Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2019,
Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3, 191 - 194, 30.12.2019
Öz
Kaynakça
- 1. Weidenbecher M, Hosemann W, Buhr W. Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 56 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994; 103: 363-7.
- 2. Hartakinen J, Grenman R, Puukka P, Seppa H. Prospectiive randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1106-13.
- 3. Okuyucu S, Gorur H, Oksuz H, Akoglu E. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone, polypropylene, and T-tube stents; randomized controlled trial of efficacy and safety. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2015; 29: 63-8.
- 4. Shah H, Sharma S, Suri N, Ralte A, Sarkar C, Gupta V et al. Comparison of surgical outcome in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicon stent placement. Natl J Med Res 2013; 73: 34-7.
- 5. Abdelshafy IA, Wagdy FM. Trans nasal powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stenting. J Am Sci 2013; 9: 448-51.
- 6. Feng YF, Cai JQ, Zhang JY, Han XH. A meta-analysis of primary dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Can J Ophthalmol 2011; 46: 521-7.
- 7. Cirkovic I, Knezevic M, Bozic DD, Rasic D, Larsen AR, Dukic S. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation on dacryocystorhinostomy silicone tubes depends on the genetic lineage. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253: 77-82.
- 8. Kim SE, Lee SJ, Lee SY, Yoon JS. Clinical significance of microbial growth on the surfaces of silicone tubes removed from dacryocystorhinostomy patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153: 253-7.
- 9. Başal Y, Güleç G, Ertuğrul B, Eryilmaz A, Günel C, Başak S. Changes in nasal flora one year after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. B-ENT 2015; 11: 129-34.
- 10. Parsa K, Schaudinn C, Gorur A, Sedghizadeh PP, Johnson T, Tse DT, et al. Demonstration of bacterial biofilms in culture-negative silicone stent and jones tube. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 26: 426-30.
- 11. Onerci M, Orhan M, Ogretmenoğlu O, Irkeç M. Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120: 319-22.
- 12. Aydın S, Paksoy M, Altın G, Eken M, Şanlı A. Our Endoscopıc Dacryocystorhınostomy Results. J Kartal TR 2008; 19: 80-4.
- 13. Yuen KSC, Lam LYM, Tse MWY, Chan DD, Wong BW, Chan WM. Modified endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with posterior lacrimal flap for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Hong Kong Med J 2004; 10: 394-400.
- 14. Ajallolloueyan M, Fartookzadeh M, Parhizgar H. Use of laser for dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Otolaryng Head Neck Surg 2007; 133: 340-3.
- 15. Başal Y, Ünsal AIA, Günel C, Eryılmaz A, Başak S. Our results of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and silicone tube intubation: results of a case series. Turkish J Rhinology 2014; 3: 51-5.
- 16. Cheng SM, Feng YF, Xu L, Li Y, Huang JH. Efficacy of mitomycin C in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: 1-10.
- 17. Pittore B, Tan N, Salis G, Brennan PA, Puxeddu R. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting: results in 64 consecutive procedures. ACTA Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 2010; 30: 294-8.
- 18. Yeon JY, Shim WS. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicone stent. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2012; 132: 77-81.
- 19. Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Terasvirta M, Teräsvirta M, Nuutinen J, Seppä J. Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: A prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol 2008; 22: 214-7.
Yıl 2019,
Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3, 191 - 194, 30.12.2019
Öz
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the use of silicone stent in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy operation on the surgical success and to compare the results of the patients who had silicone stents placed or not.
Materials and Methods: Forty-six eyes of 38 patients who had undergone endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy surgery between May 2013 and January 2015 were involved in the study. The groups with or without stent were compared with respect to the surgical outcomes.
Results: Fifteen of the patients were male and 23 were female. Twenty-two eyes of 19 patients were operated without stent and 24 eyes of 19 patients were operated with stent. The follow-up period was between 9-30 months. Epiphora was corrected 91.7% in the group with stent and 86.4% in the group without stent. The intergroup difference in terms of the correction of epiphora was not found statistically significant (p=0.659).
Conclusion: The success rates are similar in the endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy operations performed with or without stent placement. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy operation with or without stent placement is successful and efficient. The use of silicone stent in the endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy operations does not affect success.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Weidenbecher M, Hosemann W, Buhr W. Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 56 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994; 103: 363-7.
- 2. Hartakinen J, Grenman R, Puukka P, Seppa H. Prospectiive randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1106-13.
- 3. Okuyucu S, Gorur H, Oksuz H, Akoglu E. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone, polypropylene, and T-tube stents; randomized controlled trial of efficacy and safety. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2015; 29: 63-8.
- 4. Shah H, Sharma S, Suri N, Ralte A, Sarkar C, Gupta V et al. Comparison of surgical outcome in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicon stent placement. Natl J Med Res 2013; 73: 34-7.
- 5. Abdelshafy IA, Wagdy FM. Trans nasal powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stenting. J Am Sci 2013; 9: 448-51.
- 6. Feng YF, Cai JQ, Zhang JY, Han XH. A meta-analysis of primary dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Can J Ophthalmol 2011; 46: 521-7.
- 7. Cirkovic I, Knezevic M, Bozic DD, Rasic D, Larsen AR, Dukic S. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation on dacryocystorhinostomy silicone tubes depends on the genetic lineage. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253: 77-82.
- 8. Kim SE, Lee SJ, Lee SY, Yoon JS. Clinical significance of microbial growth on the surfaces of silicone tubes removed from dacryocystorhinostomy patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153: 253-7.
- 9. Başal Y, Güleç G, Ertuğrul B, Eryilmaz A, Günel C, Başak S. Changes in nasal flora one year after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. B-ENT 2015; 11: 129-34.
- 10. Parsa K, Schaudinn C, Gorur A, Sedghizadeh PP, Johnson T, Tse DT, et al. Demonstration of bacterial biofilms in culture-negative silicone stent and jones tube. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 26: 426-30.
- 11. Onerci M, Orhan M, Ogretmenoğlu O, Irkeç M. Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120: 319-22.
- 12. Aydın S, Paksoy M, Altın G, Eken M, Şanlı A. Our Endoscopıc Dacryocystorhınostomy Results. J Kartal TR 2008; 19: 80-4.
- 13. Yuen KSC, Lam LYM, Tse MWY, Chan DD, Wong BW, Chan WM. Modified endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with posterior lacrimal flap for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Hong Kong Med J 2004; 10: 394-400.
- 14. Ajallolloueyan M, Fartookzadeh M, Parhizgar H. Use of laser for dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Otolaryng Head Neck Surg 2007; 133: 340-3.
- 15. Başal Y, Ünsal AIA, Günel C, Eryılmaz A, Başak S. Our results of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and silicone tube intubation: results of a case series. Turkish J Rhinology 2014; 3: 51-5.
- 16. Cheng SM, Feng YF, Xu L, Li Y, Huang JH. Efficacy of mitomycin C in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: 1-10.
- 17. Pittore B, Tan N, Salis G, Brennan PA, Puxeddu R. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting: results in 64 consecutive procedures. ACTA Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 2010; 30: 294-8.
- 18. Yeon JY, Shim WS. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicone stent. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2012; 132: 77-81.
- 19. Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Terasvirta M, Teräsvirta M, Nuutinen J, Seppä J. Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: A prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol 2008; 22: 214-7.
Toplam 19 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Kulak Burun Boğaz |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Aralık 2019 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2019 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3 |