Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 24 Issue: 4, 268 - 273, 30.12.2023

Abstract

References

  • 1. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 2010; 54: 291-312.
  • 2. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiologyof bacterial persistence aftertreatment procedures. J Endod 2008;34: 1291-301.
  • 3. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32: 389-98.
  • 4. Dutner J, Mines P, Anderson A. Irrigation trends among AmericanAssociation of Endodontists members: a web-based survey. JEndod 2012; 38: 37-40.
  • 5. Paqué F, Boessler C, Zehnder M. Accumulated hard tissue debrislevels in mesial roots of mandibular molars after sequential irrigation steps. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 148-53.
  • 6. Tay FR, Gu LS, Schoeffel GJ, Wimmer C, Susin L, Zhang K, et al. Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a sidevented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery. J Endod2010; 36: 745-50.
  • 7. Nagendrababu V, Jayaraman J, Suresh A, KalyanasundaramS, Neelakantan P. Effectiveness of ultrasonically activated irrigationon root canal disinfection: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22: 655-70.
  • 8. Kamaci A, Aydin B, Erdilek N. The effect of ultrasonically activatedirrigation and laser based root canal irrigation methods ondebrisremoval. Int J Artif Organs 2017: 0.
  • 9. Haupt F, Meinel M, Gunawardana A, Hülsmann M. Effectivenessof different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layerremoval from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation. Aust EndodJ2020; 46: 40-6.
  • 10. Uğur Aydın Z, Erdönmez D, Ateş MO, Doğan T. Efficacy of different irrigation activation systems on bacterial extrusion. Aust EndodJ2021; 47: 137-42.
  • 11. Swimberghe RCD, De Clercq A, De Moor RJG, Meire MA. Efficacyof sonically, ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation in removinga biofilm-mimicking hydrogel from an isthmus model. Int EndodJ2019; 52: 515-23.
  • 12. Sabins RA, Johnson JD, Hellstein JW. A comparison of thecleaning efficacy of short-term sonic and ultrasonic passiveirrigation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. JEndod2003; 29: 674-8.
  • 13. Uğur Aydın Z, Erdönmez D, Ateş MO, Doğan T. Efficacy of different irrigation activation systems on bacterial extrusion. Aust EndodJ2021; 47: 137-42.
  • 14. Plotino G, Grande NM, Mercade M, Cortese T, Staffoli S, Gambarini G, Testarelli L. Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation devicesin the removal of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals. J Appl Oral Sci 2019; 27: e20180045.
  • 15. Magni E, Jäggi M, Eggmann F, Weiger R, Connert T. Apical pressuresgenerated by several canal irrigation methods: A laboratory studyina maxillary central incisor with an open apex. Int Endod J 2021; 54: 1937-47.
  • 16. Swimberghe RCD, Buyse R, Meire MA, De Moor RJG. Efficacyof different irrigation technique in simulated curved root canals. Lasers Med Sci 2021; 36: 1317-22.
  • 17. Guven Y, Uygun AD, Arslan H. Efficacy of EDDY, ultrasonicactivation, XP-endo Finisher and needle irrigation on the removal of mTAP from artificially created grooves in root canals. Aust EndodJ2021; 47: 639-44.
  • 18. Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Real-time Intracanal Temperature Measurement During Different Obturation Techniques. J Endod 2018; 44: 1832-6.
  • 19. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight andcurved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32: 271-5
  • 20. Leonardi DP, Grande NM, Tomazinho FSF, Marques-da-Silva B, Gonzaga CC, Baratto-Filho F, et al. Influence of activation mode and preheating on intracanal irrigant temperature. Aust Endod J 2019; 45: 373-7.
  • 21. Zeltner M, Peters OA, Paqué F. Temperature changes during ultrasonic irrigation with different inserts and modes of activation. J Endod 2009; 35: 573-7.
  • 22. Mohammadi Z. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. Int Dent J 2008; 58: 329-41.
  • 23. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heatinduced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 101-7.
  • 24. Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Real-time intracanal temperature measurement comparing mechanically and laseractivated irrigation to syringe irrigation. Aust Endod J 2021 ;47: 59-66.
  • 25. Salas H, Castrejon A, Fuentes D, Luque A, Luque E. Evaluationof the penetration of CHX 2% on dentinal tubules using Conventional Irrigation, Sonic Irrigation (EDDY) and Passive UltrasonicIrrigation (PUI) techniques: An in vitro study. J Clin ExpDent 2021; 13: e37-42.

Influence of Sonic Activation Duration on Root Canal Temperature Increase

Year 2023, Volume: 24 Issue: 4, 268 - 273, 30.12.2023

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated intracanal heat changes when the EDDY sonic activation system was used for different durations.
Materials and Methods: Sixty (15 per group) maxillary canine teeth were used in this study. Teeth were decoronate and enlargedup to the T-endo must M40 file. Three thermocouples were inserted on the tooth: one at the apical foramen (T1), one at the workinglength (WL) of -5 mm (T2), and one at the WL of -10 mm (T3). A fixed setup was established, and an irrigation solution insidetheroot canal was activated for 10 (S10), 20 (S20), 30 (S30), and 60 (S60) seconds per group with an EDDY tip.
Results: The S10 group exhibited less temperature change and the S60 group demonstrated a statistically significant temperatureincrease.
Conclusion: Prolonged activation durations resulted in a greater temperature increase due to root canal dry out. This temperatureis more likely to transmit periodontal tissues than the increasing effect of sodium hypoclorite because of the scattered solution. Shorter activation durations with more sicluses would be more beneficial.

References

  • 1. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 2010; 54: 291-312.
  • 2. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiologyof bacterial persistence aftertreatment procedures. J Endod 2008;34: 1291-301.
  • 3. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32: 389-98.
  • 4. Dutner J, Mines P, Anderson A. Irrigation trends among AmericanAssociation of Endodontists members: a web-based survey. JEndod 2012; 38: 37-40.
  • 5. Paqué F, Boessler C, Zehnder M. Accumulated hard tissue debrislevels in mesial roots of mandibular molars after sequential irrigation steps. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 148-53.
  • 6. Tay FR, Gu LS, Schoeffel GJ, Wimmer C, Susin L, Zhang K, et al. Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a sidevented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery. J Endod2010; 36: 745-50.
  • 7. Nagendrababu V, Jayaraman J, Suresh A, KalyanasundaramS, Neelakantan P. Effectiveness of ultrasonically activated irrigationon root canal disinfection: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22: 655-70.
  • 8. Kamaci A, Aydin B, Erdilek N. The effect of ultrasonically activatedirrigation and laser based root canal irrigation methods ondebrisremoval. Int J Artif Organs 2017: 0.
  • 9. Haupt F, Meinel M, Gunawardana A, Hülsmann M. Effectivenessof different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layerremoval from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation. Aust EndodJ2020; 46: 40-6.
  • 10. Uğur Aydın Z, Erdönmez D, Ateş MO, Doğan T. Efficacy of different irrigation activation systems on bacterial extrusion. Aust EndodJ2021; 47: 137-42.
  • 11. Swimberghe RCD, De Clercq A, De Moor RJG, Meire MA. Efficacyof sonically, ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation in removinga biofilm-mimicking hydrogel from an isthmus model. Int EndodJ2019; 52: 515-23.
  • 12. Sabins RA, Johnson JD, Hellstein JW. A comparison of thecleaning efficacy of short-term sonic and ultrasonic passiveirrigation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. JEndod2003; 29: 674-8.
  • 13. Uğur Aydın Z, Erdönmez D, Ateş MO, Doğan T. Efficacy of different irrigation activation systems on bacterial extrusion. Aust EndodJ2021; 47: 137-42.
  • 14. Plotino G, Grande NM, Mercade M, Cortese T, Staffoli S, Gambarini G, Testarelli L. Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation devicesin the removal of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals. J Appl Oral Sci 2019; 27: e20180045.
  • 15. Magni E, Jäggi M, Eggmann F, Weiger R, Connert T. Apical pressuresgenerated by several canal irrigation methods: A laboratory studyina maxillary central incisor with an open apex. Int Endod J 2021; 54: 1937-47.
  • 16. Swimberghe RCD, Buyse R, Meire MA, De Moor RJG. Efficacyof different irrigation technique in simulated curved root canals. Lasers Med Sci 2021; 36: 1317-22.
  • 17. Guven Y, Uygun AD, Arslan H. Efficacy of EDDY, ultrasonicactivation, XP-endo Finisher and needle irrigation on the removal of mTAP from artificially created grooves in root canals. Aust EndodJ2021; 47: 639-44.
  • 18. Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Real-time Intracanal Temperature Measurement During Different Obturation Techniques. J Endod 2018; 44: 1832-6.
  • 19. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight andcurved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32: 271-5
  • 20. Leonardi DP, Grande NM, Tomazinho FSF, Marques-da-Silva B, Gonzaga CC, Baratto-Filho F, et al. Influence of activation mode and preheating on intracanal irrigant temperature. Aust Endod J 2019; 45: 373-7.
  • 21. Zeltner M, Peters OA, Paqué F. Temperature changes during ultrasonic irrigation with different inserts and modes of activation. J Endod 2009; 35: 573-7.
  • 22. Mohammadi Z. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. Int Dent J 2008; 58: 329-41.
  • 23. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heatinduced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 101-7.
  • 24. Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Real-time intracanal temperature measurement comparing mechanically and laseractivated irrigation to syringe irrigation. Aust Endod J 2021 ;47: 59-66.
  • 25. Salas H, Castrejon A, Fuentes D, Luque A, Luque E. Evaluationof the penetration of CHX 2% on dentinal tubules using Conventional Irrigation, Sonic Irrigation (EDDY) and Passive UltrasonicIrrigation (PUI) techniques: An in vitro study. J Clin ExpDent 2021; 13: e37-42.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ayşenur Kamacı Esen

Fatma Furuncuoğlu

Publication Date December 30, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 24 Issue: 4

Cite

EndNote Kamacı Esen A, Furuncuoğlu F (December 1, 2023) Influence of Sonic Activation Duration on Root Canal Temperature Increase. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal 24 4 268–273.