Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2025, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 26 - 37
https://doi.org/10.71286/moi.1727407

Abstract

References

  • 1. Ayati, N., Lee, S. T., Zakavi, S. R., Cheng, M., Lau, W. F. E., Parakh, S., Pathmaraj, K., & Scott, A. M. (2021). Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction After PD-1 Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Assessment Methods. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 62(7), 926–933. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.254508
  • 2. Brahmer, J., Reckamp, K. L., Baas, P., Crinò, L., Eberhardt, W. E., Poddubskaya, E., Antonia, S., Pluzanski, A., Vokes, E. E., Holgado, E., Waterhouse, D., Ready, N., Gainor, J., Arén Frontera, O., Havel, L., Steins, M., Garassino, M. C., Aerts, J. G., Domine, M., Paz-Ares, L., … Spigel, D. R. (2015). Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. The New England journal of medicine, 373(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504627
  • 3. Borghaei, H., Paz-Ares, L., Horn, L., Spigel, D. R., Steins, M., Ready, N. E., Chow, L. Q., Vokes, E. E., Felip, E., Holgado, E., Barlesi, F., Kohlhäufl, M., Arrieta, O., Burgio, M. A., Fayette, J., Lena, H., Poddubskaya, E., Gerber, D. E., Gettinger, S. N., Rudin, C. M., … Brahmer, J. R. (2015). Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. The New England journal of medicine, 373(17), 1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1507643
  • 4. Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Soerjomataram, I., & Jemal, A. (2024). Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 74(3), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834
  • 5. Hashimoto, K., Kaira, K., Yamaguchi, O., Mouri, A., Shiono, A., Miura, Y., Murayama, Y., Kobayashi, K., Kagamu, H., & Kuji, I. (2020). Potential of FDG-PET as Prognostic Significance after anti-PD-1 Antibody against Patients with Previously Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of clinical medicine, 9(3), 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030725
  • 6. Horn, L., Spigel, D. R., Vokes, E. E., Holgado, E., Ready, N., Steins, M., Poddubskaya, E., Borghaei, H., Felip, E., Paz-Ares, L., Pluzanski, A., Reckamp, K. L., Burgio, M. A., Kohlhäeufl, M., Waterhouse, D., Barlesi, F., Antonia, S., Arrieta, O., Fayette, J., Crinò, L., … Eberhardt, W. E. E. (2017). Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Two-Year Outcomes From Two Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057). Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 35(35), 3924–3933. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3062

Prognostic Value of PET-Based Metabolic Markers in Nivolumab-Treated NSCLC

Year 2025, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 26 - 37
https://doi.org/10.71286/moi.1727407

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving nivolumab as second-line therapy. The study also explored associations between these parameters, treatment response, and survival outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 32 stage IV NSCLC patients who received at least four doses of nivolumab and underwent both baseline and follow-up PET/CT scans. Metabolic parameters, including SUVmax, SUVmean, total metabolic tumor volume (tMTV), and total lesion glycolysis (tTLG), were measured. Treatment response was classified according to EORTC criteria. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were applied for survival comparisons, and non-parametric methods evaluate associations. Results: Patients with partial metabolic response demonstrated significantly longer post-nivolumab survival. Post-treatment SUVmax, SUVmean, and tTLG differed significantly among response categories. Pretreatment tMTV and tTLG, and post-treatment SUVmax, SUVmean, and tTLG, were significantly associated with mortality (p < 0.05). Lower baseline tMTV and tTLG, and lower post-treatment SUVmax, SUVmean, tMTV, and tTLG were significantly associated with longer overall and post-nivolumab survival (p < 0.05). Post-treatment SUVmax and SUVmean were strong predictors of mortality. Conclusion: PET/CT-derived metabolic parameters, especially post-treatment SUVmax and SUVmean, offer valuable prognostic insights and may support personalized immunotherapy strategies in advanced NSCLC.

References

  • 1. Ayati, N., Lee, S. T., Zakavi, S. R., Cheng, M., Lau, W. F. E., Parakh, S., Pathmaraj, K., & Scott, A. M. (2021). Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction After PD-1 Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Assessment Methods. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 62(7), 926–933. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.254508
  • 2. Brahmer, J., Reckamp, K. L., Baas, P., Crinò, L., Eberhardt, W. E., Poddubskaya, E., Antonia, S., Pluzanski, A., Vokes, E. E., Holgado, E., Waterhouse, D., Ready, N., Gainor, J., Arén Frontera, O., Havel, L., Steins, M., Garassino, M. C., Aerts, J. G., Domine, M., Paz-Ares, L., … Spigel, D. R. (2015). Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. The New England journal of medicine, 373(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504627
  • 3. Borghaei, H., Paz-Ares, L., Horn, L., Spigel, D. R., Steins, M., Ready, N. E., Chow, L. Q., Vokes, E. E., Felip, E., Holgado, E., Barlesi, F., Kohlhäufl, M., Arrieta, O., Burgio, M. A., Fayette, J., Lena, H., Poddubskaya, E., Gerber, D. E., Gettinger, S. N., Rudin, C. M., … Brahmer, J. R. (2015). Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. The New England journal of medicine, 373(17), 1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1507643
  • 4. Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Soerjomataram, I., & Jemal, A. (2024). Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 74(3), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834
  • 5. Hashimoto, K., Kaira, K., Yamaguchi, O., Mouri, A., Shiono, A., Miura, Y., Murayama, Y., Kobayashi, K., Kagamu, H., & Kuji, I. (2020). Potential of FDG-PET as Prognostic Significance after anti-PD-1 Antibody against Patients with Previously Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of clinical medicine, 9(3), 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030725
  • 6. Horn, L., Spigel, D. R., Vokes, E. E., Holgado, E., Ready, N., Steins, M., Poddubskaya, E., Borghaei, H., Felip, E., Paz-Ares, L., Pluzanski, A., Reckamp, K. L., Burgio, M. A., Kohlhäeufl, M., Waterhouse, D., Barlesi, F., Antonia, S., Arrieta, O., Fayette, J., Crinò, L., … Eberhardt, W. E. E. (2017). Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Two-Year Outcomes From Two Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057). Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 35(35), 3924–3933. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3062
There are 6 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Nuclear Medicine
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Gozde Mutevelizade 0000-0001-5986-8777

Nazim Aydin 0009-0003-0689-448X

Atike Pinar Erdoğan 0000-0003-4859-7574

Bilal Cagri Bozdemir 0009-0006-3935-0018

Nagihan Kolkıran 0000-0001-9344-7212

Elvan S.bilgin 0000-0002-3330-1702

Early Pub Date August 11, 2025
Publication Date
Submission Date June 26, 2025
Acceptance Date July 30, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Mutevelizade, G., Aydin, N., Erdoğan, A. P., Bozdemir, B. C., et al. (2025). Prognostic Value of PET-Based Metabolic Markers in Nivolumab-Treated NSCLC. Molecular Oncologic Imaging, 5(2), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.71286/moi.1727407
AMA Mutevelizade G, Aydin N, Erdoğan AP, Bozdemir BC, Kolkıran N, S.bilgin E. Prognostic Value of PET-Based Metabolic Markers in Nivolumab-Treated NSCLC. Molecular Oncologic Imaging. August 2025;5(2):26-37. doi:10.71286/moi.1727407
Chicago Mutevelizade, Gozde, Nazim Aydin, Atike Pinar Erdoğan, Bilal Cagri Bozdemir, Nagihan Kolkıran, and Elvan S.bilgin. “Prognostic Value of PET-Based Metabolic Markers in Nivolumab-Treated NSCLC”. Molecular Oncologic Imaging 5, no. 2 (August 2025): 26-37. https://doi.org/10.71286/moi.1727407.
EndNote Mutevelizade G, Aydin N, Erdoğan AP, Bozdemir BC, Kolkıran N, S.bilgin E (August 1, 2025) Prognostic Value of PET-Based Metabolic Markers in Nivolumab-Treated NSCLC. Molecular Oncologic Imaging 5 2 26–37.
IEEE G. Mutevelizade, N. Aydin, A. P. Erdoğan, B. C. Bozdemir, N. Kolkıran, and E. S.bilgin, “Prognostic Value of PET-Based Metabolic Markers in Nivolumab-Treated NSCLC”, Molecular Oncologic Imaging, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 26–37, 2025, doi: 10.71286/moi.1727407.
ISNAD Mutevelizade, Gozde et al. “Prognostic Value of PET-Based Metabolic Markers in Nivolumab-Treated NSCLC”. Molecular Oncologic Imaging 5/2 (August 2025), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.71286/moi.1727407.
JAMA Mutevelizade G, Aydin N, Erdoğan AP, Bozdemir BC, Kolkıran N, S.bilgin E. Prognostic Value of PET-Based Metabolic Markers in Nivolumab-Treated NSCLC. Molecular Oncologic Imaging. 2025;5:26–37.
MLA Mutevelizade, Gozde et al. “Prognostic Value of PET-Based Metabolic Markers in Nivolumab-Treated NSCLC”. Molecular Oncologic Imaging, vol. 5, no. 2, 2025, pp. 26-37, doi:10.71286/moi.1727407.
Vancouver Mutevelizade G, Aydin N, Erdoğan AP, Bozdemir BC, Kolkıran N, S.bilgin E. Prognostic Value of PET-Based Metabolic Markers in Nivolumab-Treated NSCLC. Molecular Oncologic Imaging. 2025;5(2):26-37.