimliği fakültesini daha çok kişisel ilgi ve zevk duydukları için tercih ettikleri görülmüştür. Uzmanlık alanı olarak ise Ortodonti ilk sırada yer alırken (%39,4), ikinci sırada Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi bölümü seçilmiş olup (%29,1), en az tercih edilen bölüm ise Oral Diagnoz ve Radyoloji olmuştur (%2,4).
Sonuç: Mezun olduktan sonra iş bulamama korkusu ağır basmakta ve öğrencilerin hem fakülte hem de uzmanlık tercihlerini etkilemektedir. Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, maddi getirisinin yüksek olması ve iş garantisinin yanı sıra, mesleğin manevi yönüne odaklanan geniş bir kesim tarafından topluma faydalı bir insan olması nedeniyle de tercih edilmektedir. Uzmanlık sınavının yalnızca teorik değil pratik uygulama da içerecek şekilde modifiye edilmesi gerekebilir.

References

  • 1. Shaikh H, Choksi D, Idnani B. Posterior composite restoration with stamp technique. Indian J Oral Health Res. 2020;6:29.
  • 2. Nishad SV, Sharma U. Stamp technique for posterior composite restorations–a case report. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2018;17.
  • 3. Alshehadat SA, Halim MS, Carmen K, Fung CS. The stamping technique for direct Class II composite restorations: a case series. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(5):490-493.
  • 4. Duque C, da Silva RC, dos Santos-Pinto L. Treatment options for the occlusal surface of first permanent molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2004;29(1):5-9.
  • 5. Lynch CD, Wilson NHF. Managing the phase-down of amalgam: Part I. Educational and training issues. Br Dent J. 2013;215(3):109-113.
  • 6. Fukazawa S, Odaira C, Kondo H. Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(4):450-459.
  • 7. De Paula Silveira AC, Chaves SB, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by two intraoral cameras. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):386-392.
  • 8. Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(4):554-559.
  • 9. Seo D, Yi Y, Roh B. The effect of preparation designs on the marginal and internal gaps in Cerec3 partial ceramic crowns. J Dent. 2009;37(5):374-382.
  • 10. Sandoval MJ, Rocca GT, Krejci I, Mandikos M, Dietschi D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(9):2167-2177.
  • 11. D’Arcangelo C, Zarow M, De Angelis F, Vadini M, Paolantonio M, Giannoni M, et al. A five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations was luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):615-624.
  • 12. Zimmer S, Göhlich O, Rüttermann S, Lang H, Raab WH, Barthel CR. Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study. Oper Dent. 2008;33(5):484-487.
  • 13. Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res. 2014;58(4):208-216.
  • 14. Reshawn MI, Kolli S. Knowledge, attitude, and practice survey on the use of stamp technique for managing Class I caries in molars among undergraduate students in dental schools. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022;13(4):421.
  • 15. Reifeis PE, Kirkup ML, Willis LH, Browning WD. Introducing CAD/CAM into a predoctoral dental curriculum: a case study. J Dent Educ. 2014;78(10):1432-1441.
  • 16. Browning WD, Reifeis P, Willis L, Kirkup ML. Including CAD/CAM dentistry in a dental school curriculum. J Indiana Dent Assoc. 2013;92(4):40-45,47.
  • 17. Schwindling FS, Deisenhofer UK, Porsche M, Rammelsberg P, Kappel S, Stober T. Establishing CAD/CAM in preclinical dental education: evaluation of hands-on module. J Dent Educ. 2015;79(10):1215-1221.
  • 18. Brownstein SA, Murad A, Hunt RJ. Implementation of new technologies in U.S. dental school curricula. J Dent Educ. 2015;79(3):259-264.
  • 19. Fernandez MA, Nimmo A, Behar-Horentsein LS. Digital denture fabrication in pre- and postdoctoral education: a survey of U.S. dental schools. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(1):83-90.
  • 20. Jayadevan A, G GM. Microbrush stamp technique to achieve occlusal topography for composite resin restorations - a technical report. J Sci Dent. 2016;6(2):76.
  • 21. Tambake NJ, Tambake S, Gandhi N, Jadhav Y, Madhu K, Burad P. Stamp technique: a new perspective of esthetic dentistry: a case report. J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(6):49-51.
  • 22. Patil SB, Durairaj D, Kumar GS, Karthikeyan D, Pradeep D. Comparison of extended nasolabial flap versus buccal fat pad graft in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a prospective pilot study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017;16(3):312-321.
  • 23. Alshehadat SA, Halim MS, Carmen K, Fung CS. The stamping technique for direct Class II composite restorations: a case series. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(5):490-493.

Evaluation of Dentistry Students' Reasons for Choosing The Faculty of Dentistry and Perspectives on Specialization Education

Year 2025, Volume: 35 Issue: 3, 227 - 231, 24.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.17567/currresdentsci.1512912

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the factors affecting students' decision to choose the faculty of dentistry, which departments are preferred in post-graduate specialization education, and the factors that affect their decision on the field of specialization.
Methods: A total of 18 questions were asked in three basic sections to 288 dentistry students. The form was created online via the Google Forms website and distributed to participants. Multiple Chi-Square analysis was used in the analysis of multiple-choice categorical variables.
Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the father's education level and the reasons for choosing the faculty because of the binary analysis (p <0.05). It was observed that students whose fathers were literate tended to choose the dentistry faculty more due to the higher income potential, while those whose fathers had university education tended to choose it more for personal interest and enjoyment. As for the specialization, Orthodontics ranked first (39.4%), followed by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (29.1%), and Oral Diagnosis and Radiology was the least preferred option (2.4%).
Conclusion: The fear of not being able to find a job after graduation dominates and affects students' choices of both faculty and specialization. In addition to its high financial returns and job guarantee, the Faculty of Dentistry is preferred by a wide segment of people who focus on the spiritual aspect of the profession, as it is beneficial to society. The specialization exam may need to be modified to include not only theory but also practical application.

References

  • 1. Shaikh H, Choksi D, Idnani B. Posterior composite restoration with stamp technique. Indian J Oral Health Res. 2020;6:29.
  • 2. Nishad SV, Sharma U. Stamp technique for posterior composite restorations–a case report. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2018;17.
  • 3. Alshehadat SA, Halim MS, Carmen K, Fung CS. The stamping technique for direct Class II composite restorations: a case series. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(5):490-493.
  • 4. Duque C, da Silva RC, dos Santos-Pinto L. Treatment options for the occlusal surface of first permanent molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2004;29(1):5-9.
  • 5. Lynch CD, Wilson NHF. Managing the phase-down of amalgam: Part I. Educational and training issues. Br Dent J. 2013;215(3):109-113.
  • 6. Fukazawa S, Odaira C, Kondo H. Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(4):450-459.
  • 7. De Paula Silveira AC, Chaves SB, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by two intraoral cameras. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):386-392.
  • 8. Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(4):554-559.
  • 9. Seo D, Yi Y, Roh B. The effect of preparation designs on the marginal and internal gaps in Cerec3 partial ceramic crowns. J Dent. 2009;37(5):374-382.
  • 10. Sandoval MJ, Rocca GT, Krejci I, Mandikos M, Dietschi D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(9):2167-2177.
  • 11. D’Arcangelo C, Zarow M, De Angelis F, Vadini M, Paolantonio M, Giannoni M, et al. A five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations was luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):615-624.
  • 12. Zimmer S, Göhlich O, Rüttermann S, Lang H, Raab WH, Barthel CR. Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study. Oper Dent. 2008;33(5):484-487.
  • 13. Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res. 2014;58(4):208-216.
  • 14. Reshawn MI, Kolli S. Knowledge, attitude, and practice survey on the use of stamp technique for managing Class I caries in molars among undergraduate students in dental schools. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022;13(4):421.
  • 15. Reifeis PE, Kirkup ML, Willis LH, Browning WD. Introducing CAD/CAM into a predoctoral dental curriculum: a case study. J Dent Educ. 2014;78(10):1432-1441.
  • 16. Browning WD, Reifeis P, Willis L, Kirkup ML. Including CAD/CAM dentistry in a dental school curriculum. J Indiana Dent Assoc. 2013;92(4):40-45,47.
  • 17. Schwindling FS, Deisenhofer UK, Porsche M, Rammelsberg P, Kappel S, Stober T. Establishing CAD/CAM in preclinical dental education: evaluation of hands-on module. J Dent Educ. 2015;79(10):1215-1221.
  • 18. Brownstein SA, Murad A, Hunt RJ. Implementation of new technologies in U.S. dental school curricula. J Dent Educ. 2015;79(3):259-264.
  • 19. Fernandez MA, Nimmo A, Behar-Horentsein LS. Digital denture fabrication in pre- and postdoctoral education: a survey of U.S. dental schools. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(1):83-90.
  • 20. Jayadevan A, G GM. Microbrush stamp technique to achieve occlusal topography for composite resin restorations - a technical report. J Sci Dent. 2016;6(2):76.
  • 21. Tambake NJ, Tambake S, Gandhi N, Jadhav Y, Madhu K, Burad P. Stamp technique: a new perspective of esthetic dentistry: a case report. J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(6):49-51.
  • 22. Patil SB, Durairaj D, Kumar GS, Karthikeyan D, Pradeep D. Comparison of extended nasolabial flap versus buccal fat pad graft in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a prospective pilot study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017;16(3):312-321.
  • 23. Alshehadat SA, Halim MS, Carmen K, Fung CS. The stamping technique for direct Class II composite restorations: a case series. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(5):490-493.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry (Other)
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Büşra Tosun 0000-0003-3145-4454

Nur Uysal 0009-0006-5426-4935

Publication Date July 24, 2025
Submission Date July 9, 2024
Acceptance Date August 14, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 35 Issue: 3

Cite

AMA Tosun B, Uysal N. Evaluation of Dentistry Students’ Reasons for Choosing The Faculty of Dentistry and Perspectives on Specialization Education. Curr Res Dent Sci. July 2025;35(3):227-231. doi:10.17567/currresdentsci.1512912

Current Research in Dental Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.                34333

29936