Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Leap to Faith, How and Why?

Year 2025, Issue: 1, 73 - 84, 30.04.2025

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the notion of leap to faith that is found abundantly in Kierkegaard’s writings. In the first part I set the context for the discussion by focusing on different usages of the term “faith” by posing a distinction between faith-in and faith-that. In the second section I discuss the mechanism of the leap; what does the leap consist of? What are the requisite conditions for such a leap? What kind of a character ought one have to perform it? These questions then lead me to a discussion of whether we can envisage something beyond Christianity to which this mechanism might apply, and I especially focus on freedom and love.

References

  • Akal, C. B. (2012). İktidarın Üç Yüzü. Ankara: Dost Kitabevi.
  • Allison, H. E. (1967). Christianity and Nonsense. The Review of Metaphysics (20), 3, 432-460.
  • Evans, C.S. (1989) Is Kierkegaard an Irrationalist? Reason, Paradox, and Faith. Religious Studies (25), 3, 347-362. Ferreira, M. J. (1994). Leaps and Circles: Kierkegaard and Newman on Faith and Reason. Religious Studies (30), 4, 379-397.
  • Friedman, R. Z. (1982). Kierkegaard: First Existentialist or Last Kantian? Religious Studies (18), 2, 159-170.
  • Johnson, R. R. (1997). The Logic of Leaping: Kierkegaard’s Use of Hegelian Sublation. History of Philosophy Quarterly (14), 1, 155-170.
  • Kierkegaard, S. (2013). Fear and Trembling and Sickness unto Death. (W. Lowrie tr.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Kierkegaard, S. (1962). Philosophical Fragments or A Fragment of Philosophy, (D. Swenson tr.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Kierkegaard, S. (2009). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments (A. Hannay tr.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mulhall, S. (1994). Faith and Reason. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd.
  • Quanbeck, Z. (2024). Resolving to Believe: Kierkegaard’s Direct Doxastic Voluntarism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (109), 2, 548-574.
  • Schacht, R. (1973). Kierkegaard on 'Truth Is Subjectivity' and 'The Leap of Faith'. Canadian Journal of Philosophy (2), 3, 297-313.
  • Venkataraman, P. (2018). Johannes Climacus and the Leap to Faith. Horizons (45), 347-374.
  • Westphal, M. (1996). Becoming a Self: A Reading of Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Indiana: Purdue University Press.

İmana Sıçrayış, Nasıl ve Niçin?

Year 2025, Issue: 1, 73 - 84, 30.04.2025

Abstract

Bu makalede Kierkegaard'ın çeşitli metinlerinde "imana sıçrayış" olarak ifade ettiği hususu tartışmaya açıyorum. İlk bölümde tartışmanın arka planını oluşturmak adına Kierkegaard’ın iman kavramına ilişkin açıklamalarını netleştirmeye odaklanıyorum. Burada bir olguya ve bir kişiye iman etme arasındaki farkı vurguluyorum. İkinci bölümde bu sıçrayışın ana hatlarıyla nasıl gerçekleştiğine ilişkin bir inceleme yürütüyorum: Bu sıçrayış neye tekabül ediyor? Böyle bir sıçrayışın ön koşulları nelerdir? Bu sıçrayışta bulunmak nasıl bir karaktere sahip olmak anlamına gelir? Bu ve benzeri sorulara ilişkin cevapları ele aldıktan sonra Kierkegaard’ın özellikle Hristiyan dini için uygun gördüğü bu kavramsallaştırmayı özgürlük ve aşk kavramlarına doğru da açmanın mümkün olup olmadığına ilişkin bir tartışma yürütüyorum.

References

  • Akal, C. B. (2012). İktidarın Üç Yüzü. Ankara: Dost Kitabevi.
  • Allison, H. E. (1967). Christianity and Nonsense. The Review of Metaphysics (20), 3, 432-460.
  • Evans, C.S. (1989) Is Kierkegaard an Irrationalist? Reason, Paradox, and Faith. Religious Studies (25), 3, 347-362. Ferreira, M. J. (1994). Leaps and Circles: Kierkegaard and Newman on Faith and Reason. Religious Studies (30), 4, 379-397.
  • Friedman, R. Z. (1982). Kierkegaard: First Existentialist or Last Kantian? Religious Studies (18), 2, 159-170.
  • Johnson, R. R. (1997). The Logic of Leaping: Kierkegaard’s Use of Hegelian Sublation. History of Philosophy Quarterly (14), 1, 155-170.
  • Kierkegaard, S. (2013). Fear and Trembling and Sickness unto Death. (W. Lowrie tr.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Kierkegaard, S. (1962). Philosophical Fragments or A Fragment of Philosophy, (D. Swenson tr.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Kierkegaard, S. (2009). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments (A. Hannay tr.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mulhall, S. (1994). Faith and Reason. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd.
  • Quanbeck, Z. (2024). Resolving to Believe: Kierkegaard’s Direct Doxastic Voluntarism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (109), 2, 548-574.
  • Schacht, R. (1973). Kierkegaard on 'Truth Is Subjectivity' and 'The Leap of Faith'. Canadian Journal of Philosophy (2), 3, 297-313.
  • Venkataraman, P. (2018). Johannes Climacus and the Leap to Faith. Horizons (45), 347-374.
  • Westphal, M. (1996). Becoming a Self: A Reading of Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Indiana: Purdue University Press.
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Philosophy of Religion, 19th Century Philosophy
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Umut Eldem 0000-0003-2507-149X

Publication Date April 30, 2025
Submission Date October 23, 2024
Acceptance Date April 29, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Eldem, U. (2025). Leap to Faith, How and Why?. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi(1), 73-84.
AMA Eldem U. Leap to Faith, How and Why?. KFD. April 2025;(1):73-84.
Chicago Eldem, Umut. “Leap to Faith, How and Why?”. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi, no. 1 (April 2025): 73-84.
EndNote Eldem U (April 1, 2025) Leap to Faith, How and Why?. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi 1 73–84.
IEEE U. Eldem, “Leap to Faith, How and Why?”, KFD, no. 1, pp. 73–84, April 2025.
ISNAD Eldem, Umut. “Leap to Faith, How and Why?”. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi 1 (April 2025), 73-84.
JAMA Eldem U. Leap to Faith, How and Why?. KFD. 2025;:73–84.
MLA Eldem, Umut. “Leap to Faith, How and Why?”. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi, no. 1, 2025, pp. 73-84.
Vancouver Eldem U. Leap to Faith, How and Why?. KFD. 2025(1):73-84.