Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Secondary School Students' Academic Risk Taking Behaviors: A Scale Development Study

Year 2013, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 1 - 28, 14.01.2013

Arş.grv.mustafa İlhan , Doçdr.bayram Çetin

Abstract

 Extended Abstract

Purpose: The present study aims to develop a valid and reliable instrument for measuring secondary school students' mathematics-oriented academic risk taking behavior.
Method: The participants were 553 secondary school students studying in Manisa and Batman in 2011-2012 academic year first semester and comprised three study groups. Expert opinion was consulted with regard to the scale's content and face validity. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed in order to measure the scale's construct validity. For criterion related validity the correlation Mathematics-Oriented Academic Risk Taking Scale (MOARTS) and Academic Expectations Stress Inventory (AESI) was calculated. The reliability of the MOARTS was tested through such coefficients as internal consistency, split-half and test retest. The item discrimination of the MOARTS was calculated through the corrected item total correlation and a comparison between the top and bottom 27% groups. The validity and reliability analyzes were carried out with SPSS 20.0 and LISREL 8.54
Results: According to first EFA results, a three-factor structure which explained 48.84% of the total variance was obtained. Taking into consideration the items' content and theoretical structure, the primary factor was named Tendency to Difficult Tasks (TDT) the second factor was named Tendency to Negativity Following Failure (TNFF) and the third factor was named Tendency to Recovery Following Failure (TRFF). In order to understand whether the 24 items and three-factor structure obtained as a result of the EFA gives adequate goodness of fit indices, and to obtain further support for construct validity, CFA was performed. The CFA findings from have shown that the scale has adequate goodness of fit indices [χ2/sd=2.54, CFI=.96, NFI=.93, NNFI=95, RFI=.92, IFI=.96, RMSEA=.069 and SRMR=.060]. According to concurrent validity results, there is a negative relationship between AESI and MOARTS; TDT, TRFF [n=119 and respectively, r=-.51, r=-.43, r=-23; p<.001], and there is a positive relationship between AESI and TNFF [n=119, r=.45, p<.001]. These findings have been regarded as proof that MOARTS has concurrent validity. The reliability analysis showed that the internal consistency coefficients were .89, .90, .74 and .80 for the MOARTS, TDT, TNFF and TRFF respectively. On the other hand, the split-half coefficients .74, .90, .74 and .79 for MOARTS, TDT, TNFF and TRFF respectively whereas the test retest coefficients were .95, .96, .90 and .88 for MOARTS, TDT, TNFF and TRFF respectively. The item analysis reported that the corrected item total correlations ranged from .40 and .73 and the differences between the top and bottom 27% groups were significant for all the items included in the scale.
Conclusion: In light of the findings it could be argued that the scale is reliable and valid and can be used in order to test secondary school students' mathematics-oriented academic risk taking behaviors.

Keywords

Mathematics-Oriented Academic Risk Taking Mathematics-Oriented Academic Risk Taking Scale Reliability Validity.

References

  • Afifi, A., & Clark, V. (2004). Computer-aided multivariate analysis. Boca Raton, Fl: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Akbaba, S. (2006). Eğitimde motivasyon. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 343-361.
  • Akbaş, A., & Kan, A. (2007). Affective factors that influence chemistry achievement (motivation and anxiety) and the power of these factors to predict chemistry achievement-II. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 4(1), 10-19.
  • Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık.
  • Ali, M.F., & Ismail, A.M. (2005). An investigation of the relationships between EFL pre-service teachers' epistemological beliefs and their learning strategies teaching practices and foreign language classroom anxiety. Journal of Scientific Research in Education and Psychology, 18(3), 1-33.
  • Altun, F., & Yazıcı, H. (2010, Kasım). Öğrencilerin olumlu ve olumsuz mükemmeliyetçilik özellikleri ile akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişkiler. Uluslararası Eğitimde Yeni Yönelimler ve Yansımaları Konferansı’nda sunulmuş sözlü bildiri. Antalya.
  • Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and classroom motivational climate. In J. Meece and D. Schunk (Eds.). Students’ Perceptions in the Classroom (pp. 327–348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267.
  • Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing. New York: Mac Millan Publishing Co. Inc.
  • Bacanlı, H. (2006). Duyuşsal davranış eğitimi. Ankara: Nobel yayın Dağıtım.
  • Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 210-223.
  • Bentler, P.M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
  • Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
  • Bloom, S.B. (1979). İnsan nitelikleri ve okulda öğrenme (Çeviri: D.A. Özçelik). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
  • Bordens, K.S. & Abbott, B.B. (2011). Research design and methods: A process approach. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • Bråten, I., & Stromso, H.I. (2004). Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 371-388.
  • Bråten, I., & Stromso, H.I. (2006). Predicting achievement goals in two different academic contexts: A longitudinal study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 127-48.
  • Brown, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. Bollen & J. Long, (Eds), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136–162). London: Sage Publications.
  • Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  • Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Byrne, B., & Campbell, T.L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A Look Beneath the Surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(5), 555-574.
  • Cattell, R.B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.
  • Chai, C.S., Khine, M.S., & Teo, T. (2006): Epistemological beliefs on teaching and learning: A survey among pre‐service teachers in Singapore. Educational Media International, 43(4), 285-298.
  • Chastain, K. (1975). Affective and ability factors in second-language acquisition. Language Learning, 25(1), 153-161.
  • Clifford, M.M. (1988). Failure tolerance and academic risk taking in ten-to twelve-year-old students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 15-27.
  • Clifford, M.M. (1991). Risk taking: Theoretical, empirical and educational considerations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 263-297.
  • Clifford, M.M. & Chou, F. (1991). Effects of pay off and task context on academic risk taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 499–507.
  • Costello, A.B. & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
  • Cramer, D. (2003). Advanced quantitative data analysis. Philadelphia: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Croceker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper Row.
  • Çiftçi, S. (2006). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde proje tabanlı öğrenmenin öğrencilerin akademik risk alma düzeylerine, problem çözme becerilerine, erişilerine kalıcılığa ve tutumlarına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Demirbaş, M., & Yağbasan, R. (2006). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde sosyal öğrenme teorisine dayalı öğretim etkinliklerinin, öğrencilerin bilimsel tutumlarına olan etkisinin incelenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 170, 320–338.
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  • Dinnel, D.L., Brittain, T., Thompson, T., Johnson, K., King, M. & Pust, K. (2002, August). A structural model of self-worth protection and achievement: goals, evaluative anxiety, attributions, self- esteem and uncertainty. Poster Presentations in the second Biennial Self-Concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation (SELF) Research Centre International Conference, Sydney, Australia.
  • Domino, G., & Domino, M.L. (2006). Psychological testing: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Drew, P.Y., & Watkins, D. (1998). Affective variables, learning approaches and academic achievement: A causal modeling investigation with Hong Kong tertiary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 173-188.
  • Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 43-59.
  • Erden, M., & Akman, Y. (2011). Gelişim ve öğrenme. Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınevi.
  • Erkuş, A. (2012). Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  • Esen Kıran, B. (2005). Ergenlerde risk alma davranışı ile akademik başarının incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(29), 8-13.
  • Everitt, B. & Hothorn, T. (2011). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis with R. Springer.
  • Ferguson, E. & Cox, T. (1993). Exploratory factor analysis: A users’ guide. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1(2), 84–94.
  • Foster, J. (2002). Data analysis using SPSS for windows (v8-10). London: Sage Publications.
  • Fraenkel, J.R., Wallend, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Gömleksiz, M.N., & Yüksel, Y. (2003). İlköğretim 4. ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersine ilişkin kaygıları. Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Araştırmaları, 3, 71-81.
  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Grablowsky, B.J. (1979). Multivariate data analysis. Tulsa, OK: Pipe Books.
  • Hair, J.F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
  • Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33–46.
  • Hemmings, B., Grootenboer, P., & Kay, R. (2011). Predicting mathematics achievement: The influence of prior achievement and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 691-705.
  • Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112- 126.
  • House, D.J. (2002). An investigation of the effects of gender and academic self-efficacy on academic risk- taking for adolescent students. UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations. Umi Number: 3066174.
  • Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Hunter, M.A. (1982). Affective differences between learning disabled and normally achieving adolescents. Unpublished Master Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Hutcheson, G. & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist. London: Sage.
  • Jonsson, A.C., Beach, D., Korp, H., & Erlandson, P. (2012). Teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence: Influences from different disciplines and scientific theories. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 387-400.
  • Jones, K. (1964). Interest, motivation, and achievement in science. The Journal of Experimental Education. 33(1), 41-53.
  • Kelecioğlu, H., & Bilge, K. (2009). Akademik beklentilere ilişkin stres envanterinin uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 148-157.
  • Kline, R.B. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.
  • Kahn, J.H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 684-718.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). Faktör analizi. Ş. Kalaycı, (Ed.), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri içinde (234-255). Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kılıç, A. (2002). Duyuşsal alan özellikleri ve bireye kazandırılması. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8, 153- 164.
  • Kocovski, N.L., &Endler, N.S. (2000). Social anxiety, self-regulation, and fear of negative evaluation. European Journal of Personality, 14, 347–358.
  • Koller, O., Baumert, J. & Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 448-470.
  • Korkmaz, H. (2002). Fen eğitiminde proje tabanlı öğrenmenin yaratıcı düşünme, problem çözme ve akademik risk alma düzeylerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Kuzgun, Y. (2006). İlgiler. Y. Kuzgun ve D. Deryakulu, (Ed.), Eğitimde Bireysel Farklılıklar içinde (73- 96). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Lebens, M., Graff, M., & Mayer, P. (2011). The affective dimensions of mathematical difficulties in school children. Education Research International, 20, 1-13.
  • Leech, N.L. Barlett, K.C., & Morgan, G.A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics; use and interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Leung, H.-K., & Man, Y.-K. (2005, May). Relationships between affective constructs and mathematics achievement: A modeling approach. Paper Presented at Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference: Research, Policy, Practice, Singapore.
  • Lucas, P.L. (1998). The relation of gender and attitudes to math achievement levels among fourth, fifth, and sixth grade students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia University, Morgantown.
  • Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J. & Peschar, J.L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311-360.
  • Martin, C.R. & Newell, R.J. (2004). Factor structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in individuals with facial disfigurement. Psychology Health and Medicine, 3, 327-336.
  • Middleton, J.A. & Spanias, P.A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65-88.
  • Mohsenpour, M., Hejazi, E., & Kiamanesh, A.R. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, achievement goals, learning strategies and persistence in math achievement of 11th grade high school students in Tehran. Journal of Educational Innovations, 24, 153-172.
  • Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Myers, M.D., Nichols, J.D., & White, J. (2003). Teacher and student incremental and entity views of intelligence: the effects of self-regulation and persistence activities. International Journal of Educational Reform, 12(2), 97-117.
  • Neihart, M. (2010). Systematic risk-taking. Roeper Review, 21(4), 289-292.
  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oliver, J.S., & Simpson, R.D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self-concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 72 (7), 345-351.
  • Özkan, H.H. (2005). Öğrenme öğretme modelleri açısından modüler öğretim. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 117-128.
  • Özyılmaz Akamca, G. (2008). İlköğretimde analojiler, kavram karikatürleri ve tahmin-gözlem-açıklama teknikleriyle desteklenmiş fen ve teknoloji eğitiminin öğrenme ürünlerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows. Australia: Australian Copyright.
  • Parker, W.D. (2000). Healthy perfectionism in the gifted. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(4), 173-183.
  • Pedhazur, E.J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: explanation and prediction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Ram, A. (2005). The relationship of positive and negative perfectionism to academic achievement, achievement motivation, and well-being in tertiary students. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
  • Renninger, K.A. & Hidi, S. & Krapp, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Richardson, F.C., & Suinn, R.M. (1982). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551–554.
  • Robinson, L.E. (2011). Academic risk-taking in an online environment. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  • Robinson, L.E., & Bell, A. (2012, June). Exploring adult risk propensity and academic risk-taking within the online learning environment. Paper presented at the Adult Education Research Conference (AERC), Saratoga Springs.
  • Schriesheim, C.A., & Eisenbach, R.J. (1995). An exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic investigation of item wording effects on obtained factor structures of survey questionnaire measures. Journal of Management, 6, 1177-1193.
  • Schunk, D.H. (1995). Self-Efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112-137.
  • Shaha, S.H. (1983). Cognitive and affective processes related to school achievement: Implications for assessment. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation. (No. 195).
  • Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate techniques. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
  • Sing, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.
  • Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, S., & Çinko, M. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS’le veri analizi. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
  • Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Self-concept and self-efficacy in Mathematics: Relation with mathematics motivation and achievement. Joumal of Education Research, 3(3), 255-278.
  • Skaar, N.R. (2009). Development of the adolescent exploratory and risk behavior rating scale. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Minnesota University, Minneapolis, Saint Paul, ABD.
  • Soleymani, B., & Rekabdar, G. (2010). The relationship between perfectionism dimensions and mathematics performance in Iranian students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 453- 457.
  • Stangor, C. (2010). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Wadsworth.
  • Steiner, L.A. (2007). The effect of personal and epistemological beliefs on performance in a college developmental mathematics class. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas.
  • Soleymani, B., & Rekabdar, G. (2010). The relationship between perfectionism dimensions and mathematics performance in Iranian students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 453- 457.
  • Strum, İ.S. (1971). The relationship of creativity and academic risk-taking among fifth graders: Final report. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED046212.
  • Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenirlik ve geçerlilik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Şeker, H., & Gençdoğan, B. (2006). Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2009). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Tay, B., Özkan, D., & Akyürek Tay, B. (2009). The effect of academic risk taking levels on the problem solving ability of gifted students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1099-1104.
  • Tekin, H. (2009). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.
  • Tezbaşaran, A. (1997). Likert tipi ölçek hazırlama kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.
  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Tobias, S. (1991). Overcoming math anxiety. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Tocci, C.M., & Engelhard, G.Jr. (1991). Achievement, parental support, and gender differences in attitudes toward mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 84(5), 280-286.
  • Tok, Ş. (2008). Fen bilgisi dersinde yansıtıcı düşünme etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına ve fen bilgisi dersine yönelik tutumlarına etkisi. İlköğretim Online, 7(3), 557-568.
  • Tsui, J.M., & Mazzocco, M.M. (2006). Effects of math anxiety and perfectionism on timed versus untimed math testing in mathematically gifted sixth graders. Roeper Review, 29(2), 132-139.
  • Turgut, M.F. (1997). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme metotları. Ankara. Yargıcı Matbaası.
  • Urbina, S. (2004). Essentials of psychological testing. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
  • Volet, S.E. (1997). Cognitive and affective variables in academic learning: The significance of direction and effort in students’ goals. Learning and instruction, 7(3), 235-254.
  • White, A.L., Way, J., Perry, B. & Southwell, B. (2006). Mathematical attitudes, beliefs and achievement in primary pre-service mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 7, 33-52.
  • Wigfield, A. & Wentzel, K.R. (2007). Introduction to motivation at school: Interventions that work. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 191-196.
  • Yenilmez, K. (2010). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin matematik dersine yönelik umutsuzluk düzeyleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, 307-317.

Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Matematik Odaklı Akademik Risk Alma Davranışları: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması

Year 2013, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 1 - 28, 14.01.2013

Arş.grv.mustafa İlhan , Doçdr.bayram Çetin

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, matematik odaklı akademik risk alma davranışını geçerli ve güvenilir olarak ölçemeye olanak tanıyacak bir ölçme aracının geliştirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmanın katılımcılarını, 2012-2013 Eğitim-Öğretim Yılı Güz Döneminde Manisa ve Batman illerinden toplam 553 ortaokul öğrencisi oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada ölçeğin kapsam ve görünüş geçerliği için uzman görüşüne başvurulmuştur. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği için Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) uygulanmıştır. AFA’da sonucunda, toplam varyansın %48.84’ünü açıklayan, 24 madde ve üç faktörden oluşan bir yapı elde edilmiştir. Ortaya çıkan faktörler; Güç İşlemleri Tercih Etme Eğilimi (GİTE), Başarısızlık Sonrası Olumsuzluk Eğilimi (BSOE) ve Başarısızlık Sonrası Toparlanma Eğilimi (BSTE) olarak adlandırılmıştır. DFA’dan elde edilen bulgular, MOARAÖ’ye ilişkin 24 madde ve üç faktörden oluşan yapının yeterli uyum indekslerine sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. MOARAÖ’nün uyum geçerliği için, öğrencilerin ölçeğin alt boyutlarından aldıkları puanlar ile Akademik Beklentilere İlişkin Stres Envanteri’nden (ABSE) aldıkları puanlar arasındaki korelasyon hesaplanmıştır. Korelasyon analizinden elde edilen bulgular, ABSE’nin MOARAÖ’nün geneli, GİTE ve BSTE alt ölçekleri ile negatif; BSOE alt ölçeği ile pozitif anlamlı ilişki içersinde olduğunu göstermiştir. Korelasyon analizinden elde edilen bulgular MOARAÖ’nün uyum geçerliğinin sağlandığına yönelik bir kanıt olarak değerlendirilmiştir. MOARAÖ’nün geneli ile GİTE, BSOE ve BSTE alt ölçeklerinin güvenirliği iç tutarlılık, test yarılama ve test tekrar test yöntemleriyle incelenmiştir. Hesaplanan güvenirlik katsayılarının kabul edilebilir sınırlar içerisinde yer aldığı belirlenmiştir. MOARAÖ’de yer alan maddelerin ayırt edicilikleri için düzeltilmiş madde toplam korelasyonu ile %27’lik alt üst grup karşılaştırmalarına yer verilmiştir. Madde analizi sonucunda, düzeltilmiş madde toplam korelasyonlarının .40 ile .73 arasında değiştiği ve %27’lik alt-üst grupların ortalamaları arasındaki farkların ölçekte yer alan tüm maddeler için anlamlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu bulgulara dayanarak, ölçeğin ortaokul öğrencilerinin matematik odaklı akademik risk alma davranışlarını ölçmek amacıyla kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu söylenebilir

Keywords

Matematik odaklı akademik risk alma ölçeği Geçerlik Güvenirlik Mathematics-Oriented Academic Risk Taking

References

  • Afifi, A., & Clark, V. (2004). Computer-aided multivariate analysis. Boca Raton, Fl: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Akbaba, S. (2006). Eğitimde motivasyon. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 343-361.
  • Akbaş, A., & Kan, A. (2007). Affective factors that influence chemistry achievement (motivation and anxiety) and the power of these factors to predict chemistry achievement-II. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 4(1), 10-19.
  • Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık.
  • Ali, M.F., & Ismail, A.M. (2005). An investigation of the relationships between EFL pre-service teachers' epistemological beliefs and their learning strategies teaching practices and foreign language classroom anxiety. Journal of Scientific Research in Education and Psychology, 18(3), 1-33.
  • Altun, F., & Yazıcı, H. (2010, Kasım). Öğrencilerin olumlu ve olumsuz mükemmeliyetçilik özellikleri ile akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişkiler. Uluslararası Eğitimde Yeni Yönelimler ve Yansımaları Konferansı’nda sunulmuş sözlü bildiri. Antalya.
  • Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and classroom motivational climate. In J. Meece and D. Schunk (Eds.). Students’ Perceptions in the Classroom (pp. 327–348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267.
  • Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing. New York: Mac Millan Publishing Co. Inc.
  • Bacanlı, H. (2006). Duyuşsal davranış eğitimi. Ankara: Nobel yayın Dağıtım.
  • Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 210-223.
  • Bentler, P.M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
  • Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
  • Bloom, S.B. (1979). İnsan nitelikleri ve okulda öğrenme (Çeviri: D.A. Özçelik). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
  • Bordens, K.S. & Abbott, B.B. (2011). Research design and methods: A process approach. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • Bråten, I., & Stromso, H.I. (2004). Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 371-388.
  • Bråten, I., & Stromso, H.I. (2006). Predicting achievement goals in two different academic contexts: A longitudinal study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 127-48.
  • Brown, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. Bollen & J. Long, (Eds), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136–162). London: Sage Publications.
  • Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  • Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Byrne, B., & Campbell, T.L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A Look Beneath the Surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(5), 555-574.
  • Cattell, R.B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.
  • Chai, C.S., Khine, M.S., & Teo, T. (2006): Epistemological beliefs on teaching and learning: A survey among pre‐service teachers in Singapore. Educational Media International, 43(4), 285-298.
  • Chastain, K. (1975). Affective and ability factors in second-language acquisition. Language Learning, 25(1), 153-161.
  • Clifford, M.M. (1988). Failure tolerance and academic risk taking in ten-to twelve-year-old students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 15-27.
  • Clifford, M.M. (1991). Risk taking: Theoretical, empirical and educational considerations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 263-297.
  • Clifford, M.M. & Chou, F. (1991). Effects of pay off and task context on academic risk taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 499–507.
  • Costello, A.B. & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
  • Cramer, D. (2003). Advanced quantitative data analysis. Philadelphia: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Croceker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper Row.
  • Çiftçi, S. (2006). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde proje tabanlı öğrenmenin öğrencilerin akademik risk alma düzeylerine, problem çözme becerilerine, erişilerine kalıcılığa ve tutumlarına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Demirbaş, M., & Yağbasan, R. (2006). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde sosyal öğrenme teorisine dayalı öğretim etkinliklerinin, öğrencilerin bilimsel tutumlarına olan etkisinin incelenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 170, 320–338.
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  • Dinnel, D.L., Brittain, T., Thompson, T., Johnson, K., King, M. & Pust, K. (2002, August). A structural model of self-worth protection and achievement: goals, evaluative anxiety, attributions, self- esteem and uncertainty. Poster Presentations in the second Biennial Self-Concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation (SELF) Research Centre International Conference, Sydney, Australia.
  • Domino, G., & Domino, M.L. (2006). Psychological testing: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Drew, P.Y., & Watkins, D. (1998). Affective variables, learning approaches and academic achievement: A causal modeling investigation with Hong Kong tertiary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 173-188.
  • Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 43-59.
  • Erden, M., & Akman, Y. (2011). Gelişim ve öğrenme. Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınevi.
  • Erkuş, A. (2012). Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  • Esen Kıran, B. (2005). Ergenlerde risk alma davranışı ile akademik başarının incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(29), 8-13.
  • Everitt, B. & Hothorn, T. (2011). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis with R. Springer.
  • Ferguson, E. & Cox, T. (1993). Exploratory factor analysis: A users’ guide. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1(2), 84–94.
  • Foster, J. (2002). Data analysis using SPSS for windows (v8-10). London: Sage Publications.
  • Fraenkel, J.R., Wallend, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Gömleksiz, M.N., & Yüksel, Y. (2003). İlköğretim 4. ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersine ilişkin kaygıları. Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Araştırmaları, 3, 71-81.
  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Grablowsky, B.J. (1979). Multivariate data analysis. Tulsa, OK: Pipe Books.
  • Hair, J.F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
  • Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33–46.
  • Hemmings, B., Grootenboer, P., & Kay, R. (2011). Predicting mathematics achievement: The influence of prior achievement and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 691-705.
  • Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112- 126.
  • House, D.J. (2002). An investigation of the effects of gender and academic self-efficacy on academic risk- taking for adolescent students. UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations. Umi Number: 3066174.
  • Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Hunter, M.A. (1982). Affective differences between learning disabled and normally achieving adolescents. Unpublished Master Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Hutcheson, G. & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist. London: Sage.
  • Jonsson, A.C., Beach, D., Korp, H., & Erlandson, P. (2012). Teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence: Influences from different disciplines and scientific theories. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 387-400.
  • Jones, K. (1964). Interest, motivation, and achievement in science. The Journal of Experimental Education. 33(1), 41-53.
  • Kelecioğlu, H., & Bilge, K. (2009). Akademik beklentilere ilişkin stres envanterinin uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 148-157.
  • Kline, R.B. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.
  • Kahn, J.H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 684-718.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). Faktör analizi. Ş. Kalaycı, (Ed.), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri içinde (234-255). Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kılıç, A. (2002). Duyuşsal alan özellikleri ve bireye kazandırılması. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8, 153- 164.
  • Kocovski, N.L., &Endler, N.S. (2000). Social anxiety, self-regulation, and fear of negative evaluation. European Journal of Personality, 14, 347–358.
  • Koller, O., Baumert, J. & Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 448-470.
  • Korkmaz, H. (2002). Fen eğitiminde proje tabanlı öğrenmenin yaratıcı düşünme, problem çözme ve akademik risk alma düzeylerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Kuzgun, Y. (2006). İlgiler. Y. Kuzgun ve D. Deryakulu, (Ed.), Eğitimde Bireysel Farklılıklar içinde (73- 96). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Lebens, M., Graff, M., & Mayer, P. (2011). The affective dimensions of mathematical difficulties in school children. Education Research International, 20, 1-13.
  • Leech, N.L. Barlett, K.C., & Morgan, G.A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics; use and interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Leung, H.-K., & Man, Y.-K. (2005, May). Relationships between affective constructs and mathematics achievement: A modeling approach. Paper Presented at Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference: Research, Policy, Practice, Singapore.
  • Lucas, P.L. (1998). The relation of gender and attitudes to math achievement levels among fourth, fifth, and sixth grade students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia University, Morgantown.
  • Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J. & Peschar, J.L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311-360.
  • Martin, C.R. & Newell, R.J. (2004). Factor structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in individuals with facial disfigurement. Psychology Health and Medicine, 3, 327-336.
  • Middleton, J.A. & Spanias, P.A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65-88.
  • Mohsenpour, M., Hejazi, E., & Kiamanesh, A.R. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, achievement goals, learning strategies and persistence in math achievement of 11th grade high school students in Tehran. Journal of Educational Innovations, 24, 153-172.
  • Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Myers, M.D., Nichols, J.D., & White, J. (2003). Teacher and student incremental and entity views of intelligence: the effects of self-regulation and persistence activities. International Journal of Educational Reform, 12(2), 97-117.
  • Neihart, M. (2010). Systematic risk-taking. Roeper Review, 21(4), 289-292.
  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oliver, J.S., & Simpson, R.D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self-concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 72 (7), 345-351.
  • Özkan, H.H. (2005). Öğrenme öğretme modelleri açısından modüler öğretim. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 117-128.
  • Özyılmaz Akamca, G. (2008). İlköğretimde analojiler, kavram karikatürleri ve tahmin-gözlem-açıklama teknikleriyle desteklenmiş fen ve teknoloji eğitiminin öğrenme ürünlerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows. Australia: Australian Copyright.
  • Parker, W.D. (2000). Healthy perfectionism in the gifted. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(4), 173-183.
  • Pedhazur, E.J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: explanation and prediction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Ram, A. (2005). The relationship of positive and negative perfectionism to academic achievement, achievement motivation, and well-being in tertiary students. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
  • Renninger, K.A. & Hidi, S. & Krapp, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Richardson, F.C., & Suinn, R.M. (1982). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551–554.
  • Robinson, L.E. (2011). Academic risk-taking in an online environment. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  • Robinson, L.E., & Bell, A. (2012, June). Exploring adult risk propensity and academic risk-taking within the online learning environment. Paper presented at the Adult Education Research Conference (AERC), Saratoga Springs.
  • Schriesheim, C.A., & Eisenbach, R.J. (1995). An exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic investigation of item wording effects on obtained factor structures of survey questionnaire measures. Journal of Management, 6, 1177-1193.
  • Schunk, D.H. (1995). Self-Efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112-137.
  • Shaha, S.H. (1983). Cognitive and affective processes related to school achievement: Implications for assessment. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation. (No. 195).
  • Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate techniques. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
  • Sing, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.
  • Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, S., & Çinko, M. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS’le veri analizi. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
  • Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Self-concept and self-efficacy in Mathematics: Relation with mathematics motivation and achievement. Joumal of Education Research, 3(3), 255-278.
  • Skaar, N.R. (2009). Development of the adolescent exploratory and risk behavior rating scale. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Minnesota University, Minneapolis, Saint Paul, ABD.
  • Soleymani, B., & Rekabdar, G. (2010). The relationship between perfectionism dimensions and mathematics performance in Iranian students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 453- 457.
  • Stangor, C. (2010). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Wadsworth.
  • Steiner, L.A. (2007). The effect of personal and epistemological beliefs on performance in a college developmental mathematics class. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas.
  • Soleymani, B., & Rekabdar, G. (2010). The relationship between perfectionism dimensions and mathematics performance in Iranian students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 453- 457.
  • Strum, İ.S. (1971). The relationship of creativity and academic risk-taking among fifth graders: Final report. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED046212.
  • Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenirlik ve geçerlilik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Şeker, H., & Gençdoğan, B. (2006). Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2009). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Tay, B., Özkan, D., & Akyürek Tay, B. (2009). The effect of academic risk taking levels on the problem solving ability of gifted students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1099-1104.
  • Tekin, H. (2009). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.
  • Tezbaşaran, A. (1997). Likert tipi ölçek hazırlama kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.
  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Tobias, S. (1991). Overcoming math anxiety. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Tocci, C.M., & Engelhard, G.Jr. (1991). Achievement, parental support, and gender differences in attitudes toward mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 84(5), 280-286.
  • Tok, Ş. (2008). Fen bilgisi dersinde yansıtıcı düşünme etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına ve fen bilgisi dersine yönelik tutumlarına etkisi. İlköğretim Online, 7(3), 557-568.
  • Tsui, J.M., & Mazzocco, M.M. (2006). Effects of math anxiety and perfectionism on timed versus untimed math testing in mathematically gifted sixth graders. Roeper Review, 29(2), 132-139.
  • Turgut, M.F. (1997). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme metotları. Ankara. Yargıcı Matbaası.
  • Urbina, S. (2004). Essentials of psychological testing. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
  • Volet, S.E. (1997). Cognitive and affective variables in academic learning: The significance of direction and effort in students’ goals. Learning and instruction, 7(3), 235-254.
  • White, A.L., Way, J., Perry, B. & Southwell, B. (2006). Mathematical attitudes, beliefs and achievement in primary pre-service mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 7, 33-52.
  • Wigfield, A. & Wentzel, K.R. (2007). Introduction to motivation at school: Interventions that work. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 191-196.
  • Yenilmez, K. (2010). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin matematik dersine yönelik umutsuzluk düzeyleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, 307-317.
There are 124 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Educational Sciences and Sciences of Field Education
Authors

Arş.grv.mustafa İlhan

Doçdr.bayram Çetin

Publication Date January 14, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Cite

APA İlhan, A., & Çetin, D. (2013). Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Matematik Odaklı Akademik Risk Alma Davranışları: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 1-28.
 Download Cover Image

Creative Commons Lisansı
This journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license.


editor@e-ijer.com                http://www.e-ijer.com    Address: Ege University Faculty of Education İzmir/Türkiye