Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Çok Boyutlu Algılanan İş Aile Olumlu Yayılım Ölçeği: Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Year 2025, Issue: 64, 196 - 211, 19.05.2025

Fulya Cenkseven Önder , Hacı Arif Doğanülkü

https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1450098

Abstract

Bu araştırma Hanson vd. (2006) tarafından geliştirilen İş Aile Olumlu Yayılım Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarını yaparak Türkçeye uyarlamak amacı ile yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın katılımcıları Türkiye’de yaşayan 242 kadın, 165 erkek olmak üzere toplamda 407 bireyden oluşmaktadır. Veri toplama araçları olarak İş Aile Olumlu Yayılım Ölçeği, Minnesota İş Doyumu Ölçeği, İlişki Doyumu Ölçeği ve Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğin psikometrik özelliklerini test etmede doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, madde toplam korelasyonu, ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik ve Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayısı hesaplanmıştır. Analizler neticesinde ölçeğin orijinal formundaki 6 boyutlu 22 maddeden oluşan yapısının Türkçe formu içinde aynı şekilde geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Sonuç olarak uyarlanan İş Aile Olumlu Yayılım Ölçeğinin çalışan ve evli bireyler arasında geçerli nitelikte ve güvenilir özellikte ölçme aracı olarak uygulanabileceği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

İş Aile İş-aile olumlu yayılım Ölçek uyarlama

Ethical Statement

Bu araştırma, Çukurova Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler kurulunun 16/11/2023 tarihli E-74009925-604.01.02-851334 sayılı kararı ile alınan izinle yürütülmüştür.

References

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Burke, R. (2009). Workaholism and relationship quality: A spillover-crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013290
  • Barnett, R. (1994). Home-to-work spillover revisited: A study of full-time employed women in dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(3), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.2307/352875
  • Baycan A. (1985). An analysis of the several aspects of job satisfaction between different occupational groups. [Master's Thesis, Boğaziçi University]. National Thesis Center.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi.
  • Carlson, D. S., Grzywacz, J. G., Ferguson, M., Hunter, E. M., Clinch, C. R., & Arcury, T. A. (2011). Health and turnover of working mothers after childbirth via the work–family interface: An analysis across time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1045–1054. https://doi.org10.1037/a0023964
  • Carvalho, V. S., & Chambel, M. J. (2014). Work-to-family enrichment and employees’ wellbeing: High performance work system and job characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 119, 373–387. https://doi.org10.1007/s11205-013-0475-8
  • Crouter, A. C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work–family interface. Human Relations, 37(6), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678403700601
  • Curun, F. (2001). The effects of sexism and sex role orientation on relationship satisfaction. [Master's Thesis, Middle East Technical University]. National Thesis Center.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of wellbeing. Social Indicators Research Series, 39, 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4 12.
  • Eryılmaz, A., Açıkgöz, A. C., & Er, E. (2021). Examining the Relationships Between Organizational Citizenship Behaviours Emotional Intelligence and Work-Family Spillover. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, 340–353. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.872114
  • Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.57
  • Grzywacz, J. (2000). Work-family spillover and health during midlife: Is managing conflict everything? American Journal of Health Promotion, 14, 236–243. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-14.4.236
  • Grzywacz, J. & Marks, N. (2000a). Reconceptualizing the workfamily interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 111–126. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.111
  • Grzywacz, J. & Marks, N. (2000b). Family, work, work-family spillover, and problem drinking during midlife. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00336.x
  • Grzywacz, J. G., & Bass, B. L. (2003). Work, family, and mental health: Testing different models of work‐family fit. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00248.x
  • Hanson, G. C., Hammer, L. B., & Colton, C. L. (2006). Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work-family positive spillover. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.3.249
  • Heller, D., & Watson, D. (2005). The dynamic spillover of satisfaction between work and marriage: the role of time and mood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1273–1279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1273
  • Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(1), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
  • Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. Journal of Application Quantity Method, 3(1), 76-83. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5168
  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). Social psychology of organizations. Wiley.
  • Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Geurts, S., & Pulkkinen, L. (2006). Types of work-family interface: Well-being correlates of negative and positive spillover between work and family. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00502.x
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
  • Marcoulides, G., & Schumacher, R. (2001). New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Meydan, C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Ng, L. P., Kuar, L. S., & Cheng, W. H. (2016). Influence of work-family conflict and work-family positive spillover on healthcare professionals' job satisfaction. Business Management Dynamics, 5(11), 1–15.
  • Polatcı, S. (2014). Work Family Spillover And Validity And Reliability Of Its Scale in Turkish. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(27), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.30976/susead.302231
  • Polatcı, S., & Keser, A. (2017). A Research on the Effects of Work Family Spillover on Job and Life Satisfaction. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 72(2), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002451
  • Russo, M. (2015). Work–home enrichment and health: An analysis of the mediating role of persistence in goal striving and vulnerability to stress. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(19), 2486–2502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.1003085
  • Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., & Nielsen, K. (2015). The thin line between work and home: The spillover and crossover of daily conflicts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12075
  • Seçer, İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci. Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D. J., Park, S., Joshanloo, M., & Kim, M. (2020). Work–family spillover and subjective well-being: The moderating role of coping strategies. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 2909-2929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00205-8
  • Stoddard, M., & Madsen, S. R. (2007). Toward an understanding of the link between work– family enrichment and individual health. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9, 2–15.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
  • Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  • Telef, B. B. (2013). The adaptation of psychological well-being into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(3), 374–384.
  • van Steenbergen, E. F., & Ellemers, N. (2009). Is managing the work–family interface worthwhile? Benefits for employee health and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 617–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.569
  • Wayne, J. H. (2009). Cleaning up the constructs on the positive side of the work–family interface. In D. R. Crane, & J. Hill (Eds.), Handbook of families and work: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Lanham.
  • Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., & England, G. W. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnsesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 120. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1968-08111-001

Multidimensional Perceived Work-Family Positive Spillover Scale: Adaptation, Validity and Reliability Study

Year 2025, Issue: 64, 196 - 211, 19.05.2025

Fulya Cenkseven Önder , Hacı Arif Doğanülkü

https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1450098

Abstract

This study was conducted to adapt the Work-Family Positive Spillover Scale developed by Hanson et al. (2006) into Turkish by conducting validity and reliability studies. The participants of the study comprised 407 individuals, 242 women and 165 men, living in Turkey. Work-Family Positive Spillover Scale, Minnesota Job Satisfaction Scale, Relationship Satisfaction Scale and Psychological Well-Being Scale were used as data collection tools. Confirmatory factor analysis, item-total correlation, criterion-related validity and Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient were calculated to test the psychometric properties of the scale. As a result of the analyses, it was found that the 6-dimensional 22-item structure of the original form of the scale was similarly valid and reliable in its Turkish form. As a result, it was concluded that the adapted Work-Family Positive Spillover Scale can be applied as a valid and reliable measurement tool among working and married individuals.

Keywords

Work Family Work-family positive spillover Scale adaptation

References

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Burke, R. (2009). Workaholism and relationship quality: A spillover-crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013290
  • Barnett, R. (1994). Home-to-work spillover revisited: A study of full-time employed women in dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(3), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.2307/352875
  • Baycan A. (1985). An analysis of the several aspects of job satisfaction between different occupational groups. [Master's Thesis, Boğaziçi University]. National Thesis Center.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi.
  • Carlson, D. S., Grzywacz, J. G., Ferguson, M., Hunter, E. M., Clinch, C. R., & Arcury, T. A. (2011). Health and turnover of working mothers after childbirth via the work–family interface: An analysis across time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1045–1054. https://doi.org10.1037/a0023964
  • Carvalho, V. S., & Chambel, M. J. (2014). Work-to-family enrichment and employees’ wellbeing: High performance work system and job characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 119, 373–387. https://doi.org10.1007/s11205-013-0475-8
  • Crouter, A. C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work–family interface. Human Relations, 37(6), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678403700601
  • Curun, F. (2001). The effects of sexism and sex role orientation on relationship satisfaction. [Master's Thesis, Middle East Technical University]. National Thesis Center.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of wellbeing. Social Indicators Research Series, 39, 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4 12.
  • Eryılmaz, A., Açıkgöz, A. C., & Er, E. (2021). Examining the Relationships Between Organizational Citizenship Behaviours Emotional Intelligence and Work-Family Spillover. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, 340–353. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.872114
  • Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.57
  • Grzywacz, J. (2000). Work-family spillover and health during midlife: Is managing conflict everything? American Journal of Health Promotion, 14, 236–243. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-14.4.236
  • Grzywacz, J. & Marks, N. (2000a). Reconceptualizing the workfamily interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 111–126. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.111
  • Grzywacz, J. & Marks, N. (2000b). Family, work, work-family spillover, and problem drinking during midlife. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00336.x
  • Grzywacz, J. G., & Bass, B. L. (2003). Work, family, and mental health: Testing different models of work‐family fit. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00248.x
  • Hanson, G. C., Hammer, L. B., & Colton, C. L. (2006). Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work-family positive spillover. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.3.249
  • Heller, D., & Watson, D. (2005). The dynamic spillover of satisfaction between work and marriage: the role of time and mood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1273–1279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1273
  • Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(1), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
  • Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. Journal of Application Quantity Method, 3(1), 76-83. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5168
  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). Social psychology of organizations. Wiley.
  • Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Geurts, S., & Pulkkinen, L. (2006). Types of work-family interface: Well-being correlates of negative and positive spillover between work and family. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00502.x
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
  • Marcoulides, G., & Schumacher, R. (2001). New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Meydan, C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Ng, L. P., Kuar, L. S., & Cheng, W. H. (2016). Influence of work-family conflict and work-family positive spillover on healthcare professionals' job satisfaction. Business Management Dynamics, 5(11), 1–15.
  • Polatcı, S. (2014). Work Family Spillover And Validity And Reliability Of Its Scale in Turkish. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(27), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.30976/susead.302231
  • Polatcı, S., & Keser, A. (2017). A Research on the Effects of Work Family Spillover on Job and Life Satisfaction. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 72(2), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002451
  • Russo, M. (2015). Work–home enrichment and health: An analysis of the mediating role of persistence in goal striving and vulnerability to stress. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(19), 2486–2502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.1003085
  • Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., & Nielsen, K. (2015). The thin line between work and home: The spillover and crossover of daily conflicts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12075
  • Seçer, İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci. Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D. J., Park, S., Joshanloo, M., & Kim, M. (2020). Work–family spillover and subjective well-being: The moderating role of coping strategies. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 2909-2929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00205-8
  • Stoddard, M., & Madsen, S. R. (2007). Toward an understanding of the link between work– family enrichment and individual health. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9, 2–15.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
  • Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  • Telef, B. B. (2013). The adaptation of psychological well-being into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(3), 374–384.
  • van Steenbergen, E. F., & Ellemers, N. (2009). Is managing the work–family interface worthwhile? Benefits for employee health and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 617–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.569
  • Wayne, J. H. (2009). Cleaning up the constructs on the positive side of the work–family interface. In D. R. Crane, & J. Hill (Eds.), Handbook of families and work: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Lanham.
  • Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., & England, G. W. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnsesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 120. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1968-08111-001
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Career Counseling, Psychological Counseling and Guidance (Other)
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Fulya Cenkseven Önder 0000-0001-9748-626X

Hacı Arif Doğanülkü 0000-0003-2055-7511

Early Pub Date May 16, 2025
Publication Date May 19, 2025
Submission Date March 10, 2024
Acceptance Date January 14, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Issue: 64

Cite

APA Cenkseven Önder, F., & Doğanülkü, H. A. (2025). Çok Boyutlu Algılanan İş Aile Olumlu Yayılım Ölçeği: Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi(64), 196-211. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1450098
 Download Cover Image

27767 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/