Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, Volume: 20 Issue: 2, 121 - 128, 31.08.2019
https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2018.60252

Abstract

References

  • 1. Telleman G, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Long-term evaluation of hollow screw and hollow cylinder dental implants: clinical and radiographic results after 10 years. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 203-10.
  • 2. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Chew YS, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; CD006698.
  • 3. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: a literature review. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 915-23.
  • 4. Hodosh M, Povar M, Shklar G. The dental polymer implant concept. J Prosthet Dent 1969; 22: 371-80.
  • 5. Lundgren D, Rylander H, Andersson M, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Healing-in of root analogue titanium implants placed in extraction sockets. An experimental study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3: 136-43.
  • 6. Kohal RJ, Hürzeler MB, Mota LF, Klaus G, Caffesse RG, Strub JR. Custom-made root analogue titanium implants placed into extraction sockets. An experimental study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 386-92.
  • 7. Kohal R, Klaus G, Strub J. Clinical investigation of a new dental immediate implant system-the Relmplant-system. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2002; 57: 495-7.
  • 8. Mangano FG, Cirotti B, Sammons RL, Mangano C. Custom-made, root-analogue direct laser metal forming implant: a case report. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 1241-5.
  • 9. Mangano FG, De Franco M, Caprioglio A, Macchi A, Piattelli A, Mangano C. Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue direct laser metal sintering (DLMS) implants: a 1-year prospective study on 15 patients. Lasers Med Sci 2014; 29: 1321-8.
  • 10. Figliuzzi M, Mangano F, Mangano C. A novel root analogue dental implant using CT scan and CAD/CAM: selective laser melting technology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 858-62.
  • 11. Patankar A, Kshirsagar R, Patankar S, Pawar S. Immediate, Non Submerged Root Analog Zirconia Implant in Single Rooted Tooth Replacement: Case Report with 2 years Follow Up. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2016; 15: 270-3.
  • 12. Pirker W, Wiedemann D, Lidauer A, Kocher AA. Immediate, single stage, truly anatomic zirconia implant in lower molar replacement: a case report with 2.5 years follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 40: 212-6.
  • 13. Pirker W, Kocher A. Root analog zirconia implants: true anatomical design for molar replacement--a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011; 31: 663-8.
  • 14. Pirker W, Kocher A. True anatomical zirconia implants for molar replacement: a case report from an ongoing clinical study with a 2‐year follow‐up. Oral Surgery 2009; 2: 144-8.
  • 15. Pirker W, Kocher A. Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implants placed into single-rooted extraction sockets: 2-year follow-up of a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38: 1127-32.
  • 16. Pirker W, Kocher A. Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implant in single tooth replacement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37: 293-5.
  • 17. Moin DA, Hassan B, Wismeijer D. Immediate Nonsubmerged Custom Root Analog Implants: A Prospective Pilot Clinical Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018; 33: e37-44.
  • 18. Fischer J, Schott A, Märtin S. Surface micro-structuring of zirconia dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 162-6.
  • 19. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Determinants of correct clinical reporting. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 517-21.

Patient-specific Root-analogue Immediate Titanium Premolar Dental Implants: Prospective Evaluation of Fifteen Patients with One-year Follow-up

Year 2019, Volume: 20 Issue: 2, 121 - 128, 31.08.2019
https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2018.60252

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical use and outcomes of the patient-specific root-analogue immediate titanium premolar dental implants (PRIs) that are manufactured by using computer numerical control (CNC) machine.
Materials and Methods: Three-dimensional models of the 15 non-restorable premolar teeth were constructed from cone-beam computed tomography datasets and transferred to a specific modelling software to design the PRIs. PRIs were manufactured from titanium by using a CNC machine and placed immediately after tooth extraction. Implants were evaluated clinically and radiologically oneyear after implant placement.
Results: Fifteen patients (five males, 10 females), aged between 18-53 years (average 29.9) were included in the study. The success rate was 80% after oneyear follow up. There was no peri-implant radiolucency around survival implants. The 1-year mean marginal bone loss was 1.1 mm (±0.4). Clinically healthy gingival margins were observed without any signs of periodontitis or implant mobility. The mean Periotest® value was -4.7±0.3.
Conclusion: Relatively high success rate was observed for upper premolar PRIs (92.3%) compared to lower premolar PRIs (50%). PRI concept is a new promising treatment modality. Further studies with long-term follow-up are necessary

References

  • 1. Telleman G, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Long-term evaluation of hollow screw and hollow cylinder dental implants: clinical and radiographic results after 10 years. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 203-10.
  • 2. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Chew YS, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; CD006698.
  • 3. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: a literature review. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 915-23.
  • 4. Hodosh M, Povar M, Shklar G. The dental polymer implant concept. J Prosthet Dent 1969; 22: 371-80.
  • 5. Lundgren D, Rylander H, Andersson M, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Healing-in of root analogue titanium implants placed in extraction sockets. An experimental study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3: 136-43.
  • 6. Kohal RJ, Hürzeler MB, Mota LF, Klaus G, Caffesse RG, Strub JR. Custom-made root analogue titanium implants placed into extraction sockets. An experimental study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 386-92.
  • 7. Kohal R, Klaus G, Strub J. Clinical investigation of a new dental immediate implant system-the Relmplant-system. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2002; 57: 495-7.
  • 8. Mangano FG, Cirotti B, Sammons RL, Mangano C. Custom-made, root-analogue direct laser metal forming implant: a case report. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 1241-5.
  • 9. Mangano FG, De Franco M, Caprioglio A, Macchi A, Piattelli A, Mangano C. Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue direct laser metal sintering (DLMS) implants: a 1-year prospective study on 15 patients. Lasers Med Sci 2014; 29: 1321-8.
  • 10. Figliuzzi M, Mangano F, Mangano C. A novel root analogue dental implant using CT scan and CAD/CAM: selective laser melting technology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 858-62.
  • 11. Patankar A, Kshirsagar R, Patankar S, Pawar S. Immediate, Non Submerged Root Analog Zirconia Implant in Single Rooted Tooth Replacement: Case Report with 2 years Follow Up. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2016; 15: 270-3.
  • 12. Pirker W, Wiedemann D, Lidauer A, Kocher AA. Immediate, single stage, truly anatomic zirconia implant in lower molar replacement: a case report with 2.5 years follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 40: 212-6.
  • 13. Pirker W, Kocher A. Root analog zirconia implants: true anatomical design for molar replacement--a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011; 31: 663-8.
  • 14. Pirker W, Kocher A. True anatomical zirconia implants for molar replacement: a case report from an ongoing clinical study with a 2‐year follow‐up. Oral Surgery 2009; 2: 144-8.
  • 15. Pirker W, Kocher A. Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implants placed into single-rooted extraction sockets: 2-year follow-up of a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38: 1127-32.
  • 16. Pirker W, Kocher A. Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implant in single tooth replacement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37: 293-5.
  • 17. Moin DA, Hassan B, Wismeijer D. Immediate Nonsubmerged Custom Root Analog Implants: A Prospective Pilot Clinical Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018; 33: e37-44.
  • 18. Fischer J, Schott A, Märtin S. Surface micro-structuring of zirconia dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 162-6.
  • 19. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Determinants of correct clinical reporting. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 517-21.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ahmet Emin Demirbaş

Emine Fulya Akkoyun

Hasan Önder Gümüş

Banu Arzu Alkan

Alper Alkan

Publication Date August 31, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 20 Issue: 2

Cite

EndNote Demirbaş AE, Akkoyun EF, Gümüş HÖ, Alkan BA, Alkan A (August 1, 2019) Patient-specific Root-analogue Immediate Titanium Premolar Dental Implants: Prospective Evaluation of Fifteen Patients with One-year Follow-up. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal 20 2 121–128.