Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Toplumda Dijitalleşme ve Sürdürülebilirlik Çatışması: İsraf Kültürü ve Yeşil Bilinç

Yıl 2025, Sayı: Special Issue of the 1st Environment and Communication: Climate Change and Sustainability Symposium, 109 - 122, 30.04.2025
https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1610437

Öz

Günümüzde küresel iklim krizi çerçevesinde sahip olduğumuz kaynakların korunmasına dayanan sürdürülebilirlik gün geçtikçe önem kazanmaktadır. Endüstri devrimi ile birlikte bireylerin günlük hayatlarının teknolojiye entegre bir vaziyet aldığını görmekteyiz. İletişimden ekonomiye, eğitimden politikalara kadar toplumun tüm kurumlarının teknoloji ve ağa bağlı hale geldiği görülmektedir. Böylece gün geçtikçe artan dijitalleşme ile sürdürülebilirlik kavramları birbiri ile anılmaya başlanmıştır. Makalede iki kavram arasındaki ilişki toplumsal ve çevresel bağlamda ele alınarak olumlu ve olumsuz tarafları analiz edilecektir. Bu çalışma, dijitalleşme ve sürdürülebilirlik arasındaki ilişkide toplumsal etkileri ele alarak, israf kültürü ile yeşil bilinç arasındaki çatışmayı anlamayı ve değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, dijital teknolojilerin çevresel fayda sağlama potansiyelini buna karşın e-atık gibi çevresel tehditleri nasıl etkilediğini inceleyerek bu ikilemden doğan toplumsal sonuçları ortaya koymayı hedeflemektedir. Böylece araştırmada dijitalleşme, sürdürülebilirlik hedefleri doğrultusunda çevresel faydalar sağlıyor mu yoksa israf kültürünü tetikleyerek e-atık krizini mi derinleştiriyor temel sorusu yanıtlanmaya çalışılacaktır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden literatür taraması yapılacaktır. Sonuç olarak dijitalleşme ve yeşil bilinç arasında denge kurulmasına yönelik farkındalığa dikkat çekilerek sürdürülebilir dijital teknolojilerin gelecekteki potansiyeli üzerine çıkarımlar yapılacaktır.

Kaynakça

  • Acemoğlu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 3-30.
  • Bener, Ö., & Babaoğul, M. (2008). Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Davranışı ve Çevre Bilinci Oluşturmada Bir Araç Olarak Tüketici Eğitimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyolojik Araştırmalar E-Dergisi, 1-10. https://web.archive.org/web/20200802231457/http:/www.sdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/makaleler/surdurulebilirtuketimdavranisi.pdf
  • Bohnsack, R., Bidmon, C., & Pinkse, J. (2021). Sustainability in the Digital Age: Intended and Unintended Consequences of Digital Technologies for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(2), 1-5.
  • BTK. (2024). Toplum 5.0. Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu. https://www.btk.gov.tr/uploads/pages/arastirma-raporlari/toplum-5-0-arastirma-raporu.pdf
  • Butler, R. J., & Lochow, I. (2016). The Internet Of Things And Smart Cities (Smart Cities and the Internet of Things: Benefits, Risks, and Options). New America.
  • Chou, S.-Y. (2019). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 107-120.
  • Ciocoiu, C. N. (2011). Integrating Digital Economy And Green Economy: Opportunities For Sustainable Development. 6(1), 33-43.
  • Common, M., & Perrings, C. (2017). Towards an Ecological Economics of Sustainability. İçinde M. A. Toman & J. C. V. Pezzy (Ed.), The Economics of Sustainability. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315240084
  • Elbir Mermer, G., & Kurtulgan, A. (2024). Kripto Para Madenciliği ve Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik Üzerine Bibliyometrik Analiz. Uluslararası Davranış, Sürdürülebilirlik ve Yönetim Dergisi, 11(20), 18-35.
  • European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal.
  • European Parliament. (2021). Digital Automation and the Future of Work. https://doi.org/10.2861/826116.
  • Gammoh, B. S., Okoroafo, S. C., & Koh, A. (2019). Cultural Influences on Environmental Consciousness and Green Environmental Behavior. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 11(1).
  • Himmetoğlu, A. (2023). Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik ve Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk: Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz Çalışması. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 10(2), 891-911.
  • ILO. (2020). The Future of Work in the Digital Economy. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@cabinet/documents/publication/wcms_771117.pdf
  • Islam, J. U., Thomas, G., & Albishri, N. A. (2024). From Status to Sustainability: How Social Influence and Sustainability Consciousness Drive Green Purchase Intentions in Luxury Restaurants. Acta Psychologica, 251, 1-11.
  • Koçoğlu Sazkaya, M. (2019). Dijital Sürdürülebilirlik. İçinde İşletmelerin Kaçınılmaz Yolculuğu ve Dijital Dönüşüm (ss. 261-288). Beta Yayıncılık.
  • Komarčević, M. D., & Čelik, P. (2017). Challenges and Impacts of the Digital Transformation of Society in the Social Sphere. Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, 20(1), 31-48.
  • Kuvvetli Yavaş, H. (2024). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Dijitalleşmeyle Birlikte Ortaya Çıkan Meydan Okumalar. Academic Journal of Information Technology, 15(2), 136-173.
  • Mårald, E., & Priebe, J. (2021). Sustainability Metamorphosis. Nature and Culture, 16(2), 1-12.
  • Melville, N. P. (2010). Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability. Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota, 34(1), 1-21.
  • Paul, W., Robin, L., & Sörlin, S. (2018). The Environment: A History of the Idea. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Pollitzer, E. (2019). Creating a Better Futurea. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 75-90.
  • Rasnan, M. I., Mohamed, A. F., Goh, C. T., & Watanabe, K. (2016). Sustainable E-Waste Management in Asia: Analysis of Practices in Japan, Taiwan and Malaysia. World Scientific Publishing Co., 18(4), 1-23.
  • Schultz, P. W. (2002). Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors Across Cultures. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 8(1), 1-12.
  • Seele, P., & Lock, I. (2017). The game-changing potential of digitalization for sustainability: Possibilities, perils, and pathways. Sustainability Science, 12(2), 183-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0426-4
  • Sezgin, S. (2024). Kripto Madenciliğinin Çevre Ve Enerji Üzerindeki Etkileri. Akademik İzdüşüm Dergisi, 9(2), 195-222.
  • Sharma, P., & Dash, B. (2022). The Digital Carbon Footprint: Threat to an Environmentally Sustainable Future. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 14(3), 19-29.
  • SPREP. (2020). E-Waste:Assessment of Small-Scale Technology Suitable for Waste Management in the Pacific and Timor-Leste. Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP.
  • Tekdemir, N., & Çakmakoğlu, D. (2024). AB Ülkelerinde Dijital Dönüşümün Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmaya Yansımaları: Kamusal Politikalar Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(1), 149-166.
  • Tjoa, A. M., & Tjoa, S. (2016). The Role of ICT to Achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals. IFIP World Information Technology Forum: ICT for Promoting Human Development and Protecting the Environment, 3-13.
  • UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
  • UNCTAD. (2021). Digital Economy Report 2021 Cross-border Data Flows And Development: For Whom The Data Flow. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  • Van Veldhoven, Z., & Vanthienen, J. (2022). Digital transformation as an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology. Electronic Markets, 32, 629-644.
  • Wainwright, J., & Mann, G. (2018). Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future. Verso Books.
  • Westerman, G., Calméjane, C., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., & McAfee, A. (2011). Dijital Transformation:A roadmap for billion-dollarorganizations. MIT Center for digital business and capgemini consulting, 1.
  • World Trade Organization. (2018). Mainstreaming Trade to Attain the Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/sdg_e.pdf
  • Yakel, E., Hedstrom, M., Conway, P., & Wallace, D. (2011). Digital Curation for Digital Natives. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 52(1), 23-31.
  • Ya’u, Y. Z. (2004). The New Imperialism& Africa in the Global Electronic Village. Review of African Political Economy, 31(99), 11-29.

Digitalization and Sustainability Conflict in Society: Waste Culture and Green Consciousness

Yıl 2025, Sayı: Special Issue of the 1st Environment and Communication: Climate Change and Sustainability Symposium, 109 - 122, 30.04.2025
https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1610437

Öz

Sustainability, which is based on the protection of the resources we have within the framework of the global climate crisis, is gaining importance day by day. With the industrial revolution, we see that the daily lives of individuals have become integrated with technology. It is seen that all institutions of society, from communication to economy, from education to politics, have become connected to technology and networks. Thus, the concepts of increasing digitalization and sustainability have become synonymous with each other. In this article, the relationship between the two concepts will be analyzed in a social and environmental context, and their positive and negative aspects will be discussed. This study aims to understand and evaluate the conflict between wasteful culture and green consciousness by addressing the societal implications in the relationship between digitalization and sustainability. By examining how digital technologies have the potential to provide environmental benefits but also how they affect environmental threats such as e-waste, the study aims to reveal the societal consequences arising from this dilemma. Thus, the main question of the research will be tried to be answered whether digitalization provides environmental benefits in line with sustainability goals or deepens the e-waste crisis by triggering a culture of waste. In the research, a literature review will be conducted from qualitative research methods. As a result, inferences will be made on the future potential of sustainable digital technologies by drawing attention to the awareness of the balance between digitalization and green consciousness.

Kaynakça

  • Acemoğlu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 3-30.
  • Bener, Ö., & Babaoğul, M. (2008). Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Davranışı ve Çevre Bilinci Oluşturmada Bir Araç Olarak Tüketici Eğitimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyolojik Araştırmalar E-Dergisi, 1-10. https://web.archive.org/web/20200802231457/http:/www.sdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/makaleler/surdurulebilirtuketimdavranisi.pdf
  • Bohnsack, R., Bidmon, C., & Pinkse, J. (2021). Sustainability in the Digital Age: Intended and Unintended Consequences of Digital Technologies for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(2), 1-5.
  • BTK. (2024). Toplum 5.0. Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu. https://www.btk.gov.tr/uploads/pages/arastirma-raporlari/toplum-5-0-arastirma-raporu.pdf
  • Butler, R. J., & Lochow, I. (2016). The Internet Of Things And Smart Cities (Smart Cities and the Internet of Things: Benefits, Risks, and Options). New America.
  • Chou, S.-Y. (2019). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 107-120.
  • Ciocoiu, C. N. (2011). Integrating Digital Economy And Green Economy: Opportunities For Sustainable Development. 6(1), 33-43.
  • Common, M., & Perrings, C. (2017). Towards an Ecological Economics of Sustainability. İçinde M. A. Toman & J. C. V. Pezzy (Ed.), The Economics of Sustainability. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315240084
  • Elbir Mermer, G., & Kurtulgan, A. (2024). Kripto Para Madenciliği ve Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik Üzerine Bibliyometrik Analiz. Uluslararası Davranış, Sürdürülebilirlik ve Yönetim Dergisi, 11(20), 18-35.
  • European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal.
  • European Parliament. (2021). Digital Automation and the Future of Work. https://doi.org/10.2861/826116.
  • Gammoh, B. S., Okoroafo, S. C., & Koh, A. (2019). Cultural Influences on Environmental Consciousness and Green Environmental Behavior. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 11(1).
  • Himmetoğlu, A. (2023). Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik ve Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk: Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz Çalışması. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 10(2), 891-911.
  • ILO. (2020). The Future of Work in the Digital Economy. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@cabinet/documents/publication/wcms_771117.pdf
  • Islam, J. U., Thomas, G., & Albishri, N. A. (2024). From Status to Sustainability: How Social Influence and Sustainability Consciousness Drive Green Purchase Intentions in Luxury Restaurants. Acta Psychologica, 251, 1-11.
  • Koçoğlu Sazkaya, M. (2019). Dijital Sürdürülebilirlik. İçinde İşletmelerin Kaçınılmaz Yolculuğu ve Dijital Dönüşüm (ss. 261-288). Beta Yayıncılık.
  • Komarčević, M. D., & Čelik, P. (2017). Challenges and Impacts of the Digital Transformation of Society in the Social Sphere. Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, 20(1), 31-48.
  • Kuvvetli Yavaş, H. (2024). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Dijitalleşmeyle Birlikte Ortaya Çıkan Meydan Okumalar. Academic Journal of Information Technology, 15(2), 136-173.
  • Mårald, E., & Priebe, J. (2021). Sustainability Metamorphosis. Nature and Culture, 16(2), 1-12.
  • Melville, N. P. (2010). Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability. Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota, 34(1), 1-21.
  • Paul, W., Robin, L., & Sörlin, S. (2018). The Environment: A History of the Idea. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Pollitzer, E. (2019). Creating a Better Futurea. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 75-90.
  • Rasnan, M. I., Mohamed, A. F., Goh, C. T., & Watanabe, K. (2016). Sustainable E-Waste Management in Asia: Analysis of Practices in Japan, Taiwan and Malaysia. World Scientific Publishing Co., 18(4), 1-23.
  • Schultz, P. W. (2002). Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors Across Cultures. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 8(1), 1-12.
  • Seele, P., & Lock, I. (2017). The game-changing potential of digitalization for sustainability: Possibilities, perils, and pathways. Sustainability Science, 12(2), 183-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0426-4
  • Sezgin, S. (2024). Kripto Madenciliğinin Çevre Ve Enerji Üzerindeki Etkileri. Akademik İzdüşüm Dergisi, 9(2), 195-222.
  • Sharma, P., & Dash, B. (2022). The Digital Carbon Footprint: Threat to an Environmentally Sustainable Future. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 14(3), 19-29.
  • SPREP. (2020). E-Waste:Assessment of Small-Scale Technology Suitable for Waste Management in the Pacific and Timor-Leste. Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP.
  • Tekdemir, N., & Çakmakoğlu, D. (2024). AB Ülkelerinde Dijital Dönüşümün Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmaya Yansımaları: Kamusal Politikalar Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(1), 149-166.
  • Tjoa, A. M., & Tjoa, S. (2016). The Role of ICT to Achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals. IFIP World Information Technology Forum: ICT for Promoting Human Development and Protecting the Environment, 3-13.
  • UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
  • UNCTAD. (2021). Digital Economy Report 2021 Cross-border Data Flows And Development: For Whom The Data Flow. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  • Van Veldhoven, Z., & Vanthienen, J. (2022). Digital transformation as an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology. Electronic Markets, 32, 629-644.
  • Wainwright, J., & Mann, G. (2018). Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future. Verso Books.
  • Westerman, G., Calméjane, C., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., & McAfee, A. (2011). Dijital Transformation:A roadmap for billion-dollarorganizations. MIT Center for digital business and capgemini consulting, 1.
  • World Trade Organization. (2018). Mainstreaming Trade to Attain the Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/sdg_e.pdf
  • Yakel, E., Hedstrom, M., Conway, P., & Wallace, D. (2011). Digital Curation for Digital Natives. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 52(1), 23-31.
  • Ya’u, Y. Z. (2004). The New Imperialism& Africa in the Global Electronic Village. Review of African Political Economy, 31(99), 11-29.
Toplam 38 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İletişim Çalışmaları
Bölüm Derleme Makaleler
Yazarlar

Nuran Kızmaz Öztürk 0000-0003-3913-8501

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 31 Aralık 2024
Kabul Tarihi 26 Mart 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: Special Issue of the 1st Environment and Communication: Climate Change and Sustainability Symposium

Kaynak Göster

APA Kızmaz Öztürk, N. (2025). Digitalization and Sustainability Conflict in Society: Waste Culture and Green Consciousness. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi(Special Issue of the 1st Environment and Communication: Climate Change and Sustainability Symposium), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1610437