Objective: This study aimed to compare the removability of fractured nickel-titanium rotary instruments with different working principles in the middle and coronal thirds of the canal using ultrasonic tips and the BTR pen.
Method: Thirty-two mandibular molars were selected from recently extracted teeth that met the inclusion criteria. Teeth had to have a closed apex, no root caries, anomalies, fractures, cracks, or signs of internal or external resorption. The mesiobuccal roots were intentionally fractured, and the root inclination was confirmed to be ≤20° using Schneider's method. Teeth with a higher inclination angle were excluded. Access cavities were opened traditionally to allow direct canal access, and apical patency was verified with #10 K files. Canal lengths were measured, and teeth were embedded in acrylic blocks for easier handling. The teeth were divided into four study groups (n=8) based on the working principle of the instrument and the location of the fractured instrument (coronal or middle third). NiTi instruments with the same taper (0.6) and heat treatment (blue) were selected. A 4 mm mark was made on each file, and files were thinned to half their thickness at the designated breaking point using a diamond bur. A stage platform was created with Gates Glidden burs to improve the visibility of the broken instruments. After creating the platform, dentin around the broken files was removed by 2 mm with ultrasonic tips, and the broken pieces were extracted using a BTR Pen with a 0.3 mm thin wire loop.
Results: When analyzed by working principle, the removal time for fractured instruments in the middle third was significantly higher (p=0.0001). Within the coronal third, the removal time for reciprocal files was significantly longer (p=0.021). Similarly, in the middle third, the removal time for reciprocal files was statistically longer (p=0.004).
Conclusion: The BTR Pen was effective for both rotary file systems. The location of the fractured instrument influenced the removal time, with faster results in the coronal third due to better access and visibility. Additionally, the type of fractured NiTi rotary instrument also impacted the time required for successful removal, with rotary instruments in the middle third taking significantly longer.
Broken file Broken file removal NiTi rotary instruments ultrasonic BTR Pen
A-2123
Bu çalışmanın, özgün bir çalışma olduğunu; çalışmanın hazırlık, veri toplama, analiz ve bilgilerin sunumu olmak üzere tüm aşamalarından bilimsel etik ilke ve kurallarına uygun davrandığımı; bu çalışma kapsamında elde edilmeyen tüm veri ve bilgiler için kaynak gösterdiğimi ve bu kaynaklara kaynakçada yer verdiğimi; kullanılan verilerde herhangi bir değişiklik yapmadığımı, çalışmanın Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)' in tüm şartlarını ve koşullarını kabul ederek etik görev ve sorumluluklara riayet ettiğimi beyan ederim. Herhangi bir zamanda, çalışmayla ilgili yaptığım bu beyana aykırı bir durumun saptanması durumunda, ortaya çıkacak tüm ahlaki ve hukuki sonuçlara razı olduğumu bildiririm.
Ordu Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi
A-2123
Ordu Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi'ne projeye olan desteklerinden ötürü teşekkürlerimizi sunarız.
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Endodonti |
Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
Yazarlar | |
Proje Numarası | A-2123 |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Mayıs 2025 |
Gönderilme Tarihi | 1 Ağustos 2024 |
Kabul Tarihi | 20 Şubat 2025 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2025 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2 |