Review
BibTex RIS Cite

The Importance of Computer Assisted Instruction in the Development of Executive Function and Mathematics Skills of Students with Learning Disabilities: A Literature Review

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 135 - 154, 31.12.2024

Emre Laçin , Turan Başkonuş

Abstract

This study examines the importance of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) in improving the executive function and mathematics skills of students with learning disabilities. Learning disability is a condition in which individuals have difficulty in basic academic skills and is usually neurologically based. Executive functions include skills such as attention control, problem solving, planning and organisation, and these skills play a critical role in learning processes. Especially in disciplines such as mathematics, the development of executive function skills supports academic success. By providing interactive materials and individualised learning opportunities, CBL enables students to customise their learning processes. Technology-based education concretises abstract mathematical concepts by increasing motivation and addresses different learning styles. For example, for individuals with learning difficulties such as dyslexia, dysgraphia and dyscalculia, personalised teaching methods can increase the success rate. For the development of mathematical skills, CBL methods that support numerical, geometric and problem solving skills can provide students with a deeper understanding. The individualised learning approach provided by CBL is an important support mechanism for students with learning difficulties. Interactive tools and teaching materials increase student motivation and make it easier for teachers to assess students' progress. Research findings show that this method improves both mathematical skills and executive functions in students with learning difficulties. In conclusion, CBL for students with learning disabilities is an innovative approach that makes educational processes more effective and meaningful. In the future, more widespread use of CBL methods will make significant contributions to increase the academic achievement of these students.

References

  • Abbott, C. (2007). E-inclusion: Learning difficulties and digital technologies (Vol. 15). Bristol: Futurelab.
  • Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 21-29.
  • Archibald, L. M. (2017). Working memory and language learning: A review. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 33(1), 5-17.
  • Arzubi, E., & Martin, A. (2005). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(1), 197-197.
  • Asghar, A., Sladeczek, I. E., Mercier, J., & Beaudoin, E. (2017). Learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Supporting students with learning disabilities. Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne, 58(3), 238.
  • Bahr, C. M., & Rieth, H. J. (1989). The effects of instructional computer games and drill and practice software on learning disabled students' mathematics achievement. Computers in the Schools, 6(3-4), 87-102.
  • Bailin, S., & Battersby, M. (2010). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of basic skills. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(6), 654-673.
  • Barkley, R. A. (2012). Executive functions: What they are, how they work, and why they evolved. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Bartelet, D., Ansari, D., Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2014). Cognitive subtypes of mathematics learning difficulties in primary education. Research in developmental disabilities, 35(3), 657-670.
  • Batanero, C., Burrill, G., & Reading, C. (2011). Overview: Challenges for teaching statistics in school mathematics and preparing mathematics teachers. In Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education: A joint ICMI/IASE study (pp. 407-418).
  • Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48, 589-610.
  • Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research–A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255-273.
  • Brusilovsky, P., & Millán, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In The adaptive web: methods and strategies of web personalization (pp. 3-53). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Butterworth, B. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia. In D. J. Leong (Ed.), Learning and understanding: The scientific contributions of the National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Ceylan, M. (2023). Özel öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin yazılı ürünlerinin okunabilirlik ve okunaklılık açısından incelenmesi. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1214549
  • Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 419-440.
  • Christmann, E. P., & Badgett, J. L. (2003). A meta-analytic comparison of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on elementary students’ academic achievement. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2003(1), 91-104.
  • Clark, C. A., Pritchard, V. E., & Woodward, L. J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1176.
  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2023). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. john Wiley & sons.
  • Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in neuroscience and education, 3(2), 63-68.
  • Cratty, B. J., & Goldman, R. L. (2005). Learning disabilities: Contemporary viewpoints. Routledge.
  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8.
  • Demir, R., & Ceylan, M. (2024). Öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin okul derslerine yönelik benlik saygılarının incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(3), 728-746. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1443731
  • Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.
  • Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959-964.
  • Elbeheri, G. (2009). The Routledge companion to dyslexia. In G. Reid (Ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Erlia, W. (2021). Roles of the teacher for increasing learning quality of students. ETUDE: Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 77-86.
  • Espy, K. A., McDiarmid, M. M., Cwik, M. F., Stalets, M. M., Hamby, A., & Senn, T. E. (2004). The contribution of executive functions to emergent mathematic skills in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26(1), 465-486.
  • Fletcher-Flinn, C. M., & Gravatt, B. (1995). The efficacy of computer assisted instruction (CAI): A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(3), 219-241.
  • Forgrave, K. E. (2002). Assistive technology: Empowering students with learning disabilities. The Clearing House, 75(3), 122-126.
  • Garcia, R., Falkner, K., & Vivian, R. (2018). Systematic literature review: Self-regulated learning strategies using e-learning tools for computer science. Computers & Education, 123, 150-163.
  • Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for online learning. Routledge.
  • Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4-15.
  • Geary, D. C. (2010). Consequences of mathematical learning disabilities for the development of mathematics knowledge. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(2), 103-114.
  • Gilger, J. W., & Kaplan, B. J. (2001). Atypical brain development: a conceptual framework for understanding developmental learning disabilities. Developmental neuropsychology, 20(2), 465-481.
  • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of writing instruction for students in elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
  • Gunasegar, D., Devarajah, A. D., & Rosli, R. (2021). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on students with mathematics learning disabilities. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(10), 505-523.
  • Gupta, P. K., & Sharma, V. (2017). Working memory and learning disabilities: A review. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(4), 111-121.
  • Hairapetian, A. (2015). Analysis of Innovative Teaching Strategies for Students with Learning Disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California).
  • Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
  • Hefzallah, I. M. (2004). The new educational technologies and learning: Empowering teachers to teach and students to learn in the information age. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
  • Hill, H. C., & Shih, J. C. (2009). Research commentary: Examining the quality of statistical mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 241-250.
  • Jagtap, P. (2016). Teachers role as facilitator in learning. Scholarly Research Journal, 3(17), 3903-3905.
  • Kadiyala, M., & Crynes, B. L. (2000). A review of literature on effectiveness of use of information technology in education. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), 177-189.
  • Kallia, M. (2017). Assessment in computer science courses: A literature review. Royal Society, 1-60.
  • Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). History of learning disabilities: A contemporary view. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(2), 69-82.
  • Khan, A., & Ghosh, S. K. (2021). Student performance analysis and prediction in classroom learning: A review of educational data mining studies. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 205-240.
  • Kirk, S. A., Gallagher, J. J., & Anastasiow, N. J. (2015). Educating exceptional children. Cengage Learning.
  • Kiru, E. W., Doabler, C. T., Sorrells, A. M., & Cooc, N. A. (2018). A synthesis of technology-mediated mathematics interventions for students with or at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(2), 111-123.
  • Kraleva, R., Sabani, M., & Kralev, V. (2019). An analysis of some learning management systems. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(4), 1190-1198.
  • Küçükalkan, K., Beyazsaçlı, M., & Öz, A. Ş. (2019). Examination of the effects of computer-based mathematics instruction methods in children with mathematical learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(9), 913-923.
  • Langberg, J. M., Epstein, J. N., Becker, S. P., Girio-Herrera, E., & Vaughn, A. J. (2012). Evaluation of the homework, organization, and planning skills (HOPS) intervention for middle school students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as implemented by school mental health providers. School psychology review, 41(3), 342-364.
  • Lashley, L. (2017). The effects of computer-aided instruction in mathematics on the performance of grade 4 pupils. SAGE Open, 7(3), 2158244017712775.
  • Lemons, C. J., Powell, S. R., Lane, K. L., & Aceves, T. C. (2022). Handbook of special education research, volume II. Routledge.
  • Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 215-243.
  • Liao, Y. K. (1992). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on cognitive outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3).
  • Liao, Y. K. C. (2007). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on students’ achievement in Taiwan: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 48(2), 216-233.
  • Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, J. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9
  • Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2007). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction. Pearson.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning: Psychology of learning and motivation. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85-139.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
  • McCloskey, G. (2008). Assessment and intervention for executive function difficulties. New York: Academic Press.
  • Meltzer, L. (2010). Promoting executive function in the classroom. Guilford Press.
  • Meltzer, L. Y. N. N., & Krishnan, K. (2007). Executive function difficulties and learning disabilities. Executive function in education: From theory to practice, 77-105.
  • Meltzer, L. Y. N. N., & Krishnan, K. (2007). Executive function difficulties and learning disabilities. Executive function in education: From theory to practice, 77-105.
  • Miller, S. P., & Hudson, P. J. (2006). Helping students with disabilities understand what mathematics means. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(1), 28-35.
  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 621.
  • Mulligan, J. T., Mitchelmore, M. C., English, L. D., & Crevensten, N. (2013). Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning: The fundamental role of pattern and structure. In Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 47-66).
  • Murati, R. (2015). The role of the teacher in the educational process. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 5(2), 75-78.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • Nelson, G., Crawford, A., Hunt, J., Park, S., Leckie, E., Duarte, A., ... & Zarate, K. (2022). A systematic review of research syntheses on students with mathematics learning disabilities and difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 37(1), 18-36.
  • Ok, M. W., Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. R. (2020). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the research. Exceptionality, 28(1), 30-44.
  • Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. Princeton University Press.
  • Porumbu, D., & Necşoi, D. V. (2013). Relationship between parental involvement/attitude and children's school achievements. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 706-710.
  • Reid, G. (2016). Dyslexia: A practitioner's handbook. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Reigeluth, C. M., Watson, W. R., Watson, S. S. L., Dutta, P., Chen, Z., & Powell, N. D. (2008). Roles for technology in the information-age paradigm of education: Learning management systems. Educational Technology, 32-39.
  • Richland, L. E., Stigler, J. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 189-203.
  • Ritter, F. E., Baxter, G., Kim, J. W., & Srinivasmurthy, S. (2013). Learning and retention. In The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering (pp. 125-142).
  • Rizk, J., & Hillier, C. (2022). Digital technology and increasing engagement among students with disabilities: Interaction rituals and digital capital. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100099.
  • Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20-27.
  • Roediger, H. L., Nestojko, J. F., & Smith, N. S. (2019). Strategies to improve learning and retention during training. In Human Performance Optimization (pp. 302-332).
  • Ross, J. A., & Hogaboam‐Gray, A. (1998). Integrating mathematics, science, and technology: Effects on students. International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1119-1135.
  • Salam, M., Ibrahim, N., & Sukardjo, M. (2019). Effects of instructional models and spatial intelligence on the mathematics learning outcomes after controlling for students' initial competency. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 699-716.
  • Sankalaite, S., Huizinga, M., Dewandeleer, J., Xu, C., de Vries, N., Hens, E., & Baeyens, D. (2021). Strengthening executive function and self-regulation through teacher-student interaction in preschool and primary school children: a systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 718262.
  • Schramm, S. A., Hennig, T., & Linderkamp, F. (2016). Training problem solving and organizational skills in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(3), 391-411.
  • Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson.
  • Seo, Y. J., & Bryant, D. P. (2009). Analysis of studies of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities. Computers & Education, 53(3), 913-928.
  • Sharma, P., & Hannafin, M. J. (2007). Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(1), 27-46.
  • Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, J. (2020). Overcoming dyslexia: Completely revised and updated. Hachette UK.
  • Snowling, M. J., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2016). Oral language deficits in familial dyslexia: A meta-analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 142(5), 498.
  • Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., & Nation, K. (2020). Defining and understanding dyslexia: Past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education, 46(4), 501-513.
  • Stultz, S. L. (2013). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction for teaching mathematics to students with specific learning disability. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 2(2), 7.
  • Swanson, H. L., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of learning disabilities. Guilford Press.
  • Ten Braak, D., Lenes, R., Purpura, D. J., Schmitt, S. A., & Størksen, I. (2022). Why do early mathematics skills predict later mathematics and reading achievement? The role of executive function. Journal of experimental child psychology, 214, 105306.
  • Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (2014). A theory of teaching as assisted performance. In Learning to think (pp. 42-61). Routledge.
  • Titz, C., & Karbach, J. (2014). Working memory and executive functions: effects of training on academic achievement. Psychological research, 78, 852-868.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. ASCD.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD. Tseng, W. S., Kano, T., & Hsu, C. H. (2014). Effect of integrating blended teaching into mathematics learning for junior high school students. Journal of Computers and Applied Science Education, 1(2), 39-57.
  • Türel, Y. K., & Akgün, K. (2021). Zihinsel yetersizliği bulunan bireylerin matematik eğitiminde öğretim teknolojilerinin kullanımı: Bir literatür taraması. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 31(3), 1221-1234.
  • Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271-296.
  • Van der Ven, S. H., Kroesbergen, E. H., Boom, J., & Leseman, P. P. (2012). The development of executive functions and early mathematics: A dynamic relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 100-119.
  • Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Academic Press.
  • Walk, L. M., Evers, W. F., Quante, S., & Hille, K. (2018). Evaluation of a teacher training program to enhance executive functions in preschool children. PloS one, 13(5), e0197454.
  • Weller, M. J. (2014). The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn't feel like victory. Ubiquity Press.
  • Wen, Z. A., Silverstein, E., Zhao, Y., Amog, A. L., Garnett, K., & Azenkot, S. (2020, October). Teacher views of math e-learning tools for students with specific learning disabilities. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1-13).
  • Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T., Nelson, J. M., Clark, C. A., Chevalier, N., & Espy, K. A. (2011). The structure of executive function in 3-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 436-452.
  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.

Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencilerin Yürütücü İşlev Ve Matematik Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesinde Bilgisayar Destekli Öğretimin Önemi: Bir Literatür İncelemesi

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 135 - 154, 31.12.2024

Emre Laçin , Turan Başkonuş

Abstract

Bu çalışma, öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin yürütücü işlev ve matematik becerilerinin geliştirilmesinde bilgisayar destekli öğretimin (BDÖ) önemini incelemektedir. Öğrenme güçlüğü, bireylerin temel akademik becerilerde zorluk yaşadığı ve genellikle nörolojik temellere dayanan bir durumdur. Yürütücü işlevler; dikkat kontrolü, problem çözme, planlama ve organizasyon gibi becerileri kapsar ve bu beceriler öğrenme süreçlerinde kritik bir rol oynar. Özellikle matematik gibi disiplinlerde, yürütücü işlev becerilerinin gelişimi akademik başarıyı destekler. BDÖ, etkileşimli materyaller ve bireyselleştirilmiş öğrenme fırsatları sunarak, öğrencilerin öğrenme süreçlerini özelleştirme olanağı sağlar. Teknoloji tabanlı eğitim, motivasyonu artırarak soyut matematik kavramlarını somutlaştırır ve farklı öğrenme stillerine hitap eder. Örneğin, disleksi, disgrafi ve diskalkuli gibi öğrenme güçlükleri olan bireylerde, kişiselleştirilmiş öğretim yöntemleri başarı oranını artırabilir. Matematik becerilerinin gelişimi için sayısal, geometrik ve problem çözme yeteneklerini destekleyen BDÖ yöntemleri, öğrencilere daha derin bir kavrayış kazandırabilir. BDÖ’nün sağladığı bireyselleştirilmiş öğrenme yaklaşımı, öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrenciler için önemli bir destek mekanizmasıdır. Etkileşimli araçlar ve öğretim materyalleri, öğrenci motivasyonunu artırırken öğretmenlerin öğrencilerin ilerlemesini değerlendirmesini kolaylaştırır. Araştırma bulguları, bu yöntemin öğrenme güçlüğü çeken öğrencilerde hem matematik becerilerini hem de yürütücü işlevlerini geliştirdiğini göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrenciler için BDÖ, eğitim süreçlerini daha etkili ve anlamlı hale getiren yenilikçi bir yaklaşımdır. Gelecekte BDÖ yöntemlerinin daha yaygın kullanımı, bu öğrencilerin akademik başarılarını artırmada önemli katkılar sağlayacaktır.

Keywords

öğrenme güçlüğü yürütücü işlevler bilgisayar destekli öğretim (bdö)

References

  • Abbott, C. (2007). E-inclusion: Learning difficulties and digital technologies (Vol. 15). Bristol: Futurelab.
  • Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 21-29.
  • Archibald, L. M. (2017). Working memory and language learning: A review. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 33(1), 5-17.
  • Arzubi, E., & Martin, A. (2005). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(1), 197-197.
  • Asghar, A., Sladeczek, I. E., Mercier, J., & Beaudoin, E. (2017). Learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Supporting students with learning disabilities. Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne, 58(3), 238.
  • Bahr, C. M., & Rieth, H. J. (1989). The effects of instructional computer games and drill and practice software on learning disabled students' mathematics achievement. Computers in the Schools, 6(3-4), 87-102.
  • Bailin, S., & Battersby, M. (2010). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of basic skills. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(6), 654-673.
  • Barkley, R. A. (2012). Executive functions: What they are, how they work, and why they evolved. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Bartelet, D., Ansari, D., Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2014). Cognitive subtypes of mathematics learning difficulties in primary education. Research in developmental disabilities, 35(3), 657-670.
  • Batanero, C., Burrill, G., & Reading, C. (2011). Overview: Challenges for teaching statistics in school mathematics and preparing mathematics teachers. In Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education: A joint ICMI/IASE study (pp. 407-418).
  • Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48, 589-610.
  • Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research–A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255-273.
  • Brusilovsky, P., & Millán, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In The adaptive web: methods and strategies of web personalization (pp. 3-53). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Butterworth, B. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia. In D. J. Leong (Ed.), Learning and understanding: The scientific contributions of the National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Ceylan, M. (2023). Özel öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin yazılı ürünlerinin okunabilirlik ve okunaklılık açısından incelenmesi. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1214549
  • Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 419-440.
  • Christmann, E. P., & Badgett, J. L. (2003). A meta-analytic comparison of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on elementary students’ academic achievement. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2003(1), 91-104.
  • Clark, C. A., Pritchard, V. E., & Woodward, L. J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1176.
  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2023). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. john Wiley & sons.
  • Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in neuroscience and education, 3(2), 63-68.
  • Cratty, B. J., & Goldman, R. L. (2005). Learning disabilities: Contemporary viewpoints. Routledge.
  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8.
  • Demir, R., & Ceylan, M. (2024). Öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin okul derslerine yönelik benlik saygılarının incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(3), 728-746. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1443731
  • Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.
  • Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959-964.
  • Elbeheri, G. (2009). The Routledge companion to dyslexia. In G. Reid (Ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Erlia, W. (2021). Roles of the teacher for increasing learning quality of students. ETUDE: Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 77-86.
  • Espy, K. A., McDiarmid, M. M., Cwik, M. F., Stalets, M. M., Hamby, A., & Senn, T. E. (2004). The contribution of executive functions to emergent mathematic skills in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26(1), 465-486.
  • Fletcher-Flinn, C. M., & Gravatt, B. (1995). The efficacy of computer assisted instruction (CAI): A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(3), 219-241.
  • Forgrave, K. E. (2002). Assistive technology: Empowering students with learning disabilities. The Clearing House, 75(3), 122-126.
  • Garcia, R., Falkner, K., & Vivian, R. (2018). Systematic literature review: Self-regulated learning strategies using e-learning tools for computer science. Computers & Education, 123, 150-163.
  • Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for online learning. Routledge.
  • Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4-15.
  • Geary, D. C. (2010). Consequences of mathematical learning disabilities for the development of mathematics knowledge. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(2), 103-114.
  • Gilger, J. W., & Kaplan, B. J. (2001). Atypical brain development: a conceptual framework for understanding developmental learning disabilities. Developmental neuropsychology, 20(2), 465-481.
  • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of writing instruction for students in elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
  • Gunasegar, D., Devarajah, A. D., & Rosli, R. (2021). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on students with mathematics learning disabilities. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(10), 505-523.
  • Gupta, P. K., & Sharma, V. (2017). Working memory and learning disabilities: A review. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(4), 111-121.
  • Hairapetian, A. (2015). Analysis of Innovative Teaching Strategies for Students with Learning Disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California).
  • Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
  • Hefzallah, I. M. (2004). The new educational technologies and learning: Empowering teachers to teach and students to learn in the information age. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
  • Hill, H. C., & Shih, J. C. (2009). Research commentary: Examining the quality of statistical mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 241-250.
  • Jagtap, P. (2016). Teachers role as facilitator in learning. Scholarly Research Journal, 3(17), 3903-3905.
  • Kadiyala, M., & Crynes, B. L. (2000). A review of literature on effectiveness of use of information technology in education. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), 177-189.
  • Kallia, M. (2017). Assessment in computer science courses: A literature review. Royal Society, 1-60.
  • Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). History of learning disabilities: A contemporary view. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(2), 69-82.
  • Khan, A., & Ghosh, S. K. (2021). Student performance analysis and prediction in classroom learning: A review of educational data mining studies. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 205-240.
  • Kirk, S. A., Gallagher, J. J., & Anastasiow, N. J. (2015). Educating exceptional children. Cengage Learning.
  • Kiru, E. W., Doabler, C. T., Sorrells, A. M., & Cooc, N. A. (2018). A synthesis of technology-mediated mathematics interventions for students with or at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(2), 111-123.
  • Kraleva, R., Sabani, M., & Kralev, V. (2019). An analysis of some learning management systems. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(4), 1190-1198.
  • Küçükalkan, K., Beyazsaçlı, M., & Öz, A. Ş. (2019). Examination of the effects of computer-based mathematics instruction methods in children with mathematical learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(9), 913-923.
  • Langberg, J. M., Epstein, J. N., Becker, S. P., Girio-Herrera, E., & Vaughn, A. J. (2012). Evaluation of the homework, organization, and planning skills (HOPS) intervention for middle school students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as implemented by school mental health providers. School psychology review, 41(3), 342-364.
  • Lashley, L. (2017). The effects of computer-aided instruction in mathematics on the performance of grade 4 pupils. SAGE Open, 7(3), 2158244017712775.
  • Lemons, C. J., Powell, S. R., Lane, K. L., & Aceves, T. C. (2022). Handbook of special education research, volume II. Routledge.
  • Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 215-243.
  • Liao, Y. K. (1992). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on cognitive outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3).
  • Liao, Y. K. C. (2007). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on students’ achievement in Taiwan: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 48(2), 216-233.
  • Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, J. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9
  • Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2007). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction. Pearson.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning: Psychology of learning and motivation. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85-139.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
  • McCloskey, G. (2008). Assessment and intervention for executive function difficulties. New York: Academic Press.
  • Meltzer, L. (2010). Promoting executive function in the classroom. Guilford Press.
  • Meltzer, L. Y. N. N., & Krishnan, K. (2007). Executive function difficulties and learning disabilities. Executive function in education: From theory to practice, 77-105.
  • Meltzer, L. Y. N. N., & Krishnan, K. (2007). Executive function difficulties and learning disabilities. Executive function in education: From theory to practice, 77-105.
  • Miller, S. P., & Hudson, P. J. (2006). Helping students with disabilities understand what mathematics means. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(1), 28-35.
  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 621.
  • Mulligan, J. T., Mitchelmore, M. C., English, L. D., & Crevensten, N. (2013). Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning: The fundamental role of pattern and structure. In Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 47-66).
  • Murati, R. (2015). The role of the teacher in the educational process. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 5(2), 75-78.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • Nelson, G., Crawford, A., Hunt, J., Park, S., Leckie, E., Duarte, A., ... & Zarate, K. (2022). A systematic review of research syntheses on students with mathematics learning disabilities and difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 37(1), 18-36.
  • Ok, M. W., Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. R. (2020). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the research. Exceptionality, 28(1), 30-44.
  • Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. Princeton University Press.
  • Porumbu, D., & Necşoi, D. V. (2013). Relationship between parental involvement/attitude and children's school achievements. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 706-710.
  • Reid, G. (2016). Dyslexia: A practitioner's handbook. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Reigeluth, C. M., Watson, W. R., Watson, S. S. L., Dutta, P., Chen, Z., & Powell, N. D. (2008). Roles for technology in the information-age paradigm of education: Learning management systems. Educational Technology, 32-39.
  • Richland, L. E., Stigler, J. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 189-203.
  • Ritter, F. E., Baxter, G., Kim, J. W., & Srinivasmurthy, S. (2013). Learning and retention. In The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering (pp. 125-142).
  • Rizk, J., & Hillier, C. (2022). Digital technology and increasing engagement among students with disabilities: Interaction rituals and digital capital. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100099.
  • Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20-27.
  • Roediger, H. L., Nestojko, J. F., & Smith, N. S. (2019). Strategies to improve learning and retention during training. In Human Performance Optimization (pp. 302-332).
  • Ross, J. A., & Hogaboam‐Gray, A. (1998). Integrating mathematics, science, and technology: Effects on students. International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1119-1135.
  • Salam, M., Ibrahim, N., & Sukardjo, M. (2019). Effects of instructional models and spatial intelligence on the mathematics learning outcomes after controlling for students' initial competency. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 699-716.
  • Sankalaite, S., Huizinga, M., Dewandeleer, J., Xu, C., de Vries, N., Hens, E., & Baeyens, D. (2021). Strengthening executive function and self-regulation through teacher-student interaction in preschool and primary school children: a systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 718262.
  • Schramm, S. A., Hennig, T., & Linderkamp, F. (2016). Training problem solving and organizational skills in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(3), 391-411.
  • Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson.
  • Seo, Y. J., & Bryant, D. P. (2009). Analysis of studies of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities. Computers & Education, 53(3), 913-928.
  • Sharma, P., & Hannafin, M. J. (2007). Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(1), 27-46.
  • Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, J. (2020). Overcoming dyslexia: Completely revised and updated. Hachette UK.
  • Snowling, M. J., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2016). Oral language deficits in familial dyslexia: A meta-analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 142(5), 498.
  • Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., & Nation, K. (2020). Defining and understanding dyslexia: Past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education, 46(4), 501-513.
  • Stultz, S. L. (2013). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction for teaching mathematics to students with specific learning disability. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 2(2), 7.
  • Swanson, H. L., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of learning disabilities. Guilford Press.
  • Ten Braak, D., Lenes, R., Purpura, D. J., Schmitt, S. A., & Størksen, I. (2022). Why do early mathematics skills predict later mathematics and reading achievement? The role of executive function. Journal of experimental child psychology, 214, 105306.
  • Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (2014). A theory of teaching as assisted performance. In Learning to think (pp. 42-61). Routledge.
  • Titz, C., & Karbach, J. (2014). Working memory and executive functions: effects of training on academic achievement. Psychological research, 78, 852-868.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. ASCD.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD. Tseng, W. S., Kano, T., & Hsu, C. H. (2014). Effect of integrating blended teaching into mathematics learning for junior high school students. Journal of Computers and Applied Science Education, 1(2), 39-57.
  • Türel, Y. K., & Akgün, K. (2021). Zihinsel yetersizliği bulunan bireylerin matematik eğitiminde öğretim teknolojilerinin kullanımı: Bir literatür taraması. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 31(3), 1221-1234.
  • Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271-296.
  • Van der Ven, S. H., Kroesbergen, E. H., Boom, J., & Leseman, P. P. (2012). The development of executive functions and early mathematics: A dynamic relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 100-119.
  • Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Academic Press.
  • Walk, L. M., Evers, W. F., Quante, S., & Hille, K. (2018). Evaluation of a teacher training program to enhance executive functions in preschool children. PloS one, 13(5), e0197454.
  • Weller, M. J. (2014). The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn't feel like victory. Ubiquity Press.
  • Wen, Z. A., Silverstein, E., Zhao, Y., Amog, A. L., Garnett, K., & Azenkot, S. (2020, October). Teacher views of math e-learning tools for students with specific learning disabilities. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1-13).
  • Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T., Nelson, J. M., Clark, C. A., Chevalier, N., & Espy, K. A. (2011). The structure of executive function in 3-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 436-452.
  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
There are 108 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Special Talented Education
Journal Section Review Articles
Authors

Emre Laçin 0000-0003-0262-1743

Turan Başkonuş 0000-0001-8932-7656

Early Pub Date December 30, 2024
Publication Date December 31, 2024
Submission Date December 9, 2024
Acceptance Date December 24, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Laçin, E., & Başkonuş, T. (2024). Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencilerin Yürütücü İşlev Ve Matematik Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesinde Bilgisayar Destekli Öğretimin Önemi: Bir Literatür İncelemesi. Studies in Educational Research and Development, 8(2), 135-154.
 Download Cover Image

88x31.pngStudies in Educational Research and Development (SERD) is licensed under Creative Commons 4.0.