Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

RURAL VS. URBAN TRAVEL BEHAVIOR: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MOBILITY PATTERNS IN THE IZMIR URBAN RAIL MASS TRANSIT SYSTEM (IZBAN)

Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 580 - 598, 01.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1581789

Abstract

Understanding travel behavior is critical for designing equitable and sustainable transportation systems, particularly in the context of rapid urbanization and rural-urban disparities. This study examines the differences in travel behavior between rural and urban areas, with a focus on the Izmir Urban Rail Mass Transit System (IZBAN) in Turkey. By analyzing data from 606 face-to-face surveys, the research explores key factors such as mode choice, trip purpose, travel distance, socio-economic influences, and user costs. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, chi-square tests, and hypothesis testing were applied using SPSS to identify patterns and significant differences in travel behavior between rural and urban respondents. The study highlights the distinct challenges faced by rural and urban travelers, including limited transportation options in rural areas and issues of congestion, high rents, and inequality in urban centers. The findings reveal that urban travelers benefit from shorter travel times, greater access to public transportation, and proximity to transit hubs, while rural travelers rely more on private vehicles and face longer travel distances. The study also emphasizes the role of socio-economic factors, such as income and household structure, in shaping travel behavior, as well as the environmental and policy implications of these patterns. By providing a comprehensive analysis of rural and urban travel behavior, this research aims to inform transportation policies that promote accessibility, affordability, and sustainability. The study’s insights are particularly relevant for addressing the mobility challenges of underserved populations and optimizing public transportation systems in rapidly growing cities. Ultimately, this research contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable urban development and equitable access to transportation, offering valuable lessons for policymakers and urban planners in Izmir and beyond.

References

  • J. Pucher and J. L. Renne, “Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey,” Transportation, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 165–186, 2005.
  • R. Cervero, “Built environments and mode choice: Toward a normative framework,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 265–284, 2002.
  • D. G. Chatman, “Does TOD need the T?” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 17–31, 2013.
  • I. Shergold and G. Parkhurst, “Transport-related social exclusion amongst older people in rural Southwest England and Wales,” Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 412–421, 2012.
  • E. Ferguson, “The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990,” Transportation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 349–376, 1997.
  • R. Ewing and R. Cervero, “Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis,” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 265–294, 2010.
  • S. Shaheen, A. Cohen, and I. Zohdy, Shared mobility: Current practices and guiding principles. Federal Highway Administration, 2015.
  • T. Litman, “Evaluating transportation equity,” World Transport Policy & Practice, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 10–25, 2020.
  • P. L. Mokhtarian and C. Chen, “TTB or not TTB, that is the question: A review and analysis of the empirical literature on travel time (and money) budgets,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 38, no. 9–10, pp. 643–675, 2004.
  • S. Nutley, “Monitoring rural travel behavior: A longitudinal study in Northern Ireland 1979–2001,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 247–263, 2005.
  • J. Hine and F. Mitchell, “Better for everyone? Travel experiences and transport exclusion,” Urban Studies, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 319–332, 2001.
  • D. Schrank, B. Eisele, T. Lomax and J. Bak, Urban Mobility Scorecard. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, 2015.
  • E. Blumenberg and A. E. Evans, “Planning for demographic diversity: The case of immigrants and public transit,” Journal of Public Transportation, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2010.
  • J. Molloy, T. Schatzmann, B. Schoeman, C. Tchervenkov, B. Hintermann, and K. W. Axhausen, “Observed impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel behavior in Switzerland,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 145, pp. 1–14, 2021.
  • A. Field, Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 4th ed. Sage, 2013.
  • J. Pallant, SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.
  • IBM, IBM SPSS Statistics 27 documentation. IBM, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLVMB_27.0.0
  • İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi, İzmir Ulaşım Rehberi. İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi Yayınları, 2020.
  • İzmir Banliyö Sistemi, İzmir Banliyö Sistemi: Tarihçe ve Gelişim, 2019. [Online]. Available: [URL]
  • İzmir Ulaşım A.Ş., 2019 Yılı İstatistik Raporu. İzmir Ulaşım A.Ş., 2021.
  • P. G. Vries, Sampling Theory for Forest Inventory: A teach-yourself course, Berlin: Springer, 1986.
  • T. Yamane, Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Row, 1967.
  • P. Newman and J. Kenworthy, Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press, 1999.
  • R. Cervero and M. Duncan, “Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs-Housing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing?” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 475–490, 2006.
  • L. Bertolini, Planning for Sustainable Transport. Routledge, 2013.
  • TUIK, Turkish Statistical Institute: Population Statistics, 2020. [Online]. Available: [TUIK website]
  • R. Cervero, The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry, Washington, DC: Island Press, 1998.
  • R. Vickerman, "High-speed rail and regional development: the case of intermediate stations," Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 42, pp. 157-165, 2015.
  • CNT (Center for Neighborhood Technology), The Housing and Transportation Affordability Index, 2012. [Online]. Available: [CNT website].
Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 580 - 598, 01.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1581789

Abstract

References

  • J. Pucher and J. L. Renne, “Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey,” Transportation, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 165–186, 2005.
  • R. Cervero, “Built environments and mode choice: Toward a normative framework,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 265–284, 2002.
  • D. G. Chatman, “Does TOD need the T?” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 17–31, 2013.
  • I. Shergold and G. Parkhurst, “Transport-related social exclusion amongst older people in rural Southwest England and Wales,” Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 412–421, 2012.
  • E. Ferguson, “The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990,” Transportation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 349–376, 1997.
  • R. Ewing and R. Cervero, “Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis,” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 265–294, 2010.
  • S. Shaheen, A. Cohen, and I. Zohdy, Shared mobility: Current practices and guiding principles. Federal Highway Administration, 2015.
  • T. Litman, “Evaluating transportation equity,” World Transport Policy & Practice, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 10–25, 2020.
  • P. L. Mokhtarian and C. Chen, “TTB or not TTB, that is the question: A review and analysis of the empirical literature on travel time (and money) budgets,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 38, no. 9–10, pp. 643–675, 2004.
  • S. Nutley, “Monitoring rural travel behavior: A longitudinal study in Northern Ireland 1979–2001,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 247–263, 2005.
  • J. Hine and F. Mitchell, “Better for everyone? Travel experiences and transport exclusion,” Urban Studies, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 319–332, 2001.
  • D. Schrank, B. Eisele, T. Lomax and J. Bak, Urban Mobility Scorecard. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, 2015.
  • E. Blumenberg and A. E. Evans, “Planning for demographic diversity: The case of immigrants and public transit,” Journal of Public Transportation, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2010.
  • J. Molloy, T. Schatzmann, B. Schoeman, C. Tchervenkov, B. Hintermann, and K. W. Axhausen, “Observed impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel behavior in Switzerland,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 145, pp. 1–14, 2021.
  • A. Field, Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 4th ed. Sage, 2013.
  • J. Pallant, SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.
  • IBM, IBM SPSS Statistics 27 documentation. IBM, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLVMB_27.0.0
  • İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi, İzmir Ulaşım Rehberi. İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi Yayınları, 2020.
  • İzmir Banliyö Sistemi, İzmir Banliyö Sistemi: Tarihçe ve Gelişim, 2019. [Online]. Available: [URL]
  • İzmir Ulaşım A.Ş., 2019 Yılı İstatistik Raporu. İzmir Ulaşım A.Ş., 2021.
  • P. G. Vries, Sampling Theory for Forest Inventory: A teach-yourself course, Berlin: Springer, 1986.
  • T. Yamane, Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Row, 1967.
  • P. Newman and J. Kenworthy, Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press, 1999.
  • R. Cervero and M. Duncan, “Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs-Housing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing?” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 475–490, 2006.
  • L. Bertolini, Planning for Sustainable Transport. Routledge, 2013.
  • TUIK, Turkish Statistical Institute: Population Statistics, 2020. [Online]. Available: [TUIK website]
  • R. Cervero, The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry, Washington, DC: Island Press, 1998.
  • R. Vickerman, "High-speed rail and regional development: the case of intermediate stations," Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 42, pp. 157-165, 2015.
  • CNT (Center for Neighborhood Technology), The Housing and Transportation Affordability Index, 2012. [Online]. Available: [CNT website].
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Transportation and Traffic, Transportation Engineering
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ahmet Karakurt 0000-0002-9954-8636

Publication Date June 1, 2025
Submission Date November 8, 2024
Acceptance Date May 6, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Cite

IEEE A. Karakurt, “RURAL VS. URBAN TRAVEL BEHAVIOR: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MOBILITY PATTERNS IN THE IZMIR URBAN RAIL MASS TRANSIT SYSTEM (IZBAN)”, KONJES, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 580–598, 2025, doi: 10.36306/konjes.1581789.