Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4, 531 - 538, 05.12.2018

Metin Dağtekin , Ali Aybek , Serdar Üçok , Abdullah Beyaz

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.347918
Cited By: 1

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Amon T, Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Zollitsch W, Mayer K & Gruber L (2007). Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure—Influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 118(1): 173-182
  • AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA
  • Çallı B (2012). Atıklardan Biyogaz Üretimi. Türkiye Kimya Derneği -Genç Kimyacılar Platformu, http://eng.marmara.edu.tr/enve
  • Elaiyaraju P & Partha N (2012). Biogas production fromco-digestion of orange peel waste and jatropha de-oiledcake in an aerobic batchreactor. African Journal of Biotechnology 11(14): 3339-3345
  • FAO (2015). FAO Statistical Yearbook 2013. World food and agriculture. www.fao.org. (02.22.2015)
  • Gunaseelan V N (2004). Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks. Biomass and Bioenergy 26(4): 389-399
  • Heffrich D & Oechsner H (2003). Comparison of Different Lab¬oratory Techniques for the Digestion of Biomass. Landtechnik 9: 27-30
  • Nguyen H (2012). Biogas Production from Solvent Pretreated Orange Peel. Master Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
  • Özmen P (2009). Biogas production from municipal Wastemixed with different portions of orangepeel. Master Thesis, Universty of Boras, Applied Biotechnology
  • TUİK (2015). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. http://www.tüik.gov.tr (Access date: 02.22.2015)
  • Üçok S, Aybek A & Yıldız K (2016). Elma ve şeftali atıklarının biyogaz değerlerinin deneysel olarak belirlenmesi. 1st International Mediterranean Science and Engineering Congress (IMSEC2016), October 26-28, Adana, Turkey, pp. 437–444
  • Van Soest P J, Robertson J B & Lewis B A (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutraldetergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597
  • VDI 4630 (2006). Fermentatıon of organicmaterial, characterisation of substrate, collection of material data, fermentation tests, VDI Gesellschaft Energietechnik
  • Wikandari R, Millati R, Cahyanto M N & Taherzadeh M J (2014a). Biogas production from citrus wasteby membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membranes (4): 596-607
  • Wikandari R, Nguyen H, Millati R, Niklasson C & Taherzadeh M J (2014b). Improvement of biogas production from orange peel wasteby leaching of limonene. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Bio Med Research International 2015(10): 1-6

The Effect of Adding Corn Silage at Different Ratios to Orange and Tangerine Wastes on Biogas Production Efficiency

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4, 531 - 538, 05.12.2018

Metin Dağtekin , Ali Aybek , Serdar Üçok , Abdullah Beyaz

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.347918
Cited By: 1

Öz

In this study, biogas production efficiencies of mixtures obtained by adding corn silage (CS) to citrus industrial wastes at different ratios were determined. Orange (OJPW) and tangerine processing juice wastes (TJPW) (crusts and shells) were selected as materials in the study. 25%, 50%, 75% of CS was added to these selected wastes. Changes in the obtained mixture chemical properties (dry matter, dry organic matter, crude ash, crude protein, crude oil, Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF), Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF)), biogas production and methane content in the biogas were investigated. The results of the study showed that the highest crude protein content was found in 100% TJPW (10%), raw fat percentage in 100% TJPW (5.14%), dry matter content in 100% CS (93.56%), ADF in 100% CS (22.74%) and the NDF in a mixture of 25% OJPW + 75% CS (45.08%). The highest methane production was determined for a mixture of 100% TJPW and 50% TJPW + 50% OJPW (0.46 m3 kg-1 ODM). Also the highest biogas production was determined in a mixture of 50% OJPW + 50% TJPW (0.90 m3 kg-1 ODM). The mixing of CS in TJPW and OJPW reduced significantly the production of methane and biogas in the mixture. As a result of the statistical analysis, significant differences (P≤0.05) were found in both methane and biogas production of agricultural wastes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Orange wastes tangerine wastes corn silage biogas HBT

Kaynakça

  • Amon T, Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Zollitsch W, Mayer K & Gruber L (2007). Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure—Influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 118(1): 173-182
  • AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA
  • Çallı B (2012). Atıklardan Biyogaz Üretimi. Türkiye Kimya Derneği -Genç Kimyacılar Platformu, http://eng.marmara.edu.tr/enve
  • Elaiyaraju P & Partha N (2012). Biogas production fromco-digestion of orange peel waste and jatropha de-oiledcake in an aerobic batchreactor. African Journal of Biotechnology 11(14): 3339-3345
  • FAO (2015). FAO Statistical Yearbook 2013. World food and agriculture. www.fao.org. (02.22.2015)
  • Gunaseelan V N (2004). Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks. Biomass and Bioenergy 26(4): 389-399
  • Heffrich D & Oechsner H (2003). Comparison of Different Lab¬oratory Techniques for the Digestion of Biomass. Landtechnik 9: 27-30
  • Nguyen H (2012). Biogas Production from Solvent Pretreated Orange Peel. Master Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
  • Özmen P (2009). Biogas production from municipal Wastemixed with different portions of orangepeel. Master Thesis, Universty of Boras, Applied Biotechnology
  • TUİK (2015). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. http://www.tüik.gov.tr (Access date: 02.22.2015)
  • Üçok S, Aybek A & Yıldız K (2016). Elma ve şeftali atıklarının biyogaz değerlerinin deneysel olarak belirlenmesi. 1st International Mediterranean Science and Engineering Congress (IMSEC2016), October 26-28, Adana, Turkey, pp. 437–444
  • Van Soest P J, Robertson J B & Lewis B A (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutraldetergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597
  • VDI 4630 (2006). Fermentatıon of organicmaterial, characterisation of substrate, collection of material data, fermentation tests, VDI Gesellschaft Energietechnik
  • Wikandari R, Millati R, Cahyanto M N & Taherzadeh M J (2014a). Biogas production from citrus wasteby membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membranes (4): 596-607
  • Wikandari R, Nguyen H, Millati R, Niklasson C & Taherzadeh M J (2014b). Improvement of biogas production from orange peel wasteby leaching of limonene. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Bio Med Research International 2015(10): 1-6
Toplam 15 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Metin Dağtekin

Ali Aybek

Serdar Üçok

Abdullah Beyaz

Yayımlanma Tarihi 5 Aralık 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 30 Ekim 2017
Kabul Tarihi 6 Şubat 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Dağtekin, M., Aybek, A., Üçok, S., Beyaz, A. (2018). The Effect of Adding Corn Silage at Different Ratios to Orange and Tangerine Wastes on Biogas Production Efficiency. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 24(4), 531-538. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.347918
AMA Dağtekin M, Aybek A, Üçok S, Beyaz A. The Effect of Adding Corn Silage at Different Ratios to Orange and Tangerine Wastes on Biogas Production Efficiency. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. Aralık 2018;24(4):531-538. doi:10.15832/ankutbd.347918
Chicago Dağtekin, Metin, Ali Aybek, Serdar Üçok, ve Abdullah Beyaz. “The Effect of Adding Corn Silage at Different Ratios to Orange and Tangerine Wastes on Biogas Production Efficiency”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24, sy. 4 (Aralık 2018): 531-38. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.347918.
EndNote Dağtekin M, Aybek A, Üçok S, Beyaz A (01 Aralık 2018) The Effect of Adding Corn Silage at Different Ratios to Orange and Tangerine Wastes on Biogas Production Efficiency. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24 4 531–538.
IEEE M. Dağtekin, A. Aybek, S. Üçok, ve A. Beyaz, “The Effect of Adding Corn Silage at Different Ratios to Orange and Tangerine Wastes on Biogas Production Efficiency”, J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili, c. 24, sy. 4, ss. 531–538, 2018, doi: 10.15832/ankutbd.347918.
ISNAD Dağtekin, Metin vd. “The Effect of Adding Corn Silage at Different Ratios to Orange and Tangerine Wastes on Biogas Production Efficiency”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24/4 (Aralık 2018), 531-538. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.347918.
JAMA Dağtekin M, Aybek A, Üçok S, Beyaz A. The Effect of Adding Corn Silage at Different Ratios to Orange and Tangerine Wastes on Biogas Production Efficiency. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2018;24:531–538.
MLA Dağtekin, Metin vd. “The Effect of Adding Corn Silage at Different Ratios to Orange and Tangerine Wastes on Biogas Production Efficiency”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, c. 24, sy. 4, 2018, ss. 531-8, doi:10.15832/ankutbd.347918.
Vancouver Dağtekin M, Aybek A, Üçok S, Beyaz A. The Effect of Adding Corn Silage at Different Ratios to Orange and Tangerine Wastes on Biogas Production Efficiency. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2018;24(4):531-8.

Cited By

The Use of Citrus Pulps As an Alternative Feed Sources in Rumınant Feeding and Its Methane Production Capacities
Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology
Yunus BAŞAR
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.725292
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Journal of Agricultural Sciences is published as open access journal. All articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).