Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

TÉLÉPHONE PORTABLE ET PRODUCTION ASYNCHRONE

Year 2016, Volume: 2 Issue: 3-1, 85 - 96, 30.09.2016

Christine Chanudet Freiderikos Valetopoulos

Abstract

La diffusion du téléphone portable -devenu la plupart du temps «terminal mobile»- a ouvert des perspectives inédites d’apprentissage autonome, en particulier dans le processus d’acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Dans le cadre de cet article nous nous proposons de présenter les résultats d’une expérimentation qui a eu lieu à l’Université de Poitiers et qui avait pour objectif la mise en place d’un dispositif pour les apprenants allophones du CFLE ayant pour objectif d’améliorer leur compétence orale. Nous souhaitons par ailleurs, dans le cadre du projet international E-Lengua, revisiter ce dispositif et proposer des améliorations afin de mettre en place un nouveau dispositif plus motivant pour les apprenants et plus efficace.

Keywords

téléphone portable production asynchrone FLE NTCI

References

  • Burston, J. (2013). Review of mobile learning: Languages, literacies, and cultures. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 157-225.
  • Burston, J. (2016). The Future of Foreign Language Instructional Technology: BYOD MALL. The EUROCALL Review, 23(2). Chanudet, C. ( 2012). Utilisabilité et Utilité d’un dispositif de production orale asynchrone en français langue étrangère. Mémoire de Master 2. Université de Poitiers.
  • Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9-16.
  • Davis F. D., Bagotti R. P. & Warshaw P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology : a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8),982-1003.
  • Huang, Y-M., Hwang W-Y. & Hwang K-E. (2008). Innovations in designing mobile learning applications. Educational Technologies and societies, 13(3), 1-2.
  • Kiernan, P. & Aizawa, K. (2004). Cell Phones in Task Based Learning--Are Cell Phones Useful Language Learning Tools?. ReCALL, 16(1), 71-84.
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289.
  • Mtega, W. et al. (2012), Using Mobile Phones for Teaching and Learning Purposes in Higher Learning Institutions: the Case of Sokoine University of Agriculture in Tanzania, Proceedings and report of the 5th UbuntuNet Alliance annual conference, 118-129.
  • Muyinda, P.B., Mugisa, E. & Lynch, K. (2007). M-Learning: The educational use of mobile communication devices. Dans K. J. Migga et al. (eds.), Strengthening the Role of ICT in Development, (pp. 290-301), United Kingdom: Fountain Publishers.
  • Reinders, H. (2010), Twenty Ideas for Using Mobile Phones…, English Teaching Forum, 3, 20-25 et 33.
  • UNESCO, (2012). Mobile learning for teachers in Africa and the Middle East: Exploring the potentials of mobile technologies to support teachers and improve practices. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

-

Year 2016, Volume: 2 Issue: 3-1, 85 - 96, 30.09.2016

Christine Chanudet Freiderikos Valetopoulos

Abstract

-

Keywords

mobile phone FLE NTCI

References

  • Burston, J. (2013). Review of mobile learning: Languages, literacies, and cultures. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 157-225.
  • Burston, J. (2016). The Future of Foreign Language Instructional Technology: BYOD MALL. The EUROCALL Review, 23(2). Chanudet, C. ( 2012). Utilisabilité et Utilité d’un dispositif de production orale asynchrone en français langue étrangère. Mémoire de Master 2. Université de Poitiers.
  • Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9-16.
  • Davis F. D., Bagotti R. P. & Warshaw P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology : a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8),982-1003.
  • Huang, Y-M., Hwang W-Y. & Hwang K-E. (2008). Innovations in designing mobile learning applications. Educational Technologies and societies, 13(3), 1-2.
  • Kiernan, P. & Aizawa, K. (2004). Cell Phones in Task Based Learning--Are Cell Phones Useful Language Learning Tools?. ReCALL, 16(1), 71-84.
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289.
  • Mtega, W. et al. (2012), Using Mobile Phones for Teaching and Learning Purposes in Higher Learning Institutions: the Case of Sokoine University of Agriculture in Tanzania, Proceedings and report of the 5th UbuntuNet Alliance annual conference, 118-129.
  • Muyinda, P.B., Mugisa, E. & Lynch, K. (2007). M-Learning: The educational use of mobile communication devices. Dans K. J. Migga et al. (eds.), Strengthening the Role of ICT in Development, (pp. 290-301), United Kingdom: Fountain Publishers.
  • Reinders, H. (2010), Twenty Ideas for Using Mobile Phones…, English Teaching Forum, 3, 20-25 et 33.
  • UNESCO, (2012). Mobile learning for teachers in Africa and the Middle East: Exploring the potentials of mobile technologies to support teachers and improve practices. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Year 2016, Volume: 2 Issue: 3-1, 85 - 96, 30.09.2016

Christine Chanudet Freiderikos Valetopoulos

Abstract

References

  • Burston, J. (2013). Review of mobile learning: Languages, literacies, and cultures. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 157-225.
  • Burston, J. (2016). The Future of Foreign Language Instructional Technology: BYOD MALL. The EUROCALL Review, 23(2). Chanudet, C. ( 2012). Utilisabilité et Utilité d’un dispositif de production orale asynchrone en français langue étrangère. Mémoire de Master 2. Université de Poitiers.
  • Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9-16.
  • Davis F. D., Bagotti R. P. & Warshaw P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology : a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8),982-1003.
  • Huang, Y-M., Hwang W-Y. & Hwang K-E. (2008). Innovations in designing mobile learning applications. Educational Technologies and societies, 13(3), 1-2.
  • Kiernan, P. & Aizawa, K. (2004). Cell Phones in Task Based Learning--Are Cell Phones Useful Language Learning Tools?. ReCALL, 16(1), 71-84.
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289.
  • Mtega, W. et al. (2012), Using Mobile Phones for Teaching and Learning Purposes in Higher Learning Institutions: the Case of Sokoine University of Agriculture in Tanzania, Proceedings and report of the 5th UbuntuNet Alliance annual conference, 118-129.
  • Muyinda, P.B., Mugisa, E. & Lynch, K. (2007). M-Learning: The educational use of mobile communication devices. Dans K. J. Migga et al. (eds.), Strengthening the Role of ICT in Development, (pp. 290-301), United Kingdom: Fountain Publishers.
  • Reinders, H. (2010), Twenty Ideas for Using Mobile Phones…, English Teaching Forum, 3, 20-25 et 33.
  • UNESCO, (2012). Mobile learning for teachers in Africa and the Middle East: Exploring the potentials of mobile technologies to support teachers and improve practices. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
There are 11 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language French
Journal Section ARTICLES
Authors

Christine Chanudet

Freiderikos Valetopoulos

Publication Date September 30, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 2 Issue: 3-1

Cite

APA Chanudet, C., & Valetopoulos, F. (2016). TÉLÉPHONE PORTABLE ET PRODUCTION ASYNCHRONE. Istanbul Journal of Innovation in Education, 2(3-1), 85-96.
AMA Chanudet C, Valetopoulos F. TÉLÉPHONE PORTABLE ET PRODUCTION ASYNCHRONE. Istanbul Journal of Innovation in Education. September 2016;2(3-1):85-96.
Chicago Chanudet, Christine, and Freiderikos Valetopoulos. “TÉLÉPHONE PORTABLE ET PRODUCTION ASYNCHRONE”. Istanbul Journal of Innovation in Education 2, no. 3-1 (September 2016): 85-96.
EndNote Chanudet C, Valetopoulos F (September 1, 2016) TÉLÉPHONE PORTABLE ET PRODUCTION ASYNCHRONE. Istanbul Journal of Innovation in Education 2 3-1 85–96.
IEEE C. Chanudet and F. Valetopoulos, “TÉLÉPHONE PORTABLE ET PRODUCTION ASYNCHRONE”, Istanbul Journal of Innovation in Education, vol. 2, no. 3-1, pp. 85–96, 2016.
ISNAD Chanudet, Christine - Valetopoulos, Freiderikos. “TÉLÉPHONE PORTABLE ET PRODUCTION ASYNCHRONE”. Istanbul Journal of Innovation in Education 2/3-1 (September 2016), 85-96.
JAMA Chanudet C, Valetopoulos F. TÉLÉPHONE PORTABLE ET PRODUCTION ASYNCHRONE. Istanbul Journal of Innovation in Education. 2016;2:85–96.
MLA Chanudet, Christine and Freiderikos Valetopoulos. “TÉLÉPHONE PORTABLE ET PRODUCTION ASYNCHRONE”. Istanbul Journal of Innovation in Education, vol. 2, no. 3-1, 2016, pp. 85-96.
Vancouver Chanudet C, Valetopoulos F. TÉLÉPHONE PORTABLE ET PRODUCTION ASYNCHRONE. Istanbul Journal of Innovation in Education. 2016;2(3-1):85-96.
 Download Cover Image