Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Aynı Popülasyondaki Farklı Yaş Başlangıçlarına Sahip Hastalardaki Gömülü Diş Prevalansının Karşılaştırılması

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 37 - 41, 21.04.2025

Hande Erener , Volkan Kaplan

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1440512

Abstract

Amaç: Gömülü dişlerle ilgili farklı ülke, ırk ve popülasyonlarda yapılan çalışmaların farklı yaş başlangıçlarına veya yaş aralıklarına sahip olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada, aynı popülasyondaki farklı yaş başlangıçlarına sahip hasta gruplarında gömülü diş görülme sıklığının karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışma; 18 yaş ve üzeri (Grup 1), 22 yaş ve üzeri (Grup 2), 26 yaş ve üzeri (Grup 3) ve 31 yaş ve üzeri (Grup 4); her biri 400 farklı hasta röntgeni içeren 4 gruptan oluşturulmuştur. Hastaların panoramik radyografileri incelenerek gömülü kalmış dişleri kaydedilmiştir. Hastaların gömülü dişleri, cinsiyetleri ve yaşları belirlenip; gömülü dişlerin pozisyonları ve sayıları kayıt altına alınmıştır. İstatistiksel analizler SPSS 20 paket programı (SPSS Inc. version 20, IL, USA) ile yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: Gruplardaki gömülü diş oranları sırasıyla %30.25, %34.00, %25.50 ve %24.25 olarak tespit edilmiş ve gruplar arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Gruplardaki toplam gömülü diş sayılarının grupların yaş ortalamaları arttıkça azaldığı görülmüştür. Gömülü diş bulunan hastaların cinsiyetler açısından karşılaştırılmasında erkekler arasında gruplar arası fark bulunmazken, kadınlar arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p<0.05).
Sonuç: Aynı popülasyonda farklı yaş grupları incelenerek yapılan bu çalışmada, başlangıç yaşının artmasıyla gömülü diş insidansının azaldığı saptanmıştır. Bu azalmanın nedeni, üçüncü molar dişlerin sürme sürecinin 26 yaşa kadar devam edebilmesi olarak gösterilebilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: gömülü diş, insidans, prevalans, radyografi, retrospektif

Keywords

gömülü diş insidans prevalans radyografi retrospektif

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmanın hazırlanma sürecinde bilimsel ve etik ilkelere uyulduğu ve yararlanılan tüm çalışmaların kaynakçada belirtildiği beyan olunur.

Supporting Institution

Yazarlar bu çalışma için finansal destek almadığını beyan etmiştir.

Thanks

Yazarlar Duygu Korkmaz Yalçın’a istatistiksel değerlendirme, Aytaç Salih Gümüş ve Tuğba Kaplan’a veri toplama sürecindeki değerli katkılarından dolayı teşekkür eder.

References

  • 1. Bishara SE, Andreasen G. Third molars: A review. Am J of Orthod. 1983;83(2):131-137.
  • 2. Ozan F, Yeler H, Yeler D. Mandibular gömülü daimî kanin diş ile ilişkili süpernumerer diş ve kompaund odontoma: Vaka raporu. Atatürk Üniv Dis Hek Fak Derg. 2005;15: 61-64.
  • 3. Mustafa AB. Prevalence of Impacted pre-molar teeth in college of dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(6):1-3.
  • 4. Pell GJ, Gregory GT. Report on a ten-year study of a tooth division technique for the removal of impacted teeth. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1942;28:B660-666.
  • 5. Jose M, Varghese J. Panoramic radiograph a valuable diagnostic tool in dental practice-Report of three cases. Int J Dental Clin. 2011;3(4):47-49.
  • 6. Thirasupa N. Orthodontic management of a horizontally impacted maxillary incisor in an adolescent patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023;163(1):126-136.
  • 7. Pursafar F, Salemi F, Dalband M, Khamverdi Z. Prevalence of impacted teeth and their radiographic signs in panoramic radiographs of patients referred to hamadan dental school in 2009. J Dent Res. 2011;3(1):21-27.
  • 8. Idris AM, Al-Mashraqi AA, Abidi NH, et al. Third molar impaction in the Jazan Region: evaluation of the prevalence and clinical presentation. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(4):194-200.
  • 9. English JD, Akyalcin S, Peltomaki T, Litschel K. Mosby's Orthodontic Review, 2nd ed. Chapter 2: Developmet of the occlusion. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2014:17.
  • 10. Cobourne MT. Orthodontic management of the developing dentition. Chapter 1: Development of the Dentition. Springer. 2017:13.
  • 11. Gisakis IG, Palamidakis FD, Farmakis ETR, Kamberos G, Kamberos S. Prevalence of impacted teeth in a Greek population. J Investig Clin Dent. 2011;2(2):102-109.
  • 12. El-Khateeb SM, Arnout EA, Hifnawy T. Radiographic assessment of impacted teeth and associated pathosis prevalence: Pattern of occurrence at different ages in Saudi male in Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(8):973-979.
  • 13. Venta I, Vehkalahti MM, Huumonen S, Suominen AL. Prevalence of third molars determined by panoramic radiographs in a population-based survey of adult Finns. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020;48:208-214.
  • 14. Yıldırım H, Büyükgöze-Dindar M. Investigation of the prevalence of impacted third molars and the effects of eruption level and angulation on caries development by panoramic radiographs. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2022;27(2):106-112.
  • 15. Xavier CRG, Dias-Ribeiro E, Ferreira-Rocha J, et al. Evaluation of the positions of impacted third molars according to the Winter and Pell & Gregory classifications in panoramic radiography. Cir Traumatol Buco-Maxilo-fac 2010;10(2):83–90.
  • 16. Gülşahı A. Gömülü üçüncü molar dişler üzerine retrospektif bir çalışma. ADO Journal of Clin Sci. 2007;1(2):9-11.
  • 17. Alfadil L, Almajed E. Prevalence of impacted third molars and the reason for extraction in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32:262-268.
  • 18. Syed KB, Zaheer KB, Ibrahim M, Bagi MA, Assiri MA. Prevalence of impacted molar teeth among Saudi population in Asir region, Saudi Arabia–a retrospective study of 3 years. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(1):43-47.
  • 19. Salam S, Bary A, Sayed A. Prevalence of ımpacted teeth and pattern of third molar ımpaction among Kerala population a cross sectional study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023;15(1):354-357.
  • 20. Jan A, Alsehaimy M, Mokhtar H, Jadu FM. Prevalence of impacted third molars in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: a retrospective study. J Am Sci. 2014;10(10):1-4.
  • 21. Passi D, Singh G, Dutta S, et al. Study of pattern and prevalence of mandibular impacted third molar among Delhi-National Capital Region population with newer proposed classification of mandibular impacted third molar: A retrospective study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2019;10(1):59-67.
  • 22. KalaiSelvan S, Ganesh SKN, Natesh P, Moorthy MS, Niazi TM, Babu SS. Prevalence and pattern of impacted mandibular third molar: An institution-based retrospective study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020;12(1):462-467.
  • 23. Damlar İ, Altan A, Tatlı U, Arpag OA. Hatay bölgesinde gömülü diş prevalansının retrospektif olarak incelenmesi. Cukurova Med J. 2014; 39(3):559-565.
  • 24. Singh M, Chakrabarty A. Prevalence of impacted teeth: Study of 500 patients. Int J Sci Res. 2016;5(1):1577-1580.
  • 25. Kaplan V, Ciğerim L, Güzel M. Van bölgesindeki yetişkin bireylerde gömülü diş görülme sıklığının belirlenmesi. Van Sag Bil Derg 2020;13(3):44-49.
  • 26. Evirgen Ş, Karaaslan F, Dikilitaş A. (2020). Gömülü dişler ve ilişkili patolojilerin radyografik değerlendirmesi. Türkiye Klin Diş Hek Bilim Derg. 2020;26(2):181-186.
  • 27. Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32(5):548-552.
  • 28. Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: Findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92(2):150-155.
  • 29. Jung YH, Cho BH. Prevalence of missing and impacted third molars in adults aged 25 years and above. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43(4):219-225.
  • 30. Sethuraman R. Prevalence of impacted third molar teeth and commonly extracted third molars: A cross-sectional study. Int J Cranio Maxillofac Surg Rehab. 2022;Article ID 22670358:1-7.

Comparison of the Prevalence of Impacted Teeth in Patients with Different Starting Ages in the Same Population

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 37 - 41, 21.04.2025

Hande Erener , Volkan Kaplan

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1440512

Abstract

Background: Studies about impacted teeth in different countries, races and populations are observed to have different starting ages or age ranges. This study aimed to compare the incidence of impacted teeth in patients groups with different starting ages at the same population.
Methods: This retrospective study was composed of 4 groups, each containing 400 different patient x-rays: 18 years old and over (Group 1), 22 years old and over (Group 2), 26 years old and over (Group 3) and 31 years old and over (Group 4). Panoramic radiographs of the patients were examined and impacted teeth were recorded. The impacted teeth, gender and ages of the patients were determined; the positions and numbers of impacted teeth were recorded. Statistical analyzes were performed with the SPSS 20 package program (SPSS Inc. version 20, IL, USA).
Results: The rates of impacted teeth in the groups were determined as 30.25%, 34.00%, 25.50% and 24.25%, respectively. A significant difference was found between the groups (p<0.05). The total number of impacted teeth in the groups decreased, as the average age of the groups increased. When comparing patients with impacted teeth in terms of gender, there was no difference between the groups among men, but a significant difference was found between women.
Conclusion: In this study, it has been determined that the incidence of impacted teeth decreases with increasing starting age. The reason for this decrease can be shown as the eruption of third molars can continue until the age of 26.
Keywords: impacted teeth, incidance, prevalence, radiograph, retrospective

Keywords

impacted teeth incidance prevalence radiograph retrospective

Ethical Statement

It is declared that during the preparation process of this study, scientific and ethical principles were followed and all the studies benefited are stated in the bibliography.

Supporting Institution

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

Thanks

Authors thanks to Duygu Korkmaz Yalçın for statistical evaluation, and Aytaç Salih Gümüş and Tuğba Kaplan for their valuable contributions to the data collection process.

References

  • 1. Bishara SE, Andreasen G. Third molars: A review. Am J of Orthod. 1983;83(2):131-137.
  • 2. Ozan F, Yeler H, Yeler D. Mandibular gömülü daimî kanin diş ile ilişkili süpernumerer diş ve kompaund odontoma: Vaka raporu. Atatürk Üniv Dis Hek Fak Derg. 2005;15: 61-64.
  • 3. Mustafa AB. Prevalence of Impacted pre-molar teeth in college of dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(6):1-3.
  • 4. Pell GJ, Gregory GT. Report on a ten-year study of a tooth division technique for the removal of impacted teeth. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1942;28:B660-666.
  • 5. Jose M, Varghese J. Panoramic radiograph a valuable diagnostic tool in dental practice-Report of three cases. Int J Dental Clin. 2011;3(4):47-49.
  • 6. Thirasupa N. Orthodontic management of a horizontally impacted maxillary incisor in an adolescent patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023;163(1):126-136.
  • 7. Pursafar F, Salemi F, Dalband M, Khamverdi Z. Prevalence of impacted teeth and their radiographic signs in panoramic radiographs of patients referred to hamadan dental school in 2009. J Dent Res. 2011;3(1):21-27.
  • 8. Idris AM, Al-Mashraqi AA, Abidi NH, et al. Third molar impaction in the Jazan Region: evaluation of the prevalence and clinical presentation. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(4):194-200.
  • 9. English JD, Akyalcin S, Peltomaki T, Litschel K. Mosby's Orthodontic Review, 2nd ed. Chapter 2: Developmet of the occlusion. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2014:17.
  • 10. Cobourne MT. Orthodontic management of the developing dentition. Chapter 1: Development of the Dentition. Springer. 2017:13.
  • 11. Gisakis IG, Palamidakis FD, Farmakis ETR, Kamberos G, Kamberos S. Prevalence of impacted teeth in a Greek population. J Investig Clin Dent. 2011;2(2):102-109.
  • 12. El-Khateeb SM, Arnout EA, Hifnawy T. Radiographic assessment of impacted teeth and associated pathosis prevalence: Pattern of occurrence at different ages in Saudi male in Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(8):973-979.
  • 13. Venta I, Vehkalahti MM, Huumonen S, Suominen AL. Prevalence of third molars determined by panoramic radiographs in a population-based survey of adult Finns. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020;48:208-214.
  • 14. Yıldırım H, Büyükgöze-Dindar M. Investigation of the prevalence of impacted third molars and the effects of eruption level and angulation on caries development by panoramic radiographs. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2022;27(2):106-112.
  • 15. Xavier CRG, Dias-Ribeiro E, Ferreira-Rocha J, et al. Evaluation of the positions of impacted third molars according to the Winter and Pell & Gregory classifications in panoramic radiography. Cir Traumatol Buco-Maxilo-fac 2010;10(2):83–90.
  • 16. Gülşahı A. Gömülü üçüncü molar dişler üzerine retrospektif bir çalışma. ADO Journal of Clin Sci. 2007;1(2):9-11.
  • 17. Alfadil L, Almajed E. Prevalence of impacted third molars and the reason for extraction in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32:262-268.
  • 18. Syed KB, Zaheer KB, Ibrahim M, Bagi MA, Assiri MA. Prevalence of impacted molar teeth among Saudi population in Asir region, Saudi Arabia–a retrospective study of 3 years. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(1):43-47.
  • 19. Salam S, Bary A, Sayed A. Prevalence of ımpacted teeth and pattern of third molar ımpaction among Kerala population a cross sectional study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023;15(1):354-357.
  • 20. Jan A, Alsehaimy M, Mokhtar H, Jadu FM. Prevalence of impacted third molars in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: a retrospective study. J Am Sci. 2014;10(10):1-4.
  • 21. Passi D, Singh G, Dutta S, et al. Study of pattern and prevalence of mandibular impacted third molar among Delhi-National Capital Region population with newer proposed classification of mandibular impacted third molar: A retrospective study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2019;10(1):59-67.
  • 22. KalaiSelvan S, Ganesh SKN, Natesh P, Moorthy MS, Niazi TM, Babu SS. Prevalence and pattern of impacted mandibular third molar: An institution-based retrospective study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020;12(1):462-467.
  • 23. Damlar İ, Altan A, Tatlı U, Arpag OA. Hatay bölgesinde gömülü diş prevalansının retrospektif olarak incelenmesi. Cukurova Med J. 2014; 39(3):559-565.
  • 24. Singh M, Chakrabarty A. Prevalence of impacted teeth: Study of 500 patients. Int J Sci Res. 2016;5(1):1577-1580.
  • 25. Kaplan V, Ciğerim L, Güzel M. Van bölgesindeki yetişkin bireylerde gömülü diş görülme sıklığının belirlenmesi. Van Sag Bil Derg 2020;13(3):44-49.
  • 26. Evirgen Ş, Karaaslan F, Dikilitaş A. (2020). Gömülü dişler ve ilişkili patolojilerin radyografik değerlendirmesi. Türkiye Klin Diş Hek Bilim Derg. 2020;26(2):181-186.
  • 27. Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32(5):548-552.
  • 28. Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: Findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92(2):150-155.
  • 29. Jung YH, Cho BH. Prevalence of missing and impacted third molars in adults aged 25 years and above. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43(4):219-225.
  • 30. Sethuraman R. Prevalence of impacted third molar teeth and commonly extracted third molars: A cross-sectional study. Int J Cranio Maxillofac Surg Rehab. 2022;Article ID 22670358:1-7.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics
Journal Section Research
Authors

Hande Erener 0000-0001-7630-2652

Volkan Kaplan 0000-0002-7605-1125

Publication Date April 21, 2025
Submission Date February 20, 2024
Acceptance Date April 23, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Cite

Vancouver Erener H, Kaplan V. Aynı Popülasyondaki Farklı Yaş Başlangıçlarına Sahip Hastalardaki Gömülü Diş Prevalansının Karşılaştırılması. Selcuk Dent J. 2025;12(1):37-41.
 Download Cover Image

Selcuk Dental Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).