Research Article
Year 2019,
Volume: 20 Issue: 1, 28 - 33, 30.04.2019
Abstract
References
- 1. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 227-35.
- 2. Dentsply (2011) SDR Scientific Compendium. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from: [http://www.dentsply.de/bausteine.net/f/8883/SCSDRDeTrey110815E.pdf?fd=2](http://www.dentsply.de/bausteine.net/f/8883/SCSDRDeTrey110815E.pdf?fd=2).
- 3. Ivoclar Vivadent (2013) Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill Scientific Documentation. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from: [http://www.ivoclarvivadent.us/en-us/composites/restorativematerials/tetric-evoceram-bulk](http://www.ivoclarvivadent.us/en-us/composites/restorativematerials/tetric-evoceram-bulk) fill.
- 4. Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 618-25.
- 5. VOCO GmbH (2013) x-tra base. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from [http://www.voco.com/en/product/x-tra\_base/index.html](http://www.voco.com/en/product/x-tra_base/index.html).
- 6. 3M ESPE (2012) Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative Technical Product Profile. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from: [http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/792321O/filtek-bulk](http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/792321O/filtek-bulk) fill-flowable-restorative-technical-product-profile.pdf.
- 7. Söderholm KJ, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1692-9.
- 8. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-69.
- 9. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 655-65.
- 10. Kwon Y, Ferracane J, Lee IB. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 801-9.
- 11. Abbas G, Fleming GJP, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent 2003; 31: 437-44.
- 12. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 9-20.
- 13. Al-Ahdal K, Ilie N, Silikas N, Watts DC. Polymerization kinetics and impact of post polymerization on the degree of conversion of bulk fill resin-composite at clinically relevant depth. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 1207-13.
- 14. Han SH, Sadr A, Tagami J, Park SH. Internal adaptation of resin composites at two configurations: Influence of polymerization shrinkage and stress. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 1085-94.
- 15. Al Sunbul H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and shrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 998-1006.
- 16. International Standard ISO 4049:2009. Dentistry – polymer-based restorative materials.
- 17. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 36-9.
- 18. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 211-22.
- 19. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Rate of elution of leachable components from composite. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 282-7.
- 20. Zhang Y, Xu J. Effect of immersion in various media on the sorption, solubility, elution of unreacted monomers, and flexural properties of two model dental composite compositions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19: 2477-83.
- 21. Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. Long-term sorption and solubility of bulk fill and conventional resin-composites in water and artificial saliva. J Dent 2015; 43: 1511-8.
- 22. Oysaed H, Ruyter IE. Water sorption and filler characteristics of composites for use in posterior teeth. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 1315-8.
- 23. Floyd CJ, Dickens SH. Network structure of Bis-GMA- and UDMA-based resin systems. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 1143-9.
- 24. Fabre HS, Fabre S, Cefaly DF, de Oliveira Carrilho MR, Garcia FC, Wang L. Water sorption and solubility of dentin bonding agents light-cured with different light sources. J Dent 2007; 35: 253-8.
- 25. Al Sunbul H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Resin-based composites show similar kinetic profiles for dimensional change and recovery with solvent storage. Dent Mater 2015; 31: e201-17.
- 26. Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 260–5.
- 27. Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N, Karabulut E. Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable restorative materials. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 755-64.
- 28. Jung M, Eichelberger K, Klimek J. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one step and multiple step polishing. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 347-55.
- 29. Janus J, Fauxpoint G, Arntz Y, Pelletier H, Etienne O. Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 416-25.
- 30. Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 11-7.
- 31. Gönülol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent 2012; 40 Suppl 2: e64-70.
Evaluation of Water Sorption-solubility and Surface Roughness of Different Bulk Fill Composite Resins
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate and compare the water sorption (WS), solubility (SO) and surface roughness (SR) of four bulk fill resin-based composites (RBCs), a conventional flowable RBC and a conventional hybrid RBC.
Materials and Methods: Disc-shaped specimens of 3 low-viscosity bulk fill RBCs (SureFil SDR flow, X-tra base, Filtek Bulk Fill flow), 1 high-viscosity bulk fill RBC (Tetric EvoCream Bulk Fill), 1 conventional low-viscosity flowable RBC (Filtek Ultimate flow) and 1 conventional hybrid RBC (Filtek Z250) (n=10) were prepared and immersed in distilled water for 28 days. Upon removal, specimens were weighed using an electronic scale to determine WS and SO based on weight gain/loss, and surface profilometry was performed to determine SR. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc tests (p=0.05).
Results: WS and SO showed significant, positive correlations (r=0.612; p<0.001), and both varied significantly among the materials, with WS and SO values of both high-filled and low-filled bulk fill RBCs lower than their conventional counterparts. Moreover, SR values of both bulk and conventional flowable low-fill RBCs were significantly lower in comparison to the high-fill RBCs (p<0.05).
Conclusion: WS, SO and SR of RBCs are material-dependent and highly affected by filler loading and resin matrix composition. Bulk fill RBCs can be used in a large variety of clinical situations in line with the manufacturers’ recommendations.
References
- 1. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 227-35.
- 2. Dentsply (2011) SDR Scientific Compendium. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from: [http://www.dentsply.de/bausteine.net/f/8883/SCSDRDeTrey110815E.pdf?fd=2](http://www.dentsply.de/bausteine.net/f/8883/SCSDRDeTrey110815E.pdf?fd=2).
- 3. Ivoclar Vivadent (2013) Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill Scientific Documentation. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from: [http://www.ivoclarvivadent.us/en-us/composites/restorativematerials/tetric-evoceram-bulk](http://www.ivoclarvivadent.us/en-us/composites/restorativematerials/tetric-evoceram-bulk) fill.
- 4. Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 618-25.
- 5. VOCO GmbH (2013) x-tra base. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from [http://www.voco.com/en/product/x-tra\_base/index.html](http://www.voco.com/en/product/x-tra_base/index.html).
- 6. 3M ESPE (2012) Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative Technical Product Profile. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from: [http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/792321O/filtek-bulk](http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/792321O/filtek-bulk) fill-flowable-restorative-technical-product-profile.pdf.
- 7. Söderholm KJ, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1692-9.
- 8. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-69.
- 9. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 655-65.
- 10. Kwon Y, Ferracane J, Lee IB. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 801-9.
- 11. Abbas G, Fleming GJP, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent 2003; 31: 437-44.
- 12. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 9-20.
- 13. Al-Ahdal K, Ilie N, Silikas N, Watts DC. Polymerization kinetics and impact of post polymerization on the degree of conversion of bulk fill resin-composite at clinically relevant depth. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 1207-13.
- 14. Han SH, Sadr A, Tagami J, Park SH. Internal adaptation of resin composites at two configurations: Influence of polymerization shrinkage and stress. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 1085-94.
- 15. Al Sunbul H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and shrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 998-1006.
- 16. International Standard ISO 4049:2009. Dentistry – polymer-based restorative materials.
- 17. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 36-9.
- 18. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 211-22.
- 19. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Rate of elution of leachable components from composite. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 282-7.
- 20. Zhang Y, Xu J. Effect of immersion in various media on the sorption, solubility, elution of unreacted monomers, and flexural properties of two model dental composite compositions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19: 2477-83.
- 21. Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. Long-term sorption and solubility of bulk fill and conventional resin-composites in water and artificial saliva. J Dent 2015; 43: 1511-8.
- 22. Oysaed H, Ruyter IE. Water sorption and filler characteristics of composites for use in posterior teeth. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 1315-8.
- 23. Floyd CJ, Dickens SH. Network structure of Bis-GMA- and UDMA-based resin systems. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 1143-9.
- 24. Fabre HS, Fabre S, Cefaly DF, de Oliveira Carrilho MR, Garcia FC, Wang L. Water sorption and solubility of dentin bonding agents light-cured with different light sources. J Dent 2007; 35: 253-8.
- 25. Al Sunbul H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Resin-based composites show similar kinetic profiles for dimensional change and recovery with solvent storage. Dent Mater 2015; 31: e201-17.
- 26. Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 260–5.
- 27. Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N, Karabulut E. Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable restorative materials. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 755-64.
- 28. Jung M, Eichelberger K, Klimek J. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one step and multiple step polishing. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 347-55.
- 29. Janus J, Fauxpoint G, Arntz Y, Pelletier H, Etienne O. Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 416-25.
- 30. Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 11-7.
- 31. Gönülol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent 2012; 40 Suppl 2: e64-70.
There are 31 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Dentistry (Other) |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | April 30, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 20 Issue: 1 |