Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of the Effect of Different Curing Units and Exposure Times on Pulp Chamber Temperature Using Simulated Pulpal Microcirculation

Year 2020, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 104 - 110, 31.08.2020

Abstract

Objective: To compare the elevations in physiological pulp chamber temperature and blood microcirculation during light curing using four different light sources at two different exposure times.
Materials and Methods: The study was performed on eighty Class-V cavities divided into eight groups of ten experiments each, according to the curing unit and exposure time. Short-term curing was performed in four groups: quartz-tungstenhalogen (QTH)-20 seconds (s) (XL3000, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA); Woodpecker (WP)-15s (Lux V Light Cure Unit, WP, Apexion Dental Products); KR-10s (Demi Plus Dental Curing Light, Kerr Dental) and VL-3s (VALO light-emitting diode Curing Light Xtra Power mode, Ultradent Products, South Jordan, UT, USA). The same units were used for long-term curing at double the exposure time (i.e., QHT-40s, WP-30s, KR20s, VL-3+3s). Composite material (Filtek Ultimate, 3M/ESPE) was placed into the cavities, followed by light curing performed at a distance of 1 mm. Temperature changes in the pulp chamber were recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Mann-Whitney U multiple comparisons test, were used for statistical analyses, with p<0.001 considered to be statistically significant.
Results: There were no significant differences among the curing units at the same exposure times. However, increases in pulp chamber temperatures varied significantly depending on the curing time (p<0.001). All the curing units induced significantly higher intrapulpal temperature changes at long-term curing times, except the WP groups (p<0.001). WP-30s, KR-20s and VL-3+3s exhibited critical temperature increases >5.5 °C.
Conclusion: Longer curing times led to critical temperature increases in the pulp chamber. Shorter curing times can protect the pulp tissue against damage caused by temperature elevations above a certain threshold.

References

  • 1. Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp Response to Externally Applied Heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965; 19: 515-30.
  • 2. Lieu C, Nguyen TM, Payant L. In vitro comparison of peak polymerization temperatures of 5 provisional restoration resins. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67: 36-9.
  • 3. Ozturk B, Usumez A, Ozturk AN, Ozer F. In vitro assessment of temperature change in the pulp chamber during cavity preparation. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 436-40.
  • 4. Hussey DL, Biagioni PA, Lamey PJ. Thermographic measurement of temperature change during resin composite polymerization in vivo. J Dent 1995; 23: 267-71.
  • 5. Nomoto R, McCabe JF, Hirano S. Comparison of halogen, plasma and LED curing units. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 287-94.
  • 6. Hofmann N, Markert T, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Effect of high intensity vs. soft-start halogen irradiation on light-cured resin-based composites. Part I. Temperature rise and polymerization shrinkage. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 421-30.
  • 7. Hofmann N, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Effect of irradiation type (LED or QTH) on photo-activated composite shrinkage strain kinetics, temperature rise, and hardness. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 471-9.
  • 8. Powell GL, Anderson JR, Blankenau RJ. Laser and curing light induced in vitro pulpal temperature changes. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999; 17: 3-5.
  • 9. Yamaguchi R, Powers JM, Dennison JB. Thermal expansion of visible-light-cured composite resins. Oper Dent 1989; 14: 64-7.
  • 10. Knezevic A, Tarle Z, Meniga A, Sutalo J, Pichler G. Influence of light intensity from different curing units upon composite temperature rise. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 362-7.
  • 11. Weber J, Rumel A, Netto NG. \[Measurement of thickness of remaining dentin after cavity preparation. Radiographic and direct methods]. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 1980; 34: 452-61.
  • 12. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Correlation between depth of cure and temperature rise of a light-activated resin. Scand J Dent Res 1993; 101: 176-9.
  • 13. Al-Qudah AA, Mitchell CA, Biagioni PA, Hussey DL. Thermographic investigation of contemporary resin-containing dental materials. J Dent 2005; 33: 593-602.
  • 14. Raab WH. Temperature related changes in pulpal microcirculation. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992; 88 Suppl 1: 469-79.
  • 15. Meyer MW. Pulpal blood flow: use of radio-labelled microspheres. Int Endod J 1993; 26: 6-7.
  • 16. Matthews B, Andrew D. Microvascular architecture and exchange in teeth. Microcirculation 1995; 2: 305-13.
  • 17. Kodonas K, Gogos C, Tziafas D. Effect of simulated pulpal microcirculation on intrapulpal temperature changes following application of heat on tooth surfaces. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 247-52.
  • 18. Kodonas K, Gogos C, Tziafa C. Effect of simulated pulpal microcirculation on intrachamber temperature changes following application of various curing units on tooth surface. J Dent 2009; 37: 485-90.
  • 19. Pohto M, Scheinin A. Microscopic Observations on Living Dental Pulp II. The Effect of Thermal Irritants on the Circulation of the Pulp in the Lower Rat Incisor. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1958; 16: 315-27.
  • 20. Whitworth JM, Myers PM, Smith J, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 409-16.
  • 21. Baldissara P, Catapano S, Scotti R. Clinical and histological evaluation of thermal injury thresholds in human teeth: a preliminary study. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 791-801.
  • 22. Pohto M, Scheinin A. Vital microscopy of the pulp in the rat incisor. VII. Reactions to silicate cements. Suom Hammaslaak Toim 1967; 63: 178-86.
  • 23. Schmalz G, Schuster U, Nuetzel K, Schweikl H. An in vitro pulp chamber with three-dimensional cell cultures. J Endod 1999; 25: 24-9.
  • 24. Uhl A, Volpel A, Sigusch BW. Influence of heat from light curing units and dental composite polymerization on cells in vitro. J Dent 2006; 34: 298-306.
  • 25. Kim S. Microcirculation of the dental pulp in health and disease. J Endod 1985; 11: 465-71.
  • 26. Eldeniz AU, Usumez A, Usumez S, Ozturk N. Pulpal temperature rise during light-activated bleaching. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 72: 254-9.
  • 27. Sulieman M, Addy M, Rees JS. Surface and intra-pulpal temperature rises during tooth bleaching: an in vitro study. Br Dent J 2005; 199: 37-40.
  • 28. Cobb DS, Dederich DN, Gardner TV. In vitro temperature change at the dentin/pulpal interface by using conventional visible light versus argon laser. Lasers Surg Med 2000; 26: 386-97.
  • 29. Hannig M, Bott B. In-vitro pulp chamber temperature rise during composite resin polymerization with various light-curing sources. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 275-81.
  • 30. Weerakoon AT, Meyers IA, Symons AL, Walsh LJ. Pulpal heat changes with newly developed resin photopolymerisation systems. Aust Endod J 2002; 28: 108-11.
  • 31. Lloyd CH, Joshi A, McGlynn E. Temperature rises produced by light sources and composites during curing. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 170-4.
  • 32. Kim D, Park SH. Effects of age, sex, and blood pressure on the blood flow velocity in dental pulp measured by Doppler ultrasound technique. Microcirculation 2016; 23: 523-9.
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

İhsan Furkan Ertuğrul

Başak Yazkan

Publication Date August 31, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 21 Issue: 2

Cite

EndNote Ertuğrul İF, Yazkan B (August 1, 2020) Evaluation of the Effect of Different Curing Units and Exposure Times on Pulp Chamber Temperature Using Simulated Pulpal Microcirculation. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal 21 2 104–110.