Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2025, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 1 - 18, 30.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.53629/sakaefd.1582254

Abstract

References

  • Bolman, L. G., & Gallos, J. V. (2011). Reframing academic leadership. Jossey-Bass.
  • Çelik, S., & Eryılmaz, F. (2006). The levels of transformational leadership of industrial vocational high school principals according to teachers' perceptions: A case study in Ankara. Politeknik Journal, 9(4), 211–224.
  • Çekmecelioğlu, H. G., & Ülker, F. (2014). The effect of leader-member interaction on employee attitudes: A study in the education sector. Kocaeli University Journal of Social Sciences, 28, 35–58.
  • Çetin, M. (2013). Higher education management and leadership. Nobel Academic Publishing.
  • Çevik, M. S. (2021). An analysis of school principals' plasma leadership behaviors and students' perceptions of citizenship using spatial analysis methods [Doctoral Thesis. Hacettepe University]. Ankara.
  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2000). Vision in the leadership spiral. Nobel Publishing Distribution.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2004a). Organizational intelligence and organizational stupidity. Asil Publishing Distribution.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2004b). The abilities related to organizational intelligence and their action dimensions at schools. Research in Educational Reform, 9(3), 3–18.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Bülbül, M. Ş. (2013). A multi-dimensional approach to leadership in chaotic environments. In S. Banerjee (Ed.), Chaos and complexity theory for management: Nonlinear dynamics (pp. 89–104). IGI Global.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2014). Understanding Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Turkey with plasma as a metaphor of the fourth state of matter. In Ş. Ş. Erçetin (Ed.), Chaos, complexity and leadership 2014 (pp. 1–13). Springer.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2019). New paradigms in educational administration. Nobel Publishing.
  • Fullan, M. (1998). Leadership for the 21st century: Breaking the bonds of dependency. Educational Leadership, 55(7), 6–10.
  • Hanna, D. E. (2003). Building a leadership vision: Eleven strategic challenges for higher education. Educase Review, 38(4), 28–34.
  • Karaaslan, A., & Akın, U. (2019). Instructional leadership in higher education: Department heads' views. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 12(3), 992–1012. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.425597
  • Karsantık, İ. (2019). An investigation of the relationships between academic leadership, university culture, and academic identity in higher education. [Doctoral Thesis. Marmara University]. Istanbul.
  • Laroussi M, Leipold F. (2004). Evaluation of the roles of reactive species, heat, and UV radiation in the inactivation of bacterial cells by air plasmas at 267 atmospheric pressure. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 233, 81- 86.
  • Luo, Y. (2009). Are we on the same page? Justice aggreement in ınternational joint ventures. Journal of Business Research, 44(9), 383-396.
  • Poole, W. L. (2007). Organizational justice as a framework for understanding union management relations in education. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 725-748.
  • Sporn, B. (1996). Managing university culture: An analysis of the relationship between institutional culture and management approaches. Higher Education, 32(1), 41–61.
  • Stebick, D. M. (2009). A case study investigating the implications of change as instructional leaders implement IDEA’s response to intervention policy [Doctoral Thesis. University of Cincinnati]. Ohio, USA.
  • Stroh, L. K., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (2002). Organizational behavior: a management challenge. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  • Toytok, E. H. (2019). Knowledge management. In N. Cemaloğlu & M. Özdemir (Eds.), Educational management (pp. 529–550). Pegem Academy.
  • Yılmaz Fındık, L., & Erçetin, Ş. Ş., (2023). How Do Universities in Türkiye Integrate Sustainable Development Goals into Their Strategies? SUSTAINABILITY, vol.15, no.24, 1-16.

Levels of Achieving Plasma Leadership Behaviors of Deans in Higher Education

Year 2025, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 1 - 18, 30.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.53629/sakaefd.1582254

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to determine the level of deans' performance of plasma leadership behaviors, based on the perspectives of academics working at state universities in Ankara. In addition, this study aims to analyze the roles of deans, in higher education within the framework of the plasma leadership concept. By identifying the similarities and differences between these roles, the study seeks to contribute to the management processes in Turkish higher education. Another goal is to advance management practices in higher education by highlighting the significance and functionality of plasma leadership within the educational management framework. Consequently, the study also aims to offer innovative perspectives on the duties of deans within the scope of plasma leadership.
A quantitative research design has been adopted to fulfill these objectives. The level of deans' performance of plasma leadership behaviors were analyzed across several variables, as perceived by faculty members. The population of the study includes 15,846 academics employed at state universities in Ankara, with a sample group of 376 participants. The research utilized the "Multi Dimensional Plasma Leadership Scale," developed by Erçetin and Çevik (2021), adapted for the higher education context to measure deans' plasma leadership behaviors. Nonparametric tests were used for data analysis. The findings suggest that while demographic factors such as gender, seniority, and faculty affiliation may not significantly impact the perceptions of deans' plasma leadership behaviors, the length of time an academician has worked with the dean plays a crucial role in shaping these perceptions.

References

  • Bolman, L. G., & Gallos, J. V. (2011). Reframing academic leadership. Jossey-Bass.
  • Çelik, S., & Eryılmaz, F. (2006). The levels of transformational leadership of industrial vocational high school principals according to teachers' perceptions: A case study in Ankara. Politeknik Journal, 9(4), 211–224.
  • Çekmecelioğlu, H. G., & Ülker, F. (2014). The effect of leader-member interaction on employee attitudes: A study in the education sector. Kocaeli University Journal of Social Sciences, 28, 35–58.
  • Çetin, M. (2013). Higher education management and leadership. Nobel Academic Publishing.
  • Çevik, M. S. (2021). An analysis of school principals' plasma leadership behaviors and students' perceptions of citizenship using spatial analysis methods [Doctoral Thesis. Hacettepe University]. Ankara.
  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2000). Vision in the leadership spiral. Nobel Publishing Distribution.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2004a). Organizational intelligence and organizational stupidity. Asil Publishing Distribution.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2004b). The abilities related to organizational intelligence and their action dimensions at schools. Research in Educational Reform, 9(3), 3–18.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Bülbül, M. Ş. (2013). A multi-dimensional approach to leadership in chaotic environments. In S. Banerjee (Ed.), Chaos and complexity theory for management: Nonlinear dynamics (pp. 89–104). IGI Global.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2014). Understanding Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Turkey with plasma as a metaphor of the fourth state of matter. In Ş. Ş. Erçetin (Ed.), Chaos, complexity and leadership 2014 (pp. 1–13). Springer.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2019). New paradigms in educational administration. Nobel Publishing.
  • Fullan, M. (1998). Leadership for the 21st century: Breaking the bonds of dependency. Educational Leadership, 55(7), 6–10.
  • Hanna, D. E. (2003). Building a leadership vision: Eleven strategic challenges for higher education. Educase Review, 38(4), 28–34.
  • Karaaslan, A., & Akın, U. (2019). Instructional leadership in higher education: Department heads' views. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 12(3), 992–1012. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.425597
  • Karsantık, İ. (2019). An investigation of the relationships between academic leadership, university culture, and academic identity in higher education. [Doctoral Thesis. Marmara University]. Istanbul.
  • Laroussi M, Leipold F. (2004). Evaluation of the roles of reactive species, heat, and UV radiation in the inactivation of bacterial cells by air plasmas at 267 atmospheric pressure. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 233, 81- 86.
  • Luo, Y. (2009). Are we on the same page? Justice aggreement in ınternational joint ventures. Journal of Business Research, 44(9), 383-396.
  • Poole, W. L. (2007). Organizational justice as a framework for understanding union management relations in education. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 725-748.
  • Sporn, B. (1996). Managing university culture: An analysis of the relationship between institutional culture and management approaches. Higher Education, 32(1), 41–61.
  • Stebick, D. M. (2009). A case study investigating the implications of change as instructional leaders implement IDEA’s response to intervention policy [Doctoral Thesis. University of Cincinnati]. Ohio, USA.
  • Stroh, L. K., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (2002). Organizational behavior: a management challenge. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  • Toytok, E. H. (2019). Knowledge management. In N. Cemaloğlu & M. Özdemir (Eds.), Educational management (pp. 529–550). Pegem Academy.
  • Yılmaz Fındık, L., & Erçetin, Ş. Ş., (2023). How Do Universities in Türkiye Integrate Sustainable Development Goals into Their Strategies? SUSTAINABILITY, vol.15, no.24, 1-16.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Education Management, Leadership in Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Şefika Şule Erçetin 0000-0002-7686-4863

Handan Ege 0009-0001-4305-4186

Early Pub Date June 30, 2025
Publication Date June 30, 2025
Submission Date November 10, 2024
Acceptance Date March 24, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 25 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Erçetin, Ş. Ş., & Ege, H. (2025). Levels of Achieving Plasma Leadership Behaviors of Deans in Higher Education. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.53629/sakaefd.1582254
AMA Erçetin ŞŞ, Ege H. Levels of Achieving Plasma Leadership Behaviors of Deans in Higher Education. SUJEF. June 2025;25(1):1-18. doi:10.53629/sakaefd.1582254
Chicago Erçetin, Şefika Şule, and Handan Ege. “Levels of Achieving Plasma Leadership Behaviors of Deans in Higher Education”. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 25, no. 1 (June 2025): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.53629/sakaefd.1582254.
EndNote Erçetin ŞŞ, Ege H (June 1, 2025) Levels of Achieving Plasma Leadership Behaviors of Deans in Higher Education. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 25 1 1–18.
IEEE Ş. Ş. Erçetin and H. Ege, “Levels of Achieving Plasma Leadership Behaviors of Deans in Higher Education”, SUJEF, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.53629/sakaefd.1582254.
ISNAD Erçetin, Şefika Şule - Ege, Handan. “Levels of Achieving Plasma Leadership Behaviors of Deans in Higher Education”. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 25/1 (June 2025), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.53629/sakaefd.1582254.
JAMA Erçetin ŞŞ, Ege H. Levels of Achieving Plasma Leadership Behaviors of Deans in Higher Education. SUJEF. 2025;25:1–18.
MLA Erçetin, Şefika Şule and Handan Ege. “Levels of Achieving Plasma Leadership Behaviors of Deans in Higher Education”. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 25, no. 1, 2025, pp. 1-18, doi:10.53629/sakaefd.1582254.
Vancouver Erçetin ŞŞ, Ege H. Levels of Achieving Plasma Leadership Behaviors of Deans in Higher Education. SUJEF. 2025;25(1):1-18.