Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

“BU ÇALIŞMAYI ‘PUBLISH’ EDELİM”: PLAZA DEĞİŞKESİ BAĞLAMINDA GERÇEKLEŞEN DİL İDEOLOJİLERİ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 2025 Sayı: 49, 1 - 27, 26.06.2025

Emre Yağlı

https://doi.org/10.59257/turkbilig.1528199

Öz

Toplumsal alanda “plaza dili” ya da “plaza konuşması” kavramları ile ifade edilen plaza değişkesi, Türkiye’de 1990’lardan bu yana benimsenen neoliberal politikaların bir sonucu olarak ortaya çıkan bir konuşma biçemidir. Büyük şehirlerde bulunan ve ulus aşırı ticaretle ilgilenen çok uluslu şirketlerde çalışan bireylerce sergilenen bu konuşma biçemi, son yıllarda yoğun biçimde görünürlük kazanmıştır. Plaza değişkesinin sahip olduğu bu görünürlük, bu değişkeye yönelik çeşitli görüşleri ve değerlendirmeleri beraberinde getirmiştir. Bu çalışma, bireylerin plaza değişkesine yönelik sunduğu değerlendirmeleri dil ideolojisi kavramıyla ele almakta ve plaza değişkesine yönelik sergilenen dil ideolojilerine açıklama getirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu çerçevede çalışma, Ekşi Sözlük’te bireylerin plaza değişkesine yönelik yaptığı değerlendirmelere odaklanmakta, bu değerlendirmeleri toplumsal-göstergesel açıdan incelemekte ve ortaya çıkan dil ideolojilerinin oluşumuna açıklama getirmektedir. Çalışmanın en temel bulgusu, plaza değişkesi bağlamında ortaya çıkan dil ideolojilerinin, erken Cumhuriyet döneminde dil ve eğitim alanlarında gerçekleştirilen yenilik hareketleriyle içsel bir bağlantıya sahip olduğudur. Bununla birlikte çalışma, dil ideolojilerinin bireylerin farklı ilgileri, çıkarları ve farkındalık düzeyleri çerçevesinde çeşitlilik gösterdiğini bulgulamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Plaza değişkesi dil ideolojisi Dil Devrimi belirtisellik

Etik Beyan

Çalışmanın yürütülmesinde herhangi bir etik kurul iznine gerek duyulmamaktadır.

Destekleyen Kurum

Çalışmayı destekleyen kurum yoktur.

Teşekkür

-

Kaynakça

  • Aytürk, İ. (2008). The first episode of Language Reform in Republican Turkey: The Language Council from 1926 to 1931. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 18(3), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186308008511
  • Bamberg, M., De Fina, A., ve Schiffrin, D. (2011). Discourse and identity construction. S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, ve V. L. Vignoles (Yay. haz.), Handbook of identity theory and research içinde (ss. 177-199). Springer.
  • Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Çev.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Bucholtz, M., ve Hall, K. (2004). Language and identity. A. Duranti (Yay. haz.), A companion to linguistic anthropology içinde (ss. 369-394). Blackwell.
  • Bucholtz, M., ve Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585-614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
  • Cannadine, D. (1998). Class in Britain. Palgrave.
  • Cavanaugh, J. R. (2020). Language ideology revisited. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 263, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-2082
  • Cüceloğlu, D., ve Slobin, D. (1980). Effects of Turkish Language Reform on person perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11(3), 297-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022180113005
  • Çavuşoğlu, Ç. (2019). Standard language ideologies: the case of Cypriot Turkish in Turkish schools in London. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(9), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1687711
  • Çokol, E. (2020). Kuşak çatışmaları ekseninde Z kuşağının dili. International Journal of Language Education and Teaching, 8(2), 404-419. https://doi.org/10.29228/ijlet.43454
  • Çolak, Y. (2004). Language policy and official ideology in early Republican Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(6), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0026320042000282883
  • Dam, L. (2015). The functionality of personal pronouns in constructions of communities. Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, 1, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.globe.v1i0.715
  • Doğançay-Aktuna, S. (1995). An evaluation of the Turkish Language Reform after 60 years. Language Problems and Language Planning, 19(3), 221-249. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.19.3.01dog
  • Doğançay-Aktuna, S. (2004). Language planning in Turkey: Yesterday and today. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2004(165), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2004.008
  • Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 453-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x
  • Erdilek, A. (2008). Internationalization of Turkish MNEs. Journal of Management Development, 27, 744-760. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710810883634
  • Erdoğan-Öztürk, Y., ve Sağın-Şimşek, Ç. (2023). Language ideologies and stancetaking in refugee identity negotiations: exploring multilingual refugees’ narratives of language use in Turkey. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2216662
  • Erdoğan-Öztürk, Y. (2024). Exploring the intersections of language ideologies and affect: The case of multilingual ‘returnee’ women in Turkey. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12,(1), 2024, 117-142. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2023-0050
  • Errington, J. (1998). Shifting languages: Interaction and identity in Javanese Indonesian. Cambridge University Press.
  • Errington, J. (2000). Indonesian(’s) authority. P. V. Kroskrity (Yay. haz.), Regimes of language içinde (ss. 205-227). School of American Research Press.
  • Emlak Ansiklopedisi (t.y.). Plaza nedir? 15 Ocak 2024 tarihinde http://emlakansiklopedisi.com/wiki/plaza-nedir adresinden erişildi.
  • Gal, S. (1992). Multiplicity and contention among ideologies. Pragmatics, 2(3), 445-450. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.3.08gal
  • Gal, S. (1993). Diversity and contestation in linguistic ideologies: German speakers in Hungary. Language in Society, 22(3), 337-359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017279
  • Gal, S. (2006). Migration, minorities and multilingualism: Language ideologies in Europe. C. Mar-Molinero ve P. Stevenson (Yay. haz.), Language ideologies, policies and practices – Language and globalization içinde (ss. 13-27). Springer.
  • Gürsoy Ulusoy, Ş. (2018). Mekansız zamanlar zamansız mekanlar arasındaki plaza çalışanı beyaz yaka’lar. Uluslararası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.381779
  • Hakkoymaz, S., ve Uygun, N. (2022). Akademik personelin plaza dilini kullanım durumunun incelenmesi: Küreselleşmenin dile yansıması. Başkent Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 217-224.
  • Hanson, V. D. (2010, 13 Ağustos). Obama: Figthing the yuppie factor. National Review. https://www.nationalreview.com/2010/08/obama-fighting-yuppie-factor-victor-davis-hanson/
  • Harwood, N. (2007). Political scientists on the functions of personal pronouns in their writing: An interview-based study of ‘I’ and ‘we’. Text & Talk, 27(1), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.002
  • Hill, J. H. (1998) “Today there is no respect”: Nostalgia, “respect,” and oppositional discourse in Mexicano (Nahuatl) language ideology. B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, ve P. V. Kroskrity (Yay. haz.), Language ideologies içinde (ss. 68-86). Oxford University Press.
  • Iñigo-Mora, I. (2004). On the use of personal pronoun ‘we’ in communities. Journal of Language and Politics, 3(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.1.05ini
  • Irvine, J. T. (1989). When talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist, 16, 248-267. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1989.16.2.02a00040
  • Irvine, J. T., ve Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. P. V. Kroskrity (Yay. haz.), Regimes of language içinde (ss. 35-83). School of American Research Press.
  • Jaffe, A. (1999). Ideologies in action: Language politics on Corsica. Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Kana, F., Yağmıur, Y., ve Elkıran, Y. M. (2017). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin sanal dünyalarının günlük hayatlarına yansımaları üzerine bir durum çalışması. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(21), 59-71.
  • Kantor, B. P. (2023). The standard language ideology of Hebrew and Arabic grammarians of the Abbasid period. Open Book Publishers.
  • Karapehlivan, F. (2015). Implications of the neoliberal restructuring of the state-education relationship for the right to education in Turkey. (Doktora Tezi). University of Essex.
  • Karapehlivan, F. (2019, 1 Kasım). Constructing a “new Turkey” through education. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. https://tr.boell.org/en/2019/10/01/constructing-new-turkey-through-education
  • Keyder, Ç. (2017). Türkiye’de devlet ve sınıflar (21. bs.). İletişim Yayınları.
  • Kıyar, N. (2018). Türk sanat ortamında 80’ler ve değişim sürecinin düşündürdükleri. European Journal of Managerial Research, 2(2), 39-55.
  • Korkmaz, D. F. (2006). Çağdaş kentte halk bilimi ve yeni bir sosyal grup: Tikiler. Milli Folklor, 71, 28-33.
  • Kozanoğlu, H. (1993). Yuppieler ve bizim kuşak. İletişim Yayınları.
  • Kroskrity, P. V. (1998). Arizona Tewa Kiva speech as a manifestation of a dominant language ideology. B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, and P. V. Kroskrity (Yay. haz.), Language Ideologies içinde (ss. 103–122). Oxford University Press.
  • Kroskrity, P. V. (2005). Language ideologies. A. Duranti (Yay. haz.), A companion to linguistic anthropology içinde (ss. 496-517. Wiley.
  • Kramer, H. (1996). The EU-Turkey customs union: Economic integration amidst political turmoil. Mediterranean Politics, 1(1), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629399608414567
  • Lewis, G. (1999). Turkish language reform: A catasthropic success. Oxford University Press.
  • Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.
  • Lüküslü, D. (2005). 1960’lardan 2000’lere gençlik tipleri: Maddeci, başarıcı, manager tipten yuppie’ye tiki’ye. Birikim Dergisi, 196, 30-36.
  • Lytra, V. (2015). Language and language ideologies among Turkish-speaking young people in Athens and London. J. Nortier, ve B. A. Svendsen (Yay. haz.), Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century: Linguistic Practices across Urban Spaces içinde (ss. 183-204). Cambridge University Press.
  • Lytra, V. vd. (2008). Language practices, language ideologies and identity construction in London Turkish complementary schools. V. Lytra ve J. N. Jorgensen (Yay. haz.), Multilingualism and Identities across Contexts: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives on Turkish-speaking Youth in Europe içinde (ss. 15-43). Uninversity of Copenhagen Press.
  • Mardin, Ş. (2017). Türkiye’de toplum ve siyaset (23. bs.). İletişim Yayınları.
  • Milroy, J. (1999). The consequences of standardisation in descriptive linguistics. T. Bex ve R. J. Watts (Yay. haz.), Standard English: The widening debate içinde (ss. 16-39). Routledge.
  • Milroy, J. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardisation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 530-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163
  • Milroy, J., ve Milroy, L. (1999). Authority in language: Investigating language prescription and standardisation. Routledge.
  • Mogan, S. (2014). Beyaz yalaka. Okuyan Us Yayınları.
  • Özmen, Z. (2015). Bir toplumsal tip: Plaza “i”nsanı. Sosyologca, 5(10). 251-266.
  • Peirce, C. S. (1932). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Elements of logic – Vol. II. Harvard University Press.
  • Piller, I. (2015). Language ideologies. K. Tracy, C. Ilie, ve T. Sandel (Yay. haz.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction içinde (ss. 1-10). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Reed, H. A. (1988). Islam and education in Turkey: Their roles in national development. Turkish Studies Association Bulletin, 12(1), 1-5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43384190
  • Romaine, S. (2007). Linguistic diversity and language standardization. M. Hellinger ve A. Pauwels (Yay. haz.), Handbook of language and communication: Diversity and change içinde (ss. 685-714). Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. K. Basso ve H. Selby (Yay. haz.), Meaning in anthropology içinde (ss. 11-55). University of New Mexico Press.
  • Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. P. Clyne, W. Hanks, ve C. Hofbauer (Yay. haz.), The elements içinde (ss. 193-248). Chicago Linguistic Society.
  • Silverstein, M. (1998). Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, 401-426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.401
  • Toprak, B. (1981). Islam and political development in Turkey. Brill.
  • Uzun, N. B. (2019). Müzik ve kültür arasındaki ilişki bağlamında arabesk. Sanat ve İnsan Dergisi, 3(2), 1-6.
  • Ün, S. (2019). Plaza dili üzerine toplum dil bilimsel bir inceleme. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü, Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.
  • Woolard, K. A. (1985). Language variation and cultural hegemony: Toward an integration of sociolinguistic and social theory. American Ethnologist, 2, 738-748. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1985.12.4.02a00090
  • Woolard, K. A. (1989). Double talk: Bilingualism and the politics of ethnicity in Catalonia. Stanford University Press.
  • Woolard, K. A. (2020). Language ideology. J. Stanlaw (Yay. haz.), The international encyclopedia of linguistic anthropology içinde (ss. 1-21). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Woolard, K. A., ve Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55-82. Yağlı, E. (2019). Değişkeci toplumdilbilim ve dil değişkenliği. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Yağlı, E. (2024). Using the “proper one”: Language ideology in the context of Kemalism and neo-Ottomanism. New Perspectives on Turkey, 71, 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2024.6
  • Yavan, N. (2010). The location choice of foreign direct investment within Turkey: An empirical analysis. European Planning Studies, 18(10), 1675-1705. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2010.504350
  • Yılmaz, H. (2011). Learning to read (again): The social experiences of Turkey’s 1928 Alphabet Reform. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 43(4), 677-697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743811000900
  • Yurtbaşı, M. (2017). Türkiye’de 2000-2017 döneminde oluşan veya yaygınlaşan yeni sözler (neolojizmler). Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 40, 491-562. https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.12053 Yüce, C. B. (2019). Identity construction through language: The case of the Turkish Language Reform. The Journal of the Multicultural Society, 9(2), 100-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.14431/omnes.2019.07.9.2.100 Zhang, Q. (2005). A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society, 34(3), 431-466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050153 Zürcher, E. J. (2004). Turkey: A modern history. J. B. Tauris.

‘Let’s publish this article’: Language Ideologies in the Context of Plaza Variety

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 2025 Sayı: 49, 1 - 27, 26.06.2025

Emre Yağlı

https://doi.org/10.59257/turkbilig.1528199

Öz

The plaza variety, also known as “plaza language” and “plaza speech” in social contexts, is a speech style that has emerged as a result of the neoliberal policies implemented in Turkey since the 1990s. This style is commonly observed among individuals working in multinational companies engaged in global trade in major cities and has gained significant attention in recent years. This increased visibility has led to various opinions and assessments of this speech style. Therefore, this study aims to analyse individuals’ perceptions of the plaza variety through the concept of language ideology and to clarify the language ideologies associated with this speech style. The study focuses on the assessments made by individuals on Ekşi Sözlük regarding the plaza variety, examining these assessments from a socio-semiotic perspective and explaining the development of the emerging language ideologies. The main finding of the study is that the language ideologies related to the plaza variety are closely linked to the language and educational reforms of the early Republican period. Moreover, the study has identified that language ideologies differ based on individuals’ varying interests, concerns, and levels of awareness.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Plaza variety language ideology Language Reform indexicality

Etik Beyan

There is no need for ethics permit for the current work.

Destekleyen Kurum

There is no institution supporting the study.

Teşekkür

-

Kaynakça

  • Aytürk, İ. (2008). The first episode of Language Reform in Republican Turkey: The Language Council from 1926 to 1931. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 18(3), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186308008511
  • Bamberg, M., De Fina, A., ve Schiffrin, D. (2011). Discourse and identity construction. S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, ve V. L. Vignoles (Yay. haz.), Handbook of identity theory and research içinde (ss. 177-199). Springer.
  • Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Çev.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Bucholtz, M., ve Hall, K. (2004). Language and identity. A. Duranti (Yay. haz.), A companion to linguistic anthropology içinde (ss. 369-394). Blackwell.
  • Bucholtz, M., ve Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585-614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
  • Cannadine, D. (1998). Class in Britain. Palgrave.
  • Cavanaugh, J. R. (2020). Language ideology revisited. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 263, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-2082
  • Cüceloğlu, D., ve Slobin, D. (1980). Effects of Turkish Language Reform on person perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11(3), 297-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022180113005
  • Çavuşoğlu, Ç. (2019). Standard language ideologies: the case of Cypriot Turkish in Turkish schools in London. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(9), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1687711
  • Çokol, E. (2020). Kuşak çatışmaları ekseninde Z kuşağının dili. International Journal of Language Education and Teaching, 8(2), 404-419. https://doi.org/10.29228/ijlet.43454
  • Çolak, Y. (2004). Language policy and official ideology in early Republican Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(6), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0026320042000282883
  • Dam, L. (2015). The functionality of personal pronouns in constructions of communities. Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, 1, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.globe.v1i0.715
  • Doğançay-Aktuna, S. (1995). An evaluation of the Turkish Language Reform after 60 years. Language Problems and Language Planning, 19(3), 221-249. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.19.3.01dog
  • Doğançay-Aktuna, S. (2004). Language planning in Turkey: Yesterday and today. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2004(165), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2004.008
  • Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 453-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x
  • Erdilek, A. (2008). Internationalization of Turkish MNEs. Journal of Management Development, 27, 744-760. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710810883634
  • Erdoğan-Öztürk, Y., ve Sağın-Şimşek, Ç. (2023). Language ideologies and stancetaking in refugee identity negotiations: exploring multilingual refugees’ narratives of language use in Turkey. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2216662
  • Erdoğan-Öztürk, Y. (2024). Exploring the intersections of language ideologies and affect: The case of multilingual ‘returnee’ women in Turkey. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12,(1), 2024, 117-142. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2023-0050
  • Errington, J. (1998). Shifting languages: Interaction and identity in Javanese Indonesian. Cambridge University Press.
  • Errington, J. (2000). Indonesian(’s) authority. P. V. Kroskrity (Yay. haz.), Regimes of language içinde (ss. 205-227). School of American Research Press.
  • Emlak Ansiklopedisi (t.y.). Plaza nedir? 15 Ocak 2024 tarihinde http://emlakansiklopedisi.com/wiki/plaza-nedir adresinden erişildi.
  • Gal, S. (1992). Multiplicity and contention among ideologies. Pragmatics, 2(3), 445-450. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.3.08gal
  • Gal, S. (1993). Diversity and contestation in linguistic ideologies: German speakers in Hungary. Language in Society, 22(3), 337-359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017279
  • Gal, S. (2006). Migration, minorities and multilingualism: Language ideologies in Europe. C. Mar-Molinero ve P. Stevenson (Yay. haz.), Language ideologies, policies and practices – Language and globalization içinde (ss. 13-27). Springer.
  • Gürsoy Ulusoy, Ş. (2018). Mekansız zamanlar zamansız mekanlar arasındaki plaza çalışanı beyaz yaka’lar. Uluslararası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.381779
  • Hakkoymaz, S., ve Uygun, N. (2022). Akademik personelin plaza dilini kullanım durumunun incelenmesi: Küreselleşmenin dile yansıması. Başkent Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 217-224.
  • Hanson, V. D. (2010, 13 Ağustos). Obama: Figthing the yuppie factor. National Review. https://www.nationalreview.com/2010/08/obama-fighting-yuppie-factor-victor-davis-hanson/
  • Harwood, N. (2007). Political scientists on the functions of personal pronouns in their writing: An interview-based study of ‘I’ and ‘we’. Text & Talk, 27(1), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.002
  • Hill, J. H. (1998) “Today there is no respect”: Nostalgia, “respect,” and oppositional discourse in Mexicano (Nahuatl) language ideology. B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, ve P. V. Kroskrity (Yay. haz.), Language ideologies içinde (ss. 68-86). Oxford University Press.
  • Iñigo-Mora, I. (2004). On the use of personal pronoun ‘we’ in communities. Journal of Language and Politics, 3(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.1.05ini
  • Irvine, J. T. (1989). When talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist, 16, 248-267. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1989.16.2.02a00040
  • Irvine, J. T., ve Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. P. V. Kroskrity (Yay. haz.), Regimes of language içinde (ss. 35-83). School of American Research Press.
  • Jaffe, A. (1999). Ideologies in action: Language politics on Corsica. Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Kana, F., Yağmıur, Y., ve Elkıran, Y. M. (2017). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin sanal dünyalarının günlük hayatlarına yansımaları üzerine bir durum çalışması. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(21), 59-71.
  • Kantor, B. P. (2023). The standard language ideology of Hebrew and Arabic grammarians of the Abbasid period. Open Book Publishers.
  • Karapehlivan, F. (2015). Implications of the neoliberal restructuring of the state-education relationship for the right to education in Turkey. (Doktora Tezi). University of Essex.
  • Karapehlivan, F. (2019, 1 Kasım). Constructing a “new Turkey” through education. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. https://tr.boell.org/en/2019/10/01/constructing-new-turkey-through-education
  • Keyder, Ç. (2017). Türkiye’de devlet ve sınıflar (21. bs.). İletişim Yayınları.
  • Kıyar, N. (2018). Türk sanat ortamında 80’ler ve değişim sürecinin düşündürdükleri. European Journal of Managerial Research, 2(2), 39-55.
  • Korkmaz, D. F. (2006). Çağdaş kentte halk bilimi ve yeni bir sosyal grup: Tikiler. Milli Folklor, 71, 28-33.
  • Kozanoğlu, H. (1993). Yuppieler ve bizim kuşak. İletişim Yayınları.
  • Kroskrity, P. V. (1998). Arizona Tewa Kiva speech as a manifestation of a dominant language ideology. B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, and P. V. Kroskrity (Yay. haz.), Language Ideologies içinde (ss. 103–122). Oxford University Press.
  • Kroskrity, P. V. (2005). Language ideologies. A. Duranti (Yay. haz.), A companion to linguistic anthropology içinde (ss. 496-517. Wiley.
  • Kramer, H. (1996). The EU-Turkey customs union: Economic integration amidst political turmoil. Mediterranean Politics, 1(1), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629399608414567
  • Lewis, G. (1999). Turkish language reform: A catasthropic success. Oxford University Press.
  • Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.
  • Lüküslü, D. (2005). 1960’lardan 2000’lere gençlik tipleri: Maddeci, başarıcı, manager tipten yuppie’ye tiki’ye. Birikim Dergisi, 196, 30-36.
  • Lytra, V. (2015). Language and language ideologies among Turkish-speaking young people in Athens and London. J. Nortier, ve B. A. Svendsen (Yay. haz.), Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century: Linguistic Practices across Urban Spaces içinde (ss. 183-204). Cambridge University Press.
  • Lytra, V. vd. (2008). Language practices, language ideologies and identity construction in London Turkish complementary schools. V. Lytra ve J. N. Jorgensen (Yay. haz.), Multilingualism and Identities across Contexts: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives on Turkish-speaking Youth in Europe içinde (ss. 15-43). Uninversity of Copenhagen Press.
  • Mardin, Ş. (2017). Türkiye’de toplum ve siyaset (23. bs.). İletişim Yayınları.
  • Milroy, J. (1999). The consequences of standardisation in descriptive linguistics. T. Bex ve R. J. Watts (Yay. haz.), Standard English: The widening debate içinde (ss. 16-39). Routledge.
  • Milroy, J. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardisation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 530-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163
  • Milroy, J., ve Milroy, L. (1999). Authority in language: Investigating language prescription and standardisation. Routledge.
  • Mogan, S. (2014). Beyaz yalaka. Okuyan Us Yayınları.
  • Özmen, Z. (2015). Bir toplumsal tip: Plaza “i”nsanı. Sosyologca, 5(10). 251-266.
  • Peirce, C. S. (1932). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Elements of logic – Vol. II. Harvard University Press.
  • Piller, I. (2015). Language ideologies. K. Tracy, C. Ilie, ve T. Sandel (Yay. haz.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction içinde (ss. 1-10). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Reed, H. A. (1988). Islam and education in Turkey: Their roles in national development. Turkish Studies Association Bulletin, 12(1), 1-5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43384190
  • Romaine, S. (2007). Linguistic diversity and language standardization. M. Hellinger ve A. Pauwels (Yay. haz.), Handbook of language and communication: Diversity and change içinde (ss. 685-714). Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. K. Basso ve H. Selby (Yay. haz.), Meaning in anthropology içinde (ss. 11-55). University of New Mexico Press.
  • Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. P. Clyne, W. Hanks, ve C. Hofbauer (Yay. haz.), The elements içinde (ss. 193-248). Chicago Linguistic Society.
  • Silverstein, M. (1998). Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, 401-426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.401
  • Toprak, B. (1981). Islam and political development in Turkey. Brill.
  • Uzun, N. B. (2019). Müzik ve kültür arasındaki ilişki bağlamında arabesk. Sanat ve İnsan Dergisi, 3(2), 1-6.
  • Ün, S. (2019). Plaza dili üzerine toplum dil bilimsel bir inceleme. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü, Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.
  • Woolard, K. A. (1985). Language variation and cultural hegemony: Toward an integration of sociolinguistic and social theory. American Ethnologist, 2, 738-748. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1985.12.4.02a00090
  • Woolard, K. A. (1989). Double talk: Bilingualism and the politics of ethnicity in Catalonia. Stanford University Press.
  • Woolard, K. A. (2020). Language ideology. J. Stanlaw (Yay. haz.), The international encyclopedia of linguistic anthropology içinde (ss. 1-21). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Woolard, K. A., ve Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55-82. Yağlı, E. (2019). Değişkeci toplumdilbilim ve dil değişkenliği. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Yağlı, E. (2024). Using the “proper one”: Language ideology in the context of Kemalism and neo-Ottomanism. New Perspectives on Turkey, 71, 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2024.6
  • Yavan, N. (2010). The location choice of foreign direct investment within Turkey: An empirical analysis. European Planning Studies, 18(10), 1675-1705. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2010.504350
  • Yılmaz, H. (2011). Learning to read (again): The social experiences of Turkey’s 1928 Alphabet Reform. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 43(4), 677-697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743811000900
  • Yurtbaşı, M. (2017). Türkiye’de 2000-2017 döneminde oluşan veya yaygınlaşan yeni sözler (neolojizmler). Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 40, 491-562. https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.12053 Yüce, C. B. (2019). Identity construction through language: The case of the Turkish Language Reform. The Journal of the Multicultural Society, 9(2), 100-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.14431/omnes.2019.07.9.2.100 Zhang, Q. (2005). A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society, 34(3), 431-466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050153 Zürcher, E. J. (2004). Turkey: A modern history. J. B. Tauris.
Toplam 74 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Toplumsal Dilbilim
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Emre Yağlı 0000-0002-1044-9018

Yayımlanma Tarihi 26 Haziran 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 5 Ağustos 2024
Kabul Tarihi 2 Ocak 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 2025 Sayı: 49

Kaynak Göster

APA Yağlı, E. (2025). “BU ÇALIŞMAYI ‘PUBLISH’ EDELİM”: PLAZA DEĞİŞKESİ BAĞLAMINDA GERÇEKLEŞEN DİL İDEOLOJİLERİ. Türkbilig, 2025(49), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.59257/turkbilig.1528199
 Kapak Resmi İndir


assets%2F-MiVTps3hYDHulTMKgFs%2F-Mk8pxD5_cavuWho0PBF%2F-Mk8sbxTixvFT0_4bAzY%2Fimage.png?alt=media&token=880c6474-dd44-4ce3-9419-6c8be9e52b7c

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.