Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM), sociodemographic characteristics, methods used, attitudes towards this medicine and the main factors affecting its use in oncology patients.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between June 1 and July 31, 2024, involving patients receiving treatment at the Medical Oncology Service of Ankara Etlik City Hospital who agreed to participate in the study. Data collection was carried out through a questionnaire, and statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test, with a significance level set at p<0.05.
Results: While 40.8% of the 179 patients used T&CM before cancer diagnosis, this rate decreased to 28.4% afterwards. While there was a significant correlation between education level and T&CM use (p=0.03), no correlation was found between gender and age. Phytotherapy was the most frequently used method (66.7%). T&CM was mostly used for cure (66.7%), but only 3.9% of patients reported complete benefit. It was observed that 76.5% of the patients did not consult their physician or ask for information about T&CM. The most common reason for this is lack of patient knowledge. Only 11.7% of patients reported receiving adequate information about T&CM from their physicians.
Conclusion: It was found that patients did not have enough information about T&CM and doctors did not provide enough information on the subject. Accurate information for patients can be provided by increasing the awareness of doctors about T&CM methods. In this way, patient-doctor communication can be strengthened, patients’ reservations can be reduced and a more open exchange of information can be provided.
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı onkoloji hastalarında geleneksel ve tamamlayıcı tıp (T&CM) kullanım yaygınlığını, sosyodemografik özellikleri, kullanılan yöntemleri, bu tıbba yönelik tutumları ve kullanımı etkileyen temel faktörleri belirlemektir.
Yöntemler: Bu kesitsel çalışma 1 Haziran - 31 Temmuz 2024 tarihleri arasında XXX Hastanesi Tıbbi Onkoloji Servisinde tedavi gören ve çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden hastalarla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veri toplama işlemi bir anket aracılığıyla gerçekleştirilmiş ve istatistiksel analiz, anlamlılık düzeyi p<0.05 olarak belirlenen ki-kare testi kullanılarak yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: 179 hastanın %40,8'i kanser teşhisi konmadan önce T&CM kullanırken, bu oran daha sonra %28,4'e düşmüştür. Eğitim düzeyi ile T&CM kullanımı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunurken (p=0.03), cinsiyet ve yaş arasında bir ilişki bulunmadı. Fitoterapi en sık kullanılan yöntemdi (%66,7). T&CM çoğunlukla kür sağlamak amaçlı (%66,7) uygulanmaktaydı, ancak hastaların yalnızca %3,9'u tam fayda sağladığını bildirdi. Hastaların %76,5'inin T&CM hakkında doktorlarına danışmadıkları veya doktorlarından bilgi talep etmedikleri görülmüştür. Bunun en yaygın nedeni hastaların bilgi eksikliğidir. Doktorlarından T&CM hakkında yeterli bilgi aldığını bildiren hastaların oranı yalnızca %11,7'dir.
Sonuç: Hastaların T&CM hakkında yeterli bilgiye sahip olmadığı ve hekimlerin de bu konuda yeterli bilgi sunmadığı görülmüştür. Hastaların doğru bilgilendirilmesi, hekimlerin T&CM yöntemleri konusundaki farkındalığının artırılmasıyla sağlanabilir. Böylece hasta-hekim iletişimi güçlenerek hastaların çekinceleri azaltılabilir ve daha açık bir bilgi paylaşımı sağlanabilir.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Clinical Oncology |
Journal Section | Original Article |
Authors | |
Publication Date | May 30, 2025 |
Submission Date | February 24, 2025 |
Acceptance Date | April 18, 2025 |
Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 8 Issue: 3 |
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].
The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.
The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.
Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;
Ulakbim TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR, EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC), DOAJ, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index
Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review".
Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user. https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535
Journal charge policy https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912
Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.
Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.
Articles published in the Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.