Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2021, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 148 - 156, 31.08.2021
https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.03411

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Pittayachawan P, McDonald A, Petrie A, Knowles JC. The biaxial flexural strength and fatigue property of Lava Y-TZP dental ceramic. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1018-29.
  • 2. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 299-307.
  • 3. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 1-25.
  • 4. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 304-13.
  • 5. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007; 35: 819-26.
  • 6. Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Takahashi R, Zhu L, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, et al. Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 426-32.
  • 7. Preis V, Letsch C, Handel G, Behr M, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Influence of substructure design, veneer application technique, and firing regime on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 113-21.
  • 8. Alessandretti R, Borba M, Benetti P, Corazza PH, Ribeiro R, Della Bona A. Reliability and mode of failure of bonded monolithic and multilayer ceramics. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 191-7.
  • 9. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015; 31: 603-23.
  • 10. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 624-39.
  • 11. Venezia P, Torsello F, Cavalcanti R, D’Amato S. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 506-12.
  • 12. Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, Kanno T, Niwano Y, Milleding P, et al. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73: 602-8.
  • 13. Edelhoff D, Ozcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 193-204.
  • 14. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 268-74.
  • 15. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 449-56.
  • 16. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater 2011; 27: 71-82.
  • 17. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 45-50.
  • 18. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide by two air-particle abrasion methods. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 248-55.
  • 19. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004; 71: 381-6.
  • 20. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Malament KA, Van Thompson P, Rekow ED. Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particle-abraded ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19: 442-8.
  • 21. Guazzato M, Quach L, Albakry M, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent 2005; 33: 9-18.
  • 22. Kern M. Bonding to oxide ceramics—laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 8-14.
  • 23. Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B. Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 817-22.
  • 24. Yang B, Barloi A, Kern M. Influence of air-abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 44-50.
  • 25. Zhao L, Jian YT, Wang XD, Zhao K. Bond strength of primer/cement systems to zirconia subjected to artificial aging. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 790-6.
  • 26. Yagawa S, Komine F, Fushiki R, Kubochi K, Kimura F, Matsumura H. Effect of priming agents on shear bond strengths of resin-based luting agents to a translucent zirconia material. J Prosthodont Res 2018; 62: 204-9.

Effect of an MDP-containing Primer on the Bond Strength Between Ten Different Resin Cements and Air-abraded Monolithic Zirconia

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 148 - 156, 31.08.2021
https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.03411

Öz

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of different self-adhesive luting systems to airborne-particleabraded monolithic zirconia ceramic, with or without the application of a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based ceramic primer.
Materials and Methods: A total of 200 monolithic zirconia specimens were prepared and air-abraded using 50-µm aluminum oxide particles under a pressure of 2.5 bar. Ten different self-adhesive resin cements were then bonded to the zirconia specimens with or without the use of an MDP-containing primer. After 24 h of water storage, all of the resin-bonded samples were thermocycled 5,000 times (5-55 °C). The SBS of the specimens was measured using a universal testing machine, and failure types were examined under a stereomicroscope. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s honestly significant difference tests.
Results: Statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the different resin cement groups (p<0.001). All of the primer-applied groups showed statistically higher SBS values than the non-primed groups (p<0.05). The SBS values of primerapplied groups ranged between 8.56±0.91 and 16.08±0.67 MPa. Adhesive failures were more predominant in the nonprimed groups than in the primed groups for each resin cement tested. MDP-based resin cements used did not result in the highest bond strengths.
Conclusion: In the case of every self-adhesive resin cement tested, application of an additional MDP-containing priming agent yielded enhanced bond strength to air-abraded monolithic zirconia specimens. However, no association between the MDP content of the resin cements and the SBS values was observed.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Pittayachawan P, McDonald A, Petrie A, Knowles JC. The biaxial flexural strength and fatigue property of Lava Y-TZP dental ceramic. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1018-29.
  • 2. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 299-307.
  • 3. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 1-25.
  • 4. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 304-13.
  • 5. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007; 35: 819-26.
  • 6. Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Takahashi R, Zhu L, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, et al. Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 426-32.
  • 7. Preis V, Letsch C, Handel G, Behr M, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Influence of substructure design, veneer application technique, and firing regime on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 113-21.
  • 8. Alessandretti R, Borba M, Benetti P, Corazza PH, Ribeiro R, Della Bona A. Reliability and mode of failure of bonded monolithic and multilayer ceramics. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 191-7.
  • 9. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015; 31: 603-23.
  • 10. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 624-39.
  • 11. Venezia P, Torsello F, Cavalcanti R, D’Amato S. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 506-12.
  • 12. Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, Kanno T, Niwano Y, Milleding P, et al. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73: 602-8.
  • 13. Edelhoff D, Ozcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 193-204.
  • 14. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 268-74.
  • 15. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 449-56.
  • 16. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater 2011; 27: 71-82.
  • 17. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 45-50.
  • 18. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide by two air-particle abrasion methods. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 248-55.
  • 19. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004; 71: 381-6.
  • 20. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Malament KA, Van Thompson P, Rekow ED. Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particle-abraded ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19: 442-8.
  • 21. Guazzato M, Quach L, Albakry M, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent 2005; 33: 9-18.
  • 22. Kern M. Bonding to oxide ceramics—laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 8-14.
  • 23. Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B. Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 817-22.
  • 24. Yang B, Barloi A, Kern M. Influence of air-abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 44-50.
  • 25. Zhao L, Jian YT, Wang XD, Zhao K. Bond strength of primer/cement systems to zirconia subjected to artificial aging. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 790-6.
  • 26. Yagawa S, Komine F, Fushiki R, Kubochi K, Kimura F, Matsumura H. Effect of priming agents on shear bond strengths of resin-based luting agents to a translucent zirconia material. J Prosthodont Res 2018; 62: 204-9.
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Diş Hekimliği (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Yener Okutan

Münir Tolga Yücel

Mustafa Borga Dönmez

Tuğçe Gezer

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ağustos 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Okutan Y, Yücel MT, Dönmez MB, Gezer T (01 Ağustos 2021) Effect of an MDP-containing Primer on the Bond Strength Between Ten Different Resin Cements and Air-abraded Monolithic Zirconia. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal 22 2 148–156.