Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Algılanan İçsellik Statüsü Kavramının Web of Science Veritabanında Bibliyometrik Analizi

Year 2025, Volume: 18 Issue: 1, 33 - 51, 15.04.2025
https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.1585742

Abstract

Algılanan İçsellik statüsü bireysel bir çalışanın kendisini belirli bir organizasyonda içeriden biri olarak algılama derecesi olarak tanımlamıştır. Bu kavram, özellikle iş gücündeki çeşitlilik ve bireyselleşme eğilimlerinin arttığı günümüzde, çalışanların örgüte bağlılıklarını güçlendirme potansiyeline sahiptir. Bu nedenle, Algılanan İçsellik Statüsü konusunun bibliyometrik bir analizle ele alınması, araştırmacılara ve yöneticilere önemli yol gösterici bilgiler sunabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Algılanan İçsellik Statüsü konusunu ele alan akademik araştırmaların incelenerek alandaki mevcut literatürün gelişim seyrini ve bu alandaki bilgi boşluklarını tespit etmektir. Böylelikle, Algılanan İçsellik Statüsü’nün hem örgütsel davranış hem de insan kaynakları gibi farklı disiplinlerde nasıl ele alındığına dair bir akademik perspektif sunulacaktır. Araştırmada, Web of Science veri tabanından elde edilen veriler kullanılarak bibliyometrik analiz yapılmıştır. Bibliyometrik analiz, araştırmacılara bu konuda gelecekte yapılabilecek çalışmalara dair kapsamlı bir bakış açısı kazandırmaktadır. Çalışmada Wos bilimsel haritalama programı kullanılarak akademik yayınların dağılımı analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, en çok atıf alan yazarlar, ülkeler, akademik kurumlar ve bu alanda yayımlanan dergiler belirlenmiştir. Yapılan bibliometrik araştırma sonucunda ilgili konu örgütsel açıdan; örgütsel destek, örgütsel bağlılık, çalışan algılarındaki davranışsal yönler ile ilişkili olarak yoğun şekilde ele alınmıştır. Genel olarak liderlik teorileri çalışmalarda ön plana çıkan araştırma sahası olmuştur. Araştırma konusunda kavramsal açıdan; çalışan davranışları ve tutumları, psikolojik ve sosyal faktörler, inovasyon ve yaratıcılık, çalışma ortamı ve iklimi gibi temalar altında çeşitlenmiştir.

Ethical Statement

Etik Raporu gerektirmeyen Bibliometrik analiz yapılmıştır.

References

  • Armstrong‐Stassen, M., & Schlosser, F. (2011). Perceived organizational membership and the retention of older workers. Journal of organizational behavior, 32(2), 319-344.
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39.
  • Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1998). Testing the combined effects of newcomer information seeking and manager behavior on socialization. Journal of applied psychology, 83(1), 72.
  • Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge.
  • Cevher, M. F. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of the Internet of Things From A Marketing Perspective. Journal of Research in Business, 8(1), 153-170.
  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  • Guo, J., Qiu, Y., & Gan, Y. (2020). Workplace incivility and work engagement: the chain mediating effects of perceived insider status, affective organizational commitment and organizational identification. Current Psychology, 1-12.
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). sage.
  • Jha, I. N., Pal, D., & Sarkar, S. (2024). Thriving in diversity: the role of inclusive leadership and workplace inclusion in enhancing satisfaction with life among Indian IT employees. Journal of Management Development, 43(5), 663-689.
  • Liao, P. Y. (2015). The role of self‐concept in the mechanism linking proactive personality to employee work outcomes. Applied Psychology, 64(2), 421-443.
  • Liu, X., Wu, L. Z., Ye, Y., & Kwan, H. K. (2024). Are humorous frontline employees hotels’ secret weapons? Investigating when and why employee sense of humor promotes service performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 118, 103667.
  • Mao, G., Zou, H., Chen, G., Du, H., & Zuo, J. (2015). Past, current and future of biomass energy research: A bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 1823-1833.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370.
  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25, 348.
  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 698.
  • Stamper, C. L., & Masterson, S. S. (2002). Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(8), 875-894.
  • Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social science information, 13(2), 65-93.
  • Wang, H., Feng, J., Prevellie, P., & Wu, K. (2017). Why do I contribute when I am an “insider”? A moderated mediation approach to perceived insider status and employee’s innovative behavior. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(7), 1184-1197.

Bibliometric Analysis of the Concept of Perceived Insider Status in the Web of Science Database

Year 2025, Volume: 18 Issue: 1, 33 - 51, 15.04.2025
https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.1585742

Abstract

Perceived Insider Status is defined as the degree to which an individual employee perceives themselves as an insider within a specific organization. This concept holds significant potential for strengthening employees organizational commitment, particularly in today's workplace, where diversity and individualization trends are rising. Therefore, addressing the issue of Perceived Insider Status through bibliometric analysis can provide valuable insights to researchers and managers. The purpose of this study is to examine academic research on Perceived Insider Status, identify the development trajectory of the existing literature in the field, and uncover knowledge gaps. In doing so, the study aims to offer an academic perspective on how Perceived Insider Status is addressed in different disciplines such as organizational behavior and human resources. The research employs bibliometric analysis using data obtained from the Web of Science database. Bibliometric analysis provides researchers with a comprehensive overview of potential future research directions on the subject. In the study, the distribution of academic publications was analyzed using the Wos scientific mapping program. As a result of the study, the most cited authors, countries, academic institutions and journals published in this field were determined. The bibliometric research reveals that the subject is predominantly addressed in relation to organizational aspects like organizational support, organizational commitment, and behavioral dimensions of employee perceptions. Leadership theories generally emerge as a prominent research area within the studies. Conceptually, the research diversifies under themes such as employee behaviors and attitudes, psychological and social factors, innovation and creativity, as well as work environment and climate.

References

  • Armstrong‐Stassen, M., & Schlosser, F. (2011). Perceived organizational membership and the retention of older workers. Journal of organizational behavior, 32(2), 319-344.
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39.
  • Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1998). Testing the combined effects of newcomer information seeking and manager behavior on socialization. Journal of applied psychology, 83(1), 72.
  • Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge.
  • Cevher, M. F. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of the Internet of Things From A Marketing Perspective. Journal of Research in Business, 8(1), 153-170.
  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  • Guo, J., Qiu, Y., & Gan, Y. (2020). Workplace incivility and work engagement: the chain mediating effects of perceived insider status, affective organizational commitment and organizational identification. Current Psychology, 1-12.
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). sage.
  • Jha, I. N., Pal, D., & Sarkar, S. (2024). Thriving in diversity: the role of inclusive leadership and workplace inclusion in enhancing satisfaction with life among Indian IT employees. Journal of Management Development, 43(5), 663-689.
  • Liao, P. Y. (2015). The role of self‐concept in the mechanism linking proactive personality to employee work outcomes. Applied Psychology, 64(2), 421-443.
  • Liu, X., Wu, L. Z., Ye, Y., & Kwan, H. K. (2024). Are humorous frontline employees hotels’ secret weapons? Investigating when and why employee sense of humor promotes service performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 118, 103667.
  • Mao, G., Zou, H., Chen, G., Du, H., & Zuo, J. (2015). Past, current and future of biomass energy research: A bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 1823-1833.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370.
  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25, 348.
  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 698.
  • Stamper, C. L., & Masterson, S. S. (2002). Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(8), 875-894.
  • Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social science information, 13(2), 65-93.
  • Wang, H., Feng, J., Prevellie, P., & Wu, K. (2017). Why do I contribute when I am an “insider”? A moderated mediation approach to perceived insider status and employee’s innovative behavior. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(7), 1184-1197.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Human Resources and Industrial Relations (Other)
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Abdullah Türk 0000-0002-2804-4203

İlknur Çevik Tekin 0000-0002-0802-1733

Kamil Ahat 0000-0003-4734-0929

Publication Date April 15, 2025
Submission Date November 15, 2024
Acceptance Date March 18, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 18 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Türk, A., Çevik Tekin, İ., & Ahat, K. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis of the Concept of Perceived Insider Status in the Web of Science Database. Selçuk İletişim, 18(1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.1585742