Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Effects of CNC Tool Runouts on Drilling Process

Year 2024, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 119 - 124, 30.09.2024

Abstract

In this study, the surface roughness, dimensional accuracy and tool life that tool runout caused by CNC spindle mechanism based on metal mold manufacturing were investigated. In order to understand tool runout, spindle health measurement was performed: runout measurement with 300 mm test bar, spindle conical runout measurement, spindle pull force measurement and again spindle bearing vibration values were examined. In this study, spindle maintenance was performed and its effects on the final product before and after maintenance were investigated. Holes were drilled with 1, 2 and 3 times the drill diameter, the dimensional accuracy of the holes, the effect of runout on surface roughness in the hole drilling process and the runout and life of the drill bit used were investigated. The effects of runout before and after the maintenance were compared. Elimination of tool runout positively affected the surface roughness and parts with lower surface roughness were obtained. It positively affected the dimensional accuracy and the measurement tolerance was narrowed. Since the effect of tool runout on the cutting tool life is eliminated, its life is extended and the consumable cost is reduced. It has been observed that tool runout has a negative effect on machining in the hole drilling process with this experimental study.

References

  • 1. Subramanian, K., & Cook, N. H. (1977). Sensing of drill wear and prediction of drill life. ASME J. Eng. Ind., 99 (2): 295-301
  • 2. Matsumura, T. (2016). Cutting simulation of drilling with cutter runout. In 2016 International Symposium on Flexible Automation (ISFA) (pp. 251-254). IEEE.
  • 3. Mary, J. S., Balaji, M. S., Krishnakumari, A., Nakandhrakumar, R. S., & Dinakaran, D. (2019). Monitoring of drill runout using least square support vector machine classifier. Measurement, 146, 24-34.
  • 4. Schmitz, T. L., Ziegert, J. C., Canning, J. S., & Zapata, R. (2008). Case study: A comparison of error sources in high-speed mill-ing. Precision Engineering, 32(2), 126-133.
  • 5. Caixu, Y. U. E., Haining, G. A. O., Xianli, L. I. U., Liang, S. Y., & Lihui, W. A. N. G. (2019). A review of chatter vibration re-search in milling. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 32(2), 215-242.
  • 6. Sakuma, K., Kiyota, H., & Morita, H. (1983). Positional Accura-cy of Hole in Drilling: Effect of Rigidity and Point Geometry of Drill. Bulletin of JSME, 26 (214), 659-666.
  • 7. Morales Méndez, J. D., & Rodriguez, R. S. (2017). Total produc-tive maintenance (TPM) as a tool for improving productivity: a case study of application in the bottleneck of an auto-parts ma-chining line. The International Journal of Advanced Manufactur-ing Technology, 92, 1013-1026.
  • 8. Abele, E., Altintas, Y., & Brecher, C. (2010). Machine tool spin-dle units. CIRP annals, 59 (2), 781-802.
  • 9. Usop, Z., Sarhan, A. A., Mardi, N. A., & Abd Wahab, M. N. (2015). Measuring of positioning, circularity and static errors of a CNC Vertical Machining Centre for validating the machining ac-curacy. Measurement, 61, 39-50.
  • 10. Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, W., Li, J., & Zhao, W. (2018). A non-contact calibration method for cutter runout with spindle speed dependent effect and analysis of its influence on milling process. Precision Engineering, 51, 280-290.
  • 11. Li, H. Z., & Li, X. P. (2005). A numerical study of the effects of cutter runout on milling process geometry based on true tooth tra-jectory. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25, 435-443.
  • 12. Matsumura, T., & Tamura, S. (2017). Cutting force model in mill-ing with cutter runout. Procedia CIRP, 58, 566-571.
  • 13. Li, Z. L., & Zhu, L. M. (2014). Envelope surface modeling and tool path optimization for five-axis flank milling considering cut-ter runout. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 136(4), 041021.
  • 14. Wang, J. J. J., & Liang, S. Y. (1996). Chip load kinematics in milling with radial cutter runout. ASME. J. Eng. Ind., 118(1): 111–116.
  • 15. Rivière-Lorphèvre, E., & Filippi, E. (2009). Mechanistic cutting force model parameters evaluation in milling taking cutter radial runout into account. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 45, 8-15.
  • 16. Liang, S. Y., & Perry, S. A. (1994). In-process compensation for milling cutter runout via chip load manipulation. ASME. J. Eng. Ind. 116 (2): 153–160.
  • 17. Hekman, K. A., & Liang, S. Y. (1997). In-process monitoring of end milling cutter runout. Mechatronics, 7(1), 1-10.
  • 18. Kline, W. A., & DeVor, R. E. (1983). The effect of runout on cutting geometry and forces in end milling. International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research, 23(2-3), 123-140.
  • 19. Attanasio, A. (2017). Tool run-out measurement in micro milling. Micromachines, 8(7), 221.
  • 20. Isik, Y. (2010). An experimental investigation on effect of cutting fluids in turning with coated carbides tool. J. Mech. Eng, 56(3), 195-201.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Machine Tools
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehmet Kubilay Askerden

Mustafa Yazar

Şükrü Talaş

Publication Date September 30, 2024
Submission Date June 11, 2024
Acceptance Date September 3, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 3 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Askerden, M. K., Yazar, M., & Talaş, Ş. (2024). Effects of CNC Tool Runouts on Drilling Process. Engineering Perspective, 3(3), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.29228/eng.pers.77964