Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing in the Relationship between Social Capital and Frugal Innovation

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 68, 226 - 242, 27.06.2025

Salih Zeki İmamoğlu , Eda Dilara Ayber , Serhat Erat

https://doi.org/10.53568/yyusbed.1640814

Öz

This study aims to examine the effect of social capital on frugal innovation, which is a new concept, and to evaluate the mediating role of knowledge sharing in this context. The research data consists of data collected from 309 managers working in companies operating in the manufacturing sector in Kocaeli. The collected data were analysed using AMOS and SPSS Macro package programs. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that social capital has a positive and significant effect on frugal innovation. In addition, it was concluded that knowledge sharing is a mediating variable in the relationship between social capital and frugal innovation. Both direct and indirect effects of social capital highlight how social networks and partnerships play a critical role in innovative processes. Understanding how knowledge sharing mediates the relationship between social capital and frugal innovation can provide important insights for enhancing creativity and productivity, especially in resource-constrained environments. These findings reveal that organizations and managers who want to realize frugal innovation should give importance to social capital and knowledge sharing, and have a structure where social capital is high and knowledge sharing is encouraged.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social capital knowledge sharing frugal innovation

Kaynakça

  • Agarwal, N., & Brem, A. (2017). Frugal innovation-past, present, and future. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 45(3), 37-41.
  • Albert, M. (2019). Sustainable frugal innovation-The connection between frugal innovation and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117747.
  • Alumno, T. A. D., Azurin, R. G. T., Dumayas, J. R. I., Tan, S. G., Tanpoco, M. R., & Caminong, J. M. (2024). Thriving in constraints: Exploring the interplay of human capital, social capital, and financial constraints in frugal innovation within family businesses. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(1), 118-129.
  • Asbari, M., Wijayanti, L. M., Hyun, C. C., Purwanto, A., & Santoso, P. B. (2019). Effect of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing on teacher innovation capability. Dinamika Pendidikan, 14(2), 227-243.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Bell, C., & Ruhanen, L. (2016). The diffusion and adoption of eco-innovations amongst tourism businesses: The role of the social system. Tourism Recreation Research, 41(3), 291-301.
  • Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations – An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–1046.
  • Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
  • Brand, A. (1998). Knowledge management and innovation at 3M. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(1), 17-22.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge.
  • Cabrera, A., & Cabrera, E. F. (2002). Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23(5), 687-710.
  • Cao, T. T., Le, P. B., & Nguyen, N. T. M. (2022). Impacts of high-involvement HRM practices on organizational innovation capability: The mediating mechanism of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(5), 733-749.
  • Chang, C. W., Huang, H. C., Chiang, C. Y., Hsu, C. P., & Chang, C. C. (2012). Social capital and knowledge sharing: Effects on patient safety. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(8), 1793-1803.
  • Christensen, P. H. (2007). Knowledge sharing: Moving away from the obsession with best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 36-47.
  • Claridge, T. (2018). Dimensions of social capital-structural, cognitive, and relational. Social Capital Research, 1, 1-4.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
  • Davenport, S., & Daellenbach, U. (2011). Belonging’to a virtual research centre: Exploring the influence of social capital formation processes on member identification in a virtual organization. British Journal of Management, 22(1), 54-76.
  • De Dreu, C.K.W. and West, M.A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191–1201.
  • Donate, M. J., & Guadamillas, F. (2010). The effect of organizational culture on knowledge management practices and innovation. Knowledge and Process Management, 17(2), 82-94.
  • Dost, M., Pahi, M. H., Magsi, H. B., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). Effects of sources of knowledge on frugal innovation: Moderating role of environmental turbulence. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7), 1245-1259.
  • Felin, T., & Hesterly, W. S. (2007). The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 195-218.
  • Fischer, B., Guerrero, M., Guimón, J., & Schaeffer, P. R. (2021). Knowledge transfer for frugal innovation: Where do entrepreneurial universities stand? Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(2), 360-379.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Fukuyama, F., (1997). Social capital and the modern capitalist economy: Creating a high trust workplace. Stern Business Magazine, 4(1).
  • Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1105-1135.
  • García-Sánchez, P., Díaz-Díaz, N. L., & De Saá-Pérez, P. (2019). Social capital and knowledge sharing in academic research teams. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 191-207.
  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
  • Gu, Q., Wang, G. G., & Wang, L. (2013). Social capital and innovation in R&D teams: The mediating roles of psychological safety and learning from mistakes. R&D Management, 43(2), 89-102.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2019). Sosyal Bilimlerde Aracı, Düzenleyici ve Durumsal Etki Analizleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Hammond, A. L., & Prahalad, C. K. (2004). Selling to the poor. Foreign Policy, 142, 30-37.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4-40.
  • Hossain, M. (2017). Mapping the frugal innovation phenomenon. Technology in Society, 51, 199-208.
  • Hossain, M. (2018). Frugal innovation: A review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 926-936.
  • Hossain, M. (2020). Frugal innovation: Conception, development, diffusion, and outcome. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121456.
  • Hossain, M., Simula, H., & Halme, M. (2016). Can frugal go global? Diffusion patterns of frugal innovations. Technology in Society, 46, 132-139.
  • Hussein, A. T. T., Singh, S. K., Farouk, S., & Sohal, A. S. (2016). Knowledge sharing enablers, processes and firm innovation capability. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(8), 484-495.
  • Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145.
  • Iqbal, Q., & Piwowar-Sulej, K. (2023). Sustainable leadership and heterogeneous knowledge sharing: The model for frugal innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 655-673.
  • Jantunen, A. (2005), Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: An empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 336-349.
  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–398.
  • Kuo, A., & Ng, S. (2016). Frugal innovation: A strategy for emerging market penetration and beyond. International Journal of Accounting & Business Management, 4(2), 44-52.
  • Le, P. B. (2023). Determinants of frugal innovation for firms in emerging markets: The roles of leadership, knowledge sharing and collaborative culture. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(9), 3334-3353.
  • Le, P.B., Tran, D.T., Phung, T.M.T. & Vu, K.D. (2024). Leadership and knowledge management practices for frugal innovation of firms in the emerging market: Moderating role of collaborative culture. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 16(3), 637-654.
  • Lefebvre, V. M., Sorenson, D., Henchion, M., & Gellynck, X. (2016). Social capital and knowledge sharing performance of learning networks. International Journal of Information Management, 36(4), 570-579.
  • Lei, H., Gui, L., & Le, P. B. (2021). Linking transformational leadership and frugal innovation: The mediating role of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(7), 1832-1852.
  • Lei, H., Saeheng, P. & Le, P. B. (2024). Stimulating knowledge sharing behaviors for frugal innovation: The roles of inclusive leadership and competitive intensity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(5), 1468-1489.
  • Levänen, J., Hossain, M., & Wierenga, M. (2022). Frugal innovation in the midst of societal and operational pressures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 347, 131308.
  • Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315-332.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128.
  • Matsuo, M., & Easterby‐Smith, M. (2008). Beyond the knowledge sharing dilemma: The role of customisation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(4), 30-43.
  • Mengesha, G. H., Watson, R. T., & Negash, S. (2021). Frugal knowledge sharing for frugal innovation diffusion in Africa: The church woman and related models. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(6), 1-23.
  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
  • Nari Kahle, H., Dubiel, A., Ernst, H., & Prabhu, J. (2013). The democratizing effects of frugal innovation: Implications for inclusive growth and state-building. Journal of Indian Business Research, 5(4), 220-234.
  • Nonaka, I. & Toyama, R. (2003), The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2-10.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oliveira, E. J., Rezende, P. C., Andrade, D., Lopes, R. H., Figueiredo, S. C. G., Ribas, L. F., Alencar, D. B., & Batista, A. (2023). Training entrepreneurial leadership for the development of social and frugal innovations a study with incubators and solidarity economic enterprises in the northern region of Brazil. International Journal of Development Research, 13(2), 61503-61516.
  • Palvia, P., Baqir, N., & Nemati, H. (2018). ICT for socio-economic development: A citizens’ perspective. Information & Management, 55(2), 160-176.
  • Polanyi, M. (2009). The Tacit Dimension. In Knowledge in Organisations (pp. 135-146). Routledge.
  • Portes, A. (2000). Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. In E. Lesser (ed.) Knowledge and Social Capital (pp. 43-67). London: Routledge.
  • Prabhu, J. (2017). Frugal innovation: Doing more with less for more. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160372.
  • Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. In: Crothers, L., Lockhart, C. (eds) Culture and Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Qiao, S., Wang, Q., Guo, Z., & Guo, J. (2021). Collaborative innovation activities and BIM application on innovation capability in construction supply chain: Mediating role of explicit and tacit knowledge sharing. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(12), 04021168.
  • Rao, B. C., & Liefner, I. (2023). Frugal engineering of advanced frugal innovations for global sustainability entrepreneurship. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 32(2_suppl), S69-S88.
  • Rickards, T., Chen, M. H., & Moger, S. (2001). Development of a self‐report instrument for exploring team factor, leadership and performance relationships. British Journal of Management, 12(3), 243-250.
  • Riesenberger, J. R. (1998). Executive insights: Knowledge–the source of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of International Marketing, 6(3), 94-107.
  • Saenz, J., Aramburu, N., & Blanco, C. E. (2012). Knowledge sharing and innovation in Spanish and Colombian high‐tech firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6), 919-933.
  • Salehi, M. & Sadeq Alanbari, S. A. (2023). Knowledge sharing barriers and knowledge sharing facilitators in innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
  • Santos, L. L., Borini, F. M., de Miranda Oliveira, M., Rossetto, D. E., & Bernardes, R. C. (2022). Bricolage as capability for frugal innovation in emerging markets in times of crisis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(2), 413-432.
  • Shehzad, M. U., Zhang, J., Alam, S., Cao, Z., Boamah, F. A., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Knowledge management process as a mediator between collaborative culture and frugal innovation: The moderating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(7), 1424-1446.
  • Singh, S. K., Mazzucchelli, A., Vessal, S. R., & Solidoro, A. (2021). Knowledge-based HRM practices and innovation performance: Role of social capital and knowledge sharing. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100830.
  • Smith, E.A. (2001). The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 311-321.
  • Soni, P., & T. Krishnan, R. (2014). Frugal innovation: Aligning theory, practice, and public policy. Journal of Indian Business Research, 6(1), 29-47.
  • Sugarhood, P., Wherton, J., Procter, R., Hinder, S., & Greenhalgh, T. (2014). Technology as system innovation: A key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9(1), 79-87.
  • Tian, H. & Wang, A. (2023). Sustainable leadership, knowledge sharing, and frugal innovation: The moderating role of organizational innovation climate. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231200946.
  • Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
  • United Nations (2017). Sustainable Development Goals. New York, NY.
  • Van den Hooff, B. & De Ridder, J.A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130.
  • Wang, Z., Sharma, P.N. & Cao, J. (2016). From knowledge sharing to firm performance: A predictive model comparison. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4650-4658.
  • Wang, M., Wang, Y. & Mardani, A. (2023). Empirical analysis of the influencing factors of knowledge sharing in industrial technology innovation strategic alliances. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113635.
  • Weyrauch, T., & Herstatt, C. (2017). What is frugal innovation? Three defining criteria. Journal of Frugal Innovation, 2(1), 1-17.
  • Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-208.
  • World Bank (2018). Financing Infrastructure in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington D.C.
  • Yang, H. L. & Wu, T. C. (2008). Knowledge sharing in an organization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(8), 1128-1156.
  • Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76-92.
  • Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Research-Technology Management, 54(4), 38-45.
  • Zhao, L., & Detlor, B. (2023). Towards a contingency model of knowledge sharing: Interaction between social capital and social exchange theories. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21(1), 197-209.
  • Zheng, J., Wu, G., & Xie, H. (2017). Impacts of leadership on project-based organizational innovation performance: The mediator of knowledge sharing and moderator of social capital. Sustainability, 9(10), 1893.

Sosyal Sermaye ve Tutumlu İnovasyon İlişkisinde Bilgi Paylaşımının Aracı Rolü

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 68, 226 - 242, 27.06.2025

Salih Zeki İmamoğlu , Eda Dilara Ayber , Serhat Erat

https://doi.org/10.53568/yyusbed.1640814

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sosyal sermayenin henüz yeni bir kavram olan tutumlu inovasyon üzerindeki etkisini incelemek ve bu etki bağlamında bilgi paylaşımının aracılık rolünü değerlendirmektir. Araştırma verileri, Kocaeli ilinde bulunan imalat sektöründe faaliyet gösteren firmalarda çalışan 309 yöneticiden toplanan verilerden oluşmaktadır. Toplanan veriler AMOS ve SPSS Macro paket programıyla analize tabi tutulmuştur. Analizler sonucunda sosyal sermayenin tutumlu inovasyon üzerinde pozitif yönde anlamlı bir etkisinin olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca bilgi paylaşımının, sosyal sermaye ile tutumlu inovasyon arasındaki ilişkide aracı değişken etkisi olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Sosyal sermayenin hem doğrudan hem de dolaylı olarak oluşturduğu etki sosyal ağların ve ortaklıkların yenilikçi süreçlerde nasıl kritik bir rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Bilgi paylaşımının sosyal sermaye ile tutumlu inovasyon arasındaki ilişkiye nasıl aracılık ettiğini anlamak ise özellikle kaynak kısıtlı ortamlarda yaratıcılığı ve verimliliği artırma konusunda önemli içgörüler sağlayabilir. Bu bulgular tutumlu inovasyonu gerçekleştirmek isteyen örgütlerin ve yöneticilerin sosyal sermaye ve bilgi paylaşımına önem vermeleri, sosyal sermayenin yüksek olduğu ve bilgi paylaşımının teşvik edildiği bir yapıya sahip olmaları gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal sermaye bilgi paylaşımı tutumlu inovasyon

Kaynakça

  • Agarwal, N., & Brem, A. (2017). Frugal innovation-past, present, and future. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 45(3), 37-41.
  • Albert, M. (2019). Sustainable frugal innovation-The connection between frugal innovation and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117747.
  • Alumno, T. A. D., Azurin, R. G. T., Dumayas, J. R. I., Tan, S. G., Tanpoco, M. R., & Caminong, J. M. (2024). Thriving in constraints: Exploring the interplay of human capital, social capital, and financial constraints in frugal innovation within family businesses. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(1), 118-129.
  • Asbari, M., Wijayanti, L. M., Hyun, C. C., Purwanto, A., & Santoso, P. B. (2019). Effect of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing on teacher innovation capability. Dinamika Pendidikan, 14(2), 227-243.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Bell, C., & Ruhanen, L. (2016). The diffusion and adoption of eco-innovations amongst tourism businesses: The role of the social system. Tourism Recreation Research, 41(3), 291-301.
  • Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations – An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–1046.
  • Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
  • Brand, A. (1998). Knowledge management and innovation at 3M. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(1), 17-22.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge.
  • Cabrera, A., & Cabrera, E. F. (2002). Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23(5), 687-710.
  • Cao, T. T., Le, P. B., & Nguyen, N. T. M. (2022). Impacts of high-involvement HRM practices on organizational innovation capability: The mediating mechanism of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(5), 733-749.
  • Chang, C. W., Huang, H. C., Chiang, C. Y., Hsu, C. P., & Chang, C. C. (2012). Social capital and knowledge sharing: Effects on patient safety. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(8), 1793-1803.
  • Christensen, P. H. (2007). Knowledge sharing: Moving away from the obsession with best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 36-47.
  • Claridge, T. (2018). Dimensions of social capital-structural, cognitive, and relational. Social Capital Research, 1, 1-4.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
  • Davenport, S., & Daellenbach, U. (2011). Belonging’to a virtual research centre: Exploring the influence of social capital formation processes on member identification in a virtual organization. British Journal of Management, 22(1), 54-76.
  • De Dreu, C.K.W. and West, M.A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191–1201.
  • Donate, M. J., & Guadamillas, F. (2010). The effect of organizational culture on knowledge management practices and innovation. Knowledge and Process Management, 17(2), 82-94.
  • Dost, M., Pahi, M. H., Magsi, H. B., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). Effects of sources of knowledge on frugal innovation: Moderating role of environmental turbulence. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7), 1245-1259.
  • Felin, T., & Hesterly, W. S. (2007). The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 195-218.
  • Fischer, B., Guerrero, M., Guimón, J., & Schaeffer, P. R. (2021). Knowledge transfer for frugal innovation: Where do entrepreneurial universities stand? Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(2), 360-379.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Fukuyama, F., (1997). Social capital and the modern capitalist economy: Creating a high trust workplace. Stern Business Magazine, 4(1).
  • Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1105-1135.
  • García-Sánchez, P., Díaz-Díaz, N. L., & De Saá-Pérez, P. (2019). Social capital and knowledge sharing in academic research teams. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 191-207.
  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
  • Gu, Q., Wang, G. G., & Wang, L. (2013). Social capital and innovation in R&D teams: The mediating roles of psychological safety and learning from mistakes. R&D Management, 43(2), 89-102.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2019). Sosyal Bilimlerde Aracı, Düzenleyici ve Durumsal Etki Analizleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Hammond, A. L., & Prahalad, C. K. (2004). Selling to the poor. Foreign Policy, 142, 30-37.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4-40.
  • Hossain, M. (2017). Mapping the frugal innovation phenomenon. Technology in Society, 51, 199-208.
  • Hossain, M. (2018). Frugal innovation: A review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 926-936.
  • Hossain, M. (2020). Frugal innovation: Conception, development, diffusion, and outcome. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121456.
  • Hossain, M., Simula, H., & Halme, M. (2016). Can frugal go global? Diffusion patterns of frugal innovations. Technology in Society, 46, 132-139.
  • Hussein, A. T. T., Singh, S. K., Farouk, S., & Sohal, A. S. (2016). Knowledge sharing enablers, processes and firm innovation capability. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(8), 484-495.
  • Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145.
  • Iqbal, Q., & Piwowar-Sulej, K. (2023). Sustainable leadership and heterogeneous knowledge sharing: The model for frugal innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 655-673.
  • Jantunen, A. (2005), Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: An empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 336-349.
  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–398.
  • Kuo, A., & Ng, S. (2016). Frugal innovation: A strategy for emerging market penetration and beyond. International Journal of Accounting & Business Management, 4(2), 44-52.
  • Le, P. B. (2023). Determinants of frugal innovation for firms in emerging markets: The roles of leadership, knowledge sharing and collaborative culture. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(9), 3334-3353.
  • Le, P.B., Tran, D.T., Phung, T.M.T. & Vu, K.D. (2024). Leadership and knowledge management practices for frugal innovation of firms in the emerging market: Moderating role of collaborative culture. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 16(3), 637-654.
  • Lefebvre, V. M., Sorenson, D., Henchion, M., & Gellynck, X. (2016). Social capital and knowledge sharing performance of learning networks. International Journal of Information Management, 36(4), 570-579.
  • Lei, H., Gui, L., & Le, P. B. (2021). Linking transformational leadership and frugal innovation: The mediating role of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(7), 1832-1852.
  • Lei, H., Saeheng, P. & Le, P. B. (2024). Stimulating knowledge sharing behaviors for frugal innovation: The roles of inclusive leadership and competitive intensity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(5), 1468-1489.
  • Levänen, J., Hossain, M., & Wierenga, M. (2022). Frugal innovation in the midst of societal and operational pressures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 347, 131308.
  • Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315-332.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128.
  • Matsuo, M., & Easterby‐Smith, M. (2008). Beyond the knowledge sharing dilemma: The role of customisation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(4), 30-43.
  • Mengesha, G. H., Watson, R. T., & Negash, S. (2021). Frugal knowledge sharing for frugal innovation diffusion in Africa: The church woman and related models. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(6), 1-23.
  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
  • Nari Kahle, H., Dubiel, A., Ernst, H., & Prabhu, J. (2013). The democratizing effects of frugal innovation: Implications for inclusive growth and state-building. Journal of Indian Business Research, 5(4), 220-234.
  • Nonaka, I. & Toyama, R. (2003), The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2-10.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oliveira, E. J., Rezende, P. C., Andrade, D., Lopes, R. H., Figueiredo, S. C. G., Ribas, L. F., Alencar, D. B., & Batista, A. (2023). Training entrepreneurial leadership for the development of social and frugal innovations a study with incubators and solidarity economic enterprises in the northern region of Brazil. International Journal of Development Research, 13(2), 61503-61516.
  • Palvia, P., Baqir, N., & Nemati, H. (2018). ICT for socio-economic development: A citizens’ perspective. Information & Management, 55(2), 160-176.
  • Polanyi, M. (2009). The Tacit Dimension. In Knowledge in Organisations (pp. 135-146). Routledge.
  • Portes, A. (2000). Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. In E. Lesser (ed.) Knowledge and Social Capital (pp. 43-67). London: Routledge.
  • Prabhu, J. (2017). Frugal innovation: Doing more with less for more. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160372.
  • Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. In: Crothers, L., Lockhart, C. (eds) Culture and Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Qiao, S., Wang, Q., Guo, Z., & Guo, J. (2021). Collaborative innovation activities and BIM application on innovation capability in construction supply chain: Mediating role of explicit and tacit knowledge sharing. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(12), 04021168.
  • Rao, B. C., & Liefner, I. (2023). Frugal engineering of advanced frugal innovations for global sustainability entrepreneurship. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 32(2_suppl), S69-S88.
  • Rickards, T., Chen, M. H., & Moger, S. (2001). Development of a self‐report instrument for exploring team factor, leadership and performance relationships. British Journal of Management, 12(3), 243-250.
  • Riesenberger, J. R. (1998). Executive insights: Knowledge–the source of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of International Marketing, 6(3), 94-107.
  • Saenz, J., Aramburu, N., & Blanco, C. E. (2012). Knowledge sharing and innovation in Spanish and Colombian high‐tech firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6), 919-933.
  • Salehi, M. & Sadeq Alanbari, S. A. (2023). Knowledge sharing barriers and knowledge sharing facilitators in innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
  • Santos, L. L., Borini, F. M., de Miranda Oliveira, M., Rossetto, D. E., & Bernardes, R. C. (2022). Bricolage as capability for frugal innovation in emerging markets in times of crisis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(2), 413-432.
  • Shehzad, M. U., Zhang, J., Alam, S., Cao, Z., Boamah, F. A., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Knowledge management process as a mediator between collaborative culture and frugal innovation: The moderating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(7), 1424-1446.
  • Singh, S. K., Mazzucchelli, A., Vessal, S. R., & Solidoro, A. (2021). Knowledge-based HRM practices and innovation performance: Role of social capital and knowledge sharing. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100830.
  • Smith, E.A. (2001). The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 311-321.
  • Soni, P., & T. Krishnan, R. (2014). Frugal innovation: Aligning theory, practice, and public policy. Journal of Indian Business Research, 6(1), 29-47.
  • Sugarhood, P., Wherton, J., Procter, R., Hinder, S., & Greenhalgh, T. (2014). Technology as system innovation: A key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9(1), 79-87.
  • Tian, H. & Wang, A. (2023). Sustainable leadership, knowledge sharing, and frugal innovation: The moderating role of organizational innovation climate. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231200946.
  • Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
  • United Nations (2017). Sustainable Development Goals. New York, NY.
  • Van den Hooff, B. & De Ridder, J.A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130.
  • Wang, Z., Sharma, P.N. & Cao, J. (2016). From knowledge sharing to firm performance: A predictive model comparison. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4650-4658.
  • Wang, M., Wang, Y. & Mardani, A. (2023). Empirical analysis of the influencing factors of knowledge sharing in industrial technology innovation strategic alliances. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113635.
  • Weyrauch, T., & Herstatt, C. (2017). What is frugal innovation? Three defining criteria. Journal of Frugal Innovation, 2(1), 1-17.
  • Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-208.
  • World Bank (2018). Financing Infrastructure in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington D.C.
  • Yang, H. L. & Wu, T. C. (2008). Knowledge sharing in an organization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(8), 1128-1156.
  • Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76-92.
  • Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Research-Technology Management, 54(4), 38-45.
  • Zhao, L., & Detlor, B. (2023). Towards a contingency model of knowledge sharing: Interaction between social capital and social exchange theories. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21(1), 197-209.
  • Zheng, J., Wu, G., & Xie, H. (2017). Impacts of leadership on project-based organizational innovation performance: The mediator of knowledge sharing and moderator of social capital. Sustainability, 9(10), 1893.
Toplam 89 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Bilgi ve Bilim Sosyolojisi, Öğrenme, Motivasyon ve Duygu
Bölüm Tam Sayı
Yazarlar

Salih Zeki İmamoğlu 0000-0002-7160-2370

Eda Dilara Ayber 0000-0001-7732-5848

Serhat Erat 0000-0003-0227-8914

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 27 Haziran 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 27 Haziran 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 16 Şubat 2025
Kabul Tarihi 26 Haziran 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 68

Kaynak Göster

APA İmamoğlu, S. Z., Ayber, E. D., & Erat, S. (2025). Sosyal Sermaye ve Tutumlu İnovasyon İlişkisinde Bilgi Paylaşımının Aracı Rolü. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(68), 226-242. https://doi.org/10.53568/yyusbed.1640814
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.