Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2019,
Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3, 209 - 218, 30.12.2019
Öz
Kaynakça
- 1. Jarad FD, Russell MD, Moss BW. The use of digital imaging for color matching and communication in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J 2005; 199: 43-9.
- 2. Uludag B, Usumez A, Sahin V, Eser K, Ercoban E. The effect of ceramic thickness and number of firings on the colour of ceramic systems: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 25-31.
- 3. Pizzamiglio E. A color selection technique. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 592-6.
- 4. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 819-22.
- 5. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1760-4.
- 6. Berns RS. Billmeyer and Saltzman’s principles of colour technology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. p. 71-4.
- 7. Russe ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 1232-4.
- 8. Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 415-26.
- 9. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Egilmez F, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Microshear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthodont Res 2016; 60: 265-73.
- 10. Cetindemir AB, Sermet B, Ongul D. The effect of light sources and CAD/CAM monolithic blocks on degree of conversion of cement. J Adv Prosthodont 2018; 10: 291-9.
- 11. Riquieri H, Monteiro JB, Viegas DC, Campos TMB, de Melo RM, de Siqueira FASG. Impact of crystallization firing process on the microstructure and flexural strength of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramics. Dent Mater 2018; 3: 1483-91.
- 12. Yilmaz C, Korkmaz T, Demirkoprulu H, Ergun G, Ozkan Y. Color stability of glazed and polished dental porcelains. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 20-4.
- 13. Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 915-23.
- 14. de Jager N, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. The influence of surface roughness on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 381-8.
- 15. Fischer H, Schäfer M, Marx R. Effect of surface roughness on flexural strength of veneer ceramics. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 972-5.
- 16. Pires-de-Souza FCP, Casemiro LA, Garcia LFR, Cruvinel DR. Colour stability of dental ceramics submitted to artificial accelerated ageing after repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101: 13-8.
- 17. Yilmaz K, Gonuldas F, Ozturk C. The effect of repeated firings on the color change of dental ceramics using different glazing methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2014; 6: 427-33.
- 18. Yılmaz B, Ozcelık TB, Wee AG. Effect of repeated firings on the color of opaque porcelain applied on different dental alloys. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101: 395-404.
- 19. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 71-5.
- 20. Tekçe N, Fidan S, Tuncer S, Kara D, Demirci M. The effect of glazing and aging on the surface properties of CAD/CAM resin blocks. J Adv Prosthodont 2018; 10: 50-7.
- 21. Available from: URL: [https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com](https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com)
- 22. Available from: URL: [https://www.firindestek.com/ceramco-3-porselen-tozu-pisim-tablosu/](https://www.firindestek.com/ceramco-3-porselen-tozu-pisim-tablosu/)
- 23. Available from: URL: [https://www.gceurope.com](https://www.gceurope.com)
- 24. Nguyen C, Augros C, Rocca JP, Lagori G, Fornaini. KTP AND Er\:YAG laser dental bleaching comparison: a spectrophotometric, thermal and morphologic analysis. Laser Med Sci 2015; 8: 2157-64.
- 25. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 10-5.
- 26. Berns RS. Billmeyer and Saltzman’s principles of color technology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. p. 71-4.
- 27. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2006. p. 709-39, 740-3.
- 28. van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Kortsmit WJ. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 155-62.
- 29. Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O’Brien WJ. Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1755-9.
- 30. Bolt RA, Bosch JJ, Coops JC. Influence of window size in small-window colour measurement, particularly of teeth. Phys Med Biol 1994; 39: 1133-42.
- 31. Gómez-Polo C, Gómez-Polo M, Celemin-Viñuela A, Martínez Vázquez De Parga JA, De Parga V. Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour. J Dent 2014; 42: 742-5.
- 32. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent 2010; 38: 2-16.
- 33. Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface conditions on the color of dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 63: 657-63.
- 34. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 4-9.
- 35. O’Brien WJ, Kay KS, Boenke KM, Groh CL. Sources of color variation on firing porcelain. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 170-3.
- 36. Celik G, Uludag B, Usumez A, Sahin V, Ozturk O, Goktug G. The effect of repeated firings on the color of an all-ceramic system with two different veneering porcelain shades. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 203-8.
- 37. Kim IJ, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface topography on the color of dental porcelain. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003; 14: 405-9.
- 38. O’Brien WJ, Kay KS, Boenke KM, Groh CL. Sources of color variation on firing porcelain. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 170-3.
- 39. Alharbi A, Ardu S, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Stain susceptibility of composite and ceramic CAD/CAM blocks versus direct resin composites with different resinous matrices. Odontology 2017; 105: 162-9.
- 40. Barghi N. Color and glaze: effects of repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 47: 393-5.
- 41. Schürmann MG, Olms C. Shade Stability of Polymer-Infiltrated and Resin Nano Ceramics. Open Dent J 2018; 12: 791-800.
- 42. Sahin O, Dede DO, Koroglu A, Yılmaz B. Influence of surface sealant agents on the surface roughness and color stability of artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 130-7.
Effects of Glazing Procedures on the Color Stability of Conventional and CAD/CAM Hybrid Ceramics: A Comparative Study
Öz
Objective: Ceramic glazing and polishing are important for patient satisfaction and long-term clinical success. Till date, no study has compared color changes after glazing procedures between conventional and more recently introduced ceramics. In this study, we investigated the effects of glazing procedures on the color stability of conventional and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/ CAM) hybrid ceramics using a spectrophotometer.
Materials and Methods: Eighty-four disc-shaped specimens were fabricated with seven different dental porcelain materials according to the manufacturers’ instructions (n=12 each): Ivoclar IPS DSign, Vita Omega 900, Ceramco III, Vita Mark II, Vita Enamic, GC Cerasmart, and Vita Suprinity. Both sides of the specimens were polished with wet 600-, 1000-, and 1500-grit aluminium oxide abrasive papers, and color values (L*, a*, b*) were measured using a spectrophotometer before and after glazing. Treatment-induced changes in the specimen color and topography were evaluated and recorded. The color change (∆E) was calculated from the changes in the mean L*, a*, and b* values. All data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, MannWhitney U, and Wilcoxon tests (95% confidence interval).
Results: Color changes were below the clinically perceptible level (ΔΕ, <3.7) in all specimens. Color change values after the glazing procedures were 2.27±0.55, 2.99±0.67, 1.01±0.58, 1.62±0.70, 0.74±0.45, 1.35±0.52, and 1.37±0.72 for Ivoclar IPS DSign, Vita Omega 900, Ceramco III, Vita Mark II, GC Cerasmart, Vita Enamic, and Vita Suprinity, respectively; thus, there were significant differences between the conventional and CAD/CAM ceramics (p<0.05). The conventional ceramic Vita Omega 900 presented the least color stability, while the CAD/CAM ceramic GC Cerasmart presented the maximum color stability.
Conclusion: Glazing procedures do not cause evident changes in the color of conventional and CAD/CAM hybrid ceramics, although the color stability of the latter is better than that of the former.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Ceramics color stability computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing hybrid ceramic nanoceramic
Kaynakça
- 1. Jarad FD, Russell MD, Moss BW. The use of digital imaging for color matching and communication in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J 2005; 199: 43-9.
- 2. Uludag B, Usumez A, Sahin V, Eser K, Ercoban E. The effect of ceramic thickness and number of firings on the colour of ceramic systems: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 25-31.
- 3. Pizzamiglio E. A color selection technique. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 592-6.
- 4. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 819-22.
- 5. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1760-4.
- 6. Berns RS. Billmeyer and Saltzman’s principles of colour technology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. p. 71-4.
- 7. Russe ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 1232-4.
- 8. Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 415-26.
- 9. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Egilmez F, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Microshear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthodont Res 2016; 60: 265-73.
- 10. Cetindemir AB, Sermet B, Ongul D. The effect of light sources and CAD/CAM monolithic blocks on degree of conversion of cement. J Adv Prosthodont 2018; 10: 291-9.
- 11. Riquieri H, Monteiro JB, Viegas DC, Campos TMB, de Melo RM, de Siqueira FASG. Impact of crystallization firing process on the microstructure and flexural strength of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramics. Dent Mater 2018; 3: 1483-91.
- 12. Yilmaz C, Korkmaz T, Demirkoprulu H, Ergun G, Ozkan Y. Color stability of glazed and polished dental porcelains. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 20-4.
- 13. Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 915-23.
- 14. de Jager N, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. The influence of surface roughness on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 381-8.
- 15. Fischer H, Schäfer M, Marx R. Effect of surface roughness on flexural strength of veneer ceramics. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 972-5.
- 16. Pires-de-Souza FCP, Casemiro LA, Garcia LFR, Cruvinel DR. Colour stability of dental ceramics submitted to artificial accelerated ageing after repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101: 13-8.
- 17. Yilmaz K, Gonuldas F, Ozturk C. The effect of repeated firings on the color change of dental ceramics using different glazing methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2014; 6: 427-33.
- 18. Yılmaz B, Ozcelık TB, Wee AG. Effect of repeated firings on the color of opaque porcelain applied on different dental alloys. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101: 395-404.
- 19. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 71-5.
- 20. Tekçe N, Fidan S, Tuncer S, Kara D, Demirci M. The effect of glazing and aging on the surface properties of CAD/CAM resin blocks. J Adv Prosthodont 2018; 10: 50-7.
- 21. Available from: URL: [https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com](https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com)
- 22. Available from: URL: [https://www.firindestek.com/ceramco-3-porselen-tozu-pisim-tablosu/](https://www.firindestek.com/ceramco-3-porselen-tozu-pisim-tablosu/)
- 23. Available from: URL: [https://www.gceurope.com](https://www.gceurope.com)
- 24. Nguyen C, Augros C, Rocca JP, Lagori G, Fornaini. KTP AND Er\:YAG laser dental bleaching comparison: a spectrophotometric, thermal and morphologic analysis. Laser Med Sci 2015; 8: 2157-64.
- 25. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 10-5.
- 26. Berns RS. Billmeyer and Saltzman’s principles of color technology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. p. 71-4.
- 27. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2006. p. 709-39, 740-3.
- 28. van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Kortsmit WJ. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 155-62.
- 29. Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O’Brien WJ. Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1755-9.
- 30. Bolt RA, Bosch JJ, Coops JC. Influence of window size in small-window colour measurement, particularly of teeth. Phys Med Biol 1994; 39: 1133-42.
- 31. Gómez-Polo C, Gómez-Polo M, Celemin-Viñuela A, Martínez Vázquez De Parga JA, De Parga V. Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour. J Dent 2014; 42: 742-5.
- 32. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent 2010; 38: 2-16.
- 33. Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface conditions on the color of dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 63: 657-63.
- 34. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 4-9.
- 35. O’Brien WJ, Kay KS, Boenke KM, Groh CL. Sources of color variation on firing porcelain. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 170-3.
- 36. Celik G, Uludag B, Usumez A, Sahin V, Ozturk O, Goktug G. The effect of repeated firings on the color of an all-ceramic system with two different veneering porcelain shades. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 203-8.
- 37. Kim IJ, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface topography on the color of dental porcelain. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003; 14: 405-9.
- 38. O’Brien WJ, Kay KS, Boenke KM, Groh CL. Sources of color variation on firing porcelain. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 170-3.
- 39. Alharbi A, Ardu S, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Stain susceptibility of composite and ceramic CAD/CAM blocks versus direct resin composites with different resinous matrices. Odontology 2017; 105: 162-9.
- 40. Barghi N. Color and glaze: effects of repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 47: 393-5.
- 41. Schürmann MG, Olms C. Shade Stability of Polymer-Infiltrated and Resin Nano Ceramics. Open Dent J 2018; 12: 791-800.
- 42. Sahin O, Dede DO, Koroglu A, Yılmaz B. Influence of surface sealant agents on the surface roughness and color stability of artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 130-7.
Toplam 42 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Diş Hekimliği (Diğer) |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Aralık 2019 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2019 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3 |