Research Article
MUHASEBE FİNANSMAN ALANINDA LİSANSÜSTÜ EĞİTİM GÖREN ÖĞRENCİLERİN DANIŞMANLARI İLE ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ STİLLERİ
Abstract
Akademik kariyer hedefleyen öğrenciler bu kariyerlerini, ilk olarak yüksek lisans programı, devamında ise doktora programı ile gerçekleştirirler. Bu süreçte verimliliğin istenilen düzeyde olmasını sağlayan en büyük faktörlerden biri danışman ve öğrenci arasındaki ilişkidir. Bu çalışmada muhasebe ve finansman alanında lisansüstü eğitim gören öğrencilerin danışmanları ile arasındaki ilişki stilleri incelenmiştir. Bu bağlamda 136 öğrenci ve 60 danışmana anket uygulanmıştır. Anketlerden elde edilen verilere içerik analizi uygulanmış, ayrıca uygun örneklem sayısına sahip gruplar arasında fark testleri de yapılmıştır. Ortaya çıkan sonuçlara göre hem danışmanlar, hem de öğrenciler akademik desteğin yanı sıra, duygusal ve manevi desteği de kapsayan pastoral (manevi) ilişki stilini benimsemişlerdir
Keywords
References
- Carmona, S. (2006). Performance reviews, the impact of accounting research, and the role of publication forms. Advances in Accounting, 22, 241-267.
- Carroll, D. (2016). Postgraduate research experience 2015: A report on the perceptions of recent higher degree research graduates. Graduate Careers Australia.
- Gardner, S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383-406.
- Gatfield, T. (2005). An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(3), 311-325.
- Halbert, K. (2015). Students' perceptions of a ‘quality’ advisory relationship. Quality in Higher Education, 21(1), 26-37.
- Khalifa, R., & Quattrone, P. (2008). The governance of accounting academia: Issues for a debate. European Accounting Review, 17(1), 65-86.
- Khosa, A., Burch, S., Ozdil, E., & Wilkin, C. (2020). Current issues in PhD supervision of accounting and finance students: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. The British Accounting Review, 52(5), 1-15.
- Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267-281.
- McAlpine, L., Pare, A., & Starke-Meyerring, D. (2009). Disciplinary voices: A shifting landscape for English doctoral education in the twenty-first century. Routledge.
- McGagh, J., Marsh, H., Western, M., Thomas, P., Hastings, A., Mihailova, M., & Wenham, M. (2016). Review of Australia's research training system: Final report. Australian Council of Learned Academies.
- Orellana, M. L., Darder, A., Perez, A., & Salinas, J. (2016). Improving doctoral success by matching PhD students with supervisors. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 87-103.
- Roach, A., Christensen, B. K., & Rieger, E. (2019). The essential ingredients of research supervision: A discrete- choice experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000322. Advance online publication, 111(7), 1243–1260.
- Tabachnick, B. G., &Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.
- Taylor, S., & Beasley, N. (2005). A handbook for PhD supervisors. Routledge.
- Unda, L. A., Khosa, A., Burch, S., & Wilkin, C. (2018). Sustainability of the accounting and finance academic profession: Students' and supervisors' views about the PhD supervision process. Accounting & Finance, 60(3), 3103-3132. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12376
- Uzay, Ş. (2005). Muhasebe mesleki stajyerlerinin sorunları ve beklentileri: Bir araştırma. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 25, 70-78.
- YÖK. (2016). Lisansüstü Eğitim ve Öğretim Yönetmeliği. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat? MevzuatNo=21510&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5
- Wichmann-Hansen, G., & Herrmann, K. J. (2017). Does external funding push PhD supervisors to be more directive? A large-scale Danish study. Higher Education, 74(2), 357-376.
Year 2023,
Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 67 - 77, 31.07.2023
Abstract
References
- Carmona, S. (2006). Performance reviews, the impact of accounting research, and the role of publication forms. Advances in Accounting, 22, 241-267.
- Carroll, D. (2016). Postgraduate research experience 2015: A report on the perceptions of recent higher degree research graduates. Graduate Careers Australia.
- Gardner, S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383-406.
- Gatfield, T. (2005). An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(3), 311-325.
- Halbert, K. (2015). Students' perceptions of a ‘quality’ advisory relationship. Quality in Higher Education, 21(1), 26-37.
- Khalifa, R., & Quattrone, P. (2008). The governance of accounting academia: Issues for a debate. European Accounting Review, 17(1), 65-86.
- Khosa, A., Burch, S., Ozdil, E., & Wilkin, C. (2020). Current issues in PhD supervision of accounting and finance students: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. The British Accounting Review, 52(5), 1-15.
- Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267-281.
- McAlpine, L., Pare, A., & Starke-Meyerring, D. (2009). Disciplinary voices: A shifting landscape for English doctoral education in the twenty-first century. Routledge.
- McGagh, J., Marsh, H., Western, M., Thomas, P., Hastings, A., Mihailova, M., & Wenham, M. (2016). Review of Australia's research training system: Final report. Australian Council of Learned Academies.
- Orellana, M. L., Darder, A., Perez, A., & Salinas, J. (2016). Improving doctoral success by matching PhD students with supervisors. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 87-103.
- Roach, A., Christensen, B. K., & Rieger, E. (2019). The essential ingredients of research supervision: A discrete- choice experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000322. Advance online publication, 111(7), 1243–1260.
- Tabachnick, B. G., &Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.
- Taylor, S., & Beasley, N. (2005). A handbook for PhD supervisors. Routledge.
- Unda, L. A., Khosa, A., Burch, S., & Wilkin, C. (2018). Sustainability of the accounting and finance academic profession: Students' and supervisors' views about the PhD supervision process. Accounting & Finance, 60(3), 3103-3132. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12376
- Uzay, Ş. (2005). Muhasebe mesleki stajyerlerinin sorunları ve beklentileri: Bir araştırma. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 25, 70-78.
- YÖK. (2016). Lisansüstü Eğitim ve Öğretim Yönetmeliği. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat? MevzuatNo=21510&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5
- Wichmann-Hansen, G., & Herrmann, K. J. (2017). Does external funding push PhD supervisors to be more directive? A large-scale Danish study. Higher Education, 74(2), 357-376.
There are 18 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Business Administration |
| Journal Section | Araştırma Makaleleri |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 31, 2023 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2023 Volume: 6 Issue: 2 |
Gönderim-Kabul Süresi (Ortalama): 42,04 gün (6 hafta)
Makale Kabul Oranı: 0,59
Makale İndirme Sayısı (2018-2020): 18.042