This paper examines the longstanding structural dysfunction of the United Nations Security Council
(UNSC) through an in-depth analysis of its response to the Gaza War between October 2023 and
January 2025. Drawing on draft resolutions, voting records, and meeting transcripts, it explores how
permanent members, particularly the United States, strategically utilized veto power to block or undermine
ceasefire initiatives. The paper argues that the veto has evolved from a tool of great-power
consensus-building into an instrument of strategic impediment, undermining the Council’s effectiveness
in addressing mass humanitarian crises. Findings reveal that despite broad support from
non-permanent members for immediate ceasefire resolutions, strategic alignments—especially
the U.S. protection of Israeli interests—paralyzed the Council’s ability to act. Even resolutions that
passed were substantially weakened through political compromises and legal reinterpretations.
The Gaza case thus reveals the substantial limitations of the UNSC’s current structure, reinforcing
calls for urgent institutional reform. Without an end to veto abuse, the UNSC risks being irrelevant
in future humanitarian catastrophes.
United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Gaza War Veto Power UN Reform US Role in UNSC Great Power Politics.
This paper examines the longstanding structural dysfunction of the United Nations Security Council
(UNSC) through an in-depth analysis of its response to the Gaza War between October 2023 and
January 2025. Drawing on draft resolutions, voting records, and meeting transcripts, it explores how
permanent members, particularly the United States, strategically utilized veto power to block or undermine
ceasefire initiatives. The paper argues that the veto has evolved from a tool of great-power
consensus-building into an instrument of strategic impediment, undermining the Council’s effectiveness
in addressing mass humanitarian crises. Findings reveal that despite broad support from
non-permanent members for immediate ceasefire resolutions, strategic alignments—especially
the U.S. protection of Israeli interests—paralyzed the Council’s ability to act. Even resolutions that
passed were substantially weakened through political compromises and legal reinterpretations.
The Gaza case thus reveals the substantial limitations of the UNSC’s current structure, reinforcing
calls for urgent institutional reform. Without an end to veto abuse, the UNSC risks being irrelevant
in future humanitarian catastrophes.
United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Gaza War Veto Power UN Reform US Role in UNSC Great Power Politics.
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Konular | Göç Sosyolojisi |
Bölüm | Makaleler |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 25 Haziran 2025 |
Gönderilme Tarihi | 30 Nisan 2025 |
Kabul Tarihi | 18 Haziran 2025 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2025 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 68 - Yeni Dünya Yeni Düzen: Küresel Sistemin Geleceğinde Türkiye |
Muhafazakar Düşünce Dergisi