Mapping the Nursing Literature in Wound, Ostomy and Incontinence Care: A Bibliometric Analysis

Seçil Taylan; Gülden Küçükakça Çelik

doi:10.37989/gumussagbil.1608135

Araştırma Makalesi

Mapping the Nursing Literature in Wound, Ostomy and Incontinence Care: A Bibliometric Analysis

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 809 - 822, 26.06.2025

Seçil Taylan , Gülden Küçükakça Çelik

https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1608135

Öz

This search was undertaken to provide a structured macroscopic overview of the characteristics and research advances associated with the nursing literature in wound, ostomy, and incontinence care. Web of Science was selected as the search engine for the bibliometric analysis. The analysis was performed using the "biblioshiny" application available in the bibliometrics package R. The study analysed 8537 nursing articles on wounds, 737 on ostomies and 3459 on urinary incontinence. There are 1767 productive journals on wound care, 230 on ostomy care and 854 on incontinence care. 9 journals on wounds, 5 on ostomies and 17 on incontinence were in the first zone according to Bradford's law. It was found that authors' publication productivity did not follow Lotka's law in any of the three fields. The study analysed by keyword plus. In the nursing literature, research on wounds tends to focus on care, management and prevention; research on ostomies: quality of life, surgery and stoma; research on incontinence tends to focus on prevalence, urinary incontinence and quality of life. Looking at the top five countries producing nursing publications on this topic; for wounds USA, Australia, China, UK, Japan; for ostomy USA, China, UK, Turkey, Brazil; for incontinence Italy, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, Turkey. This bibliometric study provided comprehensive information on global trends and highlights in wound, ostomy and incontinence research, three specific fields of WOC nursing literature. It also identified common and different aspects of the literature across these three specific fields of WOC nursing.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Wound, Ostomy, İncontinence, Nursing, Bibliometric Analysis

Kaynakça

1. Westra BL, Bliss DZ, Savik K, Hu Y, Borchert A. Effectiveness of wound, ostomy, and continence nurses on agency-level wound and incontinence outcomes in home care. Home Healthcare Nurse: The Journal for the Home Care and Hospice Professional. 2014;32(2):119–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/NHH.0000000000000030
2. Öztürk D, Karadağ A. Historical development of ostomy and wound care nursing: Turkey sample. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing. 2019;16(2):73–8. https://doi.org/10.5222/HEAD.2019.073
3. Kelechi TJ, Naccarato MK. Knowledge translation: Summarizing and synthesizing the evidence for WOC best practices. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 2010;37(2):132–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181cf886c
4. Gallagher MA, Chraplyvy N. Building a business case for hiring wound, ostomy, and continence nurses. Advances in Skin & Wound Care: The Journal for Prevention and Healing. 2022;35(9):493–498. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000855028.36575.dc
5. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics. 2017;11(4):959–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
6. Cooper ID. Bibliometrics basics. Journal of Medical Library Association. 2015; 103 (4): 217-218. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.013
7. Yanbing S, Ruifang Z, Chen W, Shifan H, Hua L, Zhiguan, D. Bibliometric analysis of Journal of Nursing Management from 1993 to 2018. Journal of Nursing Management. 2020; 28 (3): 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12925
8. Zhu R, Liu M, Su Y, Meng X, Han S, Duan Z. A bibliometric analysis of publication of funded studies in nursing research from Web of Science, 2008-2018. International Wound Journal. 2021; 77 (2): 176-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14578
9. Azizoglu F, & Terzi B. Research topics on pressure injury prevention and measurement tools from 1997 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing. 2024; 80: 103557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103557
10. Farhat F, Sohail SS, Siddiqui F, Irshad RR, Madsen DO. Curcumin in wound healing - A bibliometric analysis. Life. 2023; 13 (1): 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010143
11. Guo Q, Li W, Xie R, Cheng K, Sun S. Visualization of the relationship between macrophage and wound healing from the perspective of bibliometric analysis. International Wound Journal. 2024; 21: e14597. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14597
12. Li P, Tong X, Wang T, Wang X, Zhang W, Qian L, et al. Biofilms in wound healing: A bibliometric and visualized study. International Wound Journal. 2023; 20: 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13878
13. Liu R, Zhai L, Feng S, Gao R, Zheng J. Research frontiers and hotspots in bacterial biofilm wound therapy: Bibliometric and visual analysis for 2012-2022. Annals of Medicine & Surgery (London). 2023; 85: 5538-5549. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001321 14. Niu SH, Li B, Gu HC, Huang Q, Cheng YQ, Wang C, et al. Knowledge mapping of extracellular vesicles in wound healing: A bibliometric analysis (2002-2022). International Wound Journal. 2023; 20: 3221-3240. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14202 15. Serpico L, Dello Iacono S, Cammarano A, De Stefano L. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive hydrogel-based wound dressing. Gels. 2023; 9 (2): 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9060451
16. Song R, Wu Z, Ma J, Yin S, Liu C, Sun R, et al. Research status and hot topics of the effects of skin innervation on wound healing from 1959 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Surgery. 2022; 9: 966375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.966375
17. Tang NFR, Heryanto H, Armynah B, Tahir D. Bibliometric analysis of the use of calcium alginate for wound dressing applications: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2023; 228: 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.140
18. Zhang J, Liu H, Che T, Zheng Y, Nan X, Wu Z. Nanomaterials for diabetic wound healing: Visualization and bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2021. Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne). 2023; 14: 1124027. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1124027
19. Capilla‐Díaz C, Durán‐López MI, Martínez‐Guerrero JM, Reina‐Leal LM, Gómez‐Urquiza JL, Gálvez‐González M, et al. Bibliometric analysis of qualitative research on patients' experiences of intestinal stoma published between 2002-2018. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2020; 76 (5):1182-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14321
20. Gao L, Cao XZ, Zhang Y, Liu TF, Zhang AH. Bibliometric analysis of literature regarding ostomy research based on the Web of Science database. Frontiers of Nursing. 2018;5(4):193–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/fon-2018-0026
21. Li T, Li Y, Wu S. Global status quo and trends of research on urinary incontinence: A bibliometric and visualized study. Bladder (San Francisco). 2023;10:e21200014. https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2023.873
22. Mahamud I, Mainwaring A. 50 years in urinary incontinence: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited articles of the last 50 years. International Urogynecology Journal. 2022;33(6):919–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05039-8
23. Wu Y, Li P, Shi J, Li J, Zhang Y, Xiao B. Research trends of acupuncture therapy on stress urinary incontinence from 1992 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis. Heliyon. 2023;9:e19732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19732
24. Zhang S, Liu J, Hong S, Yang L, Li H, Hong L. Bibliometric analysis of studies on stress urinary incontinence surgery. Heliyon. 2023;9:e21833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21833
25. Moral-Muñoz JA, Herrera-Viedma E, Santisteban-Espejo A, Cobo MJ. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. El Profesional de la Información. 2020;29:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
26. Fan D, Breslin D, Callahan JL, Iszatt‐White M. Advancing literature review methodology through rigor, generativity, scope, and transparency. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2022;24(2):171–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12291
27. Lim WM, Kumar S, Ali F. Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘What’, ‘Why’, and ‘How to contribute’. The Service Industries Journal. 2022;42(5):481–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2022.2047941
28. Wang C, Hu QJT. Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2020;94:102010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.002
29. Kumar S. Author productivity and the application of Lotka’s Law in LIS publications. Annals of Library and Information Studies (NISCAIR-CSIR). 2017;64(3):234–41. https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v64i4.15624
30. Guo YM, Huang ZL, Guo J, Li H, Guo XR, Nkeli MJ. Bibliometric analysis on smart cities research. Sustainability. 2019;11(13):3606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133606
31. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021;133:285–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
32. Mukherjee D, Lim WM, Kumar S, Donthu N. Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research. 2022;148:101–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
33. López-Robles JR, Otegi-Olaso JR, Porto Gómez I, Gamboa-Rosales NK, Gamboa-Rosales H, Robles-Berumen H. Bibliometric network analysis to identify the intellectual structure and evolution of the big data research field. In: International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 113–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03496-2_13
34. Marczewska M, Kostrzewski MJ. Sustainable business models: A bibliometric performance analysis. Sustainability. 2020;13(12):6062. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13226062
35. Karanatsiou D, Misirlis N, Vlachopoulou M. Bibliometrics and altmetrics literature review: Performance indicators and comparison analysis. Performance Measurement and Metrics. 2017;18(1):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-08-2016-0036
36. Pranckutė R. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications. 2021;9:12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
37. Bar-Ilan J. Which h-index? A comparison of WoS, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Scientometrics. 2008;74(2):257–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y
38. Patil S. Global library & information science research seen through prism of biblioshiny. Studies in Indian Place Names. 2020;40(6):157–70.
39. Ghorbani B. Bibliometrix: Science Mapping Analysis with R Biblioshiny Based on Web of Science in Applied Linguistics. In: A Scientometrics Research Perspective in Applied Linguistics. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. p. 197–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51726-6_8
40. Aksnes DW, Langfeldt L, Wouters P. Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open. 2019;9(3):2158244019829575. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
41. Gülhan PY, Kurutkan MN. Bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 publications in the field of chest and infectious diseases. Duzce Medical Journal. 2021;23(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.826465
42. Imani B, Mirezati SZ, Saberi MK. A bibliometric analysis of International Journal of Nursing Studies (1963–2018). 2019:1–14.
43. Bookstein A. Explanations of the bibliometric laws. Collection Management. 1980;3(2):151–62. https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v03n02_04
44. Chen C, Ibekwe-SanJuan F, Hou J. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010;61(7):1386–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
45. Efrain-Garcia P, Garcia-Zorita C. Desktop scientometrics: A methodology using the R statistical software with data from WoS. Revista Española de Documentación Científica. 2016;39(1):e122. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.1.1223
46. Borgohain DJ, Verma MK, Nazim M, Sarkar M. Application of Bradford’s law of scattering and Leimkuhler model to information science literature. Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management. 2021;15(3):197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.1943041
47. Meller L, Jagadeesh V, Gali H, Oca M, Wilson K, Scott N. Characterizing core journals in ophthalmology literature using Bradford’s law: A bibliometric analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2023;64(6):5381–1. [DOI eksik]
48. Bradford S. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering. 1934;137:85–6.
49. Hawthorne B, Simmons JK, Stuart B, Tung R, Zamierowski DS, Mellott AJ. Enhancing wound healing dressing development through interdisciplinary collaboration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2021;109(6):1967–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34861
50. Mahmoudi M, Gould LJ. Opportunities and challenges of the management of chronic wounds: A multidisciplinary viewpoint. Chronic Wound Care Management and Research. 2020;7:27–36.
51. Sasaki VDM, Teles AADS, Russo TMD, Aguiar JC, Paraizo-Horvath CMS, Sonobe HM. Care in the ostomates programs: The multidisciplinary team's perspective. Revista Rene. 2020;21:e44295. https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20202144295
52. Sasaki VDM, Teles AADS, Silva NM, Russo TMD, Pantoni LA, Aguiar JC, et al. Self-care of people with intestinal ostomy: Beyond the procedural towards rehabilitation. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2021;74:e20200088. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0088
53. Juliebø-Jones P, Coulthard E, Mallam E, Archer H, Drake MJ. Understanding the impact of urinary incontinence in persons with dementia: Development of an interdisciplinary service model. Advances in Urology. 2021;2021:9988056. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9988056
54. Sanses TV, Zillioux J, High RA, Dengler KL, Ackenbom MF, DuBeau CE, et al. Evidence-informed, interdisciplinary, multidimensional action plan to advance overactive bladder research and treatment initiatives: Directives from state-of-the-science conference on overactive bladder and cognitive impairment. Urogynecology. 2023;29:20–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001274
55. Kredo T, Bernhardsson S, Machingaidze S, Young T, Louw Q, Ochodo E, et al. Guide to clinical practice guidelines: The current state of play. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2016;28(1):122–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzv115
56. Pech G, Delgado C, Sorella SP. Classifying papers into subfields using abstracts, titles, keywords, and Keywords Plus through pattern detection and optimization procedures: An application in physics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2022;73(12):1513–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24655
57. Garfield E, Sher IH. Brief communication keywords plus algorithmic derivative indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1993;44(5):298. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)10974571(199306)44:53.0.CO;2-A
58. Bansal S, Mahendiratta S, Kumar S, Sarma P, Prakash A, Medhi B. Collaborative research in the modern era: Need and challenges. In: Indian Journal of Pharmacology. Medknow; 2019. p. 137–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_394_19
59. Castaneda DI, Cuellar S. Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic review. Knowledge and Process Management. 2020;27(2):159–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1637
60. Widmer RJ, Widmer JM, Lerman AJRM. International collaboration: Promises and challenges. Journal of International Collaboration. 2015;6(2):e0012. https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10196

Yara, Stoma ve İnkontinans Bakımında Hemşirelik Literatürünün Haritalanması: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 809 - 822, 26.06.2025

Seçil Taylan , Gülden Küçükakça Çelik

https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1608135

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yara, Stoma, İnkontinans, Hemşirelik, Bibliyometrik analiz

Kaynakça

1. Westra BL, Bliss DZ, Savik K, Hu Y, Borchert A. Effectiveness of wound, ostomy, and continence nurses on agency-level wound and incontinence outcomes in home care. Home Healthcare Nurse: The Journal for the Home Care and Hospice Professional. 2014;32(2):119–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/NHH.0000000000000030
2. Öztürk D, Karadağ A. Historical development of ostomy and wound care nursing: Turkey sample. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing. 2019;16(2):73–8. https://doi.org/10.5222/HEAD.2019.073
3. Kelechi TJ, Naccarato MK. Knowledge translation: Summarizing and synthesizing the evidence for WOC best practices. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 2010;37(2):132–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181cf886c
4. Gallagher MA, Chraplyvy N. Building a business case for hiring wound, ostomy, and continence nurses. Advances in Skin & Wound Care: The Journal for Prevention and Healing. 2022;35(9):493–498. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000855028.36575.dc
5. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics. 2017;11(4):959–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
6. Cooper ID. Bibliometrics basics. Journal of Medical Library Association. 2015; 103 (4): 217-218. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.013
7. Yanbing S, Ruifang Z, Chen W, Shifan H, Hua L, Zhiguan, D. Bibliometric analysis of Journal of Nursing Management from 1993 to 2018. Journal of Nursing Management. 2020; 28 (3): 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12925
8. Zhu R, Liu M, Su Y, Meng X, Han S, Duan Z. A bibliometric analysis of publication of funded studies in nursing research from Web of Science, 2008-2018. International Wound Journal. 2021; 77 (2): 176-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14578
9. Azizoglu F, & Terzi B. Research topics on pressure injury prevention and measurement tools from 1997 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing. 2024; 80: 103557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103557
10. Farhat F, Sohail SS, Siddiqui F, Irshad RR, Madsen DO. Curcumin in wound healing - A bibliometric analysis. Life. 2023; 13 (1): 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010143
11. Guo Q, Li W, Xie R, Cheng K, Sun S. Visualization of the relationship between macrophage and wound healing from the perspective of bibliometric analysis. International Wound Journal. 2024; 21: e14597. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14597
12. Li P, Tong X, Wang T, Wang X, Zhang W, Qian L, et al. Biofilms in wound healing: A bibliometric and visualized study. International Wound Journal. 2023; 20: 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13878
13. Liu R, Zhai L, Feng S, Gao R, Zheng J. Research frontiers and hotspots in bacterial biofilm wound therapy: Bibliometric and visual analysis for 2012-2022. Annals of Medicine & Surgery (London). 2023; 85: 5538-5549. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001321 14. Niu SH, Li B, Gu HC, Huang Q, Cheng YQ, Wang C, et al. Knowledge mapping of extracellular vesicles in wound healing: A bibliometric analysis (2002-2022). International Wound Journal. 2023; 20: 3221-3240. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14202 15. Serpico L, Dello Iacono S, Cammarano A, De Stefano L. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive hydrogel-based wound dressing. Gels. 2023; 9 (2): 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9060451
16. Song R, Wu Z, Ma J, Yin S, Liu C, Sun R, et al. Research status and hot topics of the effects of skin innervation on wound healing from 1959 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Surgery. 2022; 9: 966375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.966375
17. Tang NFR, Heryanto H, Armynah B, Tahir D. Bibliometric analysis of the use of calcium alginate for wound dressing applications: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2023; 228: 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.140
18. Zhang J, Liu H, Che T, Zheng Y, Nan X, Wu Z. Nanomaterials for diabetic wound healing: Visualization and bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2021. Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne). 2023; 14: 1124027. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1124027
19. Capilla‐Díaz C, Durán‐López MI, Martínez‐Guerrero JM, Reina‐Leal LM, Gómez‐Urquiza JL, Gálvez‐González M, et al. Bibliometric analysis of qualitative research on patients' experiences of intestinal stoma published between 2002-2018. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2020; 76 (5):1182-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14321
20. Gao L, Cao XZ, Zhang Y, Liu TF, Zhang AH. Bibliometric analysis of literature regarding ostomy research based on the Web of Science database. Frontiers of Nursing. 2018;5(4):193–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/fon-2018-0026
21. Li T, Li Y, Wu S. Global status quo and trends of research on urinary incontinence: A bibliometric and visualized study. Bladder (San Francisco). 2023;10:e21200014. https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2023.873
22. Mahamud I, Mainwaring A. 50 years in urinary incontinence: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited articles of the last 50 years. International Urogynecology Journal. 2022;33(6):919–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05039-8
23. Wu Y, Li P, Shi J, Li J, Zhang Y, Xiao B. Research trends of acupuncture therapy on stress urinary incontinence from 1992 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis. Heliyon. 2023;9:e19732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19732
24. Zhang S, Liu J, Hong S, Yang L, Li H, Hong L. Bibliometric analysis of studies on stress urinary incontinence surgery. Heliyon. 2023;9:e21833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21833
25. Moral-Muñoz JA, Herrera-Viedma E, Santisteban-Espejo A, Cobo MJ. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. El Profesional de la Información. 2020;29:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
26. Fan D, Breslin D, Callahan JL, Iszatt‐White M. Advancing literature review methodology through rigor, generativity, scope, and transparency. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2022;24(2):171–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12291
27. Lim WM, Kumar S, Ali F. Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘What’, ‘Why’, and ‘How to contribute’. The Service Industries Journal. 2022;42(5):481–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2022.2047941
28. Wang C, Hu QJT. Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2020;94:102010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.002
29. Kumar S. Author productivity and the application of Lotka’s Law in LIS publications. Annals of Library and Information Studies (NISCAIR-CSIR). 2017;64(3):234–41. https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v64i4.15624
30. Guo YM, Huang ZL, Guo J, Li H, Guo XR, Nkeli MJ. Bibliometric analysis on smart cities research. Sustainability. 2019;11(13):3606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133606
31. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021;133:285–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
32. Mukherjee D, Lim WM, Kumar S, Donthu N. Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research. 2022;148:101–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
33. López-Robles JR, Otegi-Olaso JR, Porto Gómez I, Gamboa-Rosales NK, Gamboa-Rosales H, Robles-Berumen H. Bibliometric network analysis to identify the intellectual structure and evolution of the big data research field. In: International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 113–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03496-2_13
34. Marczewska M, Kostrzewski MJ. Sustainable business models: A bibliometric performance analysis. Sustainability. 2020;13(12):6062. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13226062
35. Karanatsiou D, Misirlis N, Vlachopoulou M. Bibliometrics and altmetrics literature review: Performance indicators and comparison analysis. Performance Measurement and Metrics. 2017;18(1):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-08-2016-0036
36. Pranckutė R. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications. 2021;9:12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
37. Bar-Ilan J. Which h-index? A comparison of WoS, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Scientometrics. 2008;74(2):257–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y
38. Patil S. Global library & information science research seen through prism of biblioshiny. Studies in Indian Place Names. 2020;40(6):157–70.
39. Ghorbani B. Bibliometrix: Science Mapping Analysis with R Biblioshiny Based on Web of Science in Applied Linguistics. In: A Scientometrics Research Perspective in Applied Linguistics. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. p. 197–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51726-6_8
40. Aksnes DW, Langfeldt L, Wouters P. Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open. 2019;9(3):2158244019829575. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
41. Gülhan PY, Kurutkan MN. Bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 publications in the field of chest and infectious diseases. Duzce Medical Journal. 2021;23(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.826465
42. Imani B, Mirezati SZ, Saberi MK. A bibliometric analysis of International Journal of Nursing Studies (1963–2018). 2019:1–14.
43. Bookstein A. Explanations of the bibliometric laws. Collection Management. 1980;3(2):151–62. https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v03n02_04
44. Chen C, Ibekwe-SanJuan F, Hou J. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010;61(7):1386–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
45. Efrain-Garcia P, Garcia-Zorita C. Desktop scientometrics: A methodology using the R statistical software with data from WoS. Revista Española de Documentación Científica. 2016;39(1):e122. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.1.1223
46. Borgohain DJ, Verma MK, Nazim M, Sarkar M. Application of Bradford’s law of scattering and Leimkuhler model to information science literature. Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management. 2021;15(3):197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.1943041
47. Meller L, Jagadeesh V, Gali H, Oca M, Wilson K, Scott N. Characterizing core journals in ophthalmology literature using Bradford’s law: A bibliometric analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2023;64(6):5381–1. [DOI eksik]
48. Bradford S. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering. 1934;137:85–6.
49. Hawthorne B, Simmons JK, Stuart B, Tung R, Zamierowski DS, Mellott AJ. Enhancing wound healing dressing development through interdisciplinary collaboration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2021;109(6):1967–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34861
50. Mahmoudi M, Gould LJ. Opportunities and challenges of the management of chronic wounds: A multidisciplinary viewpoint. Chronic Wound Care Management and Research. 2020;7:27–36.
51. Sasaki VDM, Teles AADS, Russo TMD, Aguiar JC, Paraizo-Horvath CMS, Sonobe HM. Care in the ostomates programs: The multidisciplinary team's perspective. Revista Rene. 2020;21:e44295. https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20202144295
52. Sasaki VDM, Teles AADS, Silva NM, Russo TMD, Pantoni LA, Aguiar JC, et al. Self-care of people with intestinal ostomy: Beyond the procedural towards rehabilitation. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2021;74:e20200088. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0088
53. Juliebø-Jones P, Coulthard E, Mallam E, Archer H, Drake MJ. Understanding the impact of urinary incontinence in persons with dementia: Development of an interdisciplinary service model. Advances in Urology. 2021;2021:9988056. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9988056
54. Sanses TV, Zillioux J, High RA, Dengler KL, Ackenbom MF, DuBeau CE, et al. Evidence-informed, interdisciplinary, multidimensional action plan to advance overactive bladder research and treatment initiatives: Directives from state-of-the-science conference on overactive bladder and cognitive impairment. Urogynecology. 2023;29:20–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001274
55. Kredo T, Bernhardsson S, Machingaidze S, Young T, Louw Q, Ochodo E, et al. Guide to clinical practice guidelines: The current state of play. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2016;28(1):122–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzv115
56. Pech G, Delgado C, Sorella SP. Classifying papers into subfields using abstracts, titles, keywords, and Keywords Plus through pattern detection and optimization procedures: An application in physics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2022;73(12):1513–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24655
57. Garfield E, Sher IH. Brief communication keywords plus algorithmic derivative indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1993;44(5):298. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)10974571(199306)44:53.0.CO;2-A
58. Bansal S, Mahendiratta S, Kumar S, Sarma P, Prakash A, Medhi B. Collaborative research in the modern era: Need and challenges. In: Indian Journal of Pharmacology. Medknow; 2019. p. 137–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_394_19
59. Castaneda DI, Cuellar S. Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic review. Knowledge and Process Management. 2020;27(2):159–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1637
60. Widmer RJ, Widmer JM, Lerman AJRM. International collaboration: Promises and challenges. Journal of International Collaboration. 2015;6(2):e0012. https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10196

Toplam 58 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	İngilizce
Konular	Cerrahi Hastalıklar Hemşireliği
Bölüm	Makaleler
Yazarlar	Seçil Taylan 0000-0002-7243-0734 Gülden Küçükakça Çelik 0000-0002-8325-3198
Yayımlanma Tarihi	26 Haziran 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi	26 Aralık 2024
Kabul Tarihi	16 Mart 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2025 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA	Taylan, S., & Küçükakça Çelik, G. (2025). Mapping the Nursing Literature in Wound, Ostomy and Incontinence Care: A Bibliometric Analysis. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(2), 809-822. https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1608135
AMA	Taylan S, Küçükakça Çelik G. Mapping the Nursing Literature in Wound, Ostomy and Incontinence Care: A Bibliometric Analysis. Gümüşhane Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. Haziran 2025;14(2):809-822. doi:10.37989/gumussagbil.1608135
Chicago	Taylan, Seçil, ve Gülden Küçükakça Çelik. “Mapping the Nursing Literature in Wound, Ostomy and Incontinence Care: A Bibliometric Analysis”. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14, sy. 2 (Haziran 2025): 809-22. https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1608135.
EndNote	Taylan S, Küçükakça Çelik G (01 Haziran 2025) Mapping the Nursing Literature in Wound, Ostomy and Incontinence Care: A Bibliometric Analysis. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14 2 809–822.
IEEE	S. Taylan ve G. Küçükakça Çelik, “Mapping the Nursing Literature in Wound, Ostomy and Incontinence Care: A Bibliometric Analysis”, Gümüşhane Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 14, sy. 2, ss. 809–822, 2025, doi: 10.37989/gumussagbil.1608135.
ISNAD	Taylan, Seçil - Küçükakça Çelik, Gülden. “Mapping the Nursing Literature in Wound, Ostomy and Incontinence Care: A Bibliometric Analysis”. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14/2 (Haziran 2025), 809-822. https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1608135.
JAMA	Taylan S, Küçükakça Çelik G. Mapping the Nursing Literature in Wound, Ostomy and Incontinence Care: A Bibliometric Analysis. Gümüşhane Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2025;14:809–822.
MLA	Taylan, Seçil ve Gülden Küçükakça Çelik. “Mapping the Nursing Literature in Wound, Ostomy and Incontinence Care: A Bibliometric Analysis”. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 14, sy. 2, 2025, ss. 809-22, doi:10.37989/gumussagbil.1608135.
Vancouver	Taylan S, Küçükakça Çelik G. Mapping the Nursing Literature in Wound, Ostomy and Incontinence Care: A Bibliometric Analysis. Gümüşhane Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2025;14(2):809-22.

Kapak Resmi İndir

Makale Dosyaları

Tam Metin