Abstract
Online technologies have begun to penetrate society with many different
applications and innovations since 1990s when the internet began to enter our
lives. Until the early 2000s, various public institutions, private enterprises,
municipalities, universities and other organizations began to enforce
themselves to digital platforms. The concept of digital citizenship has emerged
as a result of these developments. In this sense, the extent to which digital
citizenship is addressed by public institutions in Turkey as a public policy
constitutes the main theme of this paper. Firstly, 9 dimensions of digital
citizenship handled by Ribble and his colleagues (Ribble et al., 2004) are going
to be examined in the context of the policies of public institutions. Thus, it will
be examined how public institutions contribute to Turkey's digital
transformation and to what extent it contributes to digital citizenship.
Keywords
References
- Akdogan, A. Argun (2011). Historical Traces of Public Policy Discipline in Turkey, Public Administration and Public Policies in Turkey, Editör: Filiz Kartal, Public Administration Institute for Turkey and Middle East Publishing, Ankara. Bicer, M. ve H. H. Yılmaz (2009), “Evaluation of Parliament's Public Policy Creation and Planning Process in the New Public Financial Management System”, Journal of Legislation, pp. 13. Calvani, A., Cartelli, A., Fini, A., and Ranieri, M. (2009). “Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school”, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge SocietyEnglish Version, 4(3). Cevik, Hasan, Demirci, Suleyman (2012), Public Policy, İkinci Baskı, Seçkin Publishing, Ankara. Cormode, G., and Krishnamurthy, B. (2008), “Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0”, First Monday, 13(6). Cubukcu, A., and Bazyan, S. (2016), “A Study Regarding the Perception of Digital Citizenship among Adults and the Assessment of This Perception: A Digital Literacy Model”, International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLDC), 7(3), 23- 37. Cubukcu, A. (2014), Studies on children online protection and development of perception of digital citizenship with online modules, ICT Expertise Thesis, Information and Communication Technologies Authority, Ankara. Conference of INGOs of The Council of Europe, (2009), Code of Good Practice for Civil Participation in the Decision-Making Process. Eren, Veysel (2014). Public Policy, Introduction to Political Science, Editor: Önder Kutlu, pp. 259-282, Lisans Publishing, Konya. Gokus, Mehmet (2000). “Role of Bureaucracy in Determination of Public Policies”, Selçuk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, Number: 6, pp. 35-43. Hague, Rod, Harrop, Martin. (2007), Comparative Goverment and Politics, Palgrave Macmillan, England. Kapti, Alican (2013). Public Policy Process, Public Policy Process, Editor: Alican Kaptı, pp. 17-25, Seçkin Publishing, Ankara. Koremez, B., Personnel Specialist of State, Innovation Management in Public Administration, 2010. Kutlu, Onder (2012), Comparative Public Administration, Cizgi Bookstore, Konya. Kutlu, Onder, “Local Public Policies”, Yeni Haber, 14.01.2015. Ozel, Mehmet (2015). Public Policy and Local Governments, Local Public Policy Approaches in Local Governments, Editor: Mehmet Özel, Çizgi Bookstore, Konya. Ribble, M. S., Bailey, G. D., and Hall, B. (2005), “Teaching digital citizenship: when will it become a priority for 21st century schools”, School Business Affairs, 71(3), 11-14.
Abstract
Online technologies have begun to penetrate society with many different applications and innovations since 1990s when the internet began to enter our lives. Until the early 2000s, various public institutions, private enterprises, municipalities, universities and other organizations began to enforce themselves to digital platforms. The concept of digital citizenship has emerged as a result of these developments. In this sense, the extent to which digital citizenship is addressed by public institutions in Turkey as a public policy constitutes the main theme of this paper. Firstly, 9 dimensions of digital citizenship handled by Ribble and his colleagues (Ribble et al., 2004) are going to be examined in the context of the policies of public institutions. Thus, it will be examined how public institutions contribute to Turkey's digital transformation and to what extent it contributes to digital citizenship.
Keywords
References
- Akdogan, A. Argun (2011). Historical Traces of Public Policy Discipline in Turkey, Public Administration and Public Policies in Turkey, Editör: Filiz Kartal, Public Administration Institute for Turkey and Middle East Publishing, Ankara. Bicer, M. ve H. H. Yılmaz (2009), “Evaluation of Parliament's Public Policy Creation and Planning Process in the New Public Financial Management System”, Journal of Legislation, pp. 13. Calvani, A., Cartelli, A., Fini, A., and Ranieri, M. (2009). “Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school”, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge SocietyEnglish Version, 4(3). Cevik, Hasan, Demirci, Suleyman (2012), Public Policy, İkinci Baskı, Seçkin Publishing, Ankara. Cormode, G., and Krishnamurthy, B. (2008), “Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0”, First Monday, 13(6). Cubukcu, A., and Bazyan, S. (2016), “A Study Regarding the Perception of Digital Citizenship among Adults and the Assessment of This Perception: A Digital Literacy Model”, International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLDC), 7(3), 23- 37. Cubukcu, A. (2014), Studies on children online protection and development of perception of digital citizenship with online modules, ICT Expertise Thesis, Information and Communication Technologies Authority, Ankara. Conference of INGOs of The Council of Europe, (2009), Code of Good Practice for Civil Participation in the Decision-Making Process. Eren, Veysel (2014). Public Policy, Introduction to Political Science, Editor: Önder Kutlu, pp. 259-282, Lisans Publishing, Konya. Gokus, Mehmet (2000). “Role of Bureaucracy in Determination of Public Policies”, Selçuk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, Number: 6, pp. 35-43. Hague, Rod, Harrop, Martin. (2007), Comparative Goverment and Politics, Palgrave Macmillan, England. Kapti, Alican (2013). Public Policy Process, Public Policy Process, Editor: Alican Kaptı, pp. 17-25, Seçkin Publishing, Ankara. Koremez, B., Personnel Specialist of State, Innovation Management in Public Administration, 2010. Kutlu, Onder (2012), Comparative Public Administration, Cizgi Bookstore, Konya. Kutlu, Onder, “Local Public Policies”, Yeni Haber, 14.01.2015. Ozel, Mehmet (2015). Public Policy and Local Governments, Local Public Policy Approaches in Local Governments, Editor: Mehmet Özel, Çizgi Bookstore, Konya. Ribble, M. S., Bailey, G. D., and Hall, B. (2005), “Teaching digital citizenship: when will it become a priority for 21st century schools”, School Business Affairs, 71(3), 11-14.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | October 1, 2017 |
| Submission Date | July 18, 2017 |
| Acceptance Date | August 15, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 3 Issue: 3 |