Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR VE EKOLOJİK MEKÂN TASARIMI BİLİNCİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİNE YÖNELİK BİR STÜDYO DENEYİMİ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 587 - 607, 20.06.2025

Hakan İmert , İpek Fitoz

Öz

Günümüzde mimarlık mesleği, küresel ısınma ve çevresel krizlerin oluşturduğu zorlukların
odağında olan bir disiplindir. Söz konusu zorlukların aşılmasında sürdürülebilir ve ekolojik
mekân tasarımı bilincinin mimarlık eğitimi süreçlerinde geliştirilmesi büyük önem
taşımaktadır. Bu çalışma, Mimarlıkta Ekoloji ve Sürdürülebilir Tasarım (MEST) dersi
kapsamındaki tasarım stüdyosunda dördüncü sınıf öğrencileri ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın
sınırlı biyoloji bilgisine sahip 16 lisans öğrencisi ile bir dönem sürdürülmüş olması
ve sürece bir biyoloğun dahil edilmemesi çalışmanın sınırlılıklarını oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma
içerisinde iki aşama üzerine oturtulmuş sürdürülebilir ve ekolojik ayak izi matrisi
parametreleri ışığında öğrencilerin çıktıları analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, sürdürülebilir
ve ekolojik ayak izi matrisi parametreleri ile oluşturulmuş basit adımları öğrencilerin
projelerine çeşitli seviyelerde aktardıklarını ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma sonunda
yapılan metin analizinde ise, güneş, enerji ve su gibi kavramlara öğrenciler tarafından
sıklıkla değinildiğinden hareketle çevresel farkındalıklarının arttırıldığı düşünülmektedir.
Bu doğrultuda, sürdürülebilir ve ekolojik mekân tasarımı bilincinin oluşturulmasını sağlayacak
araçlardan biri olarak tasarım stüdyosu süreçlerine geleneksel mimarlık yaklaşımları,
doğa esinli tasarım ve enerji etkin yapı çıktılarının dahil edilmesinin olumlu katkılar
sağlayacağı sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekolojik tasarım Stüdyo deneyimi Sürdürülebilir mimarlık.

Kaynakça

  • Abram, N. J., McGregor, H. V., Tierney, J. E., Evans, M. N., McKay, N. P., & Kaufman, D. S. (2016). Early onset of industrial-era warming across the oceans and continents. Nature, 536(7617), 411–418.
  • https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19082
  • Aurandt, J. L., & Butler, E. C. (2011). Sustainability education: approaches for incorporating sustainability into the undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 137(2), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000049
  • Avcı, A. B., & Beyhan, Ş. G. (2023). Revealing the climate-responsive strategies of traditional houses of Urla, İzmir. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 14(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.22712/susb.20230003
  • Benkari, N. (2013). The “sustainability” paradigm in architectural education in UAE. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.777
  • Bhamra, T., & Hernandez, R. J. (2021). Thirty years of design for sustainability: an evolution of research, policy and practice. Design Science, 7(Rainey 2006), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.2
  • Blok, V., & Gremmen, B. (2016). Ecological innovation: biomimicry as a new way of thinking and acting ecologically. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1
  • Bose, B. K. (2010). Global warming: energy, environmental pollution, and the impact of power electronics. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 4(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2010.935860
  • Clune, S. (2014). Design for sustainability and the design studio. Fusion Journal, 3, 1–17. https://fusion-journal.com/issue/003-fusion-the-studio/design-for-sustainability-and-the-design-studio/ Datey, A. (2023). Decolonising the design curriculum: making “sustainability” accessible, understandable and practicable to second-year undergraduate architecture students. International Joournal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2022-0228
  • Guerrero Baca, L. F., & Soria López, F. J. (2018). Traditional architecture and sustainable conservation. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 8(2), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2017-0036
  • ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ SANAT & TASARIM DERGİSİ 606 Sanat&Tasarım Dergisi,15 (1), 2025: 587-607
  • Gürel, M. Ö. (2010). Explorations in teaching sustainable design: a studio experience in interior design/architecture. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01649.x Hassan-Montero, Y., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2006). Improving tag-clouds as visual information retrieval interfaces. Information Sciences, I(2), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.04947 Helms, M. E., Vattam, S., & Goel, A. K. (2009). Biologically inspired design: process and products. Design Studies, 30, 606–622. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15682971 Ilieva, L., Ursano, I., Traista, L., Hoffmann, B., & Dahy, H. (2022). Biomimicry as a sustainable design methodology - introducing the ‘biomimicry for sustainability’ framework. Biomimetics, 7(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7020037
  • İmert, H. (2017). Konaklama mekânlarında ekolojik biçimleniş ve bir tasarım modeli önerisi [Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University]. In Doktora Tezi. tez.yok.gov.tr İmert, H. (2023). Robotik imalat sürecinde bir eşik: icd/itke biyomimetik araştırma pavyonları. Ege Mimarlık, 3(119), 68–73.
  • Keitsch, M. (2012). Sustainable design: a brief appraisal of its main concepts. Sustainable Development, 20(3), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1534 Kilmer, W. O., & Kilmer, R. (1992). Designing interiors (1st Editio). Wadsworth Pub Co.
  • Knippers, J., Gabler, M., La Magna, R., Waimer, F., Menges, A., Reichert, S., & Schwinn, T. (2013). From Nature to Fabrication: Biomimetic Design Principles for the Production of Complex Spatial Structures. In Advances in Architectural Geometry 2012 (pp. 107–122). Springer Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1251-9_8 Koch, N. (2023). Sustainability spectacle and ‘post-oil’ greening initiatives. Environmental Politics, 32(4), 708–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2127481 Kurt, S. (2012). Applying constructivist instruction method to basic design course. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(5), 253–262.
  • https://search.proquest.com/docview/1355855296/fulltextPDF/8B89EAEF0D1148FFPQ/44?accountid=31562 Lidgren, A., Rodhe, H., & Huisingh, D. (2006). A systemic approach to incorporate sustainability into university courses and curricula. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.011
  • ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ SANAT & TASARIM DERGİSİ 607 Sanat&Tasarım Dergisi,15 (1), 2025: 587-607
  • Mohamed, K. E. (2022). An instructive model of integrating sustainability into the undergraduate design studio. Journal of Cleaner Production, 338(March 2021), 130591.
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130591
  • Rossin, K. J. (2010). Biomimicry: Nature’s design process versus the designer’s process. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 138, 559–570. https://doi.org/10.2495/DN100501
  • Sadowski, K. (2021). Implementation of the new european bauhaus principles as a context for teaching sustainable architecture. Sustainability, 13(19), 10715. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910715
  • Sarhan, A., & Rutherford, P. (2014). Integrating sustainability in the architectural design education process - taxonomy of challenges and guidelines. Proceedings of the 32nd ECAADe Conference, 1, 323–332. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2014.1.323
  • Sinclair, J., & Cardew-Hall, M. (2008). The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful? Journal of Information Science, 34(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506078083
  • Supran, G., Rahmstorf, S., & Oreskes, N. (2023). Assessing exxonmobil’s global warming projections. Science, 379(6628). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0063
  • Torres Parejo, Ú., Campaña, J. R., Vila, M. A., & Delgado, M. (2021). A survey of tag clouds as tools for information retrieval and content representation. Information Visualization, 20(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871620966638 Verbrugghe, N., Rubinacci, E., & Khan, A. Z. (2023). Biomimicry in architecture: a review of definitions, case studies, and design methods. Biomimetics, 8(1), 107.
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010107 Vitalis, L., & Chayaamor-Heil, N. (2022). Forcing biological sciences into architectural design: On conceptual confusions in the field of biomimetic architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.10.001
  • Yılmaz, Ş. (2019). Geleneksel ekolojik bilgi bağlamında beypazarı evleri. Milli Folklor, 16(124), 213–229. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/millifolklor/issue/51228/629044

A STUDIO EXPERIENCE FOR DEVELOPING SUSTAINABLE AND ECOLOGICAL SPACE DESIGN AWARENESS

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 587 - 607, 20.06.2025

Hakan İmert , İpek Fitoz

Öz

In the contemporary era, the field of architecture is situated at the nexus of global warming
and environmental crises. In order to successfully address these challenges, it is of
paramount importance to integrate sustainable and ecological space design awareness into
the architectural education process. This study was conducted with fourth-year students
enrolled in the design studio as part of the Ecology and Sustainable Design in Architecture
(MEST) course. The study is limited in that it was carried out over the course of a
semester with a small group of 16 students who lacked sufficient background knowledge
in biology and where a biologist was not involved in the process. In this study, the outputs
of the students were analysed in accordance with the sustainable and ecological footprint
matrix parameters, which were considered in two stages. The findings indicated that the
students applied the straightforward steps derived from the sustainable and ecological footprint
matrix parameters to their projects at various levels. The text analysis conducted
at the conclusion of the study suggests that environmental awareness has been enhanced,
as evidenced by the frequent mention of concepts such as the sun, energy, and water by the
students. Consequently, it can be posited that the incorporation of traditional architectural
approaches, nature-inspired design, and energy-efficient building outputs into the design
studio processes serves as a valuable tool for fostering awareness of sustainable and ecological
space design.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ecological design Studio experience Sustainable architecture.

Kaynakça

  • Abram, N. J., McGregor, H. V., Tierney, J. E., Evans, M. N., McKay, N. P., & Kaufman, D. S. (2016). Early onset of industrial-era warming across the oceans and continents. Nature, 536(7617), 411–418.
  • https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19082
  • Aurandt, J. L., & Butler, E. C. (2011). Sustainability education: approaches for incorporating sustainability into the undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 137(2), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000049
  • Avcı, A. B., & Beyhan, Ş. G. (2023). Revealing the climate-responsive strategies of traditional houses of Urla, İzmir. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 14(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.22712/susb.20230003
  • Benkari, N. (2013). The “sustainability” paradigm in architectural education in UAE. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.777
  • Bhamra, T., & Hernandez, R. J. (2021). Thirty years of design for sustainability: an evolution of research, policy and practice. Design Science, 7(Rainey 2006), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.2
  • Blok, V., & Gremmen, B. (2016). Ecological innovation: biomimicry as a new way of thinking and acting ecologically. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1
  • Bose, B. K. (2010). Global warming: energy, environmental pollution, and the impact of power electronics. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 4(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2010.935860
  • Clune, S. (2014). Design for sustainability and the design studio. Fusion Journal, 3, 1–17. https://fusion-journal.com/issue/003-fusion-the-studio/design-for-sustainability-and-the-design-studio/ Datey, A. (2023). Decolonising the design curriculum: making “sustainability” accessible, understandable and practicable to second-year undergraduate architecture students. International Joournal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2022-0228
  • Guerrero Baca, L. F., & Soria López, F. J. (2018). Traditional architecture and sustainable conservation. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 8(2), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2017-0036
  • ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ SANAT & TASARIM DERGİSİ 606 Sanat&Tasarım Dergisi,15 (1), 2025: 587-607
  • Gürel, M. Ö. (2010). Explorations in teaching sustainable design: a studio experience in interior design/architecture. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01649.x Hassan-Montero, Y., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2006). Improving tag-clouds as visual information retrieval interfaces. Information Sciences, I(2), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.04947 Helms, M. E., Vattam, S., & Goel, A. K. (2009). Biologically inspired design: process and products. Design Studies, 30, 606–622. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15682971 Ilieva, L., Ursano, I., Traista, L., Hoffmann, B., & Dahy, H. (2022). Biomimicry as a sustainable design methodology - introducing the ‘biomimicry for sustainability’ framework. Biomimetics, 7(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7020037
  • İmert, H. (2017). Konaklama mekânlarında ekolojik biçimleniş ve bir tasarım modeli önerisi [Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University]. In Doktora Tezi. tez.yok.gov.tr İmert, H. (2023). Robotik imalat sürecinde bir eşik: icd/itke biyomimetik araştırma pavyonları. Ege Mimarlık, 3(119), 68–73.
  • Keitsch, M. (2012). Sustainable design: a brief appraisal of its main concepts. Sustainable Development, 20(3), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1534 Kilmer, W. O., & Kilmer, R. (1992). Designing interiors (1st Editio). Wadsworth Pub Co.
  • Knippers, J., Gabler, M., La Magna, R., Waimer, F., Menges, A., Reichert, S., & Schwinn, T. (2013). From Nature to Fabrication: Biomimetic Design Principles for the Production of Complex Spatial Structures. In Advances in Architectural Geometry 2012 (pp. 107–122). Springer Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1251-9_8 Koch, N. (2023). Sustainability spectacle and ‘post-oil’ greening initiatives. Environmental Politics, 32(4), 708–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2127481 Kurt, S. (2012). Applying constructivist instruction method to basic design course. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(5), 253–262.
  • https://search.proquest.com/docview/1355855296/fulltextPDF/8B89EAEF0D1148FFPQ/44?accountid=31562 Lidgren, A., Rodhe, H., & Huisingh, D. (2006). A systemic approach to incorporate sustainability into university courses and curricula. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.011
  • ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ SANAT & TASARIM DERGİSİ 607 Sanat&Tasarım Dergisi,15 (1), 2025: 587-607
  • Mohamed, K. E. (2022). An instructive model of integrating sustainability into the undergraduate design studio. Journal of Cleaner Production, 338(March 2021), 130591.
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130591
  • Rossin, K. J. (2010). Biomimicry: Nature’s design process versus the designer’s process. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 138, 559–570. https://doi.org/10.2495/DN100501
  • Sadowski, K. (2021). Implementation of the new european bauhaus principles as a context for teaching sustainable architecture. Sustainability, 13(19), 10715. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910715
  • Sarhan, A., & Rutherford, P. (2014). Integrating sustainability in the architectural design education process - taxonomy of challenges and guidelines. Proceedings of the 32nd ECAADe Conference, 1, 323–332. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2014.1.323
  • Sinclair, J., & Cardew-Hall, M. (2008). The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful? Journal of Information Science, 34(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506078083
  • Supran, G., Rahmstorf, S., & Oreskes, N. (2023). Assessing exxonmobil’s global warming projections. Science, 379(6628). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0063
  • Torres Parejo, Ú., Campaña, J. R., Vila, M. A., & Delgado, M. (2021). A survey of tag clouds as tools for information retrieval and content representation. Information Visualization, 20(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871620966638 Verbrugghe, N., Rubinacci, E., & Khan, A. Z. (2023). Biomimicry in architecture: a review of definitions, case studies, and design methods. Biomimetics, 8(1), 107.
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010107 Vitalis, L., & Chayaamor-Heil, N. (2022). Forcing biological sciences into architectural design: On conceptual confusions in the field of biomimetic architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.10.001
  • Yılmaz, Ş. (2019). Geleneksel ekolojik bilgi bağlamında beypazarı evleri. Milli Folklor, 16(124), 213–229. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/millifolklor/issue/51228/629044
Toplam 27 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sürdürülebilir Tasarım
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Hakan İmert 0000-0001-9216-8596

İpek Fitoz 0000-0001-5104-196X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Haziran 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 31 Ekim 2024
Kabul Tarihi 23 Mart 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA İmert, H., & Fitoz, İ. (2025). SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR VE EKOLOJİK MEKÂN TASARIMI BİLİNCİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİNE YÖNELİK BİR STÜDYO DENEYİMİ. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, 15(1), 587-607.
 Kapak Resmi İndir