Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF INDUSTRY 5.0: STUDENT PROJECTS AS A RESPONSE TO THE CHALLENGES OF DIGITAL TOOLS AND SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES

Year 2025, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 867 - 891, 01.07.2025

Zeynep Birgönül

https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1674079

Abstract

This study explores the transition from the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0) to the Fifth Industrial Revolution (Industry 5.0) within the architectural design discipline. Human-centered innovation is a crucial factor for Industry 5.0, which integrates advanced technology to enhance quality of life and achieve sustainable development. The article aims to examine how architectural design is influenced by the shift between the Fourth Industrial Revolution (I4.0) and the Fifth Industrial Revolution (I5.0). The study focuses on how digital tools and smart technology can be employed in architectural design to create high-performing, eco-friendly structures while involving the end-user in the design process. Addressing the gap between theoretical frameworks and practical applications in architectural education, this study presents student projects as a foundation for discussing design proposals tailored to the new industrial era, offering an alternative method to bridge the gap between theory and practice in architectural education. Through a design studio framework, it emphasizes the role of existing technologies and sustainable design strategies in addressing contemporary challenges. Five case studies illustrate the practical application of these concepts within architectural education, showcasing how design-driven innovation promotes collaboration, research, and critical thinking. By equipping design students with the essential skills to navigate Industry 5.0, this research aligns architectural education with the evolving demands of the construction and engineering sectors, paving the way for architects to actively engage in a sustainable and technologically advanced future.

Keywords

architectural design studio education design-driven innovation digital transformation industry 5.0 user-centered design

Ethical Statement

As this study does not involve any procedures requiring the participation of human or animal subjects, ethical committee approval was not deemed necessary.

Supporting Institution

The study was not supported by any funding agency, institution, or organization.

Thanks

The author cordially thanks to the collaborators of this research: Project I - Berk Kesimoğlu with his project titled ‘Mitigation Lab: Production Back to the City: A Systematic Change for Reunion with Nature’ has been awarded with 3rd prize by “AYDA Design Awards 2021” in the architecture section. Project II - Elif Revna Çelik and Hatice Sinem Biçer with their project titled ‘plan_b’; which was awarded with honorable mention prize by BE OPEN & Cumulus institutions in "Design for Sustainable Cities - International Student Competition, 2021”. Project III - Yağız Ateşoğlu and Yağmur Turan with their project titled ‘Bankoboyu’. Project IV - Ela Cezar and Melike Orallı with their project titled ‘Acqua Verde’. Project V - Gizem Kahraman with her project titled ‘Awareness Wave - Awave’. Research Assistant Uğur Efe Uçar for his support to our design studio throughout the semester.

References

  • Alexander, C. (1965). A City is not a Tree (Cilt 50th Anniversary Edition,2015). (M. W. Mehaffy, Dü.) Sustasis Foundation, Center for Environmental Structure.
  • Apple Inc. (2010). Challenge Based Learning A Classroom Guide. https://www.challengebasedlearning.org.
  • Barron, B. (2018). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development. Human Development, 61(4-5), 205-224.
  • Bellini, P., Francucci, F., & Manzi, A. (2020). Architectural education for the age of industry 4.0: A review. Sustainability, 12(1), 163.
  • Birgonul, Z., & Carrasco, O. (2021). The Adoption of Multidimensional Exploration Methodology to the Design-Driven Innovation and Production Practices in AEC Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, 4(2).
  • Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.
  • Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(1), 30-35.
  • Conti, M., Passarella, A., & Das, S. (2017). The Internet of People (IoP): A new wave in pervasive mobile computing. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 41, 1-27.
  • Corbusier, L. (1923). Vers une Architecture. Paris: Éditions Crès, Collection de "L'Esprit Nouveau".
  • Dalenogarea, L., Benitez, G., Ayala, N., & Frank, A. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383–394.
  • Davis, M. (2021). Ethics and the built environment. In S. Emmitt (Ed.), Design management for architects (pp. 261-273). Routledge.
  • Demirbilek, O., & Ekiz, D. (2021). Industry 4.0 and its implications for architectural education. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(3), 435-448.
  • Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.
  • European Comission. (2022-A). European Comission Research and Innovation. Retrieved from Industry 5.0: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/industrial-research-and-innovation/industry-50_en
  • European Comission. (2022-B). Industry 5.0 Roundtable. Brussels: European Comission.
  • Fitsilis, P., Tsoutsa, P., & Gerogiannis, V. (2018). Industry 4.0: Required Personnel Competences. International Scientific Journal, 3(3), 130-133.
  • Fox, M., & Kemp, M. (2009). Interactive Architecture, Adaptive World. New York, USA: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Gattulloa, M., Scuratib, G., Fiorentino, M., & Uva, A. (2019). Towards augmented reality manuals for industry 4.0: A methodology. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 56, 276–286.
  • Gausa, M. (2014). Celebrating Architecture – Enjoying Research. Barcelona: IAAC Publishing.
  • Gausa, M., Guallart, V., Müller, W., & Cros, S. (2003). The Metapolis dictionary of advanced architecture : city, technology and society in the information age. (E. Krasny, Çev.) Barcelona: Actar.
  • Gerlitz, L. (2015). Design For Product and Service Innovation in Industry 4.0 and Emerging Smart Society. Journal of Security and Sustainablity Issues, 5(2), 181-198.
  • Ghobakhlooab, M. (2020). Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119869, ISSN 0959-6526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869.
  • Gilchrist, A. (2016). Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things. Bangken, Nonthaburi, Thailand: Apress.
  • Ivanov, I. (2020). Determining the regional potential for development of industry 4.0. 11th International Scientific Conference: Business and Management.
  • Jonas, W. (2011). A sense of vertigo. Design thinking as a general problem solver? 9th European Academy of Design Conference (EAD) (pp. 1-11). Porto: EAD.
  • Kittel , C., & Kroemer , H. (1980). Thermal Physics.
  • Kraaijenbrink, J. (2022, May 24). Forbes. Retrieved from What Is Industry 5.0 And How It Will Radically Change Your Business Strategy?: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeroenkraaijenbrink/2022/05/24/what-is-industry-50-and-how-it-will-radically-change-your-business-strategy/?sh=4922764920bd
  • Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project-based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASDC.
  • Liedtka, J. (2018). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 913-929.
  • Liu, Z., Sampaio, P., Pishchulov, G., Mehandjieva, N., Cisneros-Cabrera, S., Schirrmann, A., . . . Bnouhanna, N. (2022). The architectural design and implementation of a digital platform for Industry 4.0 SME collaboration. Computers in Industry, 138.
  • Müller, A., & Loukissas, Y. (2020). From CAD to BIM: The changing nature of architectural design practice and education. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(4), 470-501.
  • Negroponte, N. (1995-A). Being Digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
  • Negroponte, N. (1995-B). The Digital Revolution: Reasons for Optimism. The Futurist, 29(6), 68.
  • Nichols, M., Cator, K., & Torres, M. (2016). Challenge Based Learner User Guide. Redwood City: Digital Promise.
  • Niemeläa, M., Shia, A., Shirowzhana, S., Sepasgozar, S., & Liu, C. (2019). 3D Printing Architectural Freeform Elements: Challenges and Opportunities in Manufacturing for Industry 4.0. 36th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2019).
  • Nokia. (2021). Industry 4.0: “think value, not tech” An inside look at the drivers for Industry 4.0 with its 'father', Henrik von Scheel. Nokia: https://www.nokia.com/networks/insights/industry-4-0/three-key-drivers-for-success/?did=D00000001887&gclid=Cj0KCQjwy5maBhDdARIsAMxrkw1kjf5x1R6i7dZ6IlifV1J8qBusegPdfFw7U7AtLBJLj_DJRSelo7oaAvjYEALw_wcB
  • Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books.
  • Origin Oil. (2013). EWS ALGAE A60: The mid-sized algae harvester for distributed architectures. Origin Oil.
  • Oxman, R. (2006-A). Re-thinking Digital Design. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 90, 239-247.
  • Oxman, R. (2006-B). Theory and Design in the First Digital Age. Design Studies, A Special Issue on Digital Design, 27(3).
  • Porter, M., & Millar, V. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), pp. 149-160.
  • Rahmayanti, H., Maulida, E., & Kamayana, E. (2019). The Role Of Sustainable Urban Building in Industry 4.0. International Conference on Education, Science and Technology 2019 Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387.
  • Ramsgaard Thomsen, M., Nicholas, P., Tamke, M., Gatz, S., Sinke, Y., & Rossi, G. (2020). Towards Machine Learning for Architectural Fabrication in the Age of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Architectural Computing.
  • Ratti, C., & Claudel, M. (2016). The City of Tomorrow: Sensors, Networks, Hackers, and the Future of Urban Life (The Future Series. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348.
  • Rifkin, J. (2011). The Third Industrial Revolution. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Sarawgi, T., Sharma, P., Sarawgi, A., & Gupta, S. (2020). Industry 4.0: A survey on techniques, applications, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(6), 2441-2461.
  • Schroeder, D. (2000). An Introduction to Thermal Physics. Addison Wesley Longman.
  • Schumacher, P. (2008-A, September). Smart Work: Patrik Schumacher on the growing importance of parametrics. RIBA Journal.
  • Schumacher, P. (2008-B). Parametricism as Style - Parametricist Manifesto. February 5, 2020 tarihinde Patrik Schumacher: https://www.patrikschumacher.com/Texts/Parametricism%20as%20Style.htm
  • Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. (G. S. World Economic Forum, Dü.) United Kingdom: Crown Business - Portfolio Penguin.
  • Shet, S., & Pereira, V. (2021). Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 173.
  • Tortorella, G., & Fettermann, D. (2018). Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2975-298.
  • UNPF. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. UNPF - United Nations Population Fund: https://www.unfpa.org/resources/unfpa-sustainable-development-goals-0?gclid=Cj0KCQjwy5maBhDdARIsAMxrkw0KIr7XbsBESyYpq-MHeBs01Kk60vuNRgK1DvY4qElXHrZy2_QlbGUaAt0hEALw_wcB
  • Verganti, R. (2009). Design Driven Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
  • Vogel, F., Koomullil, R., & Schäfer, M. (2016). What works when for whom? Designing an interactive tutorial for learners with different prior knowledge. Computers & Education(101), 79-94.
  • de Waele, A. (2017). Basics of Joule–Thomson Liquefaction and JT Cooling. Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 186, 385–403.
  • Zemansky, M. (1968). Heat and Thermodynamics; An Intermediate Textbook. McGraw-Hill.
  • Zeng, W., & Lai, Z. (2020). Research on the Deep Integration of Intelligent New Technology of Architectural Design from the Perspective of Industry 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
  • Židek, K., Pitel, J., Adámek, M., Lazorík, P., & Hošovský, A. (2020). Digital Twin of Experimental Smart Manufacturing Assembly System for Industry 4.0 Concept. Sustainability, 12(3658).

ENDÜSTRİ 5.0 ÇAĞINDA MİMARLIK TASARIMI EĞİTİMİ: DİJİTAL ARAÇLAR VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR UYGULAMALARI ÖĞRENCİ PROJELERIYLE ELE ALMAK

Year 2025, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 867 - 891, 01.07.2025

Zeynep Birgönül

https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1674079

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi’nden (Endüstri 4.0) Beşinci Sanayi Devrimi’ne (Endüstri 5.0) geçiş sürecini ve bu dönüşümün mimari tasarım disiplinine etkilerini derinlemesine incelemektedir. Endüstri 5.0, yaşam kalitesini artırmak ve sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı sağlamak amacıyla ileri teknolojileri entegre eden insan merkezli yenilikçiliği ön plana çıkarmaktadır. Bu makale, dijital araçlar ve akıllı teknolojilerin mimari tasarım süreçlerine dahil edilerek yüksek performanslı ve çevre dostu yapılar oluşturulmasını ve tasarım sürecine nihai kullanıcıların katılımını sağlamayı hedeflemektedir. Mimarlık eğitiminde teorik çerçeveler ile pratik uygulamalar arasındaki boşluğu ele alan bu çalışma, öğrenci projelerini yeni endüstriyel çağa yönelik tasarım önerilerini tartışmak için bir temel olarak sunarak, teori ve pratik arasındaki uçurumu kapatmak için alternatif bir yöntem önermektedir. Tasarım stüdyosu çerçevesinde, mevcut teknolojilerin ve sürdürülebilir tasarım stratejilerinin günümüzün karmaşık sorunlarına çözüm bulmadaki rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Beş vaka çalışması aracılığıyla, bu kavramların mimarlık eğitimi bağlamındaki pratik uygulamaları sergilenmekte ve tasarım odaklı yenilikçiliğin iş birliği, araştırma ve eleştirel düşünmeyi nasıl teşvik ettiği gösterilmektedir. Bu araştırma, tasarım öğrencilerini Endüstri 5.0’ın gerektirdiği temel becerilerle donatarak, mimarlık eğitimini inşaat ve mühendislik sektörlerinin değişen talepleriyle uyumlu hale getirmekte ve mimarların sürdürülebilir ve teknolojik olarak gelişmiş bir gelecekte aktif rol almalarının önünü açmaktadır.

Keywords

mimari tasarım stüdyosu eğitimi tasarım temelli yenilikçilik dijital dönüşüm endüstri 5.0 kullanıcı odaklı tasarım

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmada, insan ya da hayvan denek kullanımını gerektiren bir uygulama bulunmadığından etik kurul onayı alınmasına gerek duyulmamıştır.

Supporting Institution

Çalışma, herhangi bir kurum, kuruluş ya da fon sağlayıcı tarafından maddi olarak desteklenmemiştir.

Thanks

Yazar, bu araştırmaya katkı sağlayan kişilere içtenlikle teşekkür eder: Proje I – Berk Kesimoğlu’nun ‘Mitigation Lab: Üretimin Şehre Dönüşü: Doğayla Yeniden Buluşma İçin Sistematik Bir Değişim’ başlıklı projesi, 2021 “AYDA Design Awards” mimarlık kategorisinde üçüncülük ödülüne layık görülmüştür. Proje II – Elif Revna Çelik ve Hatice Sinem Biçer’in ‘plan_b’ başlıklı projeleri, 2021 yılında BE OPEN ve Cumulus kurumları tarafından düzenlenen “Sürdürülebilir Şehirler için Tasarım – Uluslararası Öğrenci Yarışması” kapsamında mansiyon ödülü almıştır. Proje III – Yağız Ateşoğlu ve Yağmur Turan’ın ‘Bankoboyu’ başlıklı projesi. Proje IV – Ela Cezar ve Melike Orallı’nın ‘Acqua Verde’ başlıklı projesi. Proje V – Gizem Kahraman’ın ‘Awareness Wave – Awave’ başlıklı projesi. Dönem boyunca tasarım stüdyomuza verdiği destek için Araştırma Görevlisi Uğur Efe Uçar’a teşekkür ederim.

References

  • Alexander, C. (1965). A City is not a Tree (Cilt 50th Anniversary Edition,2015). (M. W. Mehaffy, Dü.) Sustasis Foundation, Center for Environmental Structure.
  • Apple Inc. (2010). Challenge Based Learning A Classroom Guide. https://www.challengebasedlearning.org.
  • Barron, B. (2018). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development. Human Development, 61(4-5), 205-224.
  • Bellini, P., Francucci, F., & Manzi, A. (2020). Architectural education for the age of industry 4.0: A review. Sustainability, 12(1), 163.
  • Birgonul, Z., & Carrasco, O. (2021). The Adoption of Multidimensional Exploration Methodology to the Design-Driven Innovation and Production Practices in AEC Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, 4(2).
  • Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.
  • Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(1), 30-35.
  • Conti, M., Passarella, A., & Das, S. (2017). The Internet of People (IoP): A new wave in pervasive mobile computing. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 41, 1-27.
  • Corbusier, L. (1923). Vers une Architecture. Paris: Éditions Crès, Collection de "L'Esprit Nouveau".
  • Dalenogarea, L., Benitez, G., Ayala, N., & Frank, A. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383–394.
  • Davis, M. (2021). Ethics and the built environment. In S. Emmitt (Ed.), Design management for architects (pp. 261-273). Routledge.
  • Demirbilek, O., & Ekiz, D. (2021). Industry 4.0 and its implications for architectural education. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(3), 435-448.
  • Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.
  • European Comission. (2022-A). European Comission Research and Innovation. Retrieved from Industry 5.0: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/industrial-research-and-innovation/industry-50_en
  • European Comission. (2022-B). Industry 5.0 Roundtable. Brussels: European Comission.
  • Fitsilis, P., Tsoutsa, P., & Gerogiannis, V. (2018). Industry 4.0: Required Personnel Competences. International Scientific Journal, 3(3), 130-133.
  • Fox, M., & Kemp, M. (2009). Interactive Architecture, Adaptive World. New York, USA: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Gattulloa, M., Scuratib, G., Fiorentino, M., & Uva, A. (2019). Towards augmented reality manuals for industry 4.0: A methodology. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 56, 276–286.
  • Gausa, M. (2014). Celebrating Architecture – Enjoying Research. Barcelona: IAAC Publishing.
  • Gausa, M., Guallart, V., Müller, W., & Cros, S. (2003). The Metapolis dictionary of advanced architecture : city, technology and society in the information age. (E. Krasny, Çev.) Barcelona: Actar.
  • Gerlitz, L. (2015). Design For Product and Service Innovation in Industry 4.0 and Emerging Smart Society. Journal of Security and Sustainablity Issues, 5(2), 181-198.
  • Ghobakhlooab, M. (2020). Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119869, ISSN 0959-6526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869.
  • Gilchrist, A. (2016). Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things. Bangken, Nonthaburi, Thailand: Apress.
  • Ivanov, I. (2020). Determining the regional potential for development of industry 4.0. 11th International Scientific Conference: Business and Management.
  • Jonas, W. (2011). A sense of vertigo. Design thinking as a general problem solver? 9th European Academy of Design Conference (EAD) (pp. 1-11). Porto: EAD.
  • Kittel , C., & Kroemer , H. (1980). Thermal Physics.
  • Kraaijenbrink, J. (2022, May 24). Forbes. Retrieved from What Is Industry 5.0 And How It Will Radically Change Your Business Strategy?: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeroenkraaijenbrink/2022/05/24/what-is-industry-50-and-how-it-will-radically-change-your-business-strategy/?sh=4922764920bd
  • Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project-based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASDC.
  • Liedtka, J. (2018). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 913-929.
  • Liu, Z., Sampaio, P., Pishchulov, G., Mehandjieva, N., Cisneros-Cabrera, S., Schirrmann, A., . . . Bnouhanna, N. (2022). The architectural design and implementation of a digital platform for Industry 4.0 SME collaboration. Computers in Industry, 138.
  • Müller, A., & Loukissas, Y. (2020). From CAD to BIM: The changing nature of architectural design practice and education. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(4), 470-501.
  • Negroponte, N. (1995-A). Being Digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
  • Negroponte, N. (1995-B). The Digital Revolution: Reasons for Optimism. The Futurist, 29(6), 68.
  • Nichols, M., Cator, K., & Torres, M. (2016). Challenge Based Learner User Guide. Redwood City: Digital Promise.
  • Niemeläa, M., Shia, A., Shirowzhana, S., Sepasgozar, S., & Liu, C. (2019). 3D Printing Architectural Freeform Elements: Challenges and Opportunities in Manufacturing for Industry 4.0. 36th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2019).
  • Nokia. (2021). Industry 4.0: “think value, not tech” An inside look at the drivers for Industry 4.0 with its 'father', Henrik von Scheel. Nokia: https://www.nokia.com/networks/insights/industry-4-0/three-key-drivers-for-success/?did=D00000001887&gclid=Cj0KCQjwy5maBhDdARIsAMxrkw1kjf5x1R6i7dZ6IlifV1J8qBusegPdfFw7U7AtLBJLj_DJRSelo7oaAvjYEALw_wcB
  • Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books.
  • Origin Oil. (2013). EWS ALGAE A60: The mid-sized algae harvester for distributed architectures. Origin Oil.
  • Oxman, R. (2006-A). Re-thinking Digital Design. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 90, 239-247.
  • Oxman, R. (2006-B). Theory and Design in the First Digital Age. Design Studies, A Special Issue on Digital Design, 27(3).
  • Porter, M., & Millar, V. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), pp. 149-160.
  • Rahmayanti, H., Maulida, E., & Kamayana, E. (2019). The Role Of Sustainable Urban Building in Industry 4.0. International Conference on Education, Science and Technology 2019 Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387.
  • Ramsgaard Thomsen, M., Nicholas, P., Tamke, M., Gatz, S., Sinke, Y., & Rossi, G. (2020). Towards Machine Learning for Architectural Fabrication in the Age of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Architectural Computing.
  • Ratti, C., & Claudel, M. (2016). The City of Tomorrow: Sensors, Networks, Hackers, and the Future of Urban Life (The Future Series. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348.
  • Rifkin, J. (2011). The Third Industrial Revolution. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Sarawgi, T., Sharma, P., Sarawgi, A., & Gupta, S. (2020). Industry 4.0: A survey on techniques, applications, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(6), 2441-2461.
  • Schroeder, D. (2000). An Introduction to Thermal Physics. Addison Wesley Longman.
  • Schumacher, P. (2008-A, September). Smart Work: Patrik Schumacher on the growing importance of parametrics. RIBA Journal.
  • Schumacher, P. (2008-B). Parametricism as Style - Parametricist Manifesto. February 5, 2020 tarihinde Patrik Schumacher: https://www.patrikschumacher.com/Texts/Parametricism%20as%20Style.htm
  • Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. (G. S. World Economic Forum, Dü.) United Kingdom: Crown Business - Portfolio Penguin.
  • Shet, S., & Pereira, V. (2021). Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 173.
  • Tortorella, G., & Fettermann, D. (2018). Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2975-298.
  • UNPF. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. UNPF - United Nations Population Fund: https://www.unfpa.org/resources/unfpa-sustainable-development-goals-0?gclid=Cj0KCQjwy5maBhDdARIsAMxrkw0KIr7XbsBESyYpq-MHeBs01Kk60vuNRgK1DvY4qElXHrZy2_QlbGUaAt0hEALw_wcB
  • Verganti, R. (2009). Design Driven Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
  • Vogel, F., Koomullil, R., & Schäfer, M. (2016). What works when for whom? Designing an interactive tutorial for learners with different prior knowledge. Computers & Education(101), 79-94.
  • de Waele, A. (2017). Basics of Joule–Thomson Liquefaction and JT Cooling. Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 186, 385–403.
  • Zemansky, M. (1968). Heat and Thermodynamics; An Intermediate Textbook. McGraw-Hill.
  • Zeng, W., & Lai, Z. (2020). Research on the Deep Integration of Intelligent New Technology of Architectural Design from the Perspective of Industry 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
  • Židek, K., Pitel, J., Adámek, M., Lazorík, P., & Hošovský, A. (2020). Digital Twin of Experimental Smart Manufacturing Assembly System for Industry 4.0 Concept. Sustainability, 12(3658).
There are 60 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Architectural Science and Technology, Architecture Management, Materials and Technology in Architecture, Design, Plan, Project and Application in Architecture, Habitation and Industrial Products, Building Science, Technologies and Systems
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLES
Authors

Zeynep Birgönül 0000-0002-0803-3478

Early Pub Date June 30, 2025
Publication Date July 1, 2025
Submission Date April 11, 2025
Acceptance Date June 30, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 15 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Birgönül, Z. (2025). THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF INDUSTRY 5.0: STUDENT PROJECTS AS A RESPONSE TO THE CHALLENGES OF DIGITAL TOOLS AND SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 15(3), 867-891. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1674079
 Download Cover Image


All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution Licence. (CC-BY-NC 4.0)

by-nc.png