Referee Process Principles

Article Evaluation Process
Our journal accepts academic and original research focusing on the history of sciences and disciplines in the context of Islamic civilization. All manuscripts submitted for publication (including symposium proceedings, book reviews) are subjected to editorial board review, pre-control and referee evaluation processes.

Preliminary Evaluation: The Editorial Board examines the article for compliance with the journal's principles. Unsuitable manuscripts are returned to the author.

Preliminary Control: The article is scanned with plihal.net software. The maximum similarity rate is 20%. It is examined for compliance with the spelling rules and sent to the author for correction if necessary.

Referee Appointment: Manuscripts that pass the preliminary check are sent to at least two referees by double blind refereeing method.

Referee Evaluation: If one of the referee reports is positive and the other is negative, it is sent to the third referee and a final decision is taken in line with the referee's decision.

Revision Process: The recommendations of the Referee and Editorial Board are forwarded to the authors. Authors have the right to object with their justifications.

Final Decision: The Editorial Board decides whether or not to publish the article in line with the referees' opinions.

Last Update Time: 3/19/25, 12:34:05 PM

Journal of Near East University Faculty of Theology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).