The Morphological Changes in the Mandible Bone: The Effects of Age, Gender and Dental Status

Güldane Mağat; Sevgi Özcan Şener

doi:10.4274/meandros.02886

Araştırma Makalesi

The Morphological Changes in the Mandible Bone: The Effects of Age, Gender and Dental Status

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 111 - 120, 31.08.2018

Güldane Mağat , Sevgi Özcan Şener

Öz

Objective: This present study aimed to analzye the impact of age, gender and dental condition on remodeling of gonial and antegonial, condylar and ramus regions. We evaluated the changes in the antegonial angle (AGA), gonial angle (GA), antegonial depht (AGD), condylar height (CH), ramus width (RW) and ramus height (RH) in different age and dental groups on both genders.
Materials and Methods: Approximately nine hundred and ten panoramic radiographs that were gathered were arranged into groups of age, dental status and gender. An evaluation of the GA, AGA, AGD, CH, RW, and RH was made.
Results: There were no differences for CH in regard to gender, dental status and age groups on both sides (p>0.05). Age influenced RW in females and on AGD in males (p<0.05). Dental status influenced RW and AGA in females and on GA and RW in males (p<0.05). Gender also effected the GA, RH, AGA and AGD (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that age, gender, and dental status influenced the remodeling of the gonial, antegonial, and ramus regions. This remodeling influenced specific regions in the mandible. A conclusion can be made to say that the differences that are related to gender, age and dental status can be linked with the variance in the masticatory activity throughout this region of the mandible. Since age, gender and dental status do not affect the CH, the significant changes in the length of CH can be considered to be signs of an abnormal situation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gonial angle, antegonial angle and depht, ramus height and width, dentate, age

Kaynakça

1. Enlow DH, Bianco HJ, Eklund S. The remodeling of the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 36: 685-93.
2. Chole RH, Patil RN, Balsaraf Chole S, Gondivkar S, Gadbail AR, Yuwanati MB. Association of mandible anatomy with age, gender, and dental status: a radiographic study. ISRN Radiol 2013; 2013: 453763.
3. Ohm E, Silness J. Size of the mandibular jaw angle related to age, tooth retention and gender. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 883-91.
4. Raustia AM, Salonen MA. Gonial angles and condylar and ramus height of the mandible in complete denture wearers--a panoramic radiograph study. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 512-6.
5. Ghosh S, Vengal M, Pai KM, Abhishek K. Remodeling of the antegonial angle region in the human mandible: a panoramic radiographic cross-sectional study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: e802-7.
6. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 27: 120-32.
7. Fish SF. Change in the gonial angle. J Oral Rehabil 1979; 6: 219-27.
8. Casey DM, Emrich LJ. Changes in the mandibular angle in the edentulous state. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 373-80.
9. Dutra V, Yang J, Devlin H, Susin C. Mandibular bone remodelling in adults: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 323-8.
10. Raustia AM, Pirttiniemi P, Salonen MA, Pyhtinen J. Effect of edentulousness on mandibular size and condyle-fossa position. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 174-9.
11. Huumonen S, Sipilä K, Haikola B, Tapio M, Söderholm AL, Remes-Lyly T, et al. Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 34-8.
12. Xie Q, Wolf J, Soikkonen K, Ainamo A. Height of mandibular basal bone in dentate and edentulous subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54: 379-83.
13. Mattila K, Altonen M, Haavikko K. Determination of the gonial angle from the orthopantomogram. Angle Orthod 1977; 47: 107-10.
14. Habets LL, Bras J, Borgmeyer-Hoelen AM. Mandibular atrophy and metabolic bone loss. Endocrinology, radiology and histomorphometry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 17: 208-11.
15. Ogawa T, Osato S, Shishido Y, Okada M, Misaki K. Relationships between the gonial angle and mandibular ramus morphology in dentate subjects: a panoramic radiophotometric study. J Oral Implantol 2012; 38: 203-10.
16. McDavid WD, Tronje G, Welander U, Morris CR. Dimensional reproduction in rotational panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62: 96-101.
17. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid WD, Morris CR. Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. VI. Distortion effects in sliding systems. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1982; 23: 153-60.
18. McDavid WD, Welander U, Brent Dove S, Tronje G. Digital imaging in rotational panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 68-75.
19. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid WD, Morris CR. Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. I. General considerations. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1981; 22: 295-9.
20. Tronje G, Eliasson S, Julin P, Welander U. Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. II. Vertical distances. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1981; 22: 449-55.
21. Devlin H, Yuan J. Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 29951683.
22. Joo JK, Lim YJ, Kwon HB, Ahn SJ. Panoramic radiographic evaluation of the mandibular morphological changes in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71: 357-62.
23. Ceylan G, Yanıkoglu N, Yilmaz AB, Ceylan Y. Changes in the mandibular angle in the dentulous and edentulous states. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 680-4.
24. Ingervall B, Minder C. Correlation between maximum bite force and facial morphology in children. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 415-22.
25. Nakajima S, Osato S. Association of gonial angle with morphology and bone mineral content of the body of the adult human mandible with complete permanent dentition. Ann Anat 2013; 195: 533-8.
26. Rönning O, Barnes SA, Pearson MH, Pledger DM. Juvenile chronic arthritis: a cephalometric analysis of the facial skeleton. Eur J Orthod 1994; 16: 53-62.
27. Von Wowern N. Microradiographic and histomorphometric indices of mandibles for diagnosis of osteopenia. Scand J Dent Res 1982; 90: 47-63.
28. Upadhyay RB, Upadhyay J, Agrawal P, Rao NN. Analysis of gonial angle in relation to age, gender, and dentition status by radiological and anthropometric methods. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012; 4: 29-33.
29. Okşayan R, Aktan AM, Sökücü O, Haştar E, Ciftci ME. Does the panoramic radiography have the power to identify the gonial angle in orthodontics? ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012: 219708.
30. Xie QF, Ainamo A. Correlation of gonial angle size with cortical thickness, height of the mandibular residual body, and duration of edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 477-82.
31. Tozoğlu U, Cakur B. Evaluation of the morphological changes in the mandible for dentate and totally edentate elderly population using cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 2014; 36: 643-9.
32. Carlsson GE, Persson G. Morphologic changes of the mandible after extraction and wearing of dentures. A longitudinal, clinical, and x-ray cephalometric study covering 5 years. Odontol Revy 1967; 18: 27-54.
33. Okşayan R, Asarkaya B, Palta N, Şimşek İ, Sökücü O, İşman E. Effects of edentulism on mandibular morphology: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Scientific World Journal 2014; 2014: 254932.
34. Yanikoğlu N, Yilmaz B. Radiological evaluation of changes in the gonial angle after teeth extraction and wearing of dentures: a 3-year longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: e55-60.
35. Vinter I, Krmpotić-Nemanić J, Ivanković D, Jalsovec D. The influence of the dentition on the shape of the mandible. Coll Antropol 1997; 21: 555-60.
36. Bader G, Lavigne G. Sleep bruxism; an overview of an oromandibular sleep movement disorder. REVIEW ARTICLE. Sleep Med Rev 2000; 4: 27-43.
37. Mangla R, Singh N, Dua V, Padmanabhan P, Khanna M. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types. Contemp Clin Dent 2011; 2: 200-6.
38. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Heiskanen P, Vainio P, Lassila V. Panoramic mandibular index and bone mineral densities in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 75: 774-9.

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 111 - 120, 31.08.2018

Güldane Mağat , Sevgi Özcan Şener

Öz

Kaynakça

1. Enlow DH, Bianco HJ, Eklund S. The remodeling of the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 36: 685-93.
2. Chole RH, Patil RN, Balsaraf Chole S, Gondivkar S, Gadbail AR, Yuwanati MB. Association of mandible anatomy with age, gender, and dental status: a radiographic study. ISRN Radiol 2013; 2013: 453763.
3. Ohm E, Silness J. Size of the mandibular jaw angle related to age, tooth retention and gender. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 883-91.
4. Raustia AM, Salonen MA. Gonial angles and condylar and ramus height of the mandible in complete denture wearers--a panoramic radiograph study. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 512-6.
5. Ghosh S, Vengal M, Pai KM, Abhishek K. Remodeling of the antegonial angle region in the human mandible: a panoramic radiographic cross-sectional study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: e802-7.
6. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 27: 120-32.
7. Fish SF. Change in the gonial angle. J Oral Rehabil 1979; 6: 219-27.
8. Casey DM, Emrich LJ. Changes in the mandibular angle in the edentulous state. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 373-80.
9. Dutra V, Yang J, Devlin H, Susin C. Mandibular bone remodelling in adults: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 323-8.
10. Raustia AM, Pirttiniemi P, Salonen MA, Pyhtinen J. Effect of edentulousness on mandibular size and condyle-fossa position. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 174-9.
11. Huumonen S, Sipilä K, Haikola B, Tapio M, Söderholm AL, Remes-Lyly T, et al. Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 34-8.
12. Xie Q, Wolf J, Soikkonen K, Ainamo A. Height of mandibular basal bone in dentate and edentulous subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54: 379-83.
13. Mattila K, Altonen M, Haavikko K. Determination of the gonial angle from the orthopantomogram. Angle Orthod 1977; 47: 107-10.
14. Habets LL, Bras J, Borgmeyer-Hoelen AM. Mandibular atrophy and metabolic bone loss. Endocrinology, radiology and histomorphometry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 17: 208-11.
15. Ogawa T, Osato S, Shishido Y, Okada M, Misaki K. Relationships between the gonial angle and mandibular ramus morphology in dentate subjects: a panoramic radiophotometric study. J Oral Implantol 2012; 38: 203-10.
16. McDavid WD, Tronje G, Welander U, Morris CR. Dimensional reproduction in rotational panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62: 96-101.
17. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid WD, Morris CR. Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. VI. Distortion effects in sliding systems. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1982; 23: 153-60.
18. McDavid WD, Welander U, Brent Dove S, Tronje G. Digital imaging in rotational panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 68-75.
19. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid WD, Morris CR. Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. I. General considerations. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1981; 22: 295-9.
20. Tronje G, Eliasson S, Julin P, Welander U. Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. II. Vertical distances. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1981; 22: 449-55.
21. Devlin H, Yuan J. Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 29951683.
22. Joo JK, Lim YJ, Kwon HB, Ahn SJ. Panoramic radiographic evaluation of the mandibular morphological changes in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71: 357-62.
23. Ceylan G, Yanıkoglu N, Yilmaz AB, Ceylan Y. Changes in the mandibular angle in the dentulous and edentulous states. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 680-4.
24. Ingervall B, Minder C. Correlation between maximum bite force and facial morphology in children. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 415-22.
25. Nakajima S, Osato S. Association of gonial angle with morphology and bone mineral content of the body of the adult human mandible with complete permanent dentition. Ann Anat 2013; 195: 533-8.
26. Rönning O, Barnes SA, Pearson MH, Pledger DM. Juvenile chronic arthritis: a cephalometric analysis of the facial skeleton. Eur J Orthod 1994; 16: 53-62.
27. Von Wowern N. Microradiographic and histomorphometric indices of mandibles for diagnosis of osteopenia. Scand J Dent Res 1982; 90: 47-63.
28. Upadhyay RB, Upadhyay J, Agrawal P, Rao NN. Analysis of gonial angle in relation to age, gender, and dentition status by radiological and anthropometric methods. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012; 4: 29-33.
29. Okşayan R, Aktan AM, Sökücü O, Haştar E, Ciftci ME. Does the panoramic radiography have the power to identify the gonial angle in orthodontics? ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012: 219708.
30. Xie QF, Ainamo A. Correlation of gonial angle size with cortical thickness, height of the mandibular residual body, and duration of edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 477-82.
31. Tozoğlu U, Cakur B. Evaluation of the morphological changes in the mandible for dentate and totally edentate elderly population using cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 2014; 36: 643-9.
32. Carlsson GE, Persson G. Morphologic changes of the mandible after extraction and wearing of dentures. A longitudinal, clinical, and x-ray cephalometric study covering 5 years. Odontol Revy 1967; 18: 27-54.
33. Okşayan R, Asarkaya B, Palta N, Şimşek İ, Sökücü O, İşman E. Effects of edentulism on mandibular morphology: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Scientific World Journal 2014; 2014: 254932.
34. Yanikoğlu N, Yilmaz B. Radiological evaluation of changes in the gonial angle after teeth extraction and wearing of dentures: a 3-year longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: e55-60.
35. Vinter I, Krmpotić-Nemanić J, Ivanković D, Jalsovec D. The influence of the dentition on the shape of the mandible. Coll Antropol 1997; 21: 555-60.
36. Bader G, Lavigne G. Sleep bruxism; an overview of an oromandibular sleep movement disorder. REVIEW ARTICLE. Sleep Med Rev 2000; 4: 27-43.
37. Mangla R, Singh N, Dua V, Padmanabhan P, Khanna M. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types. Contemp Clin Dent 2011; 2: 200-6.
38. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Heiskanen P, Vainio P, Lassila V. Panoramic mandibular index and bone mineral densities in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 75: 774-9.

Toplam 38 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	İngilizce
Konular	Diş Hekimliği (Diğer)
Bölüm	Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar	Güldane Mağat Sevgi Özcan Şener
Yayımlanma Tarihi	31 Ağustos 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2018 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

EndNote	Mağat G, Özcan Şener S (01 Ağustos 2018) The Morphological Changes in the Mandible Bone: The Effects of Age, Gender and Dental Status. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal 19 2 111–120.

Makale Dosyaları

Tam Metin