Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye’de Çevresel Sürdürülebilirliği Artırmada Yenilenemeyen Enerji Verimliliğinin Rolü, EKC ve LCC Hipotezleri: Kesirli Fourier ARDL Yaklaşımı ile Bulgular

Year 2025, Volume: 33 Issue: 64, 493 - 518

Mehmet Aslan

Abstract

Bu çalışma, yenilenemeyen enerji verimliliği, yenilenebilir enerji kullanımı, ekonomik büyüme ile çevresel kalite arasındaki ilişkiyi Çevresel Kuznets eğrisi (EKC) ve Yük Kapasite Eğrisi (LCC) hipotezi çerçevesinde incelemektedir. Bu doğrultuda 1982-2022 dönemindeki veriler kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Verilerin analiz edilmesinde ADF, PP, Kapetanios birim kök testleri, Kesirli Fourier ARDL sınır testi ve Fourier Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testi uygulamaktadır. Bulgulara göre yenilenemez enerji verimliliği ile yenilenebilir enerji kullanımı CO2 ve EF üzerinde negatif, LCF üzerinde ise pozitif etkiye sahiptir. Ekonomik büyüme değişkeni dikkate alındığında Türkiye’de EKC ve LCC hipotezleri geçerlidir.

Keywords

Ekolojik Ayak İzi CO2 Emisyonları Yük Kapasitesi Faktörü Yenilenebilir Enerji Yenilenemeyen Enerji Verimliliği Fourier ARDL Eşbütünleşme Testi

References

  • Abou Houran, M. & U. Mehmood (2023), “How institutional quality and renewable energy interact with ecological footprints: Do the human capital and economic complexity matter in the Next Eleven nations?”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26744-5.
  • Acaroğlu, H. et al. (2023), “Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Terms of Ecological Footprint and CO2 Emissions through Energy Diversification for Turkey”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(22), 63289-63304.
  • Afshan, S. & T. Yaqoob (2023), “Unravelling the Efficacy of Green Innovation and Taxation in Promoting Environmental Quality: A Dual-model Assessment of Testing the LCC Theory in Emerging Economies”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 416, 137850.
  • Ahmed, K. & W. Long (2012), “Environmental Kuznets Curve and Pakistan: an Empirical Analysis”, Procedia Economics and Finance, 1, 4-13.
  • Ahmed, Z. et al. (2021), “Economic Growth, Renewable Energy Consumption, and Ecological Footprint: Exploring the Role of Environmental Regulations and Democracy in Sustainable Development”, Sustainable Development, 30(4), 595-605.
  • Akbar, M. et al. (2022), “Role of Fiscal Policy in Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emission Nexus: an Investigation of Belt and Road Region”, Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4), e2603.
  • Akbostancı, E. et al. (2009), “The Relationship Between Income and Environment in Turkey: Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve?”, Energy Policy, 37(3), 861-867.
  • Akram, R. et al. (2020), “Heterogeneous Effects of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Developing Countries”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119122.
  • Ali, M.U. et al. (2021), “Fossil Energy Consumption, Economic Development, Inward FDI Impact on CO2 Emissions in Pakistan: Testing EKC Hypothesis through ARDL Model”, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(3), 3210-3221.
  • Alnour, M. & H. Atik (2021), “The Dynamic Implications of Globalization and Renewable Energy in Turkey: Are They Vital for Environmental Sustainability? An Svar Analysis”, Bilgi, 23(2), 288-314.
  • Alola, A.A. et al. (2023), “Role of Non-Renewable Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Driving Environmental Sustainability in India: Evidence from the Load Capacity Factor Hypothesis”, Energies, 16(6), 2847.
  • Aslam, B. et al. (2021), “The Nexus of Industrialization, GDP Per Capita and CO2 Emission in China”, Environmental Technology & Innovation, 23, 101674.
  • Awan, A. et al. (2022), “Revisiting Global Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emission Nexus: Fresh Evidence from the Panel Quantile Regression Model”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(31), 47502-47515.
  • Aytaç, D. & M.C. Güran (2010), “Kamu Harcamalarının Bileşimi Ekonomik Büyümeyi Etkiler mi? Türkiye Ekonomisi için Bir Analiz”, Sosyoekonomi, 13(13), 129-152.
  • Balaguer, J. & M. Cantavella (2016), “Estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Spain by Considering Fuel Oil Prices (1874-2011)”, Ecological Indicators, 60, 853-859.
  • Bashir, M.F. et al. (2020), “The Nexus Between Environmental Tax and Carbon Emissions with The Roles of Environmental Technology and Financial Development”, Plos One, 15(11), e0242412.
  • Bataille, C. & N. Melton (2017), “Energy Efficiency and Economic Growth: A Retrospective CGE Analysis for Canada from 2002 to 2012”, Energy Economics, 64, 118-130.
  • Bölük, G. & M. Mert (2015), “The Renewable Energy, Growth and Environmental Kuznets Curve in Turkey: an ARDL Approach”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 587-595.
  • Brown, R.L. et al. (1975), “Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships over Time”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 37(2), 149-163.
  • Can, G. & F. Kılıç (2022), “Türkiye’de Sanayileşme ve Kentleşmenin Çevresel Tahribat Üzerindeki Etkisi: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı”, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 17(2), 66-76.
  • Cetin, M. et al. (2018), “The Impact of Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Trade Openness, and Financial Development on Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence from Turkey”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(36), 36589-36603.
  • Chen, W. et al. (2024), “The Need for Energy Efficiency and Economic Prosperity in a Sustainable Environment”, Gondwana Research, 127, 22-35.
  • Christopoulos, D.K. & M.A. Leon-Ledesma (2011), “International Output Convergence, Breaks, and Asymmetric Adjustment”, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 15(3), https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1823
  • Çağlar, A.E. et al. (2023), “Assessing the Connection Between Competitive Industrial Performance on Load Capacity Factor within the LCC Framework: Implications for Sustainable Policy in BRICS Economies”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 67197-67214.
  • Dai, J. et al. (2023), “Assessing the Nexus Between Human Capital, Green Energy, and Load Capacity Factor: Policymaking for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals”, Gondwana Research, 129, 452-464.
  • Dam, M.M. & S.A. Sarkodie (2023), “Renewable Energy Consumption, Real Income, Trade Openness, and Inverted Load Capacity Factor Nexus in Turkiye: Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis with Environmental Sustainability”, Sustainable Horizons, 8, 100063.
  • Destek, M. & A. Sinha (2020), “Renewable, Non-Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Trade Openness and Ecological Footprint: Evidence From Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Countries”, MPRA Paper 104246.
  • Dogan, A. & U.K. Pata (2022), “The Role of ICT, R&D Spending and Renewable Energy Consumption on Environmental Quality: Testing the LCC Hypothesis for G7 Countries”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 135038.
  • Dong, K. et al. (2018), “CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve in China: What Roles can Nuclear Energy and Renewable Energy Play?”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 51-63.
  • Esteve, V. & C. Tamarit (2012), “Threshold Cointegration and Nonlinear Adjustment Between CO2 and Income: the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Spain 1857-2007”, Energy Economics, 34(6), 2148-2156.
  • Fakher, H.A. et al. (2023), “Renewable Energy, Nonrenewable Energy, and Environmental Quality Nexus: An Investigation of the N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve Based on Six Environmental Indicators”, Energy, 263, 125660.
  • Grossman, G.M. & A.B. Krueger (1991), “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER, 3914.
  • Güloğlu, B. et al. (2023), “Analyzing the Determinants of the Load Capacity Factor in OECD Countries: Evidence from Advanced Quantile Panel Data Methods”, Gondwana Research, 118, 92-104.
  • Güneysu, Y. (2023), “Türkiye’de Finansal gelişme, Küreselleşme ve Sanayileşmenin Yük Kapasite Faktörü Üzerindeki Etkisi”, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(3), 934-946.
  • Halicioglu, F. (2009), “An Econometric Study of CO2 Emissions, Energy consumption, Income and Foreign Trade in Turkey”, Energy Policy, 37(3), 1156-1164.
  • Hasan, M.A. et al. (2022), “Nexus of Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, FDI and Emissions: A Tale of Bangladesh”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 6327-6348.
  • Haug, A.A. & M. Ucal (2019), “The Role of Trade and FDI for CO2 Emissions in Turkey: Nonlinear Relationships”, Energy Economics, 81, 297-307.
  • Huilan, W. et al. (2024), “Impact of trade liberalization and renewable energy on load capacity factor: Evidence from novel dual adjustment approach”, Energy & Environment, 35(2), 795-814.
  • Islam, M. et al. (2023), “Economic Growth and Environmental Pollution Nexus in Bangladesh: Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis”, International Journal of Environmental Studies, 80(1), 68-92.
  • Jahanger, A. et al. (2023), “Analyzing the N-shaped EKC Among top Nuclear Energy Generating Nations: A Novel Dynamic Common Correlated Effects Approach”, Gondwana Research, 116, 73-88.
  • Jalil, A. & S.F. Mahmud (2009), “Environment Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emissions: a Cointegration Analysis for China”, Energy Policy, 37(12), 5167-5172.
  • Jiang, Q. et al. (2021). Measuring the Simultaneous Effects of Electricity Consumption and Production on Carbon Dioxide Emissions (CO2e) in China: New Evidence from an EKC-Based Assessment”, Energy, 229, 120616.
  • Joof, F. et al. (2023), “Climate Change, Insurance Market, Renewable Energy, and Biodiversity: Double-Materiality Concept from BRICS Countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 28676-28689.
  • Kamacı, A. (2024), “Küreselleşme, Hidroelektrik Enerji, Ekonomik Büyüme, CO2 Emisyonları ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi İlişkisinin ABD için Analizi: Kesirli Fourier ADL Eşbütünleşme Yöntemi”, Sosyoekonomi, 32(59), 249-267.
  • Karaaslan, A. & S. Çamkaya (2022), The Relationship Between CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, Health Expenditure, and Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption: Empirical Evidence from Turkey”, Renewable Energy, 190, 457-466.
  • Kazemzadeh, E. et al. (2022). Do Energy Efficiency and Export Quality Affect the Ecological Footprint in Emerging Countries? A Two-Step Approach Using the SBM-DEA Model and Panel Quantile Regression”, Environment Systems and Decisions, 42(4), 608-625.
  • Koçak, E. (2024a), “Yenilenebilir Enerjinin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Üzerine Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği”, Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 8(1), 256-265.
  • Koçak, E. (2024b), “Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezi Geçerli Mi? AB Ülkelerinden Kanıtlar”, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 23(2), 654-666.
  • Lau, L.S. et al. (2014), “Investigation of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Carbon Emissions in Malaysia: do Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Matter?”, Energy Policy, 68, 490-497.
  • Li, L. et al. (2023), “Analyzing the Validity of Load Capability Curve: how Economic Complexity, Renewable Energy, R&D, and Communication Technologies Take their part in G-20 Countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(40), 92068-92083.
  • Lise, W. (2006), “Decomposition of CO2 Emissions over 1980-2003 in Turkey”, Energy Policy, 34(14), 1841-1852.
  • Malik, M.Y. et al. (2020), “Symmetric and Asymmetric Impact of Oil Price, FDI and Economic Growth on Carbon Emission in Pakistan: Evidence from ARDL and Non-linear ARDL Approach”, Science of the Total Environment, 726, 138421.
  • McNown, R. et al. (2018), “Bootstrapping the Autoregressive Distributed Lag Test for Cointegration”, Applied Economics, 50(13), 1509-1521.
  • Mehraaein, M. et al. (2021), “Dynamic Impact of Macroeconomic Variables on the Ecological Footprint in Malaysia: Testing EKC and PHH”, The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 583-593.
  • Mert, M. & G. Bölük (2016), “Do Foreign Direct Investment and Renewable Energy Consumption Affect the CO2 Emissions? New Evidence from a Panel ARDL Approach to Kyoto Annex Countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 21669-21681.
  • Murshed, M. et al. (2021), “The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Deforestation in Bangladesh: An ARDL Analysis with Multiple Structural Breaks”, Energy, Ecology and Environment, 6(2), 111-132.
  • Nadeem, A.M. et al. (2020), “Relationship Between Inward FDI and Environmental Degradation for Pakistan: An Exploration of Pollution haven Hypothesis through ARDL Approach”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 15407-15425.
  • Narayan, P.K. (2005), “The Saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration Tests”, Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979-1990.
  • Nasir, M. & F.U. Rehman (2011), “Environmental Kuznets Curve for Carbon Emissions in Pakistan: an Empirical Investigation”, Energy Policy, 39(3), 1857-1864.
  • Nathaniel, S.P. et al. (2021), “Natural Resource Abundance, Renewable Energy, and Ecological Footprint Linkage in MENA Countries”, Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 39(2), 9.
  • Ozturk, I. & A. Acaravci (2010), “CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Turkey”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 3220-3225.
  • Özbuğday, F.C. & B.C. Erbas (2015), “How Effective are Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Curbing CO2 Emissions in the Long run? A Heterogeneous Panel Data Analysis”, Energy, 82, 734-745.
  • Özpolat, A. & F.N. Özsoy (2021), “Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları Çevresel Bozulmayı Azaltıyor mu? Türkiye Örneği”, Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 13(24), 49-60.
  • Pata, U.K. & A.E. Caglar (2021), “Investigating the EKC Hypothesis with Renewable Energy Consumption, Human Capital, Globalization and Trade Openness for China: Evidence From Augmented ARDL Approach with a Structural Break”, Energy, 216, 119220.
  • Pata, U.K. & B. Tanriover (2023), “Is the Load Capacity Curve Hypothesis Valid for the Top Ten Tourism Destinations?”, Sustainability, 15(2), 960.
  • Pata, U.K. & M. Aydin (2020), “Testing the EKC Hypothesis for the Top Six Hydropower Energy-Consuming Countries: Evidence from Fourier Bootstrap ARDLProcedure”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121699.
  • Pata, U.K. & M.T. Kartal (2023), “Impact of Nuclear and Renewable Energy Sources on Environment Quality: Testing the EKC and LCC Hypotheses for South Korea”, Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 55(2), 587-594.
  • Pata, U.K. (2018), “Renewable Energy Consumption, Urbanization, Financial Development, Income and CO2 Emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC Hypothesis with Structural Breaks”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770-779.
  • Pata, U.K. (2019), “Environmental Kuznets Curve and Trade Openness in Turkey: Bootstrap ARDL Approach with a Structural Break”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(20), 20264-20276.
  • Pata, U.K. (2021), “Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Complexity, CO2 Emissions, and Ecological Footprint in the USA: Testing the EKC Hypothesis with a Structural Break”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 846-861.
  • Pata, U.K. et al. (2023a), “The Role of Renewable and Nuclear Energy R&D Expenditures and Income on Environmental Quality in Germany: Scrutinizing the EKC and LCC Hypotheses with Smooth Structural Changes”, Applied Energy, 342, 121138.
  • Pata, U.K. et al. (2023b), “Empirical Considerations on the Reciprocal Relationship Between Energy Efficiency and Leading Variables: New Evidence from OECD Countries”, Energy and Buildings, 284, 112857.
  • Pesaran, M.H. et al (2001), “Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
  • Polat, M.A. & S. Ergün (2023), “Türkiye’de Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezinin Ekonomik Büyüme ve Farklı Küreselleşme Türleri Bakımından Analizi”, İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 73(1), 107-142.
  • Raggad, B. (2018), “Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Economic Growth, Energy Use, and Urbanization in Saudi Arabia: Evidence from the ARDL Approach and Impulse Saturation Break Tests”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 14882-14898.
  • Saadaoui, H. (2022), “The Impact of Financial Development on Renewable Energy Development in the MENA Region: the Role of Institutional and Political Factors”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(26), 39461-39472.
  • Saboori, B. et al. (2012), “Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions in Malaysia: a Cointegration Analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve”, Energy Policy, 51, 184-191.
  • Saqib, N. et al. (2023), “Pollution Haven or Halo? How European Countries Leverage FDI, Energy, and Human Capital to Alleviate their Ecological Footprint”, Gondwana Research, 116, 136-148.
  • Seker, F. et al. (2015), “The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Quality: a Bounds Testing and Causality Analysis for Turkey”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 347-356.
  • Shahbaz, M. et al. (2012), “Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and Granger Causality”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2947-2953.
  • Sharif, A. et al. (2019), “The Dynamic Relationship of Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Consumption with Carbon Emission: A Global Study with the Application of Heterogeneous Panel Estimations”, Renewable Energy, 133, 685-691.
  • Shokoohi, Z. et al. (2022), “Energy Intensity, Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Populous Middle East Countries”, Energy, 239, 122164.
  • Sinha, A. & M. Shahbaz (2018), “Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emission: Role of Renewable Energy Generation in India”, Renewable Energy, 119, 703-711.
  • Solarin, S.A. (2019), “Modelling the Relationship Between Financing by Islamic Banking System and Environmental Quality: Evidence from Bootstrap Autoregressive Distributive lag with Fourier Terms”, Quality & Quantity, 53(6), 2867-2884.
  • Sreenu, N. (2022), “Impact of FDI, Crude Oil Price and Economic Growth on CO2 Emission in India:-Symmetric and Asymmetric Analysis Through ARDL and Non-linear ARDL Approach”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(28), 42452-42465.
  • Suki, N.M. et al. (2020), “Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Malaysia: the Role of Globalization in Sustainable Environment”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121669.
  • Tajudeen, I.A. et al. (2018), “How Significant is Energy Efficiency to Mitigate CO2 Emissions? Evidence from OECD Countries”, Energy Economics, 72, 200-221.
  • Tsiantikoudis, S. et al. (2019), “Revising the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation: An Empirical Study for Bulgaria”, Sustainability, 11(16), 4364.
  • Uche, E. et al. (2023), Re-examining the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for India via the Multiple Threshold NARDL Procedure”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(5), 11913-11925.
  • UEP (2022), Ulusal Enerji Planı, <https://enerji.gov.tr/Media/Dizin/EIGM/tr/Raporlar/TUEP/ Türkiye_Ulusal_Enerji_Planı.pdf> , 26.06.2024.
  • Ullah, A. & D. Khan (2020), “Testing environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in the Presence of Green Revolution: a Cointegration Analysis for Pakistan”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 11320-11336.
  • Usman, M. et al. (2022), “Pollution Concern During Globalization Mode in Financially Resource-rich Countries: do Financial Development, Natural Resources, and Renewable Energy Consumption matter?”, Renewable Energy, 183, 90-102.
  • Usman, O. et al. (2019), “Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypothesis in India: the Effects of Energy Consumption and Democracy”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 13390-13400.
  • Voumik, L.C. et al. (2022), “Investigating the Subsistence of Environmental Kuznets Curve in the Midst of Economic Development, Population, and Energy Consumption in Bangladesh: Imminent of ARDL Model”, Heliyon, 8, 100223.
  • WB (2022), Renewable Energy Consumption (% of Total Final Energy Consumption) - Turkiye, <https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.FEC.RNEW.ZS?locations=TR>, 26.06.2024.
  • Xu, B. & R. Xu (2022), “Assessing the Role of Environmental Regulations in Improving Energy Efficiency and Reducing CO2 Emissions: Evidence from the Logistics Industry”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 96, 106831.
  • Yilanci, V. & U.K. Pata (2020), “Investigating the EKC Hypothesis for China: the Role of Economic Complexity on Ecological Footprint”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26), 32683-32694.
  • Zhou, R. et al. (2023), “Energy Efficiency and China’s Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Non-Parametric Approaches”, Energy Efficiency, 16(6), 63.
  • Zoundi, Z. (2017), “CO2 Emissions, Renewable Energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a Panel Cointegration Approach”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1067-1075.

The Role of Non-renewable Energy Efficiency in Enhancing Environmental Sustainability in Türkiye, EKC and LCC Hypotheses: Evidence with Fractional Fourier ARDL Approach

Year 2025, Volume: 33 Issue: 64, 493 - 518

Mehmet Aslan

Abstract

This study analyses the relationship between non-renewable energy efficiency, renewable energy use, economic growth and environmental quality within the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and Load Capacity Curve (LCC) hypothesis framework. In this direction, data for the period 1982-2022 are analysed. ADF, PP, Kapetanios unit root tests, Fractional Fourier ARDL bounds test and Fourier Toda-Yamamoto causality test are applied to analyse the data. According to the findings, non-renewable energy efficiency and renewable energy use have a negative impact on CO2 and EF, but a positive impact on LCF. Considering the economic growth variable, the EKC and LCC hypotheses are valid in Türkiye.

Keywords

Ecological Footprint CO2 Emissions Load Capacity Factor Renewable Energy Non-renewable Energy Efficiency Fourier ARDL Cointegration Test

References

  • Abou Houran, M. & U. Mehmood (2023), “How institutional quality and renewable energy interact with ecological footprints: Do the human capital and economic complexity matter in the Next Eleven nations?”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26744-5.
  • Acaroğlu, H. et al. (2023), “Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Terms of Ecological Footprint and CO2 Emissions through Energy Diversification for Turkey”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(22), 63289-63304.
  • Afshan, S. & T. Yaqoob (2023), “Unravelling the Efficacy of Green Innovation and Taxation in Promoting Environmental Quality: A Dual-model Assessment of Testing the LCC Theory in Emerging Economies”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 416, 137850.
  • Ahmed, K. & W. Long (2012), “Environmental Kuznets Curve and Pakistan: an Empirical Analysis”, Procedia Economics and Finance, 1, 4-13.
  • Ahmed, Z. et al. (2021), “Economic Growth, Renewable Energy Consumption, and Ecological Footprint: Exploring the Role of Environmental Regulations and Democracy in Sustainable Development”, Sustainable Development, 30(4), 595-605.
  • Akbar, M. et al. (2022), “Role of Fiscal Policy in Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emission Nexus: an Investigation of Belt and Road Region”, Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4), e2603.
  • Akbostancı, E. et al. (2009), “The Relationship Between Income and Environment in Turkey: Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve?”, Energy Policy, 37(3), 861-867.
  • Akram, R. et al. (2020), “Heterogeneous Effects of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Developing Countries”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119122.
  • Ali, M.U. et al. (2021), “Fossil Energy Consumption, Economic Development, Inward FDI Impact on CO2 Emissions in Pakistan: Testing EKC Hypothesis through ARDL Model”, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(3), 3210-3221.
  • Alnour, M. & H. Atik (2021), “The Dynamic Implications of Globalization and Renewable Energy in Turkey: Are They Vital for Environmental Sustainability? An Svar Analysis”, Bilgi, 23(2), 288-314.
  • Alola, A.A. et al. (2023), “Role of Non-Renewable Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Driving Environmental Sustainability in India: Evidence from the Load Capacity Factor Hypothesis”, Energies, 16(6), 2847.
  • Aslam, B. et al. (2021), “The Nexus of Industrialization, GDP Per Capita and CO2 Emission in China”, Environmental Technology & Innovation, 23, 101674.
  • Awan, A. et al. (2022), “Revisiting Global Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emission Nexus: Fresh Evidence from the Panel Quantile Regression Model”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(31), 47502-47515.
  • Aytaç, D. & M.C. Güran (2010), “Kamu Harcamalarının Bileşimi Ekonomik Büyümeyi Etkiler mi? Türkiye Ekonomisi için Bir Analiz”, Sosyoekonomi, 13(13), 129-152.
  • Balaguer, J. & M. Cantavella (2016), “Estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Spain by Considering Fuel Oil Prices (1874-2011)”, Ecological Indicators, 60, 853-859.
  • Bashir, M.F. et al. (2020), “The Nexus Between Environmental Tax and Carbon Emissions with The Roles of Environmental Technology and Financial Development”, Plos One, 15(11), e0242412.
  • Bataille, C. & N. Melton (2017), “Energy Efficiency and Economic Growth: A Retrospective CGE Analysis for Canada from 2002 to 2012”, Energy Economics, 64, 118-130.
  • Bölük, G. & M. Mert (2015), “The Renewable Energy, Growth and Environmental Kuznets Curve in Turkey: an ARDL Approach”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 587-595.
  • Brown, R.L. et al. (1975), “Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships over Time”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 37(2), 149-163.
  • Can, G. & F. Kılıç (2022), “Türkiye’de Sanayileşme ve Kentleşmenin Çevresel Tahribat Üzerindeki Etkisi: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı”, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 17(2), 66-76.
  • Cetin, M. et al. (2018), “The Impact of Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Trade Openness, and Financial Development on Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence from Turkey”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(36), 36589-36603.
  • Chen, W. et al. (2024), “The Need for Energy Efficiency and Economic Prosperity in a Sustainable Environment”, Gondwana Research, 127, 22-35.
  • Christopoulos, D.K. & M.A. Leon-Ledesma (2011), “International Output Convergence, Breaks, and Asymmetric Adjustment”, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 15(3), https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1823
  • Çağlar, A.E. et al. (2023), “Assessing the Connection Between Competitive Industrial Performance on Load Capacity Factor within the LCC Framework: Implications for Sustainable Policy in BRICS Economies”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 67197-67214.
  • Dai, J. et al. (2023), “Assessing the Nexus Between Human Capital, Green Energy, and Load Capacity Factor: Policymaking for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals”, Gondwana Research, 129, 452-464.
  • Dam, M.M. & S.A. Sarkodie (2023), “Renewable Energy Consumption, Real Income, Trade Openness, and Inverted Load Capacity Factor Nexus in Turkiye: Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis with Environmental Sustainability”, Sustainable Horizons, 8, 100063.
  • Destek, M. & A. Sinha (2020), “Renewable, Non-Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Trade Openness and Ecological Footprint: Evidence From Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Countries”, MPRA Paper 104246.
  • Dogan, A. & U.K. Pata (2022), “The Role of ICT, R&D Spending and Renewable Energy Consumption on Environmental Quality: Testing the LCC Hypothesis for G7 Countries”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 135038.
  • Dong, K. et al. (2018), “CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve in China: What Roles can Nuclear Energy and Renewable Energy Play?”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 51-63.
  • Esteve, V. & C. Tamarit (2012), “Threshold Cointegration and Nonlinear Adjustment Between CO2 and Income: the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Spain 1857-2007”, Energy Economics, 34(6), 2148-2156.
  • Fakher, H.A. et al. (2023), “Renewable Energy, Nonrenewable Energy, and Environmental Quality Nexus: An Investigation of the N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve Based on Six Environmental Indicators”, Energy, 263, 125660.
  • Grossman, G.M. & A.B. Krueger (1991), “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER, 3914.
  • Güloğlu, B. et al. (2023), “Analyzing the Determinants of the Load Capacity Factor in OECD Countries: Evidence from Advanced Quantile Panel Data Methods”, Gondwana Research, 118, 92-104.
  • Güneysu, Y. (2023), “Türkiye’de Finansal gelişme, Küreselleşme ve Sanayileşmenin Yük Kapasite Faktörü Üzerindeki Etkisi”, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(3), 934-946.
  • Halicioglu, F. (2009), “An Econometric Study of CO2 Emissions, Energy consumption, Income and Foreign Trade in Turkey”, Energy Policy, 37(3), 1156-1164.
  • Hasan, M.A. et al. (2022), “Nexus of Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, FDI and Emissions: A Tale of Bangladesh”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 6327-6348.
  • Haug, A.A. & M. Ucal (2019), “The Role of Trade and FDI for CO2 Emissions in Turkey: Nonlinear Relationships”, Energy Economics, 81, 297-307.
  • Huilan, W. et al. (2024), “Impact of trade liberalization and renewable energy on load capacity factor: Evidence from novel dual adjustment approach”, Energy & Environment, 35(2), 795-814.
  • Islam, M. et al. (2023), “Economic Growth and Environmental Pollution Nexus in Bangladesh: Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis”, International Journal of Environmental Studies, 80(1), 68-92.
  • Jahanger, A. et al. (2023), “Analyzing the N-shaped EKC Among top Nuclear Energy Generating Nations: A Novel Dynamic Common Correlated Effects Approach”, Gondwana Research, 116, 73-88.
  • Jalil, A. & S.F. Mahmud (2009), “Environment Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emissions: a Cointegration Analysis for China”, Energy Policy, 37(12), 5167-5172.
  • Jiang, Q. et al. (2021). Measuring the Simultaneous Effects of Electricity Consumption and Production on Carbon Dioxide Emissions (CO2e) in China: New Evidence from an EKC-Based Assessment”, Energy, 229, 120616.
  • Joof, F. et al. (2023), “Climate Change, Insurance Market, Renewable Energy, and Biodiversity: Double-Materiality Concept from BRICS Countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 28676-28689.
  • Kamacı, A. (2024), “Küreselleşme, Hidroelektrik Enerji, Ekonomik Büyüme, CO2 Emisyonları ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi İlişkisinin ABD için Analizi: Kesirli Fourier ADL Eşbütünleşme Yöntemi”, Sosyoekonomi, 32(59), 249-267.
  • Karaaslan, A. & S. Çamkaya (2022), The Relationship Between CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, Health Expenditure, and Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption: Empirical Evidence from Turkey”, Renewable Energy, 190, 457-466.
  • Kazemzadeh, E. et al. (2022). Do Energy Efficiency and Export Quality Affect the Ecological Footprint in Emerging Countries? A Two-Step Approach Using the SBM-DEA Model and Panel Quantile Regression”, Environment Systems and Decisions, 42(4), 608-625.
  • Koçak, E. (2024a), “Yenilenebilir Enerjinin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Üzerine Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği”, Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 8(1), 256-265.
  • Koçak, E. (2024b), “Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezi Geçerli Mi? AB Ülkelerinden Kanıtlar”, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 23(2), 654-666.
  • Lau, L.S. et al. (2014), “Investigation of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Carbon Emissions in Malaysia: do Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Matter?”, Energy Policy, 68, 490-497.
  • Li, L. et al. (2023), “Analyzing the Validity of Load Capability Curve: how Economic Complexity, Renewable Energy, R&D, and Communication Technologies Take their part in G-20 Countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(40), 92068-92083.
  • Lise, W. (2006), “Decomposition of CO2 Emissions over 1980-2003 in Turkey”, Energy Policy, 34(14), 1841-1852.
  • Malik, M.Y. et al. (2020), “Symmetric and Asymmetric Impact of Oil Price, FDI and Economic Growth on Carbon Emission in Pakistan: Evidence from ARDL and Non-linear ARDL Approach”, Science of the Total Environment, 726, 138421.
  • McNown, R. et al. (2018), “Bootstrapping the Autoregressive Distributed Lag Test for Cointegration”, Applied Economics, 50(13), 1509-1521.
  • Mehraaein, M. et al. (2021), “Dynamic Impact of Macroeconomic Variables on the Ecological Footprint in Malaysia: Testing EKC and PHH”, The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 583-593.
  • Mert, M. & G. Bölük (2016), “Do Foreign Direct Investment and Renewable Energy Consumption Affect the CO2 Emissions? New Evidence from a Panel ARDL Approach to Kyoto Annex Countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 21669-21681.
  • Murshed, M. et al. (2021), “The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Deforestation in Bangladesh: An ARDL Analysis with Multiple Structural Breaks”, Energy, Ecology and Environment, 6(2), 111-132.
  • Nadeem, A.M. et al. (2020), “Relationship Between Inward FDI and Environmental Degradation for Pakistan: An Exploration of Pollution haven Hypothesis through ARDL Approach”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 15407-15425.
  • Narayan, P.K. (2005), “The Saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration Tests”, Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979-1990.
  • Nasir, M. & F.U. Rehman (2011), “Environmental Kuznets Curve for Carbon Emissions in Pakistan: an Empirical Investigation”, Energy Policy, 39(3), 1857-1864.
  • Nathaniel, S.P. et al. (2021), “Natural Resource Abundance, Renewable Energy, and Ecological Footprint Linkage in MENA Countries”, Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 39(2), 9.
  • Ozturk, I. & A. Acaravci (2010), “CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Turkey”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 3220-3225.
  • Özbuğday, F.C. & B.C. Erbas (2015), “How Effective are Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Curbing CO2 Emissions in the Long run? A Heterogeneous Panel Data Analysis”, Energy, 82, 734-745.
  • Özpolat, A. & F.N. Özsoy (2021), “Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları Çevresel Bozulmayı Azaltıyor mu? Türkiye Örneği”, Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 13(24), 49-60.
  • Pata, U.K. & A.E. Caglar (2021), “Investigating the EKC Hypothesis with Renewable Energy Consumption, Human Capital, Globalization and Trade Openness for China: Evidence From Augmented ARDL Approach with a Structural Break”, Energy, 216, 119220.
  • Pata, U.K. & B. Tanriover (2023), “Is the Load Capacity Curve Hypothesis Valid for the Top Ten Tourism Destinations?”, Sustainability, 15(2), 960.
  • Pata, U.K. & M. Aydin (2020), “Testing the EKC Hypothesis for the Top Six Hydropower Energy-Consuming Countries: Evidence from Fourier Bootstrap ARDLProcedure”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121699.
  • Pata, U.K. & M.T. Kartal (2023), “Impact of Nuclear and Renewable Energy Sources on Environment Quality: Testing the EKC and LCC Hypotheses for South Korea”, Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 55(2), 587-594.
  • Pata, U.K. (2018), “Renewable Energy Consumption, Urbanization, Financial Development, Income and CO2 Emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC Hypothesis with Structural Breaks”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770-779.
  • Pata, U.K. (2019), “Environmental Kuznets Curve and Trade Openness in Turkey: Bootstrap ARDL Approach with a Structural Break”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(20), 20264-20276.
  • Pata, U.K. (2021), “Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Complexity, CO2 Emissions, and Ecological Footprint in the USA: Testing the EKC Hypothesis with a Structural Break”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 846-861.
  • Pata, U.K. et al. (2023a), “The Role of Renewable and Nuclear Energy R&D Expenditures and Income on Environmental Quality in Germany: Scrutinizing the EKC and LCC Hypotheses with Smooth Structural Changes”, Applied Energy, 342, 121138.
  • Pata, U.K. et al. (2023b), “Empirical Considerations on the Reciprocal Relationship Between Energy Efficiency and Leading Variables: New Evidence from OECD Countries”, Energy and Buildings, 284, 112857.
  • Pesaran, M.H. et al (2001), “Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
  • Polat, M.A. & S. Ergün (2023), “Türkiye’de Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezinin Ekonomik Büyüme ve Farklı Küreselleşme Türleri Bakımından Analizi”, İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 73(1), 107-142.
  • Raggad, B. (2018), “Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Economic Growth, Energy Use, and Urbanization in Saudi Arabia: Evidence from the ARDL Approach and Impulse Saturation Break Tests”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 14882-14898.
  • Saadaoui, H. (2022), “The Impact of Financial Development on Renewable Energy Development in the MENA Region: the Role of Institutional and Political Factors”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(26), 39461-39472.
  • Saboori, B. et al. (2012), “Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions in Malaysia: a Cointegration Analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve”, Energy Policy, 51, 184-191.
  • Saqib, N. et al. (2023), “Pollution Haven or Halo? How European Countries Leverage FDI, Energy, and Human Capital to Alleviate their Ecological Footprint”, Gondwana Research, 116, 136-148.
  • Seker, F. et al. (2015), “The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Quality: a Bounds Testing and Causality Analysis for Turkey”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 347-356.
  • Shahbaz, M. et al. (2012), “Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and Granger Causality”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2947-2953.
  • Sharif, A. et al. (2019), “The Dynamic Relationship of Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Consumption with Carbon Emission: A Global Study with the Application of Heterogeneous Panel Estimations”, Renewable Energy, 133, 685-691.
  • Shokoohi, Z. et al. (2022), “Energy Intensity, Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Populous Middle East Countries”, Energy, 239, 122164.
  • Sinha, A. & M. Shahbaz (2018), “Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emission: Role of Renewable Energy Generation in India”, Renewable Energy, 119, 703-711.
  • Solarin, S.A. (2019), “Modelling the Relationship Between Financing by Islamic Banking System and Environmental Quality: Evidence from Bootstrap Autoregressive Distributive lag with Fourier Terms”, Quality & Quantity, 53(6), 2867-2884.
  • Sreenu, N. (2022), “Impact of FDI, Crude Oil Price and Economic Growth on CO2 Emission in India:-Symmetric and Asymmetric Analysis Through ARDL and Non-linear ARDL Approach”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(28), 42452-42465.
  • Suki, N.M. et al. (2020), “Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Malaysia: the Role of Globalization in Sustainable Environment”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121669.
  • Tajudeen, I.A. et al. (2018), “How Significant is Energy Efficiency to Mitigate CO2 Emissions? Evidence from OECD Countries”, Energy Economics, 72, 200-221.
  • Tsiantikoudis, S. et al. (2019), “Revising the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation: An Empirical Study for Bulgaria”, Sustainability, 11(16), 4364.
  • Uche, E. et al. (2023), Re-examining the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for India via the Multiple Threshold NARDL Procedure”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(5), 11913-11925.
  • UEP (2022), Ulusal Enerji Planı, <https://enerji.gov.tr/Media/Dizin/EIGM/tr/Raporlar/TUEP/ Türkiye_Ulusal_Enerji_Planı.pdf> , 26.06.2024.
  • Ullah, A. & D. Khan (2020), “Testing environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in the Presence of Green Revolution: a Cointegration Analysis for Pakistan”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 11320-11336.
  • Usman, M. et al. (2022), “Pollution Concern During Globalization Mode in Financially Resource-rich Countries: do Financial Development, Natural Resources, and Renewable Energy Consumption matter?”, Renewable Energy, 183, 90-102.
  • Usman, O. et al. (2019), “Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypothesis in India: the Effects of Energy Consumption and Democracy”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 13390-13400.
  • Voumik, L.C. et al. (2022), “Investigating the Subsistence of Environmental Kuznets Curve in the Midst of Economic Development, Population, and Energy Consumption in Bangladesh: Imminent of ARDL Model”, Heliyon, 8, 100223.
  • WB (2022), Renewable Energy Consumption (% of Total Final Energy Consumption) - Turkiye, <https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.FEC.RNEW.ZS?locations=TR>, 26.06.2024.
  • Xu, B. & R. Xu (2022), “Assessing the Role of Environmental Regulations in Improving Energy Efficiency and Reducing CO2 Emissions: Evidence from the Logistics Industry”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 96, 106831.
  • Yilanci, V. & U.K. Pata (2020), “Investigating the EKC Hypothesis for China: the Role of Economic Complexity on Ecological Footprint”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26), 32683-32694.
  • Zhou, R. et al. (2023), “Energy Efficiency and China’s Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Non-Parametric Approaches”, Energy Efficiency, 16(6), 63.
  • Zoundi, Z. (2017), “CO2 Emissions, Renewable Energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a Panel Cointegration Approach”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1067-1075.
There are 99 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Macroeconomics (Other)
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehmet Aslan 0000-0002-7455-5354

Early Pub Date April 14, 2025
Publication Date
Submission Date July 22, 2024
Acceptance Date March 13, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 33 Issue: 64

Cite

APA Aslan, M. (2025). Türkiye’de Çevresel Sürdürülebilirliği Artırmada Yenilenemeyen Enerji Verimliliğinin Rolü, EKC ve LCC Hipotezleri: Kesirli Fourier ARDL Yaklaşımı ile Bulgular. Sosyoekonomi, 33(64), 493-518.
AMA Aslan M. Türkiye’de Çevresel Sürdürülebilirliği Artırmada Yenilenemeyen Enerji Verimliliğinin Rolü, EKC ve LCC Hipotezleri: Kesirli Fourier ARDL Yaklaşımı ile Bulgular. Sosyoekonomi. April 2025;33(64):493-518.
Chicago Aslan, Mehmet. “Türkiye’de Çevresel Sürdürülebilirliği Artırmada Yenilenemeyen Enerji Verimliliğinin Rolü, EKC Ve LCC Hipotezleri: Kesirli Fourier ARDL Yaklaşımı Ile Bulgular”. Sosyoekonomi 33, no. 64 (April 2025): 493-518.
EndNote Aslan M (April 1, 2025) Türkiye’de Çevresel Sürdürülebilirliği Artırmada Yenilenemeyen Enerji Verimliliğinin Rolü, EKC ve LCC Hipotezleri: Kesirli Fourier ARDL Yaklaşımı ile Bulgular. Sosyoekonomi 33 64 493–518.
IEEE M. Aslan, “Türkiye’de Çevresel Sürdürülebilirliği Artırmada Yenilenemeyen Enerji Verimliliğinin Rolü, EKC ve LCC Hipotezleri: Kesirli Fourier ARDL Yaklaşımı ile Bulgular”, Sosyoekonomi, vol. 33, no. 64, pp. 493–518, 2025.
ISNAD Aslan, Mehmet. “Türkiye’de Çevresel Sürdürülebilirliği Artırmada Yenilenemeyen Enerji Verimliliğinin Rolü, EKC Ve LCC Hipotezleri: Kesirli Fourier ARDL Yaklaşımı Ile Bulgular”. Sosyoekonomi 33/64 (April 2025), 493-518.
JAMA Aslan M. Türkiye’de Çevresel Sürdürülebilirliği Artırmada Yenilenemeyen Enerji Verimliliğinin Rolü, EKC ve LCC Hipotezleri: Kesirli Fourier ARDL Yaklaşımı ile Bulgular. Sosyoekonomi. 2025;33:493–518.
MLA Aslan, Mehmet. “Türkiye’de Çevresel Sürdürülebilirliği Artırmada Yenilenemeyen Enerji Verimliliğinin Rolü, EKC Ve LCC Hipotezleri: Kesirli Fourier ARDL Yaklaşımı Ile Bulgular”. Sosyoekonomi, vol. 33, no. 64, 2025, pp. 493-18.
Vancouver Aslan M. Türkiye’de Çevresel Sürdürülebilirliği Artırmada Yenilenemeyen Enerji Verimliliğinin Rolü, EKC ve LCC Hipotezleri: Kesirli Fourier ARDL Yaklaşımı ile Bulgular. Sosyoekonomi. 2025;33(64):493-518.