Akademik MATBUAT

Öz

In reasoning based on the preconceived notion that philosophy and religion are opposing forces, Ghazali is often portrayed as the sole culprit for philosophy's decline in the Muslim world and for centuries of stagnation among its populations. This observation holds significant importance for Muslims, who have yet to achieve the leap they so desperately need; however, no significant change has occurred even centuries after this conclusion was drawn. Ghazali has long been accused of preventing the integration of reason, science, and free thought into a cultural climate. He is blamed, blamed repeatedly, and no further action is taken. It is evident that this striking claim, which yields little positive benefit, requires reflection on the grounds of scientific skepticism.
To be regarded as a so-called proponent of philosophy, reason, and science, it is deemed necessary—and even sufficient—to demonize Ghazali. Yet, genuine advocates of philosophy, reason, and science should question this unproductive stereotype and seek the truth. It should have already been understood that insistence on this stereotype does not lead to the growth of a pro-philosophy audience. On the contrary, it causes the religious audience, whom one hopes to persuade, to distance themselves further from philosophy.
This study focuses on what and how Ghazali objected within the domain of philosophy. Since objections to philosophy can only be made through philosophy, rather than being opposed to it, Ghazali is argued to have engaged in philosophy. He claimed that venturing into the domain of religion renders philosophy inconsistent, and this claim is examined in detail. Ghazali’s alleged opposition to philosophy, particularly to reason and science, should be reassessed.
This work aims to contribute to the understanding of Ghazali’s true thoughts on philosophy, reason, science, and religion by first fostering an academic-level discussion. The findings of such discussions should then be shared with society to put an end to the unproductive scapegoating stereotype. When the truth is uncovered, it is hoped that the religious community will reconcile with philosophy, and the roles of reason and science in religion and religiosity will be enhanced.