Yaşlandırmanın Sınıf V kavitelerde biyoaktif materyallerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine etkisi

Ayşe Alanur Sağun; Reyhan Fidan Spor; Zümrüt Ceren Özduman; Burcu Oglakci; Evrim Dalkılıç

doi:10.17214/gaziaot.1479205

Araştırma Makalesi

BibTex

RIS

Kaynak Göster

Yaşlandırmanın Sınıf V kavitelerde biyoaktif materyallerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine etkisi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2, 80 - 87, 05.05.2025

Ayşe Alanur Sağun , Reyhan Fidan Spor , Zümrüt Ceren Özduman , Burcu Oglakci , Evrim Dalkılıç

https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1479205

Öz

AMAÇ: İki farklı biyoaktif restoratif materyal (BRM) ve bir mikrohibrit kompozit rezin ile restore edilen Sınıf V kavitelerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine yaşlandırmanın etkisini karşılaştırmaktır.
GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Bu çalışmada 30 adet sağlam molar dişi kullanıldı. Dişlerin bukkal ve lingual yüzeylerine okluzal sınırı minede ve servikal sınırı dentinde olacak şekilde Sınıf V kaviteler (5mm x 3mm x 2mm) hazırlandı. Örnekler restoratif materyallere göre 3 ana gruba ayrıldı (N=20). Grup CE: Cention N, Grup AC: Activa Bioactive Restorative, Grup FZ: Filtek Z250. Ardından, örnekler yaşlandırma varlığına göre (yaşlandırma yok/Y-, yaşlandırma var/ Y+) alt gruplara ayrıldı (n=10). Yaşlandırma işlemi, örneklerin yapay tükürük solüsyonunda 30 gün boyunca 37°C’de bekletilmesi ile gerçekleştirildi. Mikrosızıntı değerlendirmesi için tüm örnekler, %0.5 metilen mavisi solüsyonunda 24 saat bekletildi. Boya penetrasyonu derecesi stereomikroskopta x10 büyütmede incelendi.
Verilerin analizinde Kruskal Wallis ve Mann Whitney U testleri kullanıldı (p<0.05).
BULGULAR: Restoratif materyaller kıyaslandığında, mine yüzeylerinde, Grup FZ/Y- ve Grup FZ/Y+, BRM gruplarına göre istatistiksel olarak daha fazla mikrosızıntı gösterdi (p<0.05). Dentinde yaşlandırma olmayan gruplarda, Grup CE/Y-, diğer restoratif materyal gruplarına göre istatistiksel olarak daha fazla mikrosızıntı gösterirken (p<0.05), yaşlandırma sonrasında, gruplar arasında
mikrosızıntı açısından anlamlı farka rastlanmadı (p>0.05). Mine ve dentin yüzeyleri kıyaslandığında, yaşlandırma varlığından bağımsız olarak BRM’ler için, dentinde mineye kıyasla istatistiksel olarak daha fazla mikrosızıntı gösterdi (p<0.05). Yaşlandırma varlığı kıyaslandığında, sadece Grup FZ için dentin yüzeylerinde, yaşlandırma sonrasında istatistiksel olarak daha fazla mikrosızıntı
belirlendi (p<0.05). Ancak, BRM’lerin hem mine hem dentin yüzeylerinde yaşlandırmaya bağlı olarak mikrosızıntı açısından anlamlı fark tespit edilmedi (p>0.05).
SONUÇ: Sınıf V kavitelerde, BRM’lerin mikrosızıntısı hem mine hem dentin yüzeylerinde, yaşlandırma sonrası değişmemiş iken, mikrohibrit kompozitlerin dentin yüzeylerindeki mikrosızıntısında artış gözlendi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

alkasit, biyoaktif, kompozit rezin, mikrosızıntı, yaşlandrıma

Etik Beyan

Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü,Teknoloji Transfer Ofisi, Etik Kurullar Birimi, Girişimsel Olmayan Araştırmalar Etik Kurul 11.11.2022 E-54022451-050.05.04-84965

Teşekkür

Bu çalışmanın istatistiksel değerlendirmesi için Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Sevilay Karahan’a ve materyal destekleri için Pulpdent ve İvoclar firmalarına çok teşekkür ederiz.

Kaynakça

1. Gluzman R, Katz RV, Frey BJ, McGowan R. Prevention of root caries: a literature review of primary and secondary preventive agents. Spec Care Dentist. 2013;33(3):133-40.
2. Burgess JO, Gallo JR. Treating root-surface caries. Dent Clin North Am. 2002 Apr;46(2):385-404, vii-viii.
3. Krejci I, Planinic M, Stavridakis M, Bouillaguet S. Resin composite shrinkage and marginal adaptation with different pulse-delay light curing protocols. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 Dec;113(6):531-6.
4. Bajabaa S, Balbaid S, Taleb M, Islam L, Elharazeen S, Alagha E. Microleakage Evaluation in Class V Cavities Restored with Five Different Resin Composites: In vitro Dye Leakage Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021; 13:405-11.
5. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):17-28.
6. Özdemir BE, Çelik Ç. Bioactive resin composites. Yeditepe J Dent. 2021;17(2):139-47.
7. Özcan M, Garcia LdFR, Volpato CAM. Bioactive Materials for Direct and Indirect Restorations: Concepts and Applications. Front Dent Med. 2021 Jun 17; 2:647267
8. Kasraei S, Haghi S, Valizadeh S, Panahandeh N, Nejadkarimi S. Phosphate Ion Release and Alkalizing Potential of Three Bioactive Dental Materials in Comparison with Composite Resin. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:5572569.
9. Mondal K, O'Brien EP, Rockne KJ, Drummond JL. The impact of long-term aging in artificial saliva media on resin-based dental composite strength. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2023 Apr;111(4):812-20.
10. Ionescu A, Brambilla E, Hahnel S. Does recharging dental restorative materials with fluoride influence biofilm formation. Dent Mater. 2019 Oct;35(10):1450-63.
11. Sauro S, Makeeva I, Faus-Matoses V, Foschi F, Giovarruscio M, Maciel Pires P, et al. Effects of Ions-Releasing Restorative Materials on the Dentine Bonding Longevity of Modern Universal Adhesives after Load-Cycle and Prolonged Artificial Saliva Aging. Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 1;12(5):722.
12. Mederos M, León E, García A, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Hernández-Cabanillas JC, Rivera-Gonzaga JA, et al. In vitro characterization of a novel resin-based restorative material containing alkaline fillers. J Appl Oral Sci. 2024;32:e20230219.
13. Venugopal K, Krishnaprasad L, V P PS, Ravi AB, Haridas K, Soman D. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S132-S136.
14. Arisu HD, Uçtasli MB, Eligüzeloglu E, Ozcan S, Omürlü H. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations. Oper Dent. 2008;33(2):135-41.
15. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Seseogullari-Dirihan R, Feitosa VP, Cama G, Brauer DS, Sauro S. Effects of Composites Containing Bioactive Glasses on Demineralized Dentin. J Dent Res. 2017 Aug;96(9):999-1005.
16. Öztürk Yeşilırmak S, Oglakci B, Özduman ZC, Eligüzeloğlu Dalkılıç E. Akışkan bulk-fill ve akışkan geleneksel kompozitlerin farklı adeziv uygulama yöntemlerine göre mikrosızıntı skorlarının değerlendirilmesi. Acta Odontol Turc. 2024;41(1):17-24.
17. Meshram P, Meshram V, Palve D, Patil S, Gade V, Raut A. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(3):403-7.
18. Jawaed NU, Abidi SY, Qazi FU, Ahmed S. An In-VitroEvaluation of Microleakage at the Cervical Margin Between two Different Class II Restorative Techniques Using Dye Penetration Method. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016 Sep;26(9):748-52.
19. AlHabdan A. Review of microleakage evaluation tools. J Int Oral Health. 2017;9(4):141. 20. Shah KB, Mankar NP, Bajaj PS, Nikhade PP, Chandak MG, Gilani RA. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Cavities Restored with Nanohybrid and Microfilled Composites Using Oblique Incremental Technique- An in Vitro- Study. jemds. 2020 Mar 30;9(13):1087-90. 21. Witty D, Kumaran P, Varma B, J SK, Xavier AM, Venugopal M, et al. Effect of Prolonged Water Aging on the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Three Novel Restorative Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Sep 1;24(9):632-7
22. Shahabi S, Ebrahimpour L, Walsh LJ. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation. Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun;53(2):172-5.
23. Anil Kumar S., Varun Krishnan VP, Jyothi KN, Venugopal P, Sharath Kumar P. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of G-aenial Universal Flo, Smart Dentin Replacement and Tetric Evo Ceram bulk fill resin composite restorations in class v cavity preparation: an in-vitro study. Int Dent J Stud Res 2018;6:7-12.
24. Zhao XY, Li SB, Gu LJ, Li Y. Detection of marginal leakage of Class V restorations in vitro by micro-computed tomography. Oper Dent. 2014;39(2):174-80.
25. Tohidkhah S, Kermanshah H, Ahmadi E, Jalalian B, Ranjbar Omrani L. Marginal microleakage and modified microtensile bond strength of Activa Bioactive Restorative, in comparison with conventional restorative materials. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Feb;8(1):329-35.
26. Shenoi PR, Kokane VB, Thawale HV, Kubde RR, Gunwal MK, Shahu SP. Comparing marginal microleakage in Class V cavities restored with flowable composite and Cention-N using confocal microscope-an in-vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2021;32(3):348-53.
27. Pashley DH. Dynamics of the pulpo-dentin complex. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996;7(2):104-33.
28. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001 Sep;17(5):430-44.
29. Bin-Shuwaish M, AlHussaini A, AlHudaithy L, AlDukhiel S, AlJamhan A, Alrahlah A. Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):348.
30. Oglakci B, Arhun N. The shear bond strength of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites with different adhesive systems and resin composite types. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2019 Jul 18;33(14):1584-97.
31. Rifai H, Qasim S, Mahdi S, Lambert MJ, Zarazir R, Amenta F, et al. In-vitro evaluation of the shear bond strength and fluoride release of a new bioactive dental composite material. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Jan;14(1):e55-e63.
32. Kumar AA, de Ataide IN, Fernandes M. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of two self-adhesive flowable composites following various restorative techniques in Class V lesions: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24(5):508-13.
33. Nagura Y, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Watanabe H, Johnson WW, Takamizawa T, et al. Relationship between enamel bond fatigue durability and surface free-energy characteristics with universal adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018 Apr;126(2):135-45.
34. François P, Remadi A, Le Goff S, Abdel-Gawad S, Attal JP, Dursun E. Flexural properties and dentin adhesion in recently developed self-adhesive bulk-fill materials. J Oral Sci. 2021 Mar 31;63(2):139-44.
35. Alrahlah A, Al-Odayni AB, Al-Mutairi HF, Almousa BM, Alsubaie FS, Khan R, et al. A Low-Viscosity BisGMA Derivative for Resin Composites: Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation of Its Rheological Properties. Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 11;14(2):338.
36. Ortengren U, Wellendorf H, Karlsson S, Ruyter IE. Water sorption and solubility of dental composites and identification of monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Dec;28(12):1106-15.
37. Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Domarecka M, Kopacz K, Sokolowski J, Bociong K. An Evaluation of the Properties of Urethane Dimethacrylate-Based Dental Resins. Materials (Basel). 2021 May 21;14(11):2727.
38. Firouzmandi M, Alavi AA, Jafarpour D, Sadatsharifee S. Fracture Strength and Marginal Adaptation of Conservative and Extended MOD Cavities Restored with Cention N. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:5599042.
39. Kaushik M, Yadav M. Marginal Microleakage Properties of Activa Bioactive Restorative and Nanohybrid Composite Resin Using Two Different Adhesives in Non Carious Cervical Lesions - An In Vitro Study. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2017;7(2):1-14.
40. Makowski GS, Ramsby ML. Differential effect of calcium phosphate and calcium pyrophosphate on binding of matrix metalloproteinases to fibrin: comparison to a fibrin-binding protease from inflammatory joint fluids. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004 Apr;136(1):176-87.

Effect of aging on microleakage of bioactive materials in Class V cavities

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2, 80 - 87, 05.05.2025

Ayşe Alanur Sağun , Reyhan Fidan Spor , Zümrüt Ceren Özduman , Burcu Oglakci , Evrim Dalkılıç

https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1479205

Öz

AIM:To compare the effect of aging on microleakage of class V cavities restored with two different bioactive restorative materials(BRM) and a microhybrid composite resin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 intact molar teeth were used. Class V cavities (5 mm x 3 mm x 2 mm) were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of teeth, with the occlusal margin on the enamel and the cervical margin on dentin surface.Samples were divided into 3 main groups according to restorative materials(N=20).Group CE:Cention N,Group AC:Activa Bioactive Restorative,Group FZ:Filtek Z250.Then, the samples were divided into subgroups according to the presence of aging(no aging/Y-, with aging/Y+). (n=10). ).Aging process was carried out by keeping the samples in artificial saliva solution at 37°C for 30 days.For microleakage evaluation, samples were immersed in 0.5% methylene blue solution for 24 hours.The degree of dye penetration was examined under a stereomicroscope at x10 magnification.Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests were used to analyze the data(p<0,05).

RESULTS:When restorative materials were compared,at enamel surfaces,Group FZ/Y- and Group FZ/Y+ showed statistically higher microleakage than BRM groups(p<0,05).At dentin,in groups without aging,Group CE/Y- showed statistically higher microleakage than other restorative material groups (p<0.05);after aging,no significant differences were found between groups in terms of microleakage(p>0,05).When comparing enamel and dentin surfaces,BRM showed statistically higher microleakage at dentin than in enamel,regardless of aging.Regarding to the presence of aging,statistically higher microleakage were determined after aging at the dentin surfaces only for Group FZ(p<0,05).However,no significant differences were found in microleakage at both enamel and dentin surfaces of BRM(p>0,05).

CONCLUSION:In Class V cavities after aging,while microleakage of BRM did not change on both enamel and dentin surfaces after aging, increase in microleakage was observed at dentin surfaces for microhybrid composite.

Anahtar Kelimeler

aging, alkasite, bioactive, composite resin, microleakage

Kaynakça

1. Gluzman R, Katz RV, Frey BJ, McGowan R. Prevention of root caries: a literature review of primary and secondary preventive agents. Spec Care Dentist. 2013;33(3):133-40.
2. Burgess JO, Gallo JR. Treating root-surface caries. Dent Clin North Am. 2002 Apr;46(2):385-404, vii-viii.
3. Krejci I, Planinic M, Stavridakis M, Bouillaguet S. Resin composite shrinkage and marginal adaptation with different pulse-delay light curing protocols. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 Dec;113(6):531-6.
4. Bajabaa S, Balbaid S, Taleb M, Islam L, Elharazeen S, Alagha E. Microleakage Evaluation in Class V Cavities Restored with Five Different Resin Composites: In vitro Dye Leakage Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021; 13:405-11.
5. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):17-28.
6. Özdemir BE, Çelik Ç. Bioactive resin composites. Yeditepe J Dent. 2021;17(2):139-47.
7. Özcan M, Garcia LdFR, Volpato CAM. Bioactive Materials for Direct and Indirect Restorations: Concepts and Applications. Front Dent Med. 2021 Jun 17; 2:647267
8. Kasraei S, Haghi S, Valizadeh S, Panahandeh N, Nejadkarimi S. Phosphate Ion Release and Alkalizing Potential of Three Bioactive Dental Materials in Comparison with Composite Resin. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:5572569.
9. Mondal K, O'Brien EP, Rockne KJ, Drummond JL. The impact of long-term aging in artificial saliva media on resin-based dental composite strength. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2023 Apr;111(4):812-20.
10. Ionescu A, Brambilla E, Hahnel S. Does recharging dental restorative materials with fluoride influence biofilm formation. Dent Mater. 2019 Oct;35(10):1450-63.
11. Sauro S, Makeeva I, Faus-Matoses V, Foschi F, Giovarruscio M, Maciel Pires P, et al. Effects of Ions-Releasing Restorative Materials on the Dentine Bonding Longevity of Modern Universal Adhesives after Load-Cycle and Prolonged Artificial Saliva Aging. Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 1;12(5):722.
12. Mederos M, León E, García A, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Hernández-Cabanillas JC, Rivera-Gonzaga JA, et al. In vitro characterization of a novel resin-based restorative material containing alkaline fillers. J Appl Oral Sci. 2024;32:e20230219.
13. Venugopal K, Krishnaprasad L, V P PS, Ravi AB, Haridas K, Soman D. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S132-S136.
14. Arisu HD, Uçtasli MB, Eligüzeloglu E, Ozcan S, Omürlü H. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations. Oper Dent. 2008;33(2):135-41.
15. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Seseogullari-Dirihan R, Feitosa VP, Cama G, Brauer DS, Sauro S. Effects of Composites Containing Bioactive Glasses on Demineralized Dentin. J Dent Res. 2017 Aug;96(9):999-1005.
16. Öztürk Yeşilırmak S, Oglakci B, Özduman ZC, Eligüzeloğlu Dalkılıç E. Akışkan bulk-fill ve akışkan geleneksel kompozitlerin farklı adeziv uygulama yöntemlerine göre mikrosızıntı skorlarının değerlendirilmesi. Acta Odontol Turc. 2024;41(1):17-24.
17. Meshram P, Meshram V, Palve D, Patil S, Gade V, Raut A. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(3):403-7.
18. Jawaed NU, Abidi SY, Qazi FU, Ahmed S. An In-VitroEvaluation of Microleakage at the Cervical Margin Between two Different Class II Restorative Techniques Using Dye Penetration Method. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016 Sep;26(9):748-52.
19. AlHabdan A. Review of microleakage evaluation tools. J Int Oral Health. 2017;9(4):141. 20. Shah KB, Mankar NP, Bajaj PS, Nikhade PP, Chandak MG, Gilani RA. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Cavities Restored with Nanohybrid and Microfilled Composites Using Oblique Incremental Technique- An in Vitro- Study. jemds. 2020 Mar 30;9(13):1087-90. 21. Witty D, Kumaran P, Varma B, J SK, Xavier AM, Venugopal M, et al. Effect of Prolonged Water Aging on the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Three Novel Restorative Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Sep 1;24(9):632-7
22. Shahabi S, Ebrahimpour L, Walsh LJ. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation. Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun;53(2):172-5.
23. Anil Kumar S., Varun Krishnan VP, Jyothi KN, Venugopal P, Sharath Kumar P. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of G-aenial Universal Flo, Smart Dentin Replacement and Tetric Evo Ceram bulk fill resin composite restorations in class v cavity preparation: an in-vitro study. Int Dent J Stud Res 2018;6:7-12.
24. Zhao XY, Li SB, Gu LJ, Li Y. Detection of marginal leakage of Class V restorations in vitro by micro-computed tomography. Oper Dent. 2014;39(2):174-80.
25. Tohidkhah S, Kermanshah H, Ahmadi E, Jalalian B, Ranjbar Omrani L. Marginal microleakage and modified microtensile bond strength of Activa Bioactive Restorative, in comparison with conventional restorative materials. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Feb;8(1):329-35.
26. Shenoi PR, Kokane VB, Thawale HV, Kubde RR, Gunwal MK, Shahu SP. Comparing marginal microleakage in Class V cavities restored with flowable composite and Cention-N using confocal microscope-an in-vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2021;32(3):348-53.
27. Pashley DH. Dynamics of the pulpo-dentin complex. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996;7(2):104-33.
28. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001 Sep;17(5):430-44.
29. Bin-Shuwaish M, AlHussaini A, AlHudaithy L, AlDukhiel S, AlJamhan A, Alrahlah A. Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):348.
30. Oglakci B, Arhun N. The shear bond strength of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites with different adhesive systems and resin composite types. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2019 Jul 18;33(14):1584-97.
31. Rifai H, Qasim S, Mahdi S, Lambert MJ, Zarazir R, Amenta F, et al. In-vitro evaluation of the shear bond strength and fluoride release of a new bioactive dental composite material. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Jan;14(1):e55-e63.
32. Kumar AA, de Ataide IN, Fernandes M. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of two self-adhesive flowable composites following various restorative techniques in Class V lesions: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24(5):508-13.
33. Nagura Y, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Watanabe H, Johnson WW, Takamizawa T, et al. Relationship between enamel bond fatigue durability and surface free-energy characteristics with universal adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018 Apr;126(2):135-45.
34. François P, Remadi A, Le Goff S, Abdel-Gawad S, Attal JP, Dursun E. Flexural properties and dentin adhesion in recently developed self-adhesive bulk-fill materials. J Oral Sci. 2021 Mar 31;63(2):139-44.
35. Alrahlah A, Al-Odayni AB, Al-Mutairi HF, Almousa BM, Alsubaie FS, Khan R, et al. A Low-Viscosity BisGMA Derivative for Resin Composites: Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation of Its Rheological Properties. Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 11;14(2):338.
36. Ortengren U, Wellendorf H, Karlsson S, Ruyter IE. Water sorption and solubility of dental composites and identification of monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Dec;28(12):1106-15.
37. Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Domarecka M, Kopacz K, Sokolowski J, Bociong K. An Evaluation of the Properties of Urethane Dimethacrylate-Based Dental Resins. Materials (Basel). 2021 May 21;14(11):2727.
38. Firouzmandi M, Alavi AA, Jafarpour D, Sadatsharifee S. Fracture Strength and Marginal Adaptation of Conservative and Extended MOD Cavities Restored with Cention N. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:5599042.
39. Kaushik M, Yadav M. Marginal Microleakage Properties of Activa Bioactive Restorative and Nanohybrid Composite Resin Using Two Different Adhesives in Non Carious Cervical Lesions - An In Vitro Study. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2017;7(2):1-14.
40. Makowski GS, Ramsby ML. Differential effect of calcium phosphate and calcium pyrophosphate on binding of matrix metalloproteinases to fibrin: comparison to a fibrin-binding protease from inflammatory joint fluids. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004 Apr;136(1):176-87.

Toplam 38 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	Türkçe
Konular	Restoratif Diş Tedavisi
Bölüm	Özgün Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar	Ayşe Alanur Sağun Reyhan Fidan Spor Zümrüt Ceren Özduman Burcu Oglakci Evrim Dalkılıç
Yayımlanma Tarihi	5 Mayıs 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi	10 Mayıs 2024
Kabul Tarihi	5 Ağustos 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2025 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA	Sağun, A. A., Fidan Spor, R., Özduman, Z. C., Oglakci, B., vd. (2025). Yaşlandırmanın Sınıf V kavitelerde biyoaktif materyallerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine etkisi. Acta Odontologica Turcica, 42(2), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1479205
AMA	Sağun AA, Fidan Spor R, Özduman ZC, Oglakci B, Dalkılıç E. Yaşlandırmanın Sınıf V kavitelerde biyoaktif materyallerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine etkisi. Acta Odontol Turc. Mayıs 2025;42(2):80-87. doi:10.17214/gaziaot.1479205
Chicago	Sağun, Ayşe Alanur, Reyhan Fidan Spor, Zümrüt Ceren Özduman, Burcu Oglakci, ve Evrim Dalkılıç. “Yaşlandırmanın Sınıf V Kavitelerde Biyoaktif Materyallerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine Etkisi”. Acta Odontologica Turcica 42, sy. 2 (Mayıs 2025): 80-87. https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1479205.
EndNote	Sağun AA, Fidan Spor R, Özduman ZC, Oglakci B, Dalkılıç E (01 Mayıs 2025) Yaşlandırmanın Sınıf V kavitelerde biyoaktif materyallerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine etkisi. Acta Odontologica Turcica 42 2 80–87.
IEEE	A. A. Sağun, R. Fidan Spor, Z. C. Özduman, B. Oglakci, ve E. Dalkılıç, “Yaşlandırmanın Sınıf V kavitelerde biyoaktif materyallerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine etkisi”, Acta Odontol Turc, c. 42, sy. 2, ss. 80–87, 2025, doi: 10.17214/gaziaot.1479205.
ISNAD	Sağun, Ayşe Alanur vd. “Yaşlandırmanın Sınıf V Kavitelerde Biyoaktif Materyallerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine Etkisi”. Acta Odontologica Turcica 42/2 (Mayıs 2025), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1479205.
JAMA	Sağun AA, Fidan Spor R, Özduman ZC, Oglakci B, Dalkılıç E. Yaşlandırmanın Sınıf V kavitelerde biyoaktif materyallerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine etkisi. Acta Odontol Turc. 2025;42:80–87.
MLA	Sağun, Ayşe Alanur vd. “Yaşlandırmanın Sınıf V Kavitelerde Biyoaktif Materyallerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine Etkisi”. Acta Odontologica Turcica, c. 42, sy. 2, 2025, ss. 80-87, doi:10.17214/gaziaot.1479205.
Vancouver	Sağun AA, Fidan Spor R, Özduman ZC, Oglakci B, Dalkılıç E. Yaşlandırmanın Sınıf V kavitelerde biyoaktif materyallerin mikrosızıntısı üzerine etkisi. Acta Odontol Turc. 2025;42(2):80-7.

Kapak Resmi İndir

Makale Dosyaları

Tam Metin